CHAPTER III.—DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE HEBREW AND SEPTUAGINT CHRONOLOGIES.

1. Argument against the shorter computation, founded on the

proportion between the Antepaidogonian Ages and whole Lives

of the Patriarchs—Reasons for the enlargement of this ratio,

and the diminution of the length of human life 50

2. Argument founded on the regular succession of human

generations—Anomalies and Paradoxes of the Hebrew

text—Remark of Eusebius—Objections of learned men unanswered 52

3. Argument founded on the inconsistency of the co-existence

of idolatry and the worship of the true God, in the same

family, and within a short period from the flood—Remarks on

the building of Babel—Mr. Clinton refuted—Mr. Cuninghame’s

argument from Scripture—The judgments of God forgotten 55

4. Argument founded on the inconsistency of the accounts of

Sacred and Profane History—Remark of Sir Walter Raleigh—Sir

Isaac Newton’s objection refuted—Epoch of the Foundation of

the kingdom of Egypt 57

5. Arguments founded on the deficiency of the numbers of

mankind—Epoch of the occupation of Babylon by the

Medes—Calculation of the numbers of mankind on the Eulerian

ratio—Mr. Clinton refuted 59

6. Argument founded on the alteration of the Hebrew text by

the Jews—Testimony of the early Fathers on this point—Mr.

Clinton’s admission as to the prophecies—His refutation as

to the chronology—Motives of the Jews for shortening the

genealogies 60

7. Motives ascribed to the Seventy Interpreters for enlarging

the chronology—Pretensions of the Chaldeans and Egyptians to

a remote antiquity—Insufficiency of the scheme adopted by

the Interpreters—Self-refutation of Mr. Clinton’s hypothesis 62

A dissertation on the true age of the world · 第 3 / 10 章