I then went to the Sœurs de la Charité, and soon found myself in

their secrétariat, engaged among a number of sisters in copying M.

Hervé's attestation. It was enclosed in a sort of pastoral letter of

M. l'Abbé Etienne to the sisters throughout the world, dated 31st May,

1848; expressing his confidence that the bark of S. Vincent would

weather the storm of this revolution as it had the last of 1830, if

they were faithful to their rules, and fulfilled their ministry with

zeal. I found likewise that, three days after this cure, there had

been another of a person afflicted with blindness for seven months,

and I determined to go into this case likewise. The sisters went to

the Benediction at five: soon after I followed them to their chapel.

It was a most touching sight to see so large a number of sisters and

novices in worship together before the Host. Here then, I thought,

were before me so many female hearts offering up to God daily the

sacrifice of themselves in works of charity; they have made the

voluntary surrender of the pleasures of home, of feelings dearest to

the natural man; there is no holding back in their offering: it is

complete, and penetrated with charity. Here are hundreds kneeling

in front of me who dedicate their labours to the hospital and

the sick bed, going forth into all lands, and making the healing of

the body a means to cure the soul. If ever there was any institution

on which the sunlight of God's countenance may be supposed to rest, it

is surely this.

It was settled that I should return on Monday to continue my extract.

M. Defresne told me this morning that the Pères Lazaristes possess a

great number of S. Vincent's letters in MS., giving the most minute

directions as to cases of conscience and details of practice, which

were written to his fathers during his long experience, and which show

the most marvellous knowledge of the heart and the most acute

practical judgment. It is an instance of his wisdom that he directed

the sisters for thirty years by word of mouth, and at last wrote down

for them the rules which he had found work efficiently in that time. A

real constitution exists before it is written, just as model French

constitutions cease to exist before the ink which enunciates their

principles is dry.

M. des Billiers told me to-day of an old French Legitimist of

distinction, who, like most of his party, refrained for a long time

from exercising the franchise after Louis Philippe's accession,

because it involved an oath of fidelity to him. They found at length

the inconvenience of this, when they wanted to elect a Legitimist

deputy; and the old man was much pressed to take the oath. He refused

for a long time, but at length said he would go. As his purpose became

known, and he was much respected and looked up to, there was much

expectation at the polling-place what he would do. When called upon to

take the oath, he said, "M. le Président, allow me to tell you a

story. I remember being with his Majesty, Louis XVIII., King of

France, when a young prince came before him, confessed his faults,

and, falling at his feet, promised an unalterable fidelity. We all

know how that prince has kept his oath. Now I promise and swear,

(repeating the formulary of the oath), fidelity to Louis Philippe, and

I will keep my oath as he kept his." Every one was convulsed with

laughter, and the President could hardly stifle his: but he intimated

that he could not allow the oath to be taken with that reservation.

The old man repeated it again, by itself, but the effect had been

produced, and every one saw with what purpose he took it.

But who can regret that so foul a villany as the supplanting a king, a

kinsman, and a benefactor, has met with retribution even on earth?

_Sunday, July 30._--I have just heard at S. Roch a sermon which

lasted more than an hour and a quarter, delivered, for the most part,

with great rapidity, and a vehemence of tone and action which would

have frightened an English audience. The preacher, l'Abbé

Du----, showed very considerable power both of thought and expression.

I should have preferred a less rhetorical display, both in manner and

matter. But power there certainly was. "My thoughts are not your

thoughts, saith the Lord." He began by saying we were all under the

reign of a sophism; this sophism was, under a great variety of shapes,

the preferring the present life to the future. He then dwelt with

great force and beauty on our Saviour's life on earth, that He was

God, and that He was a carpenter; that He worked for his daily bread.

