ON THE NATURAL HISTORY OF THE MAN-LIKE APES.

Ancient traditions, when tested by the severe processes of modern

investigation, commonly enough fade away into mere dreams: but it is

singular how often the dream turns out to have been a half-waking one,

presaging a reality. Ovid foreshadowed the discoveries of the geologist:

the Atlantis was an imagination, but Columbus found a western world: and

though the quaint forms of Centaurs and Satyrs have an existence only

in the realms of art, creatures approaching man more nearly than they

in essential structure, and yet as thoroughly brutal as the goat's

or horse's half of the mythical compound, are now not only known, but

notorious.

I have not met with any notice of one of these MAN-LIKE APES of earlier

date than that contained in Pigafetta's 'Description of the Kingdom of

Congo,'* drawn up from the notes of a Portuguese sailor, Eduardo Lopez,

and published in 1598. The tenth chapter of this work is entitled "De

Animalibus quae in hac provincia reperiuntur," and contains a brief

passage to the effect that "in the Songan country, on the banks of the

Zaire, there are multitudes of apes, which afford great delight to the

nobles by imitating human gestures." As this might apply to almost any

kind of apes, I should have thought little of it, had not the brothers

De Bry, whose engravings illustrate the work, thought fit, in their

eleventh 'Argumentum,' to figure two of these "Simiae magnatum

deliciae." So much of the plate as contains these apes is faithfully

copied in the woodcut (Figure 1), and it will be observed that they

are tail-less, long-armed, and large-eared; and about the size of

Chimpanzees. It may be that these apes are as much figments of the

imagination of the ingenious brothers as the winged, two-legged,

crocodile-headed dragon which adorns the same plate; or, on the other

hand, it may be that the artists have constructed their drawings from

some essentially faithful description of a Gorilla or a Chimpanzee. And,

in either case, though these figures are worth a passing notice, the

oldest trustworthy and definite accounts of any animal of this kind

date from the 17th century, and are due to an Englishman. ([Footnote] *

REGNUM CONGO: hoc est VERA DESCRIPTIO REGNI AFRICANI QUOD TAM AB INCOLIS

QUAM LUSITANIS CONGUS APPELLATUR, per Philippum Pigafettam, olim ex

Edoardo Lopez acroamatis lingua Italica excerpta, num Latio sermone

donata ab August. Cassiod. Reinio. Iconibus et imaginibus rerum

memorabilium quasi vivis, opera et industria Joan. Theodori et Joan.

Israelis de Bry, fratrum exornata. Francofurti, MDXCVIII.)

(FIGURE 1.--SIMIAE MAGNATUM DELICIAE.--De Bry, 1598.)

The first edition of that most amusing old book, 'Purchas his

Pilgrimage,' was published in 1613, and therein are to be found many

references to the statements of one whom Purchas terms "Andrew Battell

(my neere neighbour, dwelling at Leigh in Essex) who served under Manuel

Silvera Perera, Governor under the King of Spaine, at his city of Saint

Paul, and with him went farre into the countrey of Angola"; and again,

"my friend, Andrew Battle, who lived in the kingdom of Congo many

yeares," and who, "upon some quarell betwixt the Portugals (among whom

he was a sergeant of a band) and him, lived eight or nine moneths in

the woodes." From this weather-beaten old soldier, Purchas was amazed

to hear "of a kinde of Great Apes, if they might so bee termed, of the

height of a man, but twice as bigge in feature of their limmes, with

strength proportionable, hairie all over, otherwise altogether like men

and women in their whole bodily shape.* They lived on such wilde fruits

as the trees and woods yielded, and in the night time lodged on

the trees." ([Footnote] *"Except this that their legges had no

calves."--[Ed. 1626.] And in a marginal note, "These great apes are

called Pongo's.")

This extract is, however, less detailed and clear in its statements

than a passage in the third chapter of the second part of another

work--'Purchas his Pilgrimes,' published in 1625, by the same

author--which has been often, though hardly ever quite rightly, cited.

