CHAPTER XXVI

THE FUTURE OF CHEMICAL WARFARE

The pioneer, no matter what the line of endeavor, encounters

difficulties caused by his fellow-men just in proportion as the thing

pioneered promises results. If the promise be small, the difficulties

usually encountered are only those necessary to make the venture a

success. If, however, the results promise to be great, and especially

if the rewards to the inventor and those working with him promise to

be considerable, the difficulties thrown in the way of the venture

become greater and greater. Indeed whenever great results are promised,

envy is engendered in those in other lines whose importance may be

diminished, or who are so short-sighted as to be always opposed to

progress.

Chemical warfare has had, and is still having, its full share of these

difficulties. From the very day when chlorine, known to the world as

a benign substance highly useful in sanitation, water purification,

gold mining and bleaching was put into use as a poisonous gas, chemical

warfare has loomed larger and larger as a factor to be considered in

all future wars. Chlorine was first used in the cylinders designed for

shipping it. These cylinders were poorly adapted for warfare, and made

methods of preparing gas attacks extremely laborious, cumbersome and

time-consuming.

It was not many months, however, until different gases began to appear

in large quantities in shells and bombs, while the close of the war, 3½

years later, saw the development of gas in solid form whereby it could

be carried with the utmost safety under all conditions—a solid which

could become dangerous only when the heating mixture, that freed the

gas, was properly ignited.

While some of the chemicals developed for use in war prior to the

Armistice have been made known to the world, a number of others have

not. More than this, every nation of first class importance has

continued to pursue more or less energetically studies into chemical

warfare. These studies will continue, and we must expect that new

gases, new methods of turning them loose, and new tactical uses will be

developed.

Already it is clearly foreseen that these gases will be used by every

branch of the Army and the Navy. While chemicals were not used by the

Air Service in the last war, it was even then realized that there was

no material reason why they should not have been so used. That they

will be used in the future by the Air Service, and probably on a large

scale, is certain. The Navy, too, will use gases, and probably on a

considerable scale. Thus chemical materials as such become the most

universal of all weapons of war.

Some of the poisonous gases are so powerful in minute quantities and

evaporate so slowly that their liberation does not produce sufficient

condensation to cause a cloud. Consequently, we have gases that cannot

be seen. Others form clouds by themselves, such, for instance, as

the toxic smoke candle, where the solid is driven off by heating,

while still others cause clouds of condensed vapor. This brings the

discussion into the realm of ordinary smokes that have no irritating

and no poisonous effects.

These smokes are extremely valuable where the purpose is to form a

screen, whether it be to hide the advance of troops or to cut off the

view of observers. These smokes are equally useful on land and on

sea. So great is the decrease in efficiency of the rifle or machine

gun, and of artillery even when firing at troops that cannot be seen,

that smoke for screening purposes will be used on every future field

of battle. When firing through a screen of smoke, a man has certainly

less than one-quarter the chance to hit his target that he would have

were the target in plain view. Since smoke clouds may or may not be

poisonous and since smoke will be used in every battle, there is opened

up an unlimited field for the exercise of ingenuity in making these

smoke clouds poisonous or non-poisonous at will. It also opens up an

unlimited field for the well-trained chemical warfare officer who can

tell in any smoke cloud whether gas be present and whether, if present,

it is in sufficient concentration to be dangerous.

At the risk of repetition, it is again stated that there is no gas

that will kill or even permanently injure in any quantity that cannot

be detected. For every gas, there is a certain minimum amount in each

cubic foot of air that is necessary to cause any injury. In nearly all

gases, this minimum amount is sufficient to be readily noticeable by a

trained chemical warfare officer through the sense of smell.

It would be idle to attempt to enumerate the ways and means by

which chemicals will be used in the future. In fact, one can hardly

conceive of a situation where gas or smoke will not be employed, for

these materials may be liquids or solids that either automatically,

upon exposure to the air, turn into gas, or which are pulverized by

high explosive, or driven off by heat. This varied character of the

materials enables them to be used in every sort of artillery shell,

bomb or other container carried to the field of battle.

Some of the gases are extremely powerful as irritants to the nose

and throat in very minute quantities, while at the same time being

highly poisonous in high concentrations. Diphenylchloroarsine,

used extensively by the Germans in high explosive shell, is more

poisonous than phosgene, the most deadly gas in general use in the

past war. In addition, it has the quality of causing an intolerable

burning sensation in the nose, throat, and lungs, in extremely minute

quantities. This material can be kept out of masks only by filters,

whereas true gases are taken out by charcoal and chemical granules.

There is still another quality which helps make chemical warfare the

most powerful weapon of war. Gas is the only substance used in war

which can be counted on to do its work as efficiently at night as in

the daytime. Indeed, it is often more effective at night than in the

daytime, because the man who goes to sleep without his mask on, who is

careless, who loses his mask, or who becomes excited in the darkness

of night, becomes a casualty, and the past war showed that these

casualties were decidedly numerous even when the troops knew almost to

the minute the time the gas would arrive.

Accordingly, chemical warfare is an agency that must not only be

reckoned with by every civilized nation in the future, but is one

which civilized nations should not hesitate to use. When properly

safe-guarded with masks and other safety devices, it gives to the most

scientific and most ingenious people a great advantage over the less

scientific and less ingenious. Then why should the United States or any

other highly civilized country consider giving up chemical warfare?

To say that its use against savages is not a fair method of fighting,

because the savages are not equipped with it, is arrant nonsense. No

nation considers such things today. If they had, our American troops,

when fighting the Moros in the Philippine Islands, would have had to

wear the breechclout and use only swords and spears.

Notwithstanding the opposition of certain people who, through ignorance

or for other reasons, have fought it, chemical warfare has come to

stay, and just in proportion as the United States gives chemical

warfare its proper place in its military establishment, just in that

proportion will the United States be ready to meet any or all comers

in the future, for the United States has incomparable resources in the

shape of the crude materials—power, salt, sulfur and the like—that are

necessary in the manufacture of gases.

If, then, there be developed industries for manufacturing these gases

in time of war, and if the training of the army in chemical warfare be

thorough and extensive, the United States will have more than an equal

chance with any other nation or combination of nations in any future

war.

It is just as sportsman-like to fight with chemical warfare materials

as it is to fight with machine guns. The enemy will know more or less

accurately our chemical warfare materials and our methods, and we will

have the same information about the enemy. It is thus a matching of

wits just as much as in the days when the Knights of the Round Table

fought with swords or with spears on horseback. The American is a pure

sportsman and asks odds of no man. He does ask, though, that he be

given a square deal. He is unwilling to agree not to use a powerful

weapon of war when he knows that an outlaw nation would use it against

him if that outlaw nation could achieve success by so doing. How much

better it is to say to the world that we are going to use chemical

warfare to the greatest extent possible in any future struggle. In

announcing that we would repeat as always that we are making these

preparations only for defense, and who is there who dares question our

right to do so?

