CHAPTER V.

ESTABLISHMENT Of THE MODERN INQUISITION IN SPAIN.

The state of the Inquisition in the kingdom of Aragon, at the accession

of Ferdinand and Isabella, has been shown in a preceding chapter. This

tribunal was then introduced into the kingdom of Castile, after having

been reformed by statutes and regulations so severe, that the Aragonese

violently resisted the fresh burdens which were imposed on them.

This is the Inquisition which has reigned in Spain since the year 1481,

which was destroyed, to the satisfaction of all Europe, and which has

since been re-established to the grief of all enlightened Spaniards.

The war against the Albigenses was the first cause of the establishment

of the Inquisition; and the pretended necessity of punishing the

apostacy of the newly-converted Spanish Jews, was the reason for

introducing it in a reformed state. It is important to remark, that the

immense trade carried on by the Spanish Jews had thrown into their hands

the greatest part of the wealth of the Peninsula; and that they had

acquired great power and influence in Castile under Alphonso IX., Peter

I., and Henry II.; and in Aragon under Peter IV. and John I. The

Christians, who could not rival them in industry, had almost all become

their debtors, and envy soon made them the enemies of their creditors.

This disposition was fostered by evil-minded men, and popular commotions

were the consequence in almost all the towns of the two kingdoms. In

1391, five thousand Jews were sacrificed to the fury of the people in

different towns. Several were known to have escaped death by becoming

Christians; many others sought to save themselves in following their

example; and in a short time more than a million persons renounced the

law of Moses to embrace the Christian faith. The number of conversions

increased considerably during the ten first years of the fifteenth

century, through the zeal of St. Vincent Ferrier and several other

missionaries; they were seconded by the famous conferences which took

place in 1413 between several Rabbis and the converted Jew, Jerome de

Santafe. The converted Jews were named _New Christians_; they were also

called Marranos, or the cursed race, from an oath which the Jews were in

the habit of using among themselves. As the fear of death was the cause

of most of these conversions, many repented, and secretly returned to

Judaism, though they outwardly conformed to Christianity. The constraint

to which they were obliged to submit was sometimes too painful, and

several were discovered. This was the ostensible reason for the

establishment of a tribunal which gave Ferdinand an opportunity of

confiscating immense riches, and which Sextus IV. could not but approve,

as it tended to augment the credit of the maxims of the court of Rome;

it is to these projects, concealed under the appearance of zeal for

religion, that the Inquisition of Spain owes its origin.

In 1477, Philip de Barbaris, inquisitor of the kingdom of Sicily, went

to Seville, to obtain from Ferdinand and Isabella the confirmation of a

privilege granted in 1233, by the Emperor Frederic, which gave to the

Inquisition of Sicily the right of seizing a third part of the property

of condemned heretics. Barbaris, through zeal for the interests of the

Pope, endeavoured to persuade the king that the Christian religion

derived the greatest advantages from the fear which the judgments of the

Inquisition inspired. He was eagerly seconded by Alphonso de Hojida,

prior of the convent of Dominicans at Seville; and Nicholas Franco, the

nuncio of the Pope at the court of Spain. A report was then spread in

different parts of the kingdom that the _New Christians_, with the

unbaptized Jews, insulted the images of Jesus Christ, and had even

crucified Christian children in mockery of his sufferings on the cross.

Ferdinand was willing to receive the Inquisition into his states: the

only obstacle was the refusal of Isabella; that excellent queen could

not approve of measures so contrary to the gentleness of her character,

but her consent was obtained by alarming her conscience: she was told

that it became a religious duty to adopt them in the present

circumstances.

Isabella suffered herself to be led away by the representations of her

council, and commissioned her ambassador at Rome, Don Francis de

Santillan, Bishop of Osma, to solicit in her name a bull for the

establishment of the Inquisition in Castile, which was granted in 1478.

It authorized Ferdinand and Isabella to name the priests who were to be

commissioned to discover in their states all heretics, apostates, and

favourers of these crimes. As this measure was displeasing to Isabella,

her council, by her order, suspended the execution of the bull until

less severe remedies had been tried.

The queen commissioned D. Diego Alphonso de Solis, Bishop of Cadiz,

Diego de Merlo, and Alphonso de Hojida, prior of the convent of

Dominicans, to observe the effects produced by gentle means, and give a

faithful account of them. Their reports were such as might be expected

from the situation of affairs; and the Dominican fathers, the nuncio,

and even the king, desired that the measures preferred by Isabella

should be declared insufficient.

