A Dominican, born in Alsace, in 1491, who early embraced the tenets of

Luther. He afterwards inclined more to the opinions of Zuinglius, and, in

his zeal for the reformation, attempted in vain to reconcile these two

powerful leaders. For twenty years, his eloquence was exerted at Strasburg

to establish the Protestant cause; but the turbulence of the times, and

his opposition to the views of the Catholics at Augsburg, rendered him

unpopular, so that he received with pleasure the invitations of Cranmer to

settle in England. He was received with gratitude by the nation. Edward

VI. treated him with great kindness, and he was appointed theological

professor at Cambridge, in 1549, where he died two years after. Five years

after, the persecutions of Mary were extended to his remains, which were

ignominiously burned; but the insult was repaired by the good sense of

Elizabeth. In learning, judgment, and moderation, Bucer was inferior to

none of the great reformers, and, with Melancthon, he may be considered as

the best calculated to restore and maintain unanimity among contending

churches and opposite sects. His writings, in Latin and German, were very

numerous, and all on theological subjects.

Philip Melancthon.

A celebrated reformer, born 16th February, 1497, at Bretten, in the

Palatinate of the Rhine. His father’s name was Schwartserdt, which

signifies _black earth_; but the word was changed, according to the

affectation of the times, by his friend Reuchlin, into Melancthon, which,

in Greek, expresses the same meaning. He studied at Bretten, Pfortsheim,

and Heidelberg, and with such success that, at thirteen, he wrote a comedy

of some merit. He left Heidelberg in 1512, because he was refused a degree

on account of his youth, and then passed to Tubingen, where he resided for

six years, and gave public lectures on Virgil, Terence, and other

classics. In 1518, by the recommendation of his friend Reuchlin, he was

appointed, by the elector of Saxony, Greek professor at Wittemberg; and

here began that intimacy with Luther, which contributed so much to the

progress of the reformation. He was, in 1527, appointed by his patron, the

duke, to visit the churches of the electorate, and afterwards he was

employed in the arduous labors of preparing those articles of faith which

have received the name of the Augsburg Confession, because presented to

the emperor at the diet of that city. In the disputes which he maintained

in those days of controversial enmity, he displayed great candor and

mildness, which his friend Luther attributed more to a spirit of timidity,

than to the meekness of the Christian character. His moderation, as well

as his learning, was so universally acknowledged, that he received a

liberal invitation from Francis I. to come to France, to settle the

disputes of the Protestants; but through the interference of the duke of

Saxony, the offer was declined, as likewise a similar invitation from the

king of England. He was engaged in the various conferences which took

place on religious subjects at Frankfort, Reinspurg, Worms, Spires, and

Ratisbon, and every where evinced the deepest learning, the most peaceable

temper, and the strongest moderation. The character of the times, and not

inclination, rendered him a controversialist, and his answer to his mother

displayed the great and the good man. When asked by the aged woman, who

repeated before him her prayers in a simple but pious manner, what she

must believe in this great confusion of creeds; he replied, “Go on,

mother, to believe and pray as you have done, and never trouble yourself

about controversies.” He died at Wittemberg, 19th April, 1560, and was

buried by the side of his friend Luther, in the church of the castle.

Among the reasons which, on his death-bed, he assigned for considering

dissolution as happiness, he said that it delivered him from theological

persecutions. His works were very numerous, and, as they were written in

the midst of controversy and ecclesiastical avocations, they were not

always so correct in language, as they proved useful in advancing the

reformation. A chronological catalogue of these was published in 1582, and

they appeared altogether in four volumes, folio, at Wittemberg, 1601.

Peter Martyr.

A celebrated reformer and theologian, whose real name was Vermigli, was

born, in 1500, at Florence. He was originally an Augustine monk, and

became an eminent preacher, and prior of St. Fridian’s, at Lucca. Having,

however, embraced the Protestant doctrines, he found it necessary to quit

his native country. After having been for some time professor of divinity

at Strasburg, he was invited to England, and appointed professor of

theology at Oxford. He left England on the accession of Mary, and died in

1561, theological professor at Zurich. He wrote several works, of great

erudition, among which are Commentaries upon parts of the Scriptures. His

personal character is said to have been extremely amiable.

