You will probably ask how men succeeded in reconciling this solar

immortality with the doctrine which made the moon the abode of the dead.

The Greeks, following the Orientals, had been able to make a lunar-solar

calendar, and they also constructed an eschatology in which the two

great heavenly bodies both played part. They were the two divinities

whose help the priests promised to “those who were about to die.”[243]

This eschatology is founded on the astrological idea that the moon

presides over physical life, over the formation and decomposition of

bodies, but that the sun is the author of intellectual life and the

master of reason. The doctrine also includes the belief we have already

explained elsewhere,[244] that when souls leave the earth, they are

still surrounded by a subtle fluid which retains the appearance of the

persons whom they formerly animated. The pagan theologians thus admitted

that the souls which came down to earth assumed in the sphere of the

moon and in the atmosphere these aerial bodies which were regarded as

the seat of the vital principle. Inversely, when they rose again to

heaven, the function of the moon was to dissolve and to receive these

light envelopes, as on earth its damp rays provoked the corruption of

the corpse. The soul, thus becoming pure reason (νοῦς), ascended to the

sun, the source of all intelligence. According to others the formation

of the soul’s integument was begun and its reabsorption was completed in

the planetary spheres, and this is why the Neo-Platonist Jamblichus[245]

placed the Hades of mythology between the sun and the moon. These

theories are not the product of pure philosophical speculations, but

have their roots in the old astral religion of the Semites. The

mysteries of Mithras, the Chaldaic oracles, and above all Manicheism

shared the belief in a lunar-solar immortality of which the source

certainly goes back to the tenets of the “Chaldean” priests.

* * * * *

Solar immortality is a learned doctrine, the fruit of the astronomical

theories which made the king-star the centre and the master of the

universe. It was such as to find acceptance with theologians and

philosophers and to be spread by the Oriental mysteries. But it never

succeeded in eliminating or overshadowing the old popular idea that the

souls of the dead dwell in the midst of the glittering constellations. A

trace of the double conception is found in the Stoic school. For certain

of the masters of this school the directing reason of the world, the

(ἡγεμονικόν), has its principal seat in the sun, for others in the

sphere of the fixed stars. In the same way the poets, Lucan addressing

Nero, and Statius addressing Domitian, hesitatingly ask if these

emperors will ride in the flaming chariot of Phoebus or if they will

assume Jupiter’s sceptre in the highest heaven.[246] The

Neo-Pythagoreans admitted that souls could rise to the Most High (εἰς

τὸν Ὕψιστον), that is to say, to the supreme God who was enthroned at

the summit of the world.[247] It was, moreover, very anciently held

among the Greeks that Olympus was in the outer circle enveloping the

world, and until the end of antiquity we find the Elysian Fields were

transported to the zone of the constellations and in particular to the

Milky Way. This is, for instance, the doctrine of Cicero as shown in the

dream of Scipio.

So the old popular idea that the soul became a star, which in Greece was

accepted by the ancient Pythagoreans, still subsisted. According to

mythology this was the happy lot reserved for heroes. We have whole

books which tell us how these heroes at the end of their career were

transformed to brilliant stars in reward for their exploits.