The events of this year proved how displeasing the institution was to

the Castilians. In the beginning of the year 1480, the Cortes assembled

at Toledo. It was occupied in providing means to prevent the evil which

the communication of the Jews with Christians might produce: the ancient

regulations were renewed; and among others, those which obliged

unbaptized Jews to wear some distinguishing mark, and to inhabit

separate quarters, to which they were compelled to retire before night:

they were also prohibited from exercising the professions of physicians,

surgeons, merchants, barbers, and innkeepers; yet the Cortes had no

intention either of approving or demanding that the Inquisition should

be established in the kingdom.

The consent of the queen was obtained; and while the two sovereigns were

at Medina del Campo, on the 17th of November, 1480, they named as the

first inquisitors Michael Morillo and John de San Martin, both

Dominicans, as adviser and accessor of these two monks, Doctor John Ruiz

de Medina, a counsellor of the queen's; and as (procurator-fiscal)

attorney, John Lopez del Barco, the queen's chaplain.

On the 9th of October an order was sent by the king and queen to all the

governors of provinces to furnish the inquisitors and their suite with

everything they might require in their journey to Seville; an

extraordinary circumstance in that time, and which proves the influence

which the Dominicans had already acquired. Their privileges were the

same as those granted in 1223 by the Emperor Frederic. The Castilians

were so far from being pleased at the introduction of the Inquisition,

that the inquisitors, on their arrival at Seville, found it impossible

to collect the small number of persons necessary to the performance of

their functions, although they shewed their commission; and the Council

of Spain was obliged to issue another order, that the prefect and other

authorities of Seville, and the diocese of Cadiz, should assist the

inquisitors in their installation; this order was also interpreted in

such a manner that it was only executed in those towns which belonged to

the queen. The _New Christians_ then immediately emigrated into the

states of the Duke de Medina Sidonia, the Marquis of Cadiz, the Count

D'Arcos, and other nobles; and the new tribunal declared that their

heresy was proved by their emigration.

The inquisitors established their tribunal in the Dominican convent of

St. Paul, at Seville; and on the 2nd of January, 1481, they issued their

first edict, which commanded the Marquis of Cadiz, the Count D'Arcos,

and all grandees of Spain, to seize the persons of the emigrants within

fifteen days; and to send them under an escort to Seville, and

sequestrate their property, on pain of excommunication, besides the

other punishments to which they would be liable as favourers of heresy.

The number of prisoners was soon so considerable, that the convent

assigned to the inquisitors was not sufficiently large to contain them,

and the tribunal was removed to the Castle de Triana, situated near

Seville.

The inquisitors soon published a second edict, named the Edict of Grace,

to engage those who had apostatized to surrender themselves voluntarily:

it promised that if they came with true repentance, their property

should not be confiscated, and they should receive absolution; but if,

on the contrary, they suffered the time of _grace_ to elapse, or were

denounced by others, they would be prosecuted with all the severity of

the tribunal. Several suffered themselves to be persuaded; but the

inquisitors only granted them absolution when they had declared upon

oath the names, condition, and place of dwelling, of all the apostates

whom they knew or had heard spoken of. They were also obliged to keep

these revelations secret; and by these means a great number of _New

Christians_ fell into the hands of the inquisitors. When the period of

grace was passed, a new edict was published, which commanded all persons

to denounce those who had embraced the Judaic heresy, on pain of mortal

sin and excommunication. The consequence of this edict was, that an

heretic was only informed that he was accused, at the moment when he was

arrested and dragged to the dungeons of the Inquisition.

