PART I.--OUTLINE OF THE THEORY OF STRUCTURES

§ 2. _Support of Structures._--Every structure, as a whole, is

maintained in equilibrium by the joint action of its own _weight_, of

the _external load_ or pressure applied to it from without and tending

to displace it, and of the _resistance_ of the material which supports

it. A structure is supported either by resting on the solid crust of

the earth, as buildings do, or by floating in a fluid, as ships do in

water and balloons in air. The principles of the support of a floating

structure form an important part of Hydromechanics (q.v.). The

principles of the support, as a whole, of a structure resting on the

land, are so far identical with those which regulate the equilibrium

and stability of the several parts of that structure that the only

principle which seems to require special mention here is one which

comprehends in one statement the power both of liquids and of loose

earth to support structures. This was first demonstrated in a paper

"On the Stability of Loose Earth," read to the Royal Society on the

19th of June 1856 (Phil. _Trans._ 1856), as follows:--

Let E represent the weight of the portion of a horizontal stratum of

earth which is displaced by the foundation of a structure, S the

utmost weight of that structure consistently with the power of the

earth to resist displacement, [phi] the angle of repose of the earth;

then

S /1 + sin[phi]\²

--- = ( ------------ ).

E \1 - sin[phi]/

To apply this to liquids [phi] must be made zero, and then S/E = 1, as

is well known. For a proof of this expression see Rankine's _Applied

Mechanics_, 17th ed., p. 219.

§ 3. _Composition of a Structure, and Connexion of its Pieces._--A

structure is composed of _pieces_,--such as the stones of a building

in masonry, the beams of a timber framework, the bars, plates and

bolts of an iron bridge. Those pieces are connected at their joints or

surfaces of mutual contact, either by simple pressure and friction (as

in masonry with moist mortar or without mortar), by pressure and

adhesion (as in masonry with cement or with hardened mortar, and

timber with glue), or by the resistance of _fastenings_ of different

kinds, whether made by means of the form of the joint (as dovetails,

notches, mortices and tenons) or by separate fastening pieces (as

trenails, pins, spikes, nails, holdfasts, screws, bolts, rivets,

hoops, straps and sockets.)

§ 4. _Stability, Stiffness and Strength._--A structure may be damaged

or destroyed in three ways:--first, by displacement of its pieces from

their proper positions relatively to each other or to the earth;

secondly by disfigurement of one or more of those pieces, owing to

their being unable to preserve their proper shapes under the pressures

to which they are subjected; thirdly, by _breaking_ of one or more of

those pieces. The power of resisting displacement constitutes

stability, the power of each piece to resist disfigurement is its

_stiffness_; and its power to resist breaking, its _strength_.

§ 5. _Conditions of Stability._--The principles of the stability of a

structure can be to a certain extent investigated independently of the

stiffness and strength, by assuming, in the first instance, that each

piece has strength sufficient to be safe against being broken, and

stiffness sufficient to prevent its being disfigured to an extent

inconsistent with the purposes of the structure, by the greatest

forces which are to be applied to it. The condition that each piece of

the structure is to be maintained in equilibrium by having its gross

load, consisting of its own weight and of the external pressure

applied to it, balanced by the _resistances_ or pressures exerted

between it and the contiguous pieces, furnishes the means of

determining the magnitude, position and direction of the resistances

required at each joint in order to produce equilibrium; and the

_conditions of stability_ are, first, that the _position_, and,

secondly, that the _direction_, of the resistance required at each

joint shall, under all the variations to which the load is subject, be

such as the joint is capable of exerting--conditions which are

fulfilled by suitably adjusting the figures and positions of the

joints, and the _ratios_ of the gross loads of the pieces. As for the

_magnitude_ of the resistance, it is limited by conditions, not of

stability, but of strength and stiffness.

§ 6. _Principle of Least Resistance._--Where more than one system of

resistances are alike capable of balancing the same system of loads

applied to a given structure, the _smallest_ of those alternative

systems, as was demonstrated by the Rev. Henry Moseley in his

_Mechanics of Engineering and Architecture_, is that which will

actually be exerted--because the resistances to displacement are the

effect of a strained state of the pieces, which strained state is the

effect of the load, and when the load is applied the strained state

and the resistances produced by it increase until the resistances

acquire just those magnitudes which are sufficient to balance the

load, after which they increase no further.

