CHAPTER IV

The Persian, sources of the compilation of Ibn Miskawaihi 54

Preponderance of the Persian element in the evolution of the Musalman

morals 57

The "Book of Adab" by Ibn al Muqaffa and other similar Arabic works 59

_IRANIAN COMPONENTS OF ADAB LITERATURE IN ARABIC_

At the head of works under the title of ethico didactic writings, which

have come down to us stands a group most characteristically denominated

_Adab ul Arab val Furs_ belonging to the pen of a writer of the 10th and

11th centuries, Ibn Miskawaihi whose name is pronounced in Persian Ibn

Mushkuya. At the basis of this collection lies the ancient Persian

pseudepigraphical book _Javidan khired_, or "Eternal wisdom." But in the

body of it there is a series of literary monuments of Sasanian

literature and its descendants.[1] The author is known, besides, by his

philosophical works, as a historian[2] and as such he is particularly

important for the history of the Buides.[3] And his Persian origin would

point to his sympathy for Persian literary tradition. As a matter of

fact, his ethico-didactic collection is based on a book of the Sasanian

epoch. It would appear that this circumstance has undoubted significance

for the determination of the influence in the compilation of Moslem

ethical ideals. However, in contradiction to this basal fact and

notwithstanding that in the province of the development of Islam as a

religion, Persian element played an important part,[4] the development

of the Moslem ethical tracts in contemporary literature, for the most

part, is dependent upon more antique, specially Greek, tradition. J.

Goldziher recognizing the importance of the influence of Parsism on

Islam says the exact demonstration of the dependence of these phenomena

on the culture historical facts, whose consequences they are, would be

the most interesting task which those studying Islam in its present

position can place before themselves. Many of the dominating views

regarding the original spirit of Islam would receive the needed

correction by such investigation.

[Footnote 1: On this work and its manuscripts see my _Material from Arab

sources_ 68-69.]

[Footnote 2: For Miskawaihi as a philosopher see Boer 116-119.]

[Footnote 3:--He was the treasurer and a close friend of the Buide

Adudad-Daula.]

[Footnote 4: For a general sketch of Moslem ethics in ancient times see

Carra de Vaux, _Gazali_, 129-142, and _Encyclopaedia of Islam_ 4,

244-246.]

Let us examine three points regarding the influence on Moslem morals and

general conduct. In the first place stand the moral writings of

ecclesiastical character. The morality is rooted in and based on the

moral of the Bible and then on the developed Moslem law and has absorbed

in itself some of the elements of the ethics of Christianity. In the

second place, there is a series of ethical documents of a most valued

nature in the shape of proverbs, dicta, maxims, fables, constituting a

kind of moral philosophy, often independent of each other, varied in

their character, and different as to time and the place of their

compositions. Here we may separate a certain stratum of Persian element,

and an analysis of them may reveal partly contemporary knowledge and

partly elements of foreign religious ethics. The third but not the last

place in importance is occupied by the Greek ethical tradition in which

latterly are discernible important Christian constituents. Recent

studies have yielded us as their result, this structure of Musalman

ethics. But it is to be noted that the theoretical deductions at first

sight do not find confirmation in facts. For we do not know which Greek

books on ethics were translated in the beginning of the period of the

scientific development of Islam, and for the support of our thesis we

have to point to the possibility of oral transmission of Hellenic

ethical tradition through Syriac scholars, although this circumstance

does not militate against our hypothesis. Besides a small amount of

translations from Greek ethical works, especially the books of

Aristotle, there are observed among the works embodied in this tradition

a series of pseudographs which, however, can have only an external

relation with the Greek sciences and which would rather lead to the

second group of the influences on Musalman ethical monuments namely, the

group of monuments of "Oriental wisdom." The most typical of the

pseudographical _wisaya_, or "Testaments" are ascribed to Aristotle,

Pythagoras, and others. To our mind, they are derived from Persian

tradition to the same extent, if not in a larger extent than from the

Christian. Actual studies demonstrate that the basal work for this epoch

was the book above-mentioned of Ibn Miskawaihi which as we saw above,

issued from Persian literary tradition. And the character of that

tradition can be explained from exterior circumstances without an

analysis of its contents. The fact is that Ibn Miskawaihi worked upon

that class of Persian material, for instance the _Pand Nameh_ or

_Andarz_, which had nothing to do with the province of the indefinite

gnomic literature but which had the character of a catechism and

therefore expresses a definite system of religious morals, the morals of

Parsism.[1] The appreciation of the influence of Parsism on Islam has

only just commenced. But we are already in a position to emphasise the

great influence, which Parsi ethics have exercised on Islam and this

influence has been attested by a number of Greek and Christian

witnesses. So far, for an acknowledgment of this influence serves a

purely external fact, namely, a glance at the bibliography of the

ancient ethico-didactic tracts in the Musalman literature and an

examination of the contents of the book of Ibn Muskawaihi. A number of

additional facts confirm this hypothesis.

[Footnote 1: For a general review of the morals of Parsism see A.V.W.

Jackson's G. I. Ph. Vol. II, 678-683.]

