Since the adjournment of Congress the ratifications of the treaty between

the United States and Great Britain relative to coast fisheries and to

reciprocal trade with the British North American Provinces have been

exchanged, and some of its anticipated advantages are already enjoyed by

us, although its full execution was to abide certain acts of legislation

not yet fully performed. So soon as it was ratified Great Britain opened to

our commerce the free navigation of the river St. Lawrence and to our

fishermen unmolested access to the shores and bays, from which they had

been previously excluded, on the coasts of her North American Provinces; in

return for which she asked for the introduction free of duty into the ports

of the United States of the fish caught on the same coast by British

fishermen. This being the compensation stipulated in the treaty for

privileges of the highest importance and value to the United States, which

were thus voluntarily yielded before it became effective, the request

seemed to me to be a reasonable one; but it could not be acceded to from

want of authority to suspend our laws imposing duties upon all foreign

fish. In the meantime the Treasury Department issued a regulation for

ascertaining the duties paid or secured by bonds on fish caught on the

coasts of the British Provinces and brought to our markets by British

subjects after the fishing grounds had been made fully accessible to the

citizens of the United States. I recommend to your favorable consideration

a proposition, which will be submitted to you, for authority to refund the

duties and cancel the bonds thus received. The Provinces of Canada and New

Brunswick have also anticipated the full operation of the treaty by

legislative arrangements, respectively, to admit free of duty the products

of the United States mentioned in the free list of the treaty; and an

arrangement similar to that regarding British fish has been made for duties

now chargeable on the products of those Provinces enumerated in the same

free list and introduced therefrom into the United States, a proposition

for refunding which will, in my judgment, be in like manner entitled to

your favorable consideration.

There is difference of opinion between the United States and Great Britain

as to the boundary line of the Territory of Washington adjoining the

British possessions on the Pacific, which has already led to difficulties

on the part of the citizens and local authorities of the two Governments I

recommend that provision he made for a commission, to be joined by one on

the part of Her Britannic Majesty, for the purpose of running and

establishing the line in controversy. Certain stipulations of the third and

fourth articles of the treaty concluded by the United States and Great

Britain in 1846, regarding possessory rights of the Hudsons Bay Company and

property of the Pugets Sound Agricultural Company, have given rise to

serious disputes, and it is important to all concerned that summary means

of settling them amicably should be devised. I have reason to believe that

an arrangement can be made on just terms for the extinguishment of the

rights in question, embracing also the right of the Hudsons Bay Company to

the navigation of the river Columbia; and I therefore suggest to your

consideration the expediency of making a contingent appropriation for that

purpose.

France was the early and efficient ally of the United States in their

struggle for independence. From that time to the present, with occasional

slight interruptions, cordial relations of friendship have existed between

the Governments and people of the two countries. The kindly sentiments

cherished alike by both nations have led to extensive social and commercial

intercourse, which I trust will not be interrupted or checked by any casual

event of an apparently unsatisfactory character. The French consul at San

Francisco was not long since brought into the United States district court

at that place by compulsory process as a witness in favor of another

foreign consul, in violation, as the French Government conceives, of his

privileges under our consular convention with France. There being nothing

in the transaction which could imply any disrespect to France or its

consul, such explanation has been made as, I hope, will be satisfactory.

Subsequently misunderstanding arose on the subject of the French Government

having, as it appeared, abruptly excluded the American minister to Spain

from passing through France on his way from London to Madrid. But that

Government has unequivocally disavowed any design to deny the right of

transit to the minister of the United States, and after explanations to

this effect he has resumed his journey and actually returned through France

to Spain. I herewith lay before Congress the correspondence on this subject

between our envoy at Paris and the minister of foreign relations of the

French Government.