This principle of least resistance renders determinate many problems

in the statics of structures which were formerly considered

indeterminate.

§ 7. _Relations between Polygons of Loads and of Resistances._--In a

structure in which each piece is supported at two joints only, the

well-known laws of statics show that the directions of the gross load

on each piece and of the two resistances by which it is supported must

lie in one plane, must either be parallel or meet in one point, and

must bear to each other, if not parallel, the proportions of the sides

of a triangle respectively parallel to their directions, and, if

parallel, such proportions that each of the three forces shall be

proportional to the distance between the other two,--all the three

distances being measured along one direction.

[Illustration: FIG. 86.]

Considering, in the first place, the case in which the load and the

two resistances by which each piece is balanced meet in one point,

which may be called the _centre of load_, there will be as many such

points of intersection, or centres of load, as there are pieces in the

structure; and the directions and positions of the resistances or

mutual pressures exerted between the pieces will be represented by the

sides of a polygon joining those points, as in fig. 86 where P1, P2,

P3, P4 represent the centres of load in a structure of four pieces,

and the sides of the _polygon of resistances_ P1 P2 P3 P4 represent

respectively the directions and positions of the resistances exerted

at the joints. Further, at any one of the centres of load let PL

represent the magnitude and direction of the gross load, and Pa, Pb

the two resistances by which the piece to which that load is applied

is supported; then will those three lines be respectively the diagonal

and sides of a parallelogram; or, what is the same thing, they will be

equal to the three sides of a triangle; and they must be in the same

plane, although the sides of the polygon of resistances may be in

different planes.

[Illustration: FIG. 87.]

According to a well-known principle of statics, because the loads or

external pressures P1L1, &c., balance each other, they must be

proportional to the sides of a closed polygon drawn respectively

parallel to their directions. In fig. 87 construct such a _polygon of

loads_ by drawing the lines L1, &c., parallel and proportional to, and

joined end to end in the order of, the gross loads on the pieces of

the structure. Then from the proportionality and parallelism of the

load and the two resistances applied to each piece of the structure to

the three sides of a triangle, there results the following theorem

(originally due to Rankine):--

_If from the angles of the polygon of loads there be drawn lines (R1,

R2, &c.), each of which is parallel to the resistance (as P1P2, &c.)

exerted at the joint between the pieces to which the two loads

represented by the contiguous sides of the polygon of loads (such as

L1, L2, &c.) are applied; then will all those lines meet in one point

(O), and their lengths, measured from that point to the angles of the

polygon, will represent the magnitudes of the resistances to which

they are respectively parallel._

When the load on one of the pieces is parallel to the resistances

which balance it, the polygon of resistances ceases to be closed, two

of the sides becoming parallel to each other and to the load in

question, and extending indefinitely. In the polygon of loads the

direction of a load sustained by parallel resistances traverses the

point O.[2]

§ 8. _How the Earth's Resistance is to be treated_.... When the

pressure exerted by a structure on the earth (to which the earth's

resistance is equal and opposite) consists either of one pressure,

which is necessarily the resultant of the weight of the structure and

of all the other forces applied to it, or of two or more parallel

vertical forces, whose amount can be determined at the outset of the

investigation, the resistance of the earth can be treated as one or

more upward loads applied to the structure. But in other cases the

earth is to be treated as _one of the pieces of the structure_, loaded

with a force equal and opposite in direction and position to the

resultant of the weight of the structure and of the other pressures

applied to it.

§ 9. _Partial Polygons of Resistance._--In a structure in which there

are pieces supported at more than two joints, let a polygon be

constructed of lines connecting the centres of load of any continuous

series of pieces. This may be called a _partial polygon of

resistances_. In considering its properties, the load at each centre

of load is to be held to _include_ the resistances of those joints

which are not comprehended in the partial polygon of resistances, to

which the theorem of § 7 will then apply in every respect. By

constructing several partial polygons, and computing the relations

between the loads and resistances which are determined by the

application of that theorem to each of them, with the aid, if

necessary, of Moseley's principle of the least resistance, the whole

of the relations amongst the loads and resistances may be found.