Now God can do nothing but what is perfectly good and wise; therefore,

when He assumed this servile condition, it was a work of perfect

wisdom and goodness. He came to do His Father's will. And this one

condition runs through all degrees of human society, alone making them

acceptable to God,--to do God's will. Glory, genius, success, the

wonder and admiration of our fellow men; all this is nothing. To do

the will of God will alone open the kingdom of heaven--Jesus Christ

stands ready to open the kingdom of heaven to generation after

generation of those who, sealed by the fore-knowledge of God, and

working with His grace, do His will--and to those alone. There was no

key to the present state of things, to these terrible conflicts, this

incessant agitation, but one; that life was but a day's labour,

an hour's--nothing in comparison of eternity. This life was not the

proper condition of humanity. It was fallen--the Saviour's proper work

was to restore it to its normal condition; but that normal condition

can never be here. Here it is a work of reparation, slow, painful,

full of obstacles in proportion to the depth of the fall, but always

merciful. Who would give a patient the full nourishment which he could

take in health? Now, here we are all patients of Jesus--all--and to

our latest moment. We shall never return to our normal condition on

earth, but in eternity. You are all workmen and workwomen; idleness is

a capital sin--idleness will shut out from heaven--Jesus Christ has

taught us to work, every one in his estate. The work is one, though

the condition may vary,--to do God's will. It will not be asked us

whether we had genius, skill, power to embrace the works of God in our

thought; but one thing only will be asked us,--whether we have done

our work; that very work which God set us,--to do His will. And this

is why society is suffering now to its utmost depths. This world is

made the end, the limit, the object, the reward--eternity is put out

of sight. "On a ôté Jesus Christ au travailleur de la pensée, au

travailleur de l'art, au travailleur de la terre. Et nous souffrons,

nous souffrons tous--nous allons de souffrances en souffrances." Thus

the question of labour is insoluble. Men think of repaying the

young girl's sacrifice who works day and night for the support of her

parents; who denies herself every gratification to which she might

innocently aspire, with a little more wages--or the mother's tears,

who suffers for her family, or the father's continued exertions, with

a few pieces of money. Jesus Christ did not so: he assigned to labour

a far different reward--he would give it no reward at all on earth--he

would give it eternal life. He then drew a vivid picture of the

priest's life of toil, suffering, instruction, and benediction. What

was the end of this work? It was eternal life. The greater the

humiliation, the greater the suffering, the more absolute the cutting

off of all human sources of enjoyment or requital--the more the will

of God was done, the greater the reward in heaven. To man, no matter

what his condition on earth, or the powers of his mind, to man working

with grace and inspired by grace, the kingdom of heaven, according as

he has done the will of God, will be given. This, and this alone, is

the remedy for all the ills of society; and we are under the dominion

of a sophism, because this truth is set aside.

There was rather a numerous congregation, by far the greater part

women; not many persons of education, I should imagine--yet the sermon

in tone was far beyond the reach of any but the educated.

This morning at eight I was at Mass here, a short High Mass;

there were many communicants. But I have never been in a church so

inconvenient in one respect, there were hardly any prie-dieus; the

consequence is, that people sit nearly all the time, or just bend the

knee against their chair; it is no easy matter to kneel on the floor,

so encumbered with chairs. I think there is far less reverence in the

outward demeanour of people at Paris than in the provinces.

Went to the evening service at Notre Dame des Victoires: I wished to

be present at one of the meetings of the Archiconfrérie du très-saint

Cœur de Marie. There was a large congregation, which at length

filled the church: some thirty or forty members round the altar of the

Blessed Virgin; of the rest nine-tenths at least were women of the

lower classes. Vespers were sung, the congregation joining with

remarkable unanimity. This indeed gives a particular and most pleasing

character to the service of the Archiconfrérie. Then the Abbé des

Genettes, founder of the brotherhood, a silver-haired old man, mounted

the pulpit, and spoke in the most familiar and practical manner on the

text "Beware of false prophets." His manner was in calmness the very

opposite of that of this morning's preacher. He contrasted the

disobedience to parents which now prevailed, the debauchery and

wickedness all around them, with what he had known fifty or sixty

years ago. They had been struck for this, and the rod was still

suspended over their heads; he besought them to repent. When this was

over, he read from a paper requests for the prayers of the

Archiconfrérie for so many men, so many women, parishes, bishops, &c.;

among which I heard in immediate juxtaposition "270 Protestants, 69

Jews." He likewise read a letter of thanks for their prayers, to which

was attributed the conversion of a desperate sinner, and such letters

he said he was receiving every week. He implored them to be very

fervent in their prayers for the objects named to them. There would be

in the week, he said, three especial days: Tuesday, the feast of St.

Peter _in vinculis_. He read them the account of this from the Acts.

It struck me, from the attention with which they listened to this,

that they were not accustomed to read it. He then passed to the Pope,

as successor of St. Peter, who was now, it might be said, in a sort of

moral captivity. He earnestly and repeatedly besought their prayers

for him, who was suffering at the hands of ungrateful subjects on whom

he had showered benefactions. Not that the bark of St. Peter could

ever be overwhelmed by the waves: it was secure by the divine promise;

but they might so far persecute the Pope as to gain for him the crown

of martyrdom. More than twenty times since his accession the Holy

Father had commended himself to their prayers by means of

persons coming from Rome. They should all now pray for him every day.