“Catasterism” draws a moral conclusion from ancient tales. Hercules,

Castor and Pollux, Perseus and Andromeda and many others had deserved

such metamorphosis. It did not therefore seem bold to assign to the

eminent men of the present the same destiny as to the great figures of

the past, and no one was shocked by the supposition that their divine

spirits might be added to the number of the “visible gods.” This was, in

particular, a lot worthy of the princes who had deserved apotheosis. At

the death of Caesar a comet appeared. It was thought to be the

dictator’s soul which had been received among the Immortals, and

Ovid[248] does not hesitate to show us Venus descending, invisible, into

the senate, snatching this soul from the pierced body and bearing it

aloft to the sky. There Venus feels the soul become inflamed and sees it

escape from her breast to fly beyond the moon and turn into a trailing

comet. Hadrian, in his grief for the death of Antinous, let himself be

persuaded that a star had just appeared which was the deified soul of

his favourite.[249] But as in Greece “heroification” was finally awarded

by the will of families to every one of their members whose loss they

mourned, so “catasterism” was in the end accorded to deceased persons of

very moderate deserts. “Nearly the whole heaven,” says Cicero, “is

filled with mankind.”[250] In an inscription of Amorgos[251] a young

man, carried off by the Fates at the age of twenty, thus addresses his

mother: “Weep not; for of what use is weeping? Rather venerate me, for I

am now a divine star which shows itself at sunset.” And at Miletus[252]

a child of eight years old, whom Hermes has led to Olympus, contemplates

the ether and shines in the midst of the stars, “rising every evening to

the horn of the Goat. By the favour of the gods he protects the young

boys who were his playfellows in the rude palaestrae.”

Epitaphs so precise in expression are exceptional. On the other hand,

numerous epigraphic and literary texts declare that the soul of some

dead person has risen to the stars to live there with the Immortals, but

leave the position of this soul undetermined. It is stated to have flown

towards the vast sky, to have been received by the ether, to be living

at the summit of the world and following the revolutions of the

celestial armies. But the place where the blessed thus come together,

that one of the upper spheres in which their meeting takes place, is

left uncertain. Their dwelling was known to be somewhere very high above

us, but men did not willingly venture to fix its exact situation.

The heathen theologians wished however to bring order and precision into

this astral eschatology. As they had combined the doctrines of lunar and

solar immortality, so they attempted to bring both into agreement with

stellar immortality. When Lucian in the beginning of his “Icaromenippus”

shows us his hero passing over three thousand stadia from the earth to

the moon, where he makes a first halt, rising thence five hundred

parasangs to the sun, and then ascending from the sun to heaven,

Jupiter’s citadel, through the space travelled in a full day by an eagle

in rapid flight, he is giving us a humorous parody of the journey which

some men ascribed to souls. This idea that the soul thus rises to

Paradise by three stages was widely entertained in the East, and it was

notably held by Mazdeism. A trace of this belief seems to linger in the

passage of the Second Epistle to the Corinthians in which Saint Paul

tells that he has been lifted “to the third heaven.”[253]

The Platonists sometimes adopted the same conception and combined it

with psychological ideas, a development of those we recalled in

connection with solar immortality (p. 103). It was held that when the

soul came down to earth it first received an ethereal garment of almost

immaterial purity; then, imagination being added to reason, a solar

fluid surrounded it; then a lunar integument made it subject to the

passions; and finally a carnal body was the cause of its ignorance of

divine truths and of its blind foolishness. It successively lost with

these wrappings the inclinations or faculties which were bound with

them, when after death it went back again to the place of its

origin.[254]

The conception of the triple ascension of souls rested fundamentally on

a rudimentary astronomy, for it confused the five planets with the fixed

stars, discriminating from both only the sun and the moon. But for long

the system which divided the heavens into seven superimposed spheres,

enveloped by an eighth sphere which was the limit of the universe, had

imposed itself not only on the learned but also on the authors of pagan

apocalypses. The eschatological doctrine which triumphed at the end of

paganism is in agreement with this theory, generally admitted by the

science of the period. This doctrine is certainly of Chaldeo-Persian

origin, and was spread in the first century especially by the mysteries

of Mithras.[255] Then, in the second century, the Pythagorean Numenius

introduced it into philosophic speculation. Man’s soul was held to

descend from the height of heaven to this sublunary world, passing

through the planetary spheres, and thus at its birth it acquired the

dispositions and the qualities peculiar to each of these stars. After

death it went back to its celestial home by the same path. Then as it

traversed the zones of the sky, it divested itself of the passions and

faculties which it had acquired during its descent to earth, as it were

of garments. To the moon it surrendered its vital and alimentary energy,

to Mercury its cupidity, to Venus its amorous desires, to the sun its

intellectual capacities, to Mars its warlike ardour, to Jupiter its

ambitious dreams, to Saturn its slothful tendencies. It was naked,

disencumbered of all sensibility, when it reached the eighth heaven,

there to enjoy, as a sublime essence, in the eternal light where lived

the gods, bliss without end.

In the mysteries of Mithras a ladder composed of seven different metals

served as a symbol of this passage of souls through the spheres,

astrology placing each of the planets in relation with one of these

metals, lead with Saturn, gold with the sun, silver with the moon and so

on.[256]

But in opposition to this pantheism which, while identifying God with

the universe, placed the chief home of divine energy in the celestial

spheres and particularly in the highest of them, the sectaries of

Plato transported the supreme Power beyond the limits of the world and

made of him a Being no longer immanent, but transcendent and distinct

from all matter. This conception became more and more predominant in

pagan theology as Stoicism lost influence in favour of Neo-Platonism.

This God, “ultramundane and incorporeal, father and architect” of

creation,[257] had his seat, it was thought, in the infinite light

which extended beyond the starry spheres. Religion called him

sometimes the Most High (Ὕψιστος), sometimes Jupiter, but gave him at

the same time the epithets “Uppermost,” “Insuperable” (_summus_,

_exsuperantissimus_).[258] It was this celestial Father whom the elect

souls aspired to join, but only those who had attained to perfection

succeeded in doing so, as we shall see in our last lecture. The others

stayed, in accordance with their degree of purity, in a lower zone of

the successive stages formed by the atmosphere, by the planetary

circles, and by the heaven of the fixed stars, which were the “visible

gods,” opposed to the spiritual world.[259]

* * * * *

This was the last conception of paganism and on the whole it was to

impose itself on men for many centuries. Judaism had already made

concessions to the astronomical theories of the “Chaldeans,” and had

borrowed from them the idea of seven stories of heavens, an idea which

we find developed in particular in the apocryphal Book of Enoch. It also

belonged to Christianity almost from the beginning, and the gnostics

gave it a large place in their speculations. But especially Origen, who

borrowed it directly from the Greek philosophers, lent the authority of

his name to the doctrines of astral eschatology. According to him,

souls, after they have sojourned in Paradise, which he imagined as a

remote place of earth where they learn terrestrial truths, rise to the

zone of the air and there understand the nature of the beings who people

this element. But if they are free from all material weight, they cross

the atmosphere rapidly and reach “the dwellings of the heavens,” that

is, the celestial spheres. There they grasp the nature of the stars and

the causes of their movements. Finally, when they have made such

progress that they have become pure intelligences, they are admitted to

contemplate the reasonable essences face to face and see invisible

things, enjoying their perfection. Although Origen was condemned by the

Church, his ideas were not abolished. Since the Christian lore adopted

the ancient conception of the world’s structure, as formulated by

Ptolemy, it had necessarily to admit that souls traversed the planetary

circles in order to reach that “supermundane light” in which they found

perfect beatitude. Dante’s Paradise, with its choirs of angels and its

classes of the blessed, distributed among the superimposed spheres of

the heavens, is a magnificent testimony to the strength of the tradition

which antiquity bequeathed to the Middle Ages. Before this tradition

could be destroyed, Galileo and Copernicus had to ruin Ptolemy’s system

and open up to the imagination the infinite spaces of a limitless

universe.

IV

THE WINNING OF IMMORTALITY

A fundamental difference distinguishes the conception of immortality as

it appears in the religion of the Roman Empire from our modern ideas.

