I think that covers our position as to documents.

DR. FLÄCHSNER: I should like to comment briefly on one factor. Document

Number 1 is of value only if the Tribunal decides to call an expert on

the general themes which I described to the Tribunal before the recess.

An expert—for practical purposes an industrial expert—can draw from

the old distribution plan conclusions which the jurist is generally not

in a position to draw. If the expert is considered superfluous by the

Tribunal, then Document Number 1 is also superfluous—that I see.

The other documents requested by me are of importance, but not because,

as the Prosecution seem to assume, I am trying to produce evidence of

the fact that we did not want any foreign laborers; this should not be

expressed so pointedly.

The Defendant Speer had the task of producing armaments and needed

workers for that. Nothing is farther from his intentions than, in any

way, to deny or lessen his responsibility in respect to that. But what I

have to consider important—and for this purpose these documents, which

I am requesting, are essential—is the task of defining the extent to

which the defendant is responsible.

Trial of the Major War Criminals Before the International Military Tribunal, Nuremburg 14 November 1945-1 October 1946, Volume 08 · 第 125 / 127 题