He should be in his confessional that day at six A.M., for several

hours; again from half-past-two till five; and from seven till nine,

in order that they might prepare themselves for the plenary indulgence

attached to this Church on Thursday. He notified likewise a fresh

religious service, for the soul of the late archbishop, on Monday, 7th

August, at Notre Dame. They should all pray earnestly for the holy

archbishop: it may be that he had washed out with his blood his sins,

and needed not their prayers; but they should pray for him. He then

descended for the benediction. The whole congregation seemed to have

one heart and one voice in the hymns which followed. This service

lasted from seven to half-past-nine, and was very interesting.

_Monday, July 31._--Went to the Père de Ravignan. He told me that,

since our last conversation, he had been looking in "Tournely," where

he found a passage on the primacy of jurisdiction, which seemed to him

quite convincing. He gave me a note for the Père Lacordaire, but my

visit was cut short by an appointment, so he begged me to come again.

Went to M. des Billiers: he attacked me again on the primacy of

jurisdiction. I said that the Ultramontane theory, when pushed to its

absolute issue, demanded the infallibility of the Pope singly; that,

indeed, this was involved in the primacy of jurisdiction; that

the Pope had exerted the supreme power of withdrawing their authority

from the French bishops when it seemed to him for the good of the

Church. He did not like to admit that the primacy of jurisdiction

involved infallibility, because infallibility of the Pope is not a

dogma. But here lies precisely the difficulty of their position. Roman

Catholics want, for the completion and impregnability of their system,

the infallibility of the single papal chair, and this is precisely

what has been ever denied by large schools among them, and is not even

now an article of faith. For that they are the universal Church, that

their dogma alone is true, that the Greek and every other communion is

heretical or schismatical, or both, all this depends on the

infallibility of the single papal chair. I said that, if they would

prove the Greek Church to be in schism, I should give up our cause.

We went to see M. Gabet, at the Pères Lazaristes, who has been ten

years in Central Tartary, or Thibet; gone through great dangers and

privations; has come back safe; and is going out again. He was with a

brother missionary, who remains at Macao till he rejoins him. His

account of Thibet is most interesting, and in many respects very

surprising. They have many Catholic practices there--such as holy

water, the religious celibate. The Lamas, or priests, are very

numerous. Two-thirds of the men of the country live in religious

celibacy; and he believes that this is a real celibacy. He and his

companions lived for six months in a great community of 5000 lamas;

they were, perhaps, of ten different nations, and spoke four different

languages. During that time they had not observed the least

impropriety among them. They are religious, pray much, and have a

complete contempt for those who do not pray. Faire l'esprit fort among

them is a sure way to be thought little of. But this religion is very

superstitious: they have not the power to choose what they should

embrace and what refuse; they have the instinct and the need of

religion very strong, but not discernment of what is true religion.

Thus, if you read to them the Gospel, they will adore Jesus Christ,

Pilate, Caiaphas, &c. Theirs is not an "incroyance raisonnée" like

Protestantism, but a cloud of superstition which obscures their sight.

He anticipated that Christianity would make large progress among them,

because of their religious spirit. There is as yet no religious

establishment in Thibet. All over Asia the ministers of religion

observe continence. The character of priest and married man is to

their notions incompatible. They look for a complete denial of self in

one who would teach them religion. There are no laws against foreign

religions in Thibet, as there are in China. A great number of the

female sex also live in continence, though not so many as of

men. I asked him how he accounted for the connexion between so many of

their usages and Catholicity. He said some were of opinion that they

had derived them from Catholicism; but as they are exceedingly

tenacious of their rites, he did not himself think this: others again

thought that Catholicism had borrowed from them. Neither of these

views was necessary. There was no trace whatever of Christian

missionaries having been among them. He thought that all the

resemblance which was to be found in their rites, customs, and belief,

might be accounted for as relics of the one true faith communicated to

all the world originally, and handed down by tradition. This faith had

been guarded in its purity among the Jews by a written law, and other

institutions: but other nations had possessed it likewise, and

retained it more or less corrupted. They had no bloody sacrifices, but

offered wine, water, corn, and especially paper. He had been well

treated on the whole: they had converted two Lamas--one of these had

lately written to him: he had sent the letter to the Society for

Propagation of the Faith at Lyons, for he believed there was no one in

France who understood the Mongolese language. That of Thibet is taken

from Sanscrit; but the continuous line above the letters which exists

in the latter language is broken at each letter in this. But the

strangest thing of all is the Grand Lama, who is at once High Priest,

King, and Divinity. They believe in the transmigration of souls, and

suppose that Buddha continually becomes incarnate for the redemption

of man. When the Grand Lama dies, they wait till a successor is made

known to them. And here M. Gabet said that, allowing for some

jugglery, it was impossible not to conclude that there was diabolic

agency at work. The present Grand Lama is a boy of ten years old; the

son of a poor woodcutter 600 leagues from the Grand Lama's residence.