The chapter is entitled, "The strange adventures of Andrew Battell,

of Leigh in Essex, sent by the Portugals prisoner to Angola, who lived

there and in the adjoining regions neere eighteene yeeres." And the

sixth section of this chapter is headed--"Of the Provinces of Bongo,

Calongo, Mayombe, Manikesocke, Motimbas: of the Ape Monster Pongo, their

hunting: Idolatries; and divers other observations."

"This province (Calongo) toward the east bordereth upon Bongo, and

toward the north upon Mayombe, which is nineteen leagues from Longo

along the coast.

"This province of Mayombe is all woods and groves, so over-growne that

a man may travaile twentie days in the shadow without any sunne or heat.

Here is no kind of corne nor graine, so that the people liveth onely

upon plantanes and roots of sundrie sorts, very good; and nuts; nor any

kinde of tame cattell, nor hens.

"But they have great store of elephant's flesh, which they greatly

esteeme, and many kinds of wild beasts; and great store of fish. Here is

a great sandy bay, two leagues to the northward of Cape Negro,* which

is the port of Mayombe. ([Footnote] *Purchas' note.--Cape Negro is in 16

degrees south of the line.) Sometimes the Portugals lade logwood in

this bay. Here is a great river, called Banna: in the winter it hath no

barre, because the generall winds cause a great sea. But when the sunne

hath his south declination, then a boat may goe in; for then it is

smooth because of the raine. This river is very great, and hath many

ilands and people dwelling in them. The woods are so covered with

baboones, monkies, apes and parrots, that it will feare any man to

travaile in them alone. Here are also two kinds of monsters, which are

common in these woods, and very dangerous.

"The greatest of these two monsters is called Pongo in their language,

and the lesser is called Engeco. This Pongo is in all proportion like a

man; but that he is more like a giant in stature than a man; for he is

very tall, and hath a man's face, hollow-eyed, with long haire upon his

browes. His face and eares are without haire, and his hands also. His

bodie is full of haire, but not very thicke; and it is of a dunnish

colour.

"He differeth not from a man but in his legs; for they have no calfe.

Hee goeth alwaies upon his legs, and carrieth his hands clasped in the

nape of his necke when he goeth upon the ground. They sleepe in the

trees, and build shelters for the raine. They feed upon fruit that they

find in the woods, and upon nuts, for they eate no kind of flesh. They

cannot speake, and have no understanding more than a beast. The people

of the countrie, when they travaile in the woods make fires where they

sleepe in the night; and in the morning when they are gone, the Pongoes

will come and sit about the fire till it goeth out; for they have no

understanding to lay the wood together. They goe many together and kill

many negroes that travaile in the woods. Many times they fall upon the

elephants which come to feed where they be, and so beate them with their

clubbed fists, and pieces of wood, that they will runne roaring away

from them. Those Pongoes are never taken alive because they are so

strong, that ten men cannot hold one of them; but yet they take many of

their young ones with poisoned arrowes.

"The young Pongo hangeth on his mother's belly with his hands fast

clasped about her, so that when the countrie people kill any of the

females they take the young one, which hangeth fast upon his mother.

"When they die among themselves, they cover the dead with great heaps

of boughs and wood, which is commonly found in the forest."* ([Footnote]

*Purchas' marginal note, p. 982:--"The Pongo a giant ape. He told me in

conference with him, that one of these pongoes tooke a negro boy of

his which lived a moneth with them. For they hurt not those which they

surprise at unawares, except they look on them; which he avoyded. He

said their highth was like a man's, but their bignesse twice as great. I

saw the negro boy. What the other monster should be he hath forgotten

to relate; and these papers came to my hand since his death, which,

otherwise, in my often conferences, I might have learned. Perhaps he

meaneth the Pigmy Pongo killers mentioned.")

It does not appear difficult to identify the exact region of which

Battell speaks. Longo is doubtless the name of the place usually spelled

Loango on our maps. Mayombe still lies some nineteen leagues northward

from Loango, along the coast; and Cilongo or Kilonga, Manikesocke, and

Motimbas are yet registered by geographers. The Cape Negro of Battell,

however, cannot be the modern Cape Negro in 16 degrees S., since Loango

itself is in 4 degrees S. latitude. On the other hand, the "great river

called Banna" corresponds very well with the "Camma" and "Fernand Vas,"

of modern geographers, which form a great delta on this part of the

African coast.

Now this "Camma" country is situated about a degree and a-half south of

the Equator, while a few miles to the north of the line lies the Gaboon,

and a degree or so north of that, the Money River--both well known to

modern naturalists as localities where the largest of man-like Apes

has been obtained. Moreover, at the present day, the word Engeco, or

N'schego, is applied by the natives of these regions to the smaller of

the two great Apes which inhabit them; so that there can be no rational

doubt that Andrew Battell spoke of that which he knew of his own

knowledge, or, at any rate, by immediate report from the natives of

Western Africa. The "Engeco," however, is that "other monster" whose

nature Battell "forgot to relate," while the name "Pongo"--applied

to the animal whose characters and habits are so fully and carefully

described--seems to have died out, at least in its primitive form and

signification. Indeed, there is evidence that not only in Battell's

time, but up to a very recent date, it was used in a totally different

sense from that in which he employs it.

For example, the second chapter of Purchas' work, which I have just

quoted, contains "A Description and Historicall Declaration of the

Golden Kingdom of Guinea, etc. etc. Translated from the Dutch, and

compared also with the Latin," wherein it is stated (p. 986) that--"The

River Gaboon lyeth about fifteen miles northward from Rio de Angra, and

eight miles northward from Cape de Lope Gonsalves (Cape Lopez), and is

right under the Equinoctial line, about fifteene miles from St. Thomas,

and is a great land, well and easily to be knowne. At the mouth of

the river there lieth a sand, three or foure fathoms deepe, whereon it

beateth mightily with the streame which runneth out of the river into

the sea. This river, in the mouth thereof, is at least four miles broad;

but when you are about the Iland called 'Pongo', it is not above two

miles broad...On both sides the river there standeth many trees...The

Iland called 'Pongo', which hath a monstrous high hill."

(FIGURE 2.--"Homo Sylvestris. Orang Outang." The Orang of Tulpius,

1641.)

The French naval officers, whose letters are appended to the late

M. Isidore Geoff. Saint Hilaire's excellent essay on the Gorilla,*

([Footnote] *'Archives du Museum', tome x.) note in similar terms the

width of the Gaboon, the trees that line its banks down to the water's

edge, and the strong current that sets out of it. They describe two

islands in its estuary;--one low, called Perroquet; the other high,

presenting three conical hills, called Coniquet; and one of them, M.

Franquet, expressly states that, formerly, the Chief of Coniquet was

called 'Meni-Pongo', meaning thereby Lord of 'Pongo'; and that the

'N'Pongues' (as, in agreement with Dr. Savage, he affirms the natives

call themselves) term the estuary of the Gaboon itself 'N'Pongo'.

It is so easy, in dealing with savages, to misunderstand their

applications of words to things, that one is at first inclined to

suspect Battell of having confounded the name of this region, where his

"greater monster" still abounds, with the name of the animal itself. But

he is so right about other matters (including the name of the "lesser

monster") that one is loth to suspect the old traveller of error; and,

on the other hand, we shall find that a voyager of a hundred years'

later date speaks of the name "Boggoe," as applied to a great Ape, by

the inhabitants of quite another part of Africa--Sierra Leone.

But I must leave this question to be settled by philologers and

travellers; and I should hardly have dwelt so long upon it except for

the curious part played by this word 'Pongo' in the later history of the

man-like Apes.

The generation which succeeded Battell saw the first of the man-like

Apes which was ever brought to Europe, or, at any rate, whose visit

found a historian. In the third book of Tulpius' 'Observationes

Medicae', published in 1641, the 56th chapter or section is devoted to

what he calls 'Satyrus indicus', "called by the Indians Orang-autang or

Man-of-the-Woods, and by the Africans Quoias Morrou." He gives a very

good figure, evidently from the life, of the specimen of this animal,

"nostra memoria ex Angola delatum," presented to Frederick Henry Prince

of Orange. Tulpius says it was as big as a child of three years old, and

as stout as one of six years: and that its back was covered with black

hair. It is plainly a young Chimpanzee.