The position of our affairs with Spain remains as at the close of the last

session. Internal agitation, assuming very nearly the character of

political revolution, has recently convulsed that country. The late

ministers were violently expelled from power, and men of very different

views in relation to its internal affairs have succeeded. Since this change

there has been no propitious opportunity to resume and press on

negotiations for the adjustment of serious questions of difficulty between

the Spanish Government and the United States. There is reason to believe

that our minister will find the present Government more favorably inclined

than the preceding to comply with our just demands and to make suitable

arrangements for restoring harmony and preserving peace between the two

countries.

Negotiations are pending with Denmark to discontinue the practice of

levying tolls on our vessels and their cargoes passing through the Sound. I

do not doubt that we can claim exemption therefrom as a matter of right. It

is admitted on all hands that this exaction is sanctioned, not by the

general principles of the law of nations, but only by special conventions

which most of the commercial nations have entered into with Denmark. The

fifth article of our treaty of 1826 with Denmark provides that there shall

not be paid on the vessels of the United States and their cargoes when

passing through the Sound higher duties than those of the most favored

nations. This may be regarded as an implied agreement to submit to the

tolls during the continuance of the treaty, and consequently may embarrass

the assertion of our right to be released therefrom. There are also other

provisions in the treaty which ought to be modified. It was to remain in

force for ten years and until one year after either party should give

notice to the other of intention to terminate it. I deem it expedient that

the contemplated notice should be given to the Government of Denmark.

The naval expedition dispatched about two years since for the purpose of

establishing relations with the Empire of Japan has been ably and

skillfully conducted to a successful termination by the officer to whom it

was intrusted. A treaty opening certain of the ports of that populous

country has been negotiated, and in order to give full effect thereto it

only remains to exchange ratifications and adopt requisite commercial

regulations.

The treaty lately concluded between the United States and Mexico settled

some of our most embarrassing difficulties with that country, but numerous

claims upon it for wrongs and injuries to our citizens remained unadjusted,

and many new cases have been recently added to the former list of

grievances. Our legation has been earnest in its endeavors to obtain from

the Mexican Government a favorable consideration of these claims, but

hitherto without success. This failure is probably in some measure to be

ascribed to the disturbed condition of that country. It has been my anxious

desire to maintain friendly relations with the Mexican Republic and to

cause its rights and territories to be respected, not only by our citizens,

but by foreigners who have resorted to the United States for the purpose of

organizing hostile expeditions against some of the States of that Republic.

The defenseless condition in which its frontiers have been left has

stimulated lawless adventurers to embark in these enterprises and greatly

increased the difficulty of enforcing our obligations of neutrality.

Regarding it as my solemn duty to fulfill efficiently these obligations not

only toward Mexico, but other foreign nations, I have exerted all the

powers with which I am invested to defeat such proceedings and bring to

punishment those who by taking a part therein violated our laws. The energy

and activity of our civil and military authorities have frustrated the

designs of those who meditated expeditions of this character except in two

instances. One of these, composed of foreigners, was at first countenanced

and aided by the Mexican Government itself, it having been deceived as to

their real object. The other, small in number, eluded the vigilance of the

magistrates at San Francisco and succeeded in reaching the Mexican

territories; but the effective measures taken by this Government compelled

the abandonment of the undertaking.

The commission to establish the new line between the United States and

Mexico, according to the provisions of the treaty of the 30th of December

last, has been organized, and the work is already commenced.

Our treaties with the Argentine Confederation and with the Republics of

Uruguay and Paraguay secure to us the free navigation of the river La Plata

and some of its larger tributaries, but the same success has not attended

our endeavors to open the Amazon. The reasons in favor of the free use of

that river I had occasion to present fully in a former message, and,

considering the cordial relations which have long existed between this

Government and Brazil, it may be expected that pending negotiations will

eventually reach a favorable result.

Convenient means of transit between the several parts of a country are not

only desirable for the objects of commercial and personal communication,

but essential to its existence under one government. Separated, as are the

Atlantic and Pacific coasts of the United States, by the whole breadth of

the continent, still the inhabitants of each are closely bound together by

community of origin and institutions and by strong attachment to the Union.