Henry Bullinger.

One of the early reformers, born in the canton of Zurich at Baumgarten, in

1504. The works of Melancthon converted him to Protestantism, and he

became closely connected with Zuinglius, to whom he succeeded as pastor of

Zurich. He was one of the authors of the Helvetic Confession, and assisted

Calvin in drawing up the formulary of 1549. Bullinger was a moderate and

conscientious man; and it is much to his honor that, on the ground of its

being inconsistent with Christianity for any one to hire himself out to

slaughter those who had never injured him, he successfully opposed a

treaty for supplying France with a body of Swiss mercenaries. He died in

1575. His printed works form ten folio volumes.

John Knox.

The great champion of the Scottish reformation was born, in 1505, at

Gifford, in East Lothian, and was educated at Haddington and St. Andrews.

After he was created master of arts, he taught philosophy, most probably

as a regent in one of the colleges of the university. His class became

celebrated, and he was considered as equalling, if not excelling, his

master in the subtilties of the dialectic art. About the same time,

although he had no interest but what was procured by his own merit, he was

advanced to clerical orders, and ordained a priest before he reached the

age fixed by the canons of the church. At this time, the fathers of the

Christian church, Jerome and Augustine, attracted his particular

attention. By the writings of the former, he was led to the Scriptures as

the only pure fountain of divine truth, and instructed in the utility of

studying them in the original languages. In the works of the latter he

found religious sentiments very opposite to those taught in the Romish

church, who, while she retained his name as a saint in her calendar, had

banished his doctrine as heretical from her pulpits. From this time he

renounced the study of scholastic theology; and, although not yet

completely emancipated from superstition, his mind was fitted for

improving the means which Providence had given for leading him to a fuller

and more comprehensive view of the system of evangelical religion. It was

about the year 1535, when this favorable change commenced; but it does not

appear that he professed himself a Protestant before the year 1542. He was

converted from the Romish faith by Wishart, and became a zealous preacher

of the new doctrines. Having been compelled to take shelter in the castle

of St. Andrews, he fell into the hands of the French in July, 1547, and

was carried with the garrison to France, where he remained a captive on

board of the galleys till 1549. Subsequent to his liberation, he was for a

short time chaplain to Edward VI., after which he visited Geneva and

Frankfort, and, in 1555, returned to his native country. After having for

twelve months labored actively and successfully to strengthen the

Protestant cause in Scotland, he revisited Geneva, where he remained till

1559. During his residence in Geneva, he published his “First Blast of the

Trumpet against the monstrous Government of Women”—a treatise which was

levelled against Mary of England, but which gave serious offence to

Elizabeth. From April, 1559, when he once more and finally set foot on

Scottish earth, till his decease, which took place November 24, 1572, the

reformed church was triumphant, and he was one of its most prominent,

admired, and honored leaders.

When his body was laid in the grave, the regent of Scotland emphatically

pronounced his eulogium, in the well-known words, “There lies he who never

feared the face of man.”

Knox has been styled the intrepid reformer; and that character he

unquestionably deserves. In personal intrepidity and popular eloquence he

resembled Luther. His doctrinal sentiments were those of Calvin; and, like

Zuinglius, he felt an attachment to the principles of religious liberty.

He effected much in the great work of the reformation; but his manners

were so severe, and his temper so acrid, that whilst he may be equally

respected with Luther and Melancthon, he is not equally beloved. Knox was,

however, known and beloved by the principal persons among the reformed in

France, Switzerland, and Germany; and the affectionate veneration in which

his memory was held in Scotland after his death, evinced that the

influence he possessed among his countrymen, during his life, was not

constrained, but founded on the high opinion which they entertained.

Banatyne has thus drawn his character, and it is unquestionably entitled

to consideration:—“In this manner,” says he, “departed this man of God;

the light of Scotland, the comfort of the church within the same, the

mirror of godliness, and pattern and example to all true ministers, in

purity of life, soundness of doctrine, and boldness in reproving of

wickedness; one that cared not for the favor of men, how great soever they

were.”

John Calvin.