The Grand Lama is discovered by a child of a few months or a year old

announcing that he is the Grand Lama who died--that his soul has

passed to him. Thereupon the most particular inquiries are made. A

commission is sent to the spot, and the utensils used by the late

Grand Lama are put among a number of others just like them; they then

demand of the infant which belonged to the Grand Lama, and he replies,

this and this was mine. Were this merely an arrangement of the men in

power, would not have chosen the son of a poor man, at a great

distance. They had not been, it is true, ocular witnesses of these

things; but from what he had heard, he could not doubt that there were

"des prestiges diaboliques." Under the Grand Lama there is a king for

the management of temporal matters, and four ministers; these conduct

matters in an interregnum. They had lived in intimacy with one

of these four ministers. The missionary in these countries must be

prepared for the most absolute self-denial--he must carry his life in

his hand. He noticed that throughout Hindostan the religious

indifference of the Europeans (save the Spaniards and Portuguese)

injured them exceedingly in the opinion of the natives. With them

religion is a first need of life: it does not matter so much what

religion it is--to pray is sufficient; but a man who does not

pray,--who has apparently no religion at all--is one of the lowest of

beings in their eyes. The English might save themselves an immense

expense if they showed themselves devoted to their religion instead of

indifferent.

M. Gabet has a very pleasing countenance: moustache and long beard,

plentifully mixed with grey hairs. He looks in vigorous health. Yet

when he went to the East he was delicate. He believes that the

constitution adapts itself to the rigours of climate. The cold of

Tartary is intense. From this high table land the rivers of Hindostan,

China, and Siberia all take their sources. They slept continually on

the earth; up to midnight, while the body was warmed with the day's

exercise, they maintained some heat, but from that time to the morning

they froze. Their only nourishment was wheat or oats, moistened with a

little tea. He is going back to Great Tartary. We had no introduction,

but nothing could exceed his readiness to hear and answer our

inquiries: and he offered to give us again any information in his

power.

We got from him the address of the young person who was cured of her

blindness in the chapel of S. Vincent on the 12th May, three days

after the former cure of the neck. We drove at once to see her at one

of the houses of the Sisters of Charity, Rue de l'Arbalète, 25. We

told the Sister who received us for what purpose we were come; she

assented to it, went out, and brought back immediately the young girl.

She is fourteen; very simple and homely in appearance, and looks the

daughter of a peasant. She said, in answer to our questions, that it

was hearing of the other cure which put it in her thoughts to go to

S. Vincent's chapel, and ask for his intercession. She was taken there

on Friday, May 12th, at 6¼ a.m., by the Sister who was then with us. I

asked her if she could see at all in going there. She replied, "Not

the least." She knelt and assisted at the Mass, but nothing took

place; but "as soon as I received our Lord, I saw perfectly." "Could

you not see at all the instant before?" "Not at all." "And the instant

after you saw perfectly?" "Yes." "The cure did not come then by

degrees?" "No; it was instantaneous." The disease called amaurosis had

subsisted from the month of September before; and every variety

of cure having been tried in vain, all treatment had been given up for

a month previously. It was accompanied with violent pains in the head.

Since the cure she has seen perfectly: she appears to be quite free

from any disease in the eyes now. While she and the Sister were gone

to the chapel, the rest united themselves at home at Mass in intention

for her cure. I said I was going to copy the account of this at the

Rue du Bac, when the Sister offered me a MS. copy, which would save me

that trouble. And, as it contained the report of the physician who had

attended her, we took it at once to get his signature, Rue Mouffetard,

94. He was out, but his wife received us, and it was settled that I

should come to-morrow, between twelve and one, when he would be at

home. The testimony of this young girl was so clear that I saw no

possibility of doubting the effect produced.

I dined with Mr. Coppinger and his two sons: since 1824, he has

resided here. The account they give of the irreligion of the

shop-keeping class, and of the wretched education which has tainted

the springs of French society, is terrible. They said by far the

greater number of men at Paris dine away from home in public places,

and often leave their wives and families to fare poorly at home, while

they themselves feast at a restaurateur's. It appears that on the

Sunday night of the last émeute the alarm at Paris was extreme:

the rebels were thought to have the best of it; and it was their known

intention to sack the quarter of the Tuileries and the Chaussée

d'Antin. They think that the present state of things cannot last: but

what is to come nobody can tell.

Journal in France in 1845 and 1848 with Letters from Italy in 1847 Of Things and Persons Concerning the Church and Education · 第 14 / 27 段