Hence the constant and increasing intercourse and vast interchange of

commercial productions between these remote divisions of the Republic. At

the present time the most practicable and only, commodious routes for

communication between them are by the way of the isthmus of Central

America. It is the duty of the Government to secure these avenues against

all danger of interruption.

In relation to Central America, perplexing questions existed between the

United States and Great Britain at the time of the cession of California.

These, as well as questions which subsequently arose concerning

interoceanic communication across the Isthmus, were, as it was supposed,

adjusted by the treaty of April 19, 1850, but, unfortunately, they have

been reopened by serious misunderstanding as to the import of some or its

provisions, a readjustment of which is now under consideration. Our

minister at London has made strenuous efforts to accomplish this desirable

object, but has not yet found it possible to bring the negotiations to a

termination.

As incidental to these questions, I deem it proper to notice an occurrence

which happened in Central America near the close of the last session of

Congress. So soon as the necessity was perceived of establishing

interoceanic communications across the Isthmus a company was organized,

under the authority of the State of Nicaragua, but composed for the most

part of citizens of the United States, for the purpose of opening such a

transit way by the river San Juan and Lake Nicaragua, which soon became an

eligible and much used route in the transportation of our citizens and

their property between the Atlantic and Pacific. Meanwhile, and in

anticipation of the completion and importance of this transit way, a number

of adventurers had taken possession of the old Spanish port at the mouth of

the river San Juan in open defiance of the State or States of Central

America, which upon their becoming independent had rightfully succeeded to

the local sovereignty and jurisdiction of Spain. These adventurers

undertook to change the name of the place from San Juan del Norte to

Greytown, and though at first pretending to act as the subjects of the

fictitious sovereign of the Mosquito Indians, they subsequently repudiated

the control of any power whatever, assumed to adopt a distinct political

organization, and declared themselves an independent sovereign state. If at

some time a faint hope was entertained that they might become a stable and

respectable community, that hope soon vanished. They proceeded to assert

unfounded claims to civil jurisdiction over Punta Arenas, a position on the

opposite side of the river San Juan, which was in possession, under a title

wholly independent of them, of citizens of the United States interested in

the Nicaragua Transit Company, and which was indispensably necessary to the

prosperous operation of that route across the Isthmus. The company resisted

their groundless claims, whereupon they proceeded to destroy some of its

buildings and attempted violently to dispossess it.

At a later period they organized a strong force for the purpose of

demolishing the establishment at Punta Arenas, but this mischievous design

was defeated by the interposition of one of our ships of war at that time

in the harbor of San Juan. Subsequently to this, in May last, a body of men

from Greytown crossed over to Punta Arenas, arrogating authority to arrest

on the charge of murder a captain of one of the steamboats of the Transit

Company. Being well aware that the claim to exercise jurisdiction there

would be resisted then, as it had been on previous occasions, they went

prepared to assert it by force of arms. Our minister to Central America

happened to be present on that occasion. Believing that the captain of the

steamboat was innocent (for he witnessed the transaction on which the

charge was founder), and believing also that the intruding party, having no

jurisdiction over the place where they proposed to make the arrest, would

encounter desperate resistance if they persisted in their purpose, he

interposed, effectually, to prevent violence and bloodshed. The American

minister afterwards visited Greytown, and whilst he was there a mob,

including certain of the so-called public functionaries of the place,

surrounded the house in which he was, avowing that they had come to arrest

him by order of some person exercising the chief authority. While parleying

with them he was wounded by a missile from the crowd. A boat dispatched

from the American steamer Northern Light to release him from the perilous

situation in which he was understood to be was fired into by the town guard

and compelled to return. These incidents, together with the known character

of the population of Greytown and their excited state, induced just

apprehensions that the lives and property of our citizens at Punta Arenas

would be in imminent danger after the departure of the steamer, with her

passengers, for New York, unless a guard was left for their protection. For

this purpose, and in order to insure the safety of passengers and property

passing over the route, a temporary force was organized, at considerable

expense to the United States, for which provision was made at the last

session of Congress.