INDEX

Absorbents, Requirements of, 237

Testing, 259

Absorptive activity, 237

Absorptive capacity, 238

Aeroplane, Smoke screen, 309

American Tissot mask, 224

Ammonia canister, 230

Ammonium chloride smoke, 327

Animals, Susceptibility to mustard gas, 173

Anthracite coal, Activation of, 249

A. R. S. mask, 203

Arsenic derivatives, 180

Arsenic trichloride, Manufacture, 180

Arsenic trifluoride, Manufacture, 180

Arsine, proposed use of, 180

Artillery, Gas, use of, by, 396

Aviation, Gas, use of, by, 380, 399

Baby Incendiary bomb, 340

Barrages, Gas, use of, in, 376

Benzyl bromide, 16, 141

Benzyl chloride, 16

Berger mixture, 290

Black signal smokes, 331

Black veiling respirator, 195

Blue cross. _See_ Diphenylchloroarsine

Blue pencil, German, 346

Bombs, incendiary, 337

Box respirator, American, 209

English, 198

Break point of canisters, 262

Bromoacetone, 16, 138

German manufacture, 140

Bromobenzyl cyanide, 16, 142

Bromomethylethyl ketone, German manufacture, 140

Bullets, incendiary, 344

Camouflage gases, 23, 416

Canister, life of, Gas concentration and, 132

Temperature, effect of, 132

Testing, 260

Carbon dioxide, Manufacture, 129

Carbonite, 250

Carbon monoxide, 190

Canister, 191

Manufacture, 128

Cavalry, Gas, use of, by, 378

Cement, Soda-lime, function in, 257

Charcoal, 239

Active, 242

German, 251

Inactive, 242

Manufacture, 242

Raw material, 239

Substitutes, 249

Tests of, 253

Theory of action, 241

Chemical Service Section, Organization, 34

Chemical Warfare, Future of, 435

Gases used in, 24

Historical, 1

Officers, duties of, 369

Strategy, relation to, 363

Chemical Warfare Service, Administrative division, 36

A. E. F., organization, 72

Development division, 61

Edgewood arsenal, 53

Gas defense division, 48

Liaison officers, 70

Medical division, 68

Organization, 35

Proving division, 63

Research division, 38

Training division, 65

Chemical Warfare troops, 92

Chenard bomb, 340

Chlorine, 116

Manufacture, 117

Properties, 123

Chloroacetone, 16

Chloroacetophenone, 16

Chloromethyl chloroformate, 21

Chloropicrin, 21

Manufacture, 145

Physiological test, 146

Properties, 146

Protection, 147

Tactical use, 148

Chlorovinyldichloroarsine, 188

Chlorosulfonic acid, Smoke material, use as, 286

Cloud gas, 10, 116, 390

Coalite, 250

Cocoanut shell charcoal, 239

Cohune nut charcoal, 240

Complexene, 201

Horse masks, use in, 278

Cottrell Precipitation Tube, 299

Darts, incendiary, 343

Density of smoke clouds, 295

Development Division, C. W. S., 61

Dichloroethyl sulfide, 22, 80, 105

Detection, 166

Historical, 151

Manufacture, 152, 161

Mixtures, melting point of, 164

Properties, 163

Tactical use, 175, 417

Toxicity, 168

Vesicant action, 171

β, β′-Dichlorodivinylchloroarsine, 189

Dihydroxyethyl sulfide, 160

Diphenylchloroarsine, 22, 182

Manufacture, 183

Diphenylcyanoarsine, 185

Diphosgene. _See_ Trichloromethyl chloroformate

Dog mask, 280

Doughnut filter, 324

Dressler tunnel kiln, 248

D-Shell, 134

Dugout blankets, 283

Dyes for signal smokes, 333

Edgewood arsenal, C. W. S., 53

Efficiency test, Absorbents, 259

Canisters, 262

Ethyldichloroarsine, 185

Ethylene, Manufacture of, 155, 158

Ethylene chlorhydrin, 158

Ethyl iodoacetate, 16, 141

Explosive dispersion, 314

“First gas attack,” 10

First gas regiment, 93

Flammenwerfer, 349

Flaming gun, 347, 401

Food, protection of, against mustard gas, 422

French artillery mask, 202

Gas, Defense against, 405

Effectiveness of, 375, 385

Humanity of, 13, 370, 387

Offensive use of, 385

Permanency of, 378

Requirements of, 116, 395

Gas alarms, 422

Gas cloud, height and spread, 394

Smoke in, 311, 403

Gas cylinder, Mobile, 17

Gas defense division, C. W. S., 48

Gases, Detection of, 415

Peace uses of, 427

Pharmacology, 353

Gas and Flame Regiment, 34

Gas mask, Development, 195

Physiological features, 232

Testing, 259

_See also_ names of various masks

Gas shell, Markings, 28, 404

Value, 18, 396

Gassing chamber, 354

Gas training, 413

In France, 81

Value in peace, 373, 383

Gas warfare, Fundamentals, 388

Humanity, 13, 370, 387

German mask, 205

Greasene, 201

Green Cross shell, 148

Green T-Stoff, 142

Hand grenade, incendiary, 345

Hanlon field, 111

Hardness, Absorbents, test of, 259

Hague conference, Poison gases, action on, 6

Homomartonite, 16, 138

Hopcalite, Carbon monoxide absorbent, 193

Horse boots, 280

Horse mask, 277

Humanity, Gas warfare, 13, 370, 387

Hypo helmet, 196

Incendiary materials, 336

Tactical use of, 402

Infantry, Gas, use of, by, 377, 400

Intelligence section, 113

Inter-allied gas conference, 79

Irritants, Efficiency of, 389

Testing, 359

Ivory nut charcoal, 241

Kieselguhr, Soda-lime, function in, 257

Kupramite, 230

Lachrymators, 15, 137

Comparative value, 143

Protection, 143

Testing, 356

Lachrymatory shell, Tactical value, 15

Lamp-black, Charcoal from, 250

Lantern test, Mustard gas, 166

Leak detecting apparatus, 266

Leakage, Canister, testing of, 261

Levinstein reactor, 158

Lewisite, 23, 187

Liaison officers, 70

Lime, Soda-lime, function in, 257

Livens’ projector, 18, 391

Livens’ smoke drum, 304

M-2 Mask, 201

Man test, 262

Martonite, 16, 138

Mask, Development, 405

Disinfection, 269

Field tests, 270

Issuance, 423

_See also_ Gas mask

_See also_ Names of masks

Mechanical dispersion, 313

Medical division, C. W. S., 68

Medical section, A. E. F., 114

Methyldichloroarsine, 181

Moisture, Absorbents, tests of, 259

Mustard gas. _See_ Dichloroethyl sulfide.

Navy, Canister, 230

Gas, use of, by, 381

Smoke funnel, 305

Nelson cell, 117

“Nineteen nineteen” canister, 325

“Nineteen nineteen” Model American Mask, 225

Odors, Testing of, 358

Oleum, Smoke material, use as, 286

Overall suit, 273

Palite. _See_ Chloromethyl chloroformate

Penetration apparatus, Toxic smoke, measurement of, 315

P-Helmet, 197

PH Helmet, 197

Phosgene, 14, 126

Manufacture, 127

Properties, 130

Protection, 131

Shell filling, 132

Tactical use, 134

Phosphorus, Smoke material, 286, 382

Stokes’ mortar, use in, 393

_See also_ Smoke

Physiological action, Phosgene, 135

Mustard gas, 168

Toxic Smokes, 316

Pressure drop apparatus, 266

Protective clothing, 272

Protective gloves, 274

Protective ointments, 275

Proving division, C. W. S., 63

Pumice stone, Phosgene shell, use in, 130, 135

Research division, C. W. S., 38

Resistance, Canister, test of, 261

Decreased, 410

Respirator, _See_ Gas mask, Mask

Sag paste, 277

Screening smokes, 285

_See also_ Smoke

Screening power, Smoke cloud, 285

Selenious acid, Mustard gas detector, 166

Shell, Gas, Filling of, 132

Value, 18, 396

Incendiary, 344

Markings, 28, 404

Pumice stone and phosgene in, 130, 135

Smoke, 303

Ships, Screening Smoke, 299, 305

Shrapnel, Gas in connection with, 379

Signal smokes, 330

Tactics, 333

Silicon tetrachloride, Smoke material, use as, 290

Smoke, Intensity, measurement of, 296

Tactical value, 310, 402

Use in offense, 401

_See also_, Screening, Signal and Toxic Smokes

Smoke box, 299

Smoke candle, 301, 372

Toxic, 318

Smoke cloud, Properties, 116, 285, 395

Smoke drum, 304

Smoke filters, 322

Felt, 324

Paper, 323

Testing, 327

Theory, 326

Smoke funnel, 305

Smoke grenade, 302

Smoke knapsack, 306

Smoke particles, Measurement of, 292

Size of, 291

Smoke screen, Purpose of, 309

Smoke shell, 303, 307

Smoke signals, 333

Sneezing gas. _See_ Diphenylchloroarsine

Soda-lime, Composition, 256

Requirements, 255

Sodium hydroxide, Soda-lime, function in, 257

Sodium permanganate, Soda-lime, function in, 257

“Solid oil”, 336

Spray nozzles, 357

Staff troops, C. W. S., 92

Standard Box respirator, 198

Stokes’ mortar, 20, 392

Sulfur chloride, Manufacture, 157

Sulfuric acid smoke, 328

Sulfur trioxide, Smoke material, use as, 289

Superpalite. _See_ Trichloromethyl chloroformate

Tactical use, Chloropicrin, 148

Dichloroethyl sulfide, 175, 417

Gases in offense, 385

Incendiary materials, 402

Lachrymatory shell, 15

Phosgene, 134

Screening smokes, 310, 402

Signal smokes, 333

Tactics, Chemical Warfare and, 363

Tanks, Smoke screen for, 309

Thermal dispersion, 313

Thermit, Uses, 393

Tin tetrachloride, Smoke material, use as, 289

Tissot mask, 202

Titanium tetrachloride, Smoke material, use as, 290

Tobacco smoke, 328

Total obscuring power of smoke, 295

Touch method, Irritants, testing of, 362

Toxicity, Gases, testing of, for, 353

Toxic smoke, 313

Candle, B. M., 319

Candle, Dispersoid, 320

Penetration, 314

Quantitative relationship, 316

Training division, C. W. S., 65

Trench mortar, 20, 392

Trichloromethyl chloroformate, 20

Trichloronitromethane. _See_ Chloropicrin

β, β′, β″-Trichlorotrivinylarsine, 189

T-Stoff, 141

Tyndall meter, 299

Ultramicroscope, Smoke particles, measurements of, 292

Vapor tests, Irritants, testing of, 359

Versatility of absorbents, 238

Vincennite, 15, 180

Vision chart, 271

“Vomiting gas.” _See_ Chloropicrin

War gas. _See_ Gases

War, humanity of, 6

Wave attack, Disadvantages, 16

Xylyl bromide, 16, 141

Yellow cross. _See_ Dichloroethyl sulfide

Yellow smoke, 331

Yperite. _See_ Dichloroethyl sulfide

Chemical warfare · 第 23 / 23 章