Well-known is the importance enjoyed in the beginning of the epoch of

the development of the Arabic Musalman literature, by the activities of

the Parsi Ibn al Muqaffa.[1] He is famous as the first commentator of

the Greek books on logic in Arabic literature, but he is particularly

renowned as the efficient supporter of the Persian literary tradition

and its translator into the Arabic literature. His rendering of _Kalila

and Dimma_ is well-known. It enjoys a prime role in the migration of

this collection of stories to the West. Well-known also is his

translation of the Persian book of _Khoday Nameh_,--that is, the

official chronicle of the Sasanian times and of the _Ain Nameh_, the

Institutes of the time. We shall have occasion to speak about these

books later on. To him also belong the books closely connected with the

Sasanian epoch, namely, the _Book of Mazdak_ the _Book of Taj_ to which

we shall refer further on. It is interesting that he is also the reputed

author of two books on Adab, perhaps among the most ancient ones in

Arabic literature.[2] One of these books called the Smaller was probably

contained in the other which is called the Larger and has the purely

Persian title of Mah farra Jushnas. (This is how the title is to be read

according to Hoffmann and Justi).[3] Since the interest of Muqaffa was

concentrated in the province of Persian culture it is indisputable that

his activity was not confined in this direction to one book and the

contents of the book have vestiges in a high degree of dependence on

Persian motifs. This is proved by a variety of circumstances. We have

descended to us his book called _Al Yatima_, a tract on that aspect of

morals which was especially diffused in the Sasanian epoch and was

devoted to politics and in form represented the species of writings

called Furstenspiegel.[4] A tradition of this kind of literature for

long continued to live in the Musalman writers and the typical

representative of the species seems to be the famous _Siyasat Nameh_, of

Nizam-ulmulk, the Saljuk Wazir. On some occasions it directly serves as

a source for the internal history of the Sasanian domination. It bears

particularly on didactic literature though it has been as yet very ill

studied from the comparative standpoint. The Sasanian influence is

perfectly obvious. Some portions of Al Yatima of Ibn Muqaffa may be

parallelled to corresponding remnants from Pahlavi literature in the

_Kabus Nameh_ and the _Siasat Nameh._[5] We know further that books

under the title of Persian Adab were spread among those who sympathised

with Mazdaism and Manichism in the circle of Moslem society.[6] These

books by their character were comparable to books on Mazdak but also to

Kalila wa Dimna.

[Footnote 1: Fihrist, 118, 18-29, and Ibn al Qifti's _Tarkh al hukama_

edited by Lippert, page 220, 1-10.]

[Footnote 2: Brockelmann, On the rhetorical writings of Ibn all Mukaffa,

Z.D.M.G. 53, 231-32.]

[Footnote 3: Hoffmann "Extracts from Syrian acts of Persian martyrs",

1880 page 289 note, and Justi, _Namenbuch_ 186.]

[Footnote 4: Precise information regarding its contents is rather to be

found in Ibn al Qifti than in the _Fihrist_. In the former the heading

is _Fi taat us Sultan_, in the latter _Fi rasail._ See _La perle

incomparable ou_ l'art du parfait courtisane de Abdallah ibn al-Muqaffa,

1906. See the French translation from the Dutch rendering of this

tract.]

[Footnote 5: On the political ideas of the latter see Pizzi, Le idee

politiche di Nizam-ul-Mulk G.S.A. 1., 131-141.]

[Footnote 6: Tabari "Annales" Vol. 3, 1309, 9-15, and Browne A literary

History of Persia, 1, 332.]

Besides Muqaffa a number of writers of the epoch of the development of

Arabic Musalman literature interested themselves in themes connected

with Persian antiquities. One of them, Aban Ibn Abdul Humiad ar Rakashi

otherwise known as Aban al-Lahiki chose a number of themes from ancient

Persian literature and according to the Fihrist versified them (119,

1-6-163, 7-10). Such subjects were--_Kalila and Dimna,_ the _Book of

Barlaam and Yuasef, the Book of Sindbad_, the _Book of Mazdak_ and

finally books on two popular representative of the Sasanian dynasty,

namely, the _Book of the acts of Ardasher_ and the _Book of the acts of

Anushirvan._[1]

[Footnote 1: Versification of the history of Anushirvan is also to be

met with in later Parsi literature, see, Sachau, Contribution to the

knowledge of the Parsi literature, J.R.A.S. 1870 page 258.]

Another author, Ahmed Ibn Tahir Taifur, wrote according the Fihrist

(146, 21) a special Book of Hormuz son of Kisra Anushirvan.[1] No doubt,

further more, writers of Persian origin followed in their books on

_Adab_ Persian models. Such probably was the book of Adab by an author

whose name has been mutilated in the Fihrist (139, 15, 18). There is

another class of writings which bears relation to this one and which is

mentioned in the Fihrist. It is quite possible that on this literary

Persian tradition, were based also some of the tracts under the title of

"_Books on counsels_" a considerable number of which we meet with in the

Fihrist.[2]

[Footnote 1: See the essay of Baron Rosen on the anthology of Ahmed Ibn

Abi Tahir.]

[Footnote 2: 78, 15; 105, 10; 293, 12; 204, 17-18; 204, 29; 207, 21;

210, 23; 212, 22-23; 217, 4-5; 220, 25; 222, 14; 234, 23; 281, 20; 282,

5.]

Ethico-didactical treatises in the form of counsels, maxima or

testaments, constitute a singular group of literary mementos the genesis

of which in the Musalman literature maybe established only after an

examination of similar books in the Persian writings of the Sasanian

times. Examples of a like class of testaments, literary compilations

under the title, for the most part, of pseudo-graphs going up to

pre-Moslem period we have already noticed in the _Book of the counsels

of Ardasher_ and the _Pand Nameh_ of Kisra Anushirvan.

Iranian Influence on Moslem Literature, Part I · 第 4 / 8 章