This pretended community, a heterogeneous assemblage gathered from various

countries, and composed for the most part of blacks and persons of mixed

blood, had previously given other indications of mischievous and dangerous

propensities. Early in the same month property was clandestinely abstracted

from the depot of the Transit Company and taken to Greytown. The plunderers

obtained shelter there and their pursuers were driven back by its people,

who not only protected the wrongdoers and shared the plunder, but treated

with rudeness and violence those who sought to recover their property.

Such, in substance, are the facts submitted to my consideration, and proved

by trustworthy evidence. I could not doubt that the case demanded the

interposition of this Government. Justice required that reparation should

be made for so many and such gross wrongs, and that a course of insolence

and plunder, tending directly to the insecurity of the lives of numerous

travelers and of the rich treasure belonging to our citizens passing over

this transit way, should be peremptorily arrested. Whatever it might be in

other respects, the community in question, in power to do mischief, was not

despicable. It was well provided with ordnance, small arms, and ammunition,

and might easily seize on the unarmed boats, freighted with millions of

property, which passed almost daily within its reach. It did not profess to

belong to any regular government, and had, in fact, no recognized

dependence on or connection with anyone to which the United States or their

injured citizens might apply for redress or which could be held responsible

in any way for the outrages committed. Not standing before the world in the

attitude of an organized political society, being neither competent to

exercise the rights nor to discharge the obligations of a government, it

was, in fact, a marauding establishment too dangerous to be disregarded and

too guilty to pass unpunished, and yet incapable of being treated in any

other way than as a piratical resort of outlaws or a camp of savages

depredating on emigrant trains or caravans and the frontier settlements of

civilized states.

Seasonable notice was given to the people of Greytown that this Government

required them to repair the injuries they had done to our citizens and to

make suitable apology for their insult of our minister, and that a ship of

war would be dispatched thither to enforce compliance with these demands.

But the notice passed unheeded. Thereupon a commander of the Navy, in

charge of the sloop of war Cyane, was ordered to repeat the demands and to

insist upon a compliance therewith. Finding that neither the populace nor

those assuming to have authority over them manifested any disposition to

make the required reparation, or even to offer excuse for their conduct, he

warned them by a public proclamation that if they did not give satisfaction

within a time specified he would bombard the town. By this procedure he

afforded them opportunity to provide for their personal safety. To those

also who desired to avoid loss of property in the punishment about to be

inflicted on the offending town he furnished the means of removing their

effects by the boats of his own ship and of a steamer which he procured and

tendered to them for that purpose. At length, perceiving no disposition on

the part of the town to comply with his requisitions, he appealed to the

commander of Her Britannic Majesty's schooner Bermuda, who was seen to have

intercourse and apparently much influence with the leaders among them, to

interpose and persuade them to take some course calculated to save the

necessity of resorting to the extreme measure indicated in his

proclamation; but that officer, instead of acceding to the request, did

nothing more than to protest against the contemplated bombardment. No steps

of any sort were taken by the people to give the satisfaction required. No

individuals, if any there were, who regarded themselves as not responsible

for the misconduct of the community adopted any means to separate

themselves from the fate of the guilty. The several charges on which the

demands for redress were founded had been publicly known to all for some

time, and were again announced to them. They did not deny any of these

charges; they offered no explanation, nothing in extenuation of their

conduct, but contumaciously refused to hold any intercourse with the

commander of the Cyane. By their obstinate silence they seemed rather

desirous to provoke chastisement than to escape it. There is ample reason

to believe that this conduct of wanton defiance on their part is imputable

chiefly to the delusive idea that the American Government would be deterred

from punishing them through fear of displeasing a formidable foreign power,

which they presumed to think looked with complacency upon their aggressive

and insulting deportment toward the United States. The Cyane at length

fired upon the town. Before much injury had been done the fire was twice

suspended in order to afford opportunity for an arrangement, but this was

declined. Most of the buildings of the place, of little value generally,

were in the sequel destroyed, but, owing to the considerate precautions

taken by our naval commander, there was no destruction of life.

