How To Be a Lion Tamer

_The Ways of the Circus_ is a decidedly readable book, rich in anecdotes

of the life of circus folk and circus animals. The narrator is an old

lion tamer and Harvey W. Root, who has done the actual writing, has

managed to keep a decidedly naive quality in the talk as he sets it

down. There is a delightful chapter, for instance, in which Conklin

tells how he first became a lion tamer. By gradual process of promotion

he had gone as far as an elephant, but his salary was still much lower

than that of Charlie Forepaugh, the lion man. There were three lions

with the circus, but Charlie never worked with more than one in the cage

at the time. Conklin got the notion that an act with all the lions in

action at once would be a sensational success. He was not sure that it

could be done, as he had had no experience with lions. The only way to

find out was to try. Accordingly Conklin sneaked into the menagerie

alone, late at night, to ascertain whether or not lions lay along his

natural bent.

"The animals seemed somewhat surprised at being disturbed in the middle

of the night," he says, "and began to pace rapidly up and down their

cages. I paid no attention to this, but opened the door of each cage in

succession and drove them out. Then I began as sternly as I could to

order them round and give them their cues.

"Except, perhaps, for an unusual amount of snarling, they did as well

for me as for Charlie. I put them through their regular work, which took

fifteen or twenty minutes, drove them back, and fastened them into their

own cages and climbed down on to the floor from the performing cage,

much elated with my success. I had proved to myself that I could handle

lions."

Conklin then goes on to tell how he gave a secret exhibition for the

proprietor of the circus and convinced him of his skill. In fact, the

proprietor promised that he should become the lion tamer of the show as

soon as Charlie Forepaugh's contract ran out. Conklin goes on to say

that he himself was very particular for the sake of safety not to let

Charlie know of this arrangement. And in explaining his timidity, he

writes, "He was a big fellow with a quick temper."

This almost emboldens us to believe the old story of the lion tamer and

his shrewish wife. Coming home late from a party, he feared to enter the

house and so he went to the backyard and crept into the cage with the

lions. There it was that his wife discovered him the next morning,

sleeping with the lions, and she shook her fist and shouted through the

bars, "you coward!"

To be sure as Mr. Conklin tells it there seems to be no great trick in

being a lion tamer. Take, for instance, the familiar stunt in which a

trainer puts his head into a lion's mouth and you will find upon close

survey that it is nothing to worry about. "This never failed to make the

crowd hold its breath, but it was not as risky as it seemed," says

Conklin, "for with my hold on the lion's nose and jowl I could detect

the slightest movement of his muscles and govern my actions

accordingly." Mr. Conklin does not develop the point, but we suppose

that if he detected any intention on the lion's part of closing his

mouth he would take his head out in order to make it easier for the

animal.

Mr. Conklin also corrects a number of misapprehensions about lions which

may be of use to some readers. Contrary to popular belief, you have

nothing to worry about if any of your lions insist on walking up and

down. "A lion that will walk round when you get in the cage with him is

all right, as a general thing," explains Conklin, "but look out for the

one that goes and lies down in a corner."

To be sure, there is something just a little disturbing in the

afterthought indicated in "as a general thing." Our luck is so bad that

we wouldn't feel safe in a cage with a lion even if he ran up and down.

In fact, we would be almost willing to wager that ours would be one of

the unfortunate exceptions which didn't know the rule and so would do

his bit toward providing it.

In another respect the lion tamer is a little more specific about lions

and therefore more helpful. "It is true, though," he adds, "that you

should never let one get behind you if you can help it, though in many

of the acts it is not possible to keep all of them in front of you all

the time." We can understand this advice, though it is not altogether

clear to us just what we would do if a lion tried to get behind us. Of

course, we would tell him not to, but after that we should be somewhat

at a loss. We have never believed in being rough with lions. Probably we

would let him have his way just to avoid argument. As a matter of fact

we would have no great objection to having all our lions behind us if

only we could keep far enough in front.

"A lion that growls frightfully and acts very ferocious when you are

outside the cage may be one of the easiest to handle and get work out of

when once you are actually in the cage; and on the other hand, a lion

that is mean and dangerous to do anything with in the cage may be

exceptionally docile from the outside and allow you to pet him freely."

This should go a long way toward solving the problems of lion tamers.