A celebrated reformer, born at Noyon, in Picardy, 10th July, 1509. His

family name was _Cauvin_, which he Latinized into _Calvinus_. He was first

intended for the church, and, subsequently, for the profession of civil

law. Having embraced the principles of Protestantism, he was under the

necessity of quitting France; and he settled at Bâsle, where he published

his celebrated “Institutions of the Christian Religion.” After having

visited Italy, he was returning by the way of Geneva, in 1536, when Farel

and other reformers induced him to take up his abode in that city. He was

chosen one of the ministers of the gospel, and professor of divinity. A

dispute with the city authorities soon compelled him to leave Geneva, and

he withdrew to Strasburg; whence he was recalled in 1541. From the time of

his recall, he possessed almost absolute power at Geneva; and he exerted

himself vigorously in establishing the Presbyterian form of church

government. The reformer, who so loudly exclaimed against the tyranny of

Rome, directed the whole torrent of his persecution against Servetus, a

physician, who had in an ambiguous style written upon the Trinity; and his

vengeance was not appeased till the unfortunate heretic had expired in the

flames. He died May 26, 1564; and, though he had long enjoyed a high

reputation and exercised an unbounded authority, he left only three

hundred crowns to his heirs, including his library, the books of which

sold afterwards at a great price. The works of Calvin were printed in

twelve volumes, folio, Geneva, and in nine, Amsterdam, in 1667.

Jerome Zanchius.

A native of Alzano, who entered in the congregation of the Lateran canons.

He embraced the tenets of the Protestants by the conversation of Peter

Martyr, who was of the same establishment; and, afraid of persecution, he

retired, 1553, to Strasburg, where he taught divinity and the philosophy

of Aristotle. He quitted Strasburg, in 1563, for Chiavene, and, in 1568,

removed to Heidelberg, where he was appointed professor of theology, and

where he died 19th November, 1590, aged eighty-four. He was author of

“Commentaries on St. Paul’s Epistles,” and other works, published together

at Geneva, in eight volumes, folio, 1613. In his character he was a man of

moderation, learned, benevolent, and pious.

Theodore Beza.

one of the most eminent of the reformers, was born at Vezelai, in the

Nivernois, in 1519, and was originally a Catholic, and intended for the

law. At the age of twenty, he gained an unenviable reputation by the

composition of Latin poetry which was at once elegant and licentious, and

which, some years afterwards, he published under the title of “Juvenile

Poems.” Though not in orders, he possessed benefices of considerable

value. These, however, he abandoned in 1548, and retired to Geneva, where

he publicly abjured Popery. To this he was induced by his having

meditated, during illness, upon the doctrines which he had heard from his

Protestant tutor, Melchior Wolmar; and perhaps also, in some measure, by

his attachment to a lady, whom he carried with him to Geneva, and married.

He now accepted the Greek professorship at Lausanne, which he held for ten

years. It was while he was thus occupied that he produced his tragedy of

“Abraham’s Sacrifice,” his version of the New Testament, and his hateful

defence of the right of the magistrate to punish heretics. In 1559, he

removed to Geneva, and became the colleague of Calvin, through whom he was

appointed rector of the academy, and theological professor. Two years

after this, he took a prominent part in the conference at Poissy, and was

present at the battle of Dreux. He returned to Geneva in 1563, succeeded

Calvin in his offices and influence, and was thenceforward considered as

the head of the Calvinistic church. After an exceedingly active life, he

died on the 13th of October, 1605.

Leo X.

Pope JOHN DE MEDICI, the son of the illustrious Lorenzo, was born in 1475,

at Florence, and was nominated a cardinal in his thirteenth year. In 1505,

he was made governor of Perugia; was intrusted with the command of the

Papal army in 1511; and was made prisoner, in the following year, at the

battle of Ravenna. He attained the Papal crown in 1513, on the death of

Julius II. He died in 1521. Leo was one of the most munificent patrons of

learning and of the arts; but he was prodigal, and on some occasions

grossly violated the principles of justice. To his shameless sale of

indulgences, to raise money to complete St. Peter’s Church at Rome, and

other extravagances, the world is indebted for the reformation of the

church by Luther and others.

Justin.

Surnamed the MARTYR, one of the fathers of the church, was born at

Neapolis, anciently Sichem, in Palestine, and was a philosopher of the

Platonic school. He is believed to have preached the gospel in Italy, Asia

Minor, and Egypt. He was beheaded at Rome, in 165. Of his works, the

principal are two Apologies for the Christians.

Arius.

Founder of the sect of the Arians, was an African by birth. Disappointment

made him a sectary. He propagated the opinion that the Word was not a

divine person; and the heresy, though condemned by various councils,

gained followers, and excited schisms in the Roman empire. The Nicene

creed was drawn up to combat his errors. He was a violent enemy of

Athanasius. He died at Alexandria, 386.

Athanasius.

The celebrated patriarch of Alexandria was born in that city about 296. At

the council of Nice, though then but a deacon of Alexandria, his

reputation for skill in controversy gained him an honorable place in the

council, and with signal ability he exposed the sophistry of those who

pleaded on the side of Arius. Six months after, he was appointed the

successor of Alexander. Notwithstanding the influence of the emperor, who

had recalled Arius from banishment, and, upon a plausible confession of

his faith, in which he affected to be Orthodox in his sentiments, directed

that he should be received by the Alexandrian church, Athanasius refused

to admit him to communion, and exposed his prevarication. The Arians upon

this exerted themselves to raise tumults at Alexandria, and to injure the

character of Athanasius with the emperor, who was prevailed upon by

falsehoods to pronounce against him a sentence of banishment. In the

beginning of the reign of Constantius, he was recalled to his happy

people, but was again disturbed and deposed through the influence of the

Arians. Accusations were also sent against him and other bishops from the

east to the west; but they were acquitted by Pope Julius in full council.

Athanasius was restored a second time to his see, upon the death of the

Arian bishop, who had been placed in it. Arianism, however, being in favor

at court, he was condemned by a council convened at Arles, and by another

at Milan, and was a third time obliged to fly into the deserts. His

enemies pursued him even here, and set a price upon his head. In this

situation, Athanasius composed writings full of eloquence to strengthen

the faith of believers, and expose the falsehood of his enemies. He

returned with the other bishops whom Julian the Apostate recalled from

banishment, and, in A. D. 362, held a council at Alexandria, where the

belief of a consubstantial Trinity was openly professed. Many now were

recovered from Arianism, and brought to subscribe the Nicene creed. But

his peace was again interrupted by the complaints of the heathen, whose

temples the zeal of Athanasius kept always empty. He was again obliged to

fly to save his life. The accession of Jovian brought him back. During the

reign of Jovian, also, Athanasius held another council, which declared its

adherence to the Nicene faith; and with the exception of a short

retirement under Valens, he was permitted to sit down in quiet and govern

his affectionate church of Alexandria, until his death, in 373. Of the

forty-six years of his official life, he spent twenty in banishment.

Athanasius (says the Encyclopedia Americana) is one of the greatest men of

whom the church can boast. His deep mind, his noble heart, his invincible

courage, his living faith, his unbounded benevolence, sincere humility,

lofty eloquence, and strictly virtuous life, gained the honor and love of

all. In all his writings, his style is distinguished for clearness and

moderation.

Moses Maimonides.

Moses son of Maimon, commonly called Moses Egypticus, because physician to

the sultan of Egypt, was a Jewish rabbi, born at Cordova, in Spain, 1131.

He opened a school in Egypt, and as his skill, not only in languages, but

in all branches of science and of philosophy, was very great, his

instructions were attended by numerous and respectable pupils. Thus

eminently distinguished as a scholar, as a physician, and also as a

divine, so as to be called inferior only to the legislator Moses, he

beheld with indifference, and even contempt, the fables and traditions of

his countrymen, and applied all the powers of learning, and the vast

resources of his mind, in the cause of truth, virtue, and philosophy. Some

of his works were written in Arabic, but are extant now in Hebrew only.

The most famous of these are his Commentaries on the Misna; Jad, a

complete pandect of the Jewish law; More Nevochim, a valuable work,

explaining the difficult passages, phrases, parables, and allegories, in

Scripture, and several other works. This great and learned man died in

Egypt at the age of seventy, and was buried with his nation in the land of

Upper Galilee. His death was mourned for three whole days by Jews and

Egyptians, and the year in which he died, in respect of his great virtues

and learning, was called Lamentum Lamentabile.

John Agricola.