§ 10. _Line of Pressures--Centres and Line of Resistance._--The line

of pressures is a line to which the directions of all the resistances

in one polygon are tangents. The _centre of resistance_ at any joint

is the point where the line representing the total resistance exerted

at that joint intersects the joint. The _line of resistance_ is a line

traversing all the centres of resistance of a series of joints,--its

form, in the positions intermediate between the actual joints of the

structure, being determined by supposing the pieces and their loads to

be subdivided by the introduction of intermediate joints _ad

infinitum_, and finding the continuous line, curved or straight, in

which the intermediate centres of resistance are all situated, however

great their number. The difference between the line of resistance and

the line of pressures was first pointed out by Moseley.

[Illustration: FIG. 88.]

§ 11.* The principles of the two preceding sections may be illustrated

by the consideration of a particular case of a buttress of blocks

forming a continuous series of pieces (fig. 88), where aa, bb, cc, dd

represent plane joints. Let the centre of pressure C at the first

joint aa be known, and also the pressure P acting at C in direction

and magnitude. Find R1 the resultant of this pressure, the weight of

the block aabb acting through its centre of gravity, and any other

external force which may be acting on the block, and produce its line

of action to cut the joint bb in C1. C1 is then the centre of pressure

for the joint bb, and R1 is the total force acting there. Repeating

this process for each block in succession there will be found the

centres of pressure C2, C3, &c., and also the resultant pressures R2,

R3, &c., acting at these respective centres. The centres of pressure

at the joints are also called _centres of resistance_, and the curve

passing through these points is called a _line of resistance_. Let all

the resultants acting at the several centres of resistance be produced

until they cut one another in a series of points so as to form an

unclosed polygon. This polygon is the _partial polygon of resistance_.

A curve tangential to all the sides of the polygon is the _line of

pressures_.

§ 12. _Stability of Position, and Stability of Friction._--The

resistances at the several joints having been determined by the

principles set forth in §§ 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10, not only under the

ordinary load of the structure, but under all the variations to which

the load is subject as to amount and distribution, the joints are now

to be placed and shaped so that the pieces shall not suffer relative

displacement under any of those loads. The relative displacement of

the two pieces which abut against each other at a joint may take place

either by turning or by sliding. Safety against displacement by

turning is called _stability of position_; safety against displacement

by sliding, _stability of friction_.

§ 13. _Condition of Stability of Position._--If the materials of a

structure were infinitely stiff and strong, stability of position at

any joint would be insured simply by making the centre of resistance

fall within the joint under all possible variations of load. In order

to allow for the finite stiffness and strength of materials, the least

distance of the centre of resistance inward from the nearest edge of

the joint is made to bear a definite proportion to the depth of the

joint measured in the same direction, which proportion is fixed,

sometimes empirically, sometimes by theoretical deduction from the

laws of the strength of materials. That least distance is called by

Moseley the _modulus of stability_. The following are some of the

ratios of the modulus of stability to the depth of the joint which

occur in practice:--

Retaining walls, as designed by British engineers 1:8

Retaining walls, as designed by French engineers 1:5

Rectangular piers of bridges and other buildings, and

arch-stones 1:3

Rectangular foundations, firm ground 1:3

Rectangular foundations, very soft ground 1:2

Rectangular foundations, intermediate kinds of ground 1:3 to 1:2

Thin, hollow towers (such as furnace chimneys exposed

to high winds), square 1:6

Thin, hollow towers, circular 1:4

Frames of timber or metal, under their ordinary or

average distribution of load 1:3

Frames of timber or metal, under the greatest

irregularities of load 1:3

In the case of the towers, the _depth of the joint_ is to be

understood to mean the _diameter of the tower_.

[Illustration: FIG. 89.]