All you have to do before a performance is to make a test from outside

the cage. Try to pat your lion and pull his ears. If he growls and bites

your hand you will know at once that you may come in and go about your

business with perfect safety. On the other hand, if he meets your

caresses by rolling over on his back and purring it is up to you to call

off the show or send for your understudy.

The unfortunate fate of such a substitute is described by Conklin with

much detail and, we fear, a little relish. The man in question took

Conklin's job when he struck for a raise in salary. Things went well

enough during the first performance until the very end, and then it was

the fault not of the lion but of the substitute, for the trainer was

ignorant of one of the cues which had become a part of the act.

"I had taught George to jump for me as I went out the door," writes

Conklin. "It had been done by blowing on his nose and then jumping back

as you would play with a dog. It always made a great hit with the crowd,

who supposed it had seen a lion try to eat a man and that I had had a

very narrow escape. I worked it this way: After I had finished the rest

of my act I would get George all stirred up and growling. Then I would

fire my pistol two or three times and jump out of the cage as quickly as

I could. At the same time George would give a big lunge and come up

against the door which I had just shut behind me. George had learned the

trick so well that I frequently had to turn on him once or twice and

work him farther back from the door before I dared attempt getting out."

Unfortunately the substitute had missed all this part of the act. He

started out of the cage and George jumped at him and the man was not

prepared to dodge. The moral seems to be that nobody should covet

another man's job, not even that of lion taming.

Some readers we suppose will find Mr. Conklin's lion stories unwelcome

because they may tend to take away their illusions. It is not to be

denied that he has to some extent rubbed the gilt off the gingerbread by

writing that the record for all the lions he has known consists of one

substitute trainer and a cow. His whole attitude toward lions is

contemptuous in its calm and so is the attitude of practically everybody

else in the book with the exception of the cow and the substitute

trainer. Even they suffered a little, at first, from overconfidence.

On the night down in Philadelphia when Wallace, the big lion, escaped

from his cage in winter quarters nobody grew excited. O'Brien, the owner

of the show, did not even get up, but called through the door "Go git

Conklin!" The preparations of the trainer were simple. First he got an

iron bar and then he found the lion and hit him on the end of the nose.

"After a few minutes," he adds, "I had him safely locked in again."

Lions, for all their air of authority, seem to be easily dominated.

They're not so much wicked as weak. Anybody with a little firmness can

twist them around a finger, possibly not the little finger, but any of

the others. It is a great pity that lions should be like that. To be

sure, the information ought not to come as a surprise to anybody who is

familiar with the Bible. The condition we have mentioned has existed for

a long time. As far as we know, Daniel had not so much as an iron bar

when he went into the den. He overawed the lions with nothing more than

faith.

Perhaps it is not quite fair to go on as if lions were the only living

creatures in all the world who are swayed and cowed by firmness and

authority. The same weakness may be found now and then among men. All

too many of us if hit on the nose with iron bars, either real ones or

symbols, do little more than lions in similar circumstances. We may

growl and roar a little, but we do not show resentment in any efficient

way. And like the lions, we are singularly stupid in not making working

alliances with our fellows against the man with the iron bar. By and by

we begin to go through the hoops as if the procedure were inevitable.

Having made a protest we feel that our duty is done.

It is a great pity. Lions ought to know better. The man who stares you

in the eye and squeezes hard in a handshake may come to the bad end

which you wish him, but it is unlikely that he will ever be eaten by

lions. Something else must be devised for him. Even outside the circus

he is likely to go far. Anybody who can shake a little personality can

be ringmaster in this world. And we, all of us who have none, do nothing

about it except to obey him. Camels we can swallow easily enough, but we

strain at the natty dresser.

Still we did manage to find a few bits of information in _The Ways of

the Circus_ which were brand new to us. If, for instance, a rhinoceros

escaped from his cage just what would you do to get him back again? That

is, if he were the sort of rhinoceros you wanted back. At first glance

it seems rather a problem, but any reader of Mr. Conklin's book could

arrange it for you without difficulty. Nothing is needed but carrots and

a stout heart. The carrots you scatter profusely about the floor of the

cage, and when the rhinoceros returns to get them you slam down the

door, and there he is.

Seeing Things at Night · 第 41 / 78 题