A German divine, born at Isleb. He was the friend and the disciple of

Luther, but afterwards violently opposed him, and became the head of the

Antinomians, a sect which regarded faith as the whole of the duties of

man. He was also engaged in a dispute with Melancthon; but, with the most

laudable motives, he endeavored to effect a reconciliation between the

Catholics and Protestants. He died at Berlin, 1566, aged seventy-four.

Michael Servetus.

A native of Villanuova, in Arragon, son of a notary. He studied the law at

Toulouse, but afterwards applied to medicine at Paris, and took there his

doctor’s degree. The boldness and pertinacity of his opinions created him

enemies, and he left the capital to settle at Lyons, but afterwards he

retired to Charlieu. On the invitation of the archbishop of Vienne, in

Dauphiny, he was prevailed upon to fix his residence there, and he might

have lived in peace and respected, had he been satisfied to seek celebrity

in medical pursuits alone. Eager to publish his Arian opinions on

religion, he sent three questions to Calvin on the Divinity of Christ, on

Regeneration, and on the Necessity of Baptism, and, when answered with

civility, he reflected on the sentiments of his correspondent with

arrogant harshness. This produced a quarrel, and ended in the most

implacable hatred, so that Calvin, bent on revenge, obtained, by secret

means, copies of a work in which his antagonist was engaged, and caused

him to be accused before the archbishop as a dangerous man. Servetus

escaped from prison; but, on his way to Italy, he had the imprudence to

pass in disguise through Geneva, where he was recognized by Calvin, and

immediately seized by the magistrate as an impious heretic. Forty

heretical errors were proved against him by his accusers; but Servetus

refused to renounce them, and the magistrates, at last yielding to the

loud representations of the ministers of Bâsle, Berne, and Zurich, and

especially of Calvin, who demanded the punishment of a profane heretic,

ordered the unhappy man to be burnt. On the 27th October, 1553, the

wretched Servetus was conducted to the stake, and, as the wind prevented

the flames from fully reaching his body, two long hours elapsed before he

was freed from his miseries. This cruel treatment deservedly called down

the general odium on the head of Calvin, who ably defended his conduct and

that of the magistrates. Servetus published various works against the

Trinity, which were burnt in disgrace at Geneva, and other places.

Simonis Menno.

An ecclesiastic of Friesland, embraced the tenets of the Anabaptists, and,

after being again baptized by Ubbo Philippi, became a powerful leader of

his sect. He denied that Jesus Christ received a human shape from his

mother, the virgin Mary; and while he maintained the necessity of again

baptizing adults, he inveighed against the custom of infant baptism, which

he regarded as Popish innovation. His eloquence and his learning were so

much admired, that he gained a great number of followers in Westphalia,

Guelderland, Holland, and Brabant; but, though a price was set on his

head, he had the good fortune to escape his persecutors. He was, in his

opinions, more moderate than the rest of the Anabaptists. His followers

are still to be found in the Low Countries, under the name of

_Mennonites_, divided into two distinct sects. He died at Oldeslo, between

Lubec and Hamburg, 1565. His works were published at Amsterdam, 1681.

Francis Xavier.

Denominated the _Apostle of the Indies_, was born, in 1506, at the castle

of Xavier, in Navarre; studied at Paris; became one of the first and most

zealous disciples of Ignatius Loyola; was sent to the East by John III. of

Portugal, to propagate the gospel; performed his mission in Hindoostan,

the Moluccas, and Japan; and was on the point of landing in China, when he

died, 1552.

Faustus Socinus.

He who from whom the Socinians derive their name, was born, in 1539, at

Sienna, and was for a considerable period in the service of the grand duke

of Tuscany; after which he went to study theology, at Bâsle. The result of

his studies was the adoption of those anti-Trinitarian doctrines, which

his uncle Lelio Socinus is believed also to have professed. Faustus

settled in Poland, gained many followers, endured much persecution, and

died in 1604.

Robert Brown.

The Book of Religions Comprising the Views, Creeds, Sentiments, or Opinions, of All the Principal Religious Sects in the World, Particularly of All Christian Denominations in Europe and America, to Which are Added Church and Missionary Statistics, Together With Biographical Sketches · 第 29 / 35 段