From both these relations it follows as a first approximation that

(71) _dx_ = 1 - α/2_r_.

The unit measuring rod appears, when referred to the co-ordinate-system,

shortened by the calculated magnitude through the presence of the

gravitational field, when we place it radially in the field.

Similarly we can get its co-ordinate-length in a tangential position, if

we put for example

_ds²_ = -1, _dx₁_ = _dx₃_ = _dx₄_ = 0, _x₁_ = _r_, _x₂_ = _x₃_ = 0

we then get

(71a) -1 = _g₂₂_ _dx₂²_ = -_dx₂²_.

The gravitational field has no influence upon the length of the rod,

when we put it tangentially in the field.

Thus Euclidean geometry does not hold in the gravitational field even in

the first approximation, if we conceive that one and the same rod

independent of its position and its orientation can serve as the measure

of the same extension. But a glance at (70a) and (69) shows that the

expected difference is much too small to be noticeable in the

measurement of earth’s surface.

We would further investigate the rate of going of a unit-clock which is

placed in a statical gravitational field. Here we have for a period of

the clock

_ds_ = 1, _dx₁_ = _dx₂_ _dx₃_ = 0;

then we have

The Principle of Relativity · 第 181 / 203 题