In the meanwhile, the existence of other, Asiatic, man-like Apes became

known, but at first in a very mythical fashion. Thus Bontius (1658)

gives an altogether fabulous and ridiculous account and figure of an

animal which he calls "Orang-outang"; and though he says "vidi Ego cujus

effigiem hic exhibeo," the said effigies (see Figure 6 for Hoppius' copy

of it) is nothing but a very hairy woman of rather comely aspect, and

with proportions and feet wholly human. The judicious English anatomist,

Tyson, was justified in saying of this description by Bontius, "I

confess I do mistrust the whole representation."

It is to the last mentioned writer, and his coadjutor Cowper, that we

owe the first account of a man-like ape which has any pretensions

to scientific accuracy and completeness. The treatise entitled,

"'Orang-outang, sive Homo Sylvestris'; or the Anatomy of a Pygmie

compared with that of a 'Monkey', an 'Ape', and a 'Man'," published by

the Royal Society in 1699, is, indeed, a work of remarkable merit, and

has, in some respects, served as a model to subsequent inquirers. This

"Pygmie," Tyson tells us "was brought from Angola, in Africa; but was

first taken a great deal higher up the country"; its hair "was of a

coal-black colour and strait," and "when it went as a quadruped on all

four, 'twas awkwardly; not placing the palm of the hand flat to the

ground, but it walk'd upon its knuckles, as I observed it to do when

weak and had not strength enough to support its body."--"From the top

of the head to the heel of the foot, in a strait line, it measured

twenty-six inches."

(FIGURES 3 AND 4.--The 'Pygmie' reduced from Tyson's figures 1 and 2,

1699.)

These characters, even without Tyson's good figures (Figs. 3 and

4), would have been sufficient to prove his "Pygmie" to be a young

Chimpanzee. But the opportunity of examining the skeleton of the very

animal Tyson anatomised having most unexpectedly presented itself to

me, I am able to bear independent testimony to its being a veritable

'Troglodytes niger',* though still very young. Although fully

appreciating the resemblances between his Pygmie and Man, Tyson by no

means overlooked the differences between the two, and he concludes his

memoir by summing up first, the points in which "the Ourang-outang or

Pygmie more resembled a Man than Apes and Monkeys do," under forty-seven

distinct heads; and then giving, in thirty-four similar brief

paragraphs, the respects in which "the Ourang-outang or Pygmie differ'd

from a Man and resembled more the Ape and Monkey kind."

([Footnote] * I am indebted to Dr. Wright, of Cheltenham, whose

paleontological labours are so well known, for bringing this interesting

relic to my knowledge. Tyson's granddaughter, it appears, married Dr.

Allardyce, a physician of repute in Cheltenham, and brought, as part of

her dowry, the skeleton of the 'Pygmie.' Dr. Allardyce presented it to

the Cheltenham Museum, and, through the good offices of my friend Dr.

Wright, the authorities of the Museum have permitted me to borrow, what

is, perhaps its most remarkable ornament.

After a careful survey of the literature of the subject extant in

his time, our author arrives at the conclusion that his "Pygmie" is

identical neither with the Orangs of Tulpius and Bontius, nor with the

Quoias Morrou of Dapper (or rather of Tulpius), the Barris of d'Arcos,

nor with the Pongo of Battell; but that it is a species of ape probably

identical with the Pygmies of the Ancients, and, says Tyson, though it

"does so much resemble a 'Man' in many of its parts, more than any of

the ape kind, or any other 'animal' in the world, that I know of: yet by

no means do I look upon it as the product of a 'mixt' generation--'tis a

'Brute-Animal sui generis', and a particular 'species of Ape'."

The name of "Chimpanzee," by which one of the African Apes is now so

well known, appears to have come into use in the first half of the

eighteenth century, but the only important addition made, in that

period, to our acquaintance with the man-like apes of Africa is

contained in 'A New Voyage to Guinea', by William Smith, which bears the

date 1744.

Lectures and Essays(#6414) · 第 44 / 56 题