The same fate awaited the _converted_ Jew, who might have acquired

certain habits in his infancy, which, though not contrary to

Christianity, might be represented as certain signs of apostacy. The

inquisitors mentioned in their edict several cases where accusation was

commanded. The following cases are so equivocal, that altogether they

would scarcely form a simple presumption in the present time. A convert

was considered as relapsed into heresy, if he kept the sabbath out of

respect to the law which he had abandoned; this was sufficiently proved

if he wore better linen and garments on that day than those which he

commonly used, or had not a fire in his house from the preceding

evening; if he took the suet and fat from the animals which were

intended for his food, and washed the blood from it; if he examined the

blade of the knife before he killed the animals, and covered the blood

with earth; if he blessed the table after the manner of the Jews; if he

has drunk of the wine named caser, (a word derived from caxer, which

means _lawful_,) and which is prepared by Jews; if he pronounces the

bahara, or benediction, when he takes the vessel of wine into his hands,

and pronounces certain words before he gives it to another person; if he

eats of an animal killed by Jews; if he has recited the Psalms of David

without repeating the Gloria Patri at the end; if he gives his son a

Hebrew name chosen among those used by the Jews; if he plunges him seven

days after his birth into a basin containing water, gold, silver,

seed-pearl, wheat, barley, and other substances, pronouncing at the same

time certain words, according to the custom of the Jews; if he draws the

horoscope of his children at their birth; if he performs the ruaya, a

ceremony which consists in inviting his relations and friends to a

repast the day before he undertakes a journey; if he turned his face to

the wall at the time of his death, or has been placed in that posture

before he expired; if he has washed, or caused to be washed, in hot

water the body of a dead person, and interred him in a new shroud, with

hose, shirt, and a mantle, and placed a piece of money in his mouth; if

he has uttered a discourse in praise of the dead, or recited melancholy

verses; if he has emptied the pitchers and other vessels of water in the

house of the dead person, or in those of his neighbours, according to

the custom of the Jews; if he sits behind the door of the deceased as a

sign of grief, or eats fish and olives instead of meat, to honour his

memory; if he remains in his house one year after the death of any one,

to prove his grief. All these articles show the artifice used by the

inquisitors in order to prove to Isabella that a great number of Judaic

heretics existed in the dioceses of Cadiz and Seville. These measures,

so well adapted to multiply victims, could not fail in their effect, and

the tribunal soon began its cruel executions. On the 6th of January,

1481, six persons were burnt, seventeen on the 26th of March following,

and a still greater number a month after; on the 4th of November, the

same year, two hundred and ninety-eight _New Christians_ had suffered

the punishment of burning, and seventy-nine were condemned to the

horrors of perpetual imprisonment in the town of Seville alone. In other

parts of the province and in the diocese of Cadiz, two thousand of these

unfortunate creatures were burnt; according to Mariana, a still greater

number were burnt in effigy, and one thousand seven hundred suffered

different canonical punishments.

The great number of persons condemned to be burnt, obliged the prefect

of Seville to construct a scaffold of stone in a field near the town,

name Tablada; it was called Quemadero, and still exists. Four statues,

of plaster, were erected on it, and bore the name of the _Four

Prophets_; the condemned persons were enclosed alive in these figures,

and perished by a slow and horrible death[3].

The dread which these executions inspired in the _New Christians_ caused

a great number to emigrate to France, Portugal, and even to Africa. Many

of those who had been condemned for contumacy had fled to Rome, and

demanded justice of the Pope against their judges. The sovereign pontiff

wrote on the 29th of January to Ferdinand and Isabella, and complained

that the inquisitors did not follow the rule of right in declaring those

to be heretics who were not guilty. His Holiness added that he would

have pronounced their deprivation but from respect to the royal decree

which had instituted them in their office, but he revoked the

authorization which he had given. On the 11th of the following month the

Pope despatched a new brief, in which, without mentioning the first, he

says, the general of the Dominicans, Alphonso de St. Cebriant, having

proved to him the necessity of increasing the number of inquisitors, he

had appointed to that office Alphonso de St. Cebriant, and seven monks

of his order. It was at this time that Queen Isabella requested the Pope

to give the Inquisition a permanent form which should be satisfactory to

all parties; she required that the judgments passed in Spain should be

definitive and without appeal to Rome, and complained at the same time

that many persons accused her of being influenced in all that she did

for the tribunal by a desire to seize the wealth of the condemned.

When Sixtus IV. received this letter he had just learnt that his bulls

had met with some resistance in Sicily from the viceroy and other

magistrates, and artfully took advantage of Isabella's request to

confirm his authority in that kingdom. He replied to the queen, and

praised her zeal for the Inquisition; appeased her scruples of

conscience in regard to the confiscations; and assured her that he would

have complied with all her demands, if the cardinals, and those charged

with the administration of affairs, had not found insurmountable

difficulties in so doing. He exhorted her to maintain the Inquisition in

her states, and above all to take proper measures that the apostolical

bulls should be received and executed in Sicily.

The councillors to whom the Pope had submitted the demands of Isabella,

approved of the creation of an apostolical judge of appeal in Spain; and

proposed at the same time that no person descended from the Jews, either

by the male or female side, should be admitted among the inquisitorial

judges. Don Inigo Manrique was named sole judge of appeals in all

matters of faith.

The History of the Inquisition of Spain from the Time of its Establishment to the Reign of Ferdinand VII. · 第 5 / 30 章