When the Cyane was ordered to Central America, it was confidently hoped and

expected that no occasion would arise for "a resort to violence and

destruction of property and loss of life." Instructions to that effect were

given to her commander; and no extreme act would have been requisite had

not the people themselves, by their extraordinary conduct in the affair,

frustrated all the possible mild measures for obtaining satisfaction. A

withdrawal from the place, the object of his visit entirely defeated, would

under the circumstances in which the commander of the Cyane found himself

have been absolute abandonment of all claim of our citizens for

indemnification and submissive acquiescence in national indignity. It would

have encouraged in these lawless men a spirit of insolence and rapine most

dangerous to the lives and property of our citizens at Punta Arenas, and

probably emboldened them to grasp at the treasures and valuable merchandise

continually passing over the Nicaragua route. It certainly would have been

most satisfactory to me if the objects of the Cyane's mission could have

been consummated without any act of public force, but the arrogant

contumacy of the offenders rendered it impossible to avoid the alternative

either to break up their establishment or to leave them impressed with the

idea that they might persevere with impunity in a career of insolence and

plunder.

This transaction has been the subject of complaint on the part of some

foreign powers, and has been characterized with more of harshness than of

justice. If comparisons were to be instituted, it would not be difficult to

present repeated instances in the history of states standing in the very

front of modern civilization where communities far less offending and more

defenseless than Greytown have been chastised with much greater severity,

and where not cities only have been laid in ruins, but human life has been

recklessly sacrificed and the blood of the innocent made profusely to

mingle with that of the guilty.

Passing from foreign to domestic affairs, your attention is naturally

directed to the financial condition of the country, always a subject of

general interest. For complete and exact information regarding the finances

and the various branches of the public service connected therewith I refer

you to the report of the Secretary of the Treasury, from which it will

appear that the amount of revenue during the last fiscal year from all

sources was $73,549,705, and that the public expenditures for the same

period, exclusive of payments on account of the public debt, amounted to

$51, 018,249. During the same period the payments made in redemption of the

public debt, including interest and premium, amounted to $24,336,380. To

the sum total of the receipts of that year is to be added a balance

remaining in the Treasury at the commencement thereof, amounting to

$21,942,892; and at the close of the same year a corresponding balance,

amounting to $20,137,967, of receipts above expenditures also remained in

the Treasury. Although, in the opinion of the Secretary of the Treasury,

the receipts of the current fiscal year are not likely to equal in amount

those of the last, yet they will undoubtedly exceed the amount of

expenditures by at least $15,000,000. I shall therefore continue to direct

that the surplus revenue be applied, so far as it can be judiciously and

economically done, to the reduction of the public debt, the amount of which

at the commencement of the last fiscal year was $67,340,628; of which there

had been paid on the 20th day of November, 1854, the sum of $22,365,172,

leaving a balance of outstanding public debt of only $44,975,456,

redeemable at different periods within fourteen years. There are also

remnants of other Government stocks, most of which are already due, and on

which the interest has ceased, but which have not yet been presented for

payment, amounting to $233,179. This statement exhibits the fact that the

annual income of the Government greatly exceeds the amount of its public

debt, which latter remains unpaid only because the time of payment has not

yet matured, and it can not be discharged at once except at the option of

public creditors, who prefer to retain the securities of the United States;

and the other fact, not less striking, that the annual revenue from all

sources exceeds by many millions of dollars the amount needed for a prudent

and economical administration of the Government.

State of the Union Addresses(#5022) · 第 3 / 10 段