CHARLES LAMB'S AUTOBIOGRAPHY.

"Charles Lamb, born in the Inner Temple, 10th February, 1775; educated

in Christ's Hospital; afterwards a clerk in the Accountants' Office,

East-India House; pensioned off from that service, 1825, after

thirty-three years' service; is now a gentleman at large;--can remember

few specialties in his life worth noting, except that he once caught a

swallow flying (_teste suâ manu_). Below the middle stature; cast of

face slightly Jewish, with no Judaic tinge in his complexional religion;

stammers abominably, and is therefore more apt to discharge his

occasional conversation in a quaint aphorism or a poor quibble than in

set and edifying speeches; has consequently been libelled as a person

always aiming at wit, which, as he told a dull fellow that charged him

with it, is at least as good as aiming at dulness. A small eater,

but not drinker; confesses a partiality for the production of the

juniper-berry; was a fierce smoker of tobacco, but may be resembled to

a volcano burnt out, emitting only now and then a casual puff. Has been

guilty of obtruding upon the public a tale in prose, called 'Rosamund

Gray,'--a dramatic sketch, named 'John Woodvil,'--a 'Farewell Ode to

Tobacco,'--with sundry other poems, and light prose matter, collected in

two slight crown octavos, and pompously christened his works, though in

fact they were his recreations, and his true works may be found on the

shelves of Leadenhall Street, filling some hundred folios. He is also

the true Elia, whose essays are extant in a little volume, published

a year or two since, and rather better known from that name without a

meaning than from anything he has done, or can hope to do, in his own.

He also was the first to draw the public attention to the old English

dramatists, in a work called 'Specimens of English Dramatic Writers

who lived about the Time of Shakspeare,' published about fifteen years

since. In short, all his merits and demerits to set forth would take to

the end of Mr. Upcott's book, and then not be told truly.

"He died _____ 18__, much lamented.[A]

Witness his hand,

CHARLES LAMB.

"18th April, 1827."

[Footnote A: "_To Anybody_--Please to fill up these blanks."]

Lamb, if he did not find tongues in trees, books in the running brooks,

and sermons in stones, found good in everything. The soul of goodness in

things evil was visible to him. He had thought, felt, and suffered

so much, that, as Leigh Hunt says, he literally had intolerance for

nothing. Though he could see but little religion in many professing

Christians, he nevertheless saw that the motley players, "made up of

mimic laughter and tears, passing from the extremes of joy or woe at the

prompter's call," were not so godless and impious as the world believed

them to be.

Writing to Bernard Barton in the spring of 1826, Lamb says, speaking

of his literary projects,--"A little thing without name will also be

printed on the Religion of the Actors, but it is out of your way; so I

recommend you, with true author's hypocrisy, to skip it." I wonder if

"good B.B." read the article, and, if he did, how he liked it. Quaker

though he was, he could not but have been pleased with it. Should you

like to read the "Religion of the Actors," reader? You will not find it

in any edition of Charles Lamb's writings. Here it is.

The Atlantic Monthly, Volume 11, No. 67, May, 1863 A Magazine of Literature, Art, and Politics · 第 6 / 42 题