§ 14. _Condition of Stability of Friction._--If the resistance to be

exerted at a joint is always perpendicular to the surfaces which abut

at and form that joint, there is no tendency of the pieces to be

displaced by sliding. If the resistance be oblique, let JK (fig. 89)

be the joint, C its centre of resistance, CR a line representing the

resistance, CN a perpendicular to the joint at the centre of

resistance. The angle NCR is the _obliquity_ of the resistance. From R

draw RP parallel and RQ perpendicular to the joint; then, by the

principles of statics, the component of the resistance _normal_ to the

joint is--

CP = CR · cos PCR;

and the component _tangential_ to the joint is--

CQ = CR · sin PCR = CP · tan PCR.

If the joint be provided either with projections and recesses, such as

mortises and tenons, or with fastenings, such as pins or bolts, so as

to resist displacement by sliding, the question of the utmost amount

of the tangential resistance CQ which it is capable of exerting

depends on the _strength_ of such projections, recesses, or

fastenings; and belongs to the subject of strength, and not to that of

stability. In other cases the safety of the joint against displacement

by sliding depends on its power of exerting friction, and that power

depends on the law, known by experiment, that the friction between two

surfaces bears a constant ratio, depending on the nature of the

surfaces, to the force by which they are pressed together. In order

that the surfaces which abut at the joint JK may be pressed together,

the resistance required by the conditions of equilibrium CR, must be a

_thrust_ and not a _pull_; and in that case the force by which the

surfaces are pressed together is equal and opposite to the normal

component CP of the resistance. The condition of stability of friction

is that the tangential component CQ of the resistance required shall

not exceed the friction due to the normal component; that is, that

CQ [/>] f · CP,

where f denotes the _coefficient of friction_ for the surfaces in

question. The angle whose tangent is the coefficient of friction is

called _the angle of repose_, and is expressed symbolically by--

[phi] = tan^-1 f.

Now CQ = CP · tan PCR;

consequently the condition of stability of friction is fulfilled if

the angle PCR is not greater than [phi]; that is to say, if _the

obliquity of the resistance required at the joint does not exceed the

angle of repose_; and this condition ought to be fulfilled under all

possible variations of the load.

It is chiefly in masonry and earthwork that stability of friction is

relied on.

§ 15. _Stability of Friction in Earth._--The grains of a mass of loose

earth are to be regarded as so many separate pieces abutting against

each other at joints in all possible positions, and depending for

their stability on friction. To determine whether a mass of earth is

stable at a given point, conceive that point to be traversed by planes

in all possible positions, and determine which position gives the

greatest obliquity to the total pressure exerted between the portions

of the mass which abut against each other at the plane. The condition

of stability is that this obliquity shall not exceed the angle of

repose of the earth. The consequences of this principle are developed

in a paper, "On the Stability of Loose Earth," already cited in § 2.

§ 16. _Parallel Projections of Figures._--If any figure be referred to

a system of co-ordinates, rectangular or oblique, and if a second

figure be constructed by means of a second system of co-ordinates,

rectangular or oblique, and either agreeing with or differing from the

first system in rectangularity or obliquity, but so related to the

co-ordinates of the first figure that for each point in the first

figure there shall be a corresponding point in the second figure, the

lengths of whose co-ordinates shall bear respectively to the three

corresponding co-ordinates of the corresponding point in the first

figure three ratios which are the same for every pair of corresponding

points in the two figures, these corresponding figures are called

_parallel projections_ of each other. The properties of parallel

projections of most importance to the subject of the present article

are the following:--

(1) A parallel projection of a straight line is a straight line.

(2) A parallel projection of a plane is a plane.

(3) A parallel projection of a straight line or a plane surface

divided in a given ratio is a straight line or a plane surface divided

in the same ratio.

(4) A parallel projection of a pair of equal and parallel straight

lines, or plain surfaces, is a pair of equal and parallel straight lines,

or plane surfaces; whence it follows

(5) That a parallel projection of a parallelogram is a parallelogram,

and

(6) That a parallel projection of a parallelepiped is a parallelepiped.

(7) A parallel projection of a pair of solids having a given ratio

is a pair of solids having the same ratio.

Though not essential for the purposes of the present article, the

following consequence will serve to illustrate the principle of

parallel projections:--

(8) A parallel projection of a curve, or of a surface of a given

algebraical order, is a curve or a surface of the same order.

For example, all ellipsoids referred to co-ordinates parallel to any

three conjugate diameters are parallel projections of each other and

of a sphere referred to rectangular co-ordinates.