Immortality, as we conceive of it, follows on the very nature which we

ascribe to the human soul. It is affirmed by some, denied by others, in

accordance with the character which each one attributes to the principle

of conscious thought, but whenever credence is given to it, it is

generally supposed to be absolute, eternal, universal. For the ancients,

on the other hand, immortality was no more than conditional: it might

not be perpetual and it might not belong to all men. According to the

Platonists the soul, an incorruptible essence, a principle of life and

movement, survived necessarily;[260] according to the Epicureans, being

composed of atoms, it was dissolved at the moment of death.[261] But

between these extreme opinions of the philosophers, the religion of the

people remained faithful to the old belief that the shade must be

nourished with offerings and sacrifices, that if it lacked sustenance it

was condemned to waste away miserably. This conception, like not a few

others which were fading away in the West, was revived when the

Orientals imposed on the Roman world their more primitive and sometimes

very crude beliefs. The normal destiny of the soul was therefore to

survive the body for a certain time, then in its turn to disappear. A

second death (δεύτερος θάνατος) completed the work of the first which

gave the corpse over to corruption. The spiritual essence which had

abandoned the body was annihilated after it. Such was the inevitable

necessity imposed on mankind. Immortality was a privilege of divinity.

The man who was exempted from the common lot of his kind was therefore

the equal of the gods; he had risen above his perishable condition to

acquire the everlasting youth of the Olympians, the unlimited duration

of the stars which travel the heavens, the eternity of the Supreme

Being.

If he became a god after his death it was sometimes because he had been

one ever since his birth. For men were not all born equal: if each of

them possessed the _psyche_ which nourished and animated the body, yet

all men did not equally receive the divine effluence (πνεῦμα) which gave

reason. This reason, which distinguished man from the beasts, was akin

to the fires of the stars; it established between man and heaven a

community of nature (συγγένεια) which alone made it possible for him to

acquire a knowledge of divinity,[262] the “gnosis” of God and of the

world which He animated. This special grace also exempted him who

obtained it from the passions and weaknesses to which the inclinations

of the flesh exposed him. It made him pious, temperate and chaste: he

was holy (_sanctus_).[263] It communicated to him a lucidity and power

lacking to the common run of mortals. He penetrated the secrets of

nature and commanded the elements; he received revelations and was

capable of prophetic divination. Inversely, every exceptional quality

was regarded as superhuman; every extraordinary act seemed a miracle.

The most enlightened spoke merely of celestial inspiration. “_Nemo

magnus vir sine quodam adflatu divino_,” said Cicero.[264] The many saw

in these privileged beings earthly incarnations of all the Olympians.

From the moment of their appearance on the earth these men were really

gods; their soul kept its higher nature in all its purity; it would

indubitably return after death to its place of origin. Such are the

leading ideas which explain the belief in the immortality of the heroes.

Among those who escaped the common law of death because they were

divine, first of all, were the kings. In all times kings have been

looked upon as of superior essence to the rest of mankind, and the

ancient East approximated them or made them equal to the heavenly

powers. The Hellenistic realms, in Egypt, Syria, Asia Minor, raised the

cult of the monarch to the rank of a state institution; and the Caesars

inherited this homage, which was rendered to them by their subjects even

in their lifetime, first in the East and then throughout the Empire. The

powerful chief who delivered his state from the scourge of invasion and

ensured it peace and welfare, accomplished a work which seemed to be

beyond the ability of man, and he was adored as a present god (ἐπιφανὴς

θεός, _praesens numen_), a saviour (σωτήρ). Sometimes the god incarnate

in him was specified; and he was looked upon as a manifestation of Zeus,

Apollo, or another. Very ancient but still active beliefs gave him the

power to command nature as well as men. If the fields were fertile, if

the flocks and herds had increased, these were benefits received from

the godlike sovereign. No miracle was beyond his accomplishment. He was

the providence of his people, having indeed the power of foreseeing and

foretelling the future. According to Manilius,[265] it was to kings,

whose lofty thoughts reached the heights of the sky, that nature first

revealed her mysteries. The pagan theologians affirmed, indeed, that the

souls of kings came from a higher place than those of other men, and

that these august personages borrowed more from heaven than the common

crowd of mortals.[266] And thus, death had no sooner carried them off

from the earth than their souls once again rose to the stars, who

welcomed them as their equals (_sideribus recepti_). It was thought that

an eagle or the chariot of the sun bore them away.[267] It may seem

strange that the senate should deliberate as to whether or not a

deceased emperor deserved apotheosis, and should refuse or accord him

official canonisation. But this act is in conformity with all the ideas

we have described, since the monarch’s benefits and victories were the

proof of his divine origin, and since, if he had committed crimes and

caused misfortunes, he was thus shown to be in no respect a god.

