SURNAMES.

The subject of surnames has more than once been referred to in the pages

of "N. & Q.," and it may assist those of your readers who have

investigated the question of their origin and use, to offer them the

following examples of peculiar forms of personal designation which occur

in certain of the more ancient public muniments of the city of Norwich.

It is the opinion of Camden, Du Cange, Pegge, Sharon Turner, and other

writers, that the custom of appropriating a permanent appellation to

particular families, became fully established in this country at the

period (sooner or later) of the Norman Conquest. The instances, however,

exhibited below, prove that such custom was not, at any rate,

universally prevalent at that time amongst us. And, indeed, whatever

might have been the case in reference to "the high men of the lond," it

is very certain that surnames, properly so called, were not completely

adopted by the mass of the people until the close of the fourteenth

century.

But as the intention of this Note is simply to adduce original examples

of individual designations, without inquiring into the circumstances

attending their acquisition, or pointing to the causes, obvious enough

for the most part, to which their various after-changes and

modifications are to be attributed, the subject calls for no other

general remark, except, perhaps, as to the prefixes "Le"[1] and "De,"

which, it may be noticed in passing, are, though not _constantly_, as is

commonly asserted, attached to names in records of an older date than

the time of Edward IV., when they began to fall into desuetude.

[Footnote 1: This prefix was occasionally in Cheshire, and in the

North with few exceptions, contracted into "A," as Thomas à

Becket, Thomas à Dutton, &c.]

With these introductory observations are now given, from the source

above indicated,--

Notes and Queries, Vol. V, Number 126, March 27, 1852 A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 29 / 177 题