§ 17. _Parallel Projections of Systems of Forces._--If a balanced

system of forces be represented by a system of lines, then will every

parallel projection of that system of lines represent a balanced

system of forces.

For the condition of equilibrium of forces not parallel is that they

shall be represented in direction and magnitude by the sides and

diagonals of certain parallelograms, and of parallel forces that they

shall divide certain straight lines in certain ratios; and the

parallel projection of a parallelogram is a parallelogram, and that of

a straight line divided in a given ratio is a straight line divided in

the same ratio.

The resultant of a parallel projection of any system of forces is the

projection of their resultant; and the centre of gravity of a parallel

projection of a solid is the projection of the centre of gravity of

the first solid.

§ 18. _Principle of the Transformation of Structures._--Here we have

the following theorem: If a structure of a given figure have stability

of position under a system of forces represented by a given system of

lines, then will any structure whose figure is a parallel projection

of that of the first structure have stability of position under a

system of forces represented by the corresponding projection of the

first system of lines.

For in the second structure the weights, external pressures, and

resistances will balance each other as in the first structure; the

weights of the pieces and all other parallel systems of forces will

have the same ratios as in the first structure; and the several

centres of resistance will divide the depths of the joints in the same

proportions as in the first structure.

If the first structure have stability of friction, the second

structure will have stability of friction also, so long as the effect

of the projection is not to increase the obliquity of the resistance

at any joint beyond the angle of repose.

The lines representing the forces in the second figure show their

_relative_ directions and magnitudes. To find their _absolute_

directions and magnitudes, a vertical line is to be drawn in the first

figure, of such a length as to represent the weight of a particular

portion of the structure. Then will the projection of that line in the

projected figure indicate the vertical direction, and represent the

weight of the part of the second structure corresponding to the

before-mentioned portion of the first structure.

The foregoing "principle of the transformation of structures" was

first announced, though in a somewhat less comprehensive form, to the

Royal Society on the 6th of March 1856. It is useful in practice, by

enabling the engineer easily to deduce the conditions of equilibrium

and stability of structures of complex and unsymmetrical figures from

those of structures of simple and symmetrical figures. By its aid, for

example, the whole of the properties of elliptical arches, whether

square or skew, whether level or sloping in their span, are at once

deduced by projection from those of symmetrical circular arches, and

the properties of ellipsoidal and elliptic-conoidal domes from those

of hemispherical and circular-conoidal domes; and the figures of

arches fitted to resist the thrust of earth, which is less

horizontally than vertically in a certain given ratio, can be deduced

by a projection from those of arches fitted to resist the thrust of a

liquid, which is of equal intensity, horizontally and vertically.

§ 19. _Conditions of Stiffness and Strength._--After the arrangement

of the pieces of a structure and the size and figure of their joints

or surfaces of contact have been determined so as to fulfil the

conditions of _stability_,--conditions which depend mainly on the

position and direction of the _resultant_ or _total_ load on each

piece, and the _relative_ magnitude of the loads on the different

pieces--the dimensions of each piece singly have to be adjusted so as

to fulfil the conditions of _stiffness_ and _strength_--conditions

which depend not only on the _absolute_ magnitude of the load on each

piece, and of the resistances by which it is balanced, but also on the

_mode of distribution_ of the load over the piece, and of the

resistances over the joints.

The effect of the pressures applied to a piece, consisting of the load

and the supporting resistances, is to force the piece into a state of

_strain_ or disfigurement, which increases until the elasticity, or

resistance to strain, of the material causes it to exert a _stress_,

or effort to recover its figure, equal and opposite to the system of

applied pressures. The condition of _stiffness_ is that the strain or

disfigurement shall not be greater than is consistent with the

purposes of the structure; and the condition of _strength_ is that the

stress shall be within the limits of that which the material can bear

with safety against breaking. The ratio in which the utmost stress

before breaking exceeds the safe working stress is called the _factor

of safety_, and is determined empirically. It varies from three to

twelve for various materials and structures. (See STRENGTH OF

MATERIALS.)

Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition, "Matter" to "Mecklenburg" Volume 17, Slice 8 · 第 5 / 7 章