In the remote ages of ancient Egypt, the Pharaohs were the first whom

Osiris consented to identify with himself, or whom their father Ra bore

away in the solar boat, but little by little the rites practised in

order to ensure eternity to the sovereign were extended to the magnates

surrounding him. Thus immortality was a kind of posthumous nobility

bestowed on the great servants of the state, or usurped by them, long

before the rest of the people obtained it. In Greece, also, kings were

the first to be the objects of a cult as protecting heroes, but after

them other classes of eminent men received the same title and the same

adoration, in particular the founder of a city, its lawmaker who had

given it a constitution and the warrior who had victoriously defended

it. In the same way as fabulous demigods, Castor and Pollux or Hercules,

had in heaven become brilliant stars as a reward for their earthly

deeds, they also were public benefactors who by their works and their

virtues had shown themselves worthy of the same “catasterism.” These

ideas passed to Rome with the Stoic philosophy. After having given a

list of those who had triumphed in the wars of the Republic, Cicero lays

down as a fact that not one of them could have attained so far without

the help of God;[268] and elsewhere he states more explicitly:[269] “To

all who have saved, succoured or aggrandized their country, a fixed

place in which they shall enjoy everlasting bliss is assigned in heaven,

for it is from heaven that they who guide and guard cities have

descended, thither to reascend.” The ex-consul Cicero claimed apotheosis

for the great men of the state: this was the republican transformation

of the doctrine of the divinity of kings.

Pagan theology was to give much wider extension to this doctrine. In a

curious passage Hermes Trismegistus[270] explains that there are royal,

that is to say divine, souls of different kinds, for there is a royalty

of the spirit, a royalty of art, a royalty of science, and even a

royalty of bodily strength. All exceptional men were godly, and it was

not to be admitted that the sacred energy which animated them was

extinguished with them.

Pious priests, like kings, were judged, or rather judged themselves, to

be worthy of immortality. Who could more justly deserve a share in the

felicity of the gods than those who on the earth had lived in their

company and known their designs? He who had thus been in communication

with the godhead and learnt his secrets was raised above the condition

of humanity. This sacred knowledge, this gift of prophecy, this

“gnosis,” which was inseparable from piety, transformed him who had

obtained it, set him free even in life from the condemnation of fate;

and after death he went to the immortals whose confidant he had been

here below.

The philosophers and theologians who treated of the nature of the Divine

Being shared the blessed lot of the priests and soothsayers who

interpreted His will. Their doctrine came to them by inspiration from on

high, or at least so they readily believed. Their intelligence, which

was lit by a divine ray, penetrated the world’s mysteries and subjected

it to their will. _Philosophus_ became a synonym for thaumaturge. Even

in this life the superior mind of the philosophers allowed them to

escape the necessities by which other men were oppressed, and this

reason returned after death to the source of all intelligence.

But all knowledge came from God. It was He who gave light to the wise

man, absorbed in austere research, and caused him to discover truth. It

was He too who inspired the poet, who worked in him when enthusiasm

carried him away; He likewise who gave to the artist the faculty of

apprehending and expressing beauty, to the musician the power to recall

by his chords the sublime harmony of the celestial spheres. All who gave

themselves up to works of the intellect had a part in the godhead. They

were purified by the high pursuit of spiritual joy and freed thereby

from the passions of the body and the oppression of matter. For this

reason the Muses are frequently represented on tombs; beautiful

sarcophagi are decorated with the figures of the nine sisters. Thanks to

these goddesses, mortals were delivered from earthly misery and led back

towards the sacred light of the heavens.

After Life in Roman Paganism · 第 9 / 19 段