“1. That all true virtue, or real holiness, consists in

The Book of Religions

Comprising The

Views, Creeds, Sentiments, or Opinions,

Of All The

Principal Religious Sects In The World

Particularly Of

All Christian Denominations

In

Europe and America

To Which Are Added

Church and Missionary Statistics

Together With

Biographical Sketches

By John Hayward

Author of “New England Gazetteer”

Boston:

Albert Colby And Company.

20 Washington Street.

1860

CONTENTS

Preface.

Index.

Lutherans, Or, The Evangelical Lutheran Church.

Calvinists.

Hopkinsians.

Arians.

Socinians.

Humanitarians.

Sectarians.

Church Government.

Presbyterians.

Cumberland Presbyterians.

Episcopalians.

Historical Notice Of The Church In The United States.

Articles Of Religion.

Cambridge And Saybrook Platforms.

Moravians, Or United Brethren.

Tunkers.

Mennonites, Or Harmless Christians.

Disciples Of Christ; Sometimes Called Campbellites, or Reformers.

Friends, or Quakers.

Shakers, Or The United Society Of Believers.

Reformation.

Reformed Churches.

Reformed Dutch Church.

Reformed German Church.

Restorationists.

Universalists.

Roman Catholics.

Bereans.

Materialists.

Arminians.

Methodists, Or The Methodist Episcopal Church.

Methodists, Or The Methodist Protestant Church.

Protestants.

Sabellians.

Sandemanians.

Antinomians.

Pelagians.

Pre-Adamites.

Predestinarians.

Orthodox Creeds.

Andover Orthodox Creed.

New Haven Orthodox Creed.

Swedenborgians, Or, The New Jerusalem Church.

Fighting Quakers.

Harmonists.

Dorrelites.

Osgoodites.

Rogerenes.

Whippers.

Wilkinsonians.

Aquarians.

Baxterians.

Miller’s Views on the Second Coming of Christ.

Come-Outers.

Jumpers.

Baptists.

Anabaptists.

Free-Will Baptists.

Seventh-Day Baptists, Or Sabbatarians,

Six-Principle Baptists.

Quaker Baptists, Or Keithians.

Pedobaptists.

Anti-Pedobaptists.

Unitarians.

Brownists.

Puritans.

Bourignonists.

Jews.

Indian Religions.

Deists.

Atheists.

Pantheists.

Mahometans.

Simonians.

Pagans.

Satanians.

Abelians, or Abelonians.

Supralapsarians.

Dancers.

Epicureans.

Skeptics.

Wickliffites.

Diggers.

Zuinglians.

Seekers.

Wilhelminians.

Non-Resistants.

Southcotters.

Family Of Love.

Hutchinsonians.

Mormonites, Or The Church Of The Latter-Day Saints.

Daleites.

Emancipators.

Perfectionists.

Waldenses.

Allenites.

Johnsonians.

Donatists.

Se-Baptists.

Re-Anointers.

Tao-Se, or Taou-Tsze.

Quietists.

Knipperdolings.

Mendæans, Mendaites, Mendai Ijahi, Or Disciples Of St. John, That Is, The

Baptist.

Muggletonians.

Yezidees, Or Worshippers Of The Devil.

Greek or Russian Church.

Primitive Christians.

Trinitarians.

Millenarians.

Whitefield Calvinistic Methodists.

Nonjurors.

Nonconformists.

Christian Connection.

Puseyites.

Free Communion Baptists.

Transcendentalists.

Augsburg Confession Of Faith.

Armenians.

Primitive Methodists.

Novatians.

Nestorians.

High-Churchmen.

Ancient American Covenant Or Confession Of Faith.

Statistics Of Churches.

Baptists.

Free-Will Baptists.

Seventh-Day Baptists.

Christian Connection.

Calvinistic Congregationalists.

Disciples Of Christ.

Episcopalians.

Friends.

Jews.

Lutherans.

Protestant Methodists.

Methodists.

Presbyterians.

Other Presbyterian Communities.

Reformed Dutch Church.

Roman Catholics.

Swedenborgians.

Unitarians.

Universalists.

Missionary Statistics.

First Protestant Missions.

Moravian Missions.

London Missionary Society.

American Board Of Foreign Missions.

Presbyterian Board Of Foreign Missions.

English Baptist Missionary Society.

American Baptist Board Of Foreign Missions.

Free-Will Baptists.

Episcopal Missions.

Society For Propagating The Gospel Among The Indians And Others.

Wesleyan Or English Methodist Missionary Society.

Missions Of The Methodist Episcopal Church.

Seventh-Day Baptist Missionary Society.

French Protestant Missionary Society.

Netherlands Missionary Society.

Scottish Missionary Society.

German Missionary Society.

Church Of Scotland Missions.

Rhenish Missionary Society.

Missions Of The Roman Catholic Church.

Jews’ Missionary Society.

Indians.

Biographical Sketches of the Fathers of the Reformation, Founders of

Sects, and of other Distinguished Individuals Mentioned in this Volume.

John Wickliffe.

Jerome of Prague.

John Huss.

John Œcolampadius.

Martin Luther.

Ulriucus Zuinglius.

Martin Bucer.

Philip Melancthon.

Peter Martyr.

Henry Bullinger.

John Knox.

John Calvin.

Jerome Zanchius.

Theodore Beza.

Leo X.

Justin.

Arius.

Athanasius.

Moses Maimonides.

John Agricola.

Michael Servetus.

Simonis Menno.

Francis Xavier.

Faustus Socinus.

Robert Brown.

James Arminius.

Francis Higginson.

Richard Baxter.

George Fox.

William Penn.

Benedict Spinoza.

Ann Lee.

John Glass.

George Keith.

Nicholas Louis, Count Zinzendorf.

William Courtney.

Richard Hooker.

Charles Chauncey.

Roger Williams.

John Clarke.

Ann Hutchinson.

Michael Molinos.

John Wesley.

George Whitefield.

Selina Huntingdon.

Robert Sandeman.

Samuel Hopkins.

Jonathan Mayhew.

Samuel Seabury.

Richard Clarke.

Joseph Priestly.

James Purves.

John Jebb.

John Gaspar Christian Lavater.

John Tillotson.

Isaac Newton.

Charles V.

Francis Bacon.

Matthew Hale.

Princess Elizabeth.

Robert Boyle.

John Locke.

Joseph Addison.

Isaac Watts.

Philip Doddridge.

John Murray.

Elhanan Winchester.

Saint Genevieve.

Gilbert Burnet.

Theological Schools.

Footnotes

PREFACE.

A few years since, the Editor of the following pages published a volume of

“Religious Creeds and Statistics;” and, as the work, although quite

limited, met with general approbation, he has been induced to publish

another of the same nature, but on a much larger plan, trusting that it

will prove more useful, and more worthy of public favor.

His design has been, to exhibit to his readers, with the utmost

impartiality and perspicuity, and as briefly as their nature will permit,

the views, creeds, sentiments, or opinions, of all the religious sects or

denominations in the world, so far as utility seemed to require such an

exhibition; but more especially to give the rise, progress, and

peculiarities, of all the principal schemes or systems of religion which

exist in the United States at the present day.

The work is intended to serve as a manual for those who are desirous of

acquiring, with as little trouble as possible, a correct knowledge of the

tenets or systems of religious faith, presented for the consideration of

mankind;—to enable them, almost at a glance, to compare one creed or

system with another, and each with the holy Scriptures;—to settle the

minds of those who have formed no definite opinions on religious

subjects;—and to lead us all, by contrasting the sacred truths and sublime

beauties of Christianity with the absurd notions of pagan idolaters, of

skeptics, and of infidels, to set a just value on the doctrines of HIM WHO

SPAKE AS NEVER MAN SPAKE.

To accomplish this design, the Editor has obtained, from the most

intelligent and candid among the living defenders of each denomination,

full and explicit statements of their religious sentiments—such as they

believe and teach. He is indebted to the friends of some new sects or

parties in philosophy and religion, for an account of their respective

views and opinions. With regard to anterior sects, he has noticed, from

the best authorities, as large a number as is thought necessary for the

comparison of ancient with modern creeds.

The Church and Missionary Statistics are believed to be as accurate as can

be constructed from materials which annually undergo greater or less

changes.

The Biographical Sketches are derived from the most authentic sources.

While they convey useful knowledge in regard to the fathers and defenders

of the various systems of religious faith, they may also stimulate our

readers to the practice of those Christian virtues and graces which

adorned the lives of many of them, and render their names immortal.

A few only of the works from which valuable aid has been received, can be

mentioned:—Mosheim and McLaine’s Ecclesiastical History; Gregory and

Ruter’s Church History; Encyclopædia Americana; Brown’s Encyclopedia of

Religious Knowledge; Adams’s View of Religions, and History of the Jews;

Benedict’s History of all Religions; Evans’s Sketches; Buck’s and

Henderson’s Theological Dictionaries; Eliot’s, Allen’s, and Blake’s

Biographical Dictionaries; Davenport; Watson; Grant’s Nestorians,

Coleman’s Christian Antiquities; Ratio Disciplinæ; Haydn’s Dictionary of

Dates, &c.

To clergymen and laymen of all denominations, who have assisted the Editor

in presenting their various views with clearness and fairness; to the

secretaries of the several missionary boards; to editors of religious

journals, and to other persons who have kindly furnished documents for the

Statistics and Biographical Sketches, he tenders acknowledgments of

unfeigned gratitude.

While the Editor assures the public that the whole has been prepared with

much diligence and care, and with an entire freedom from sectarian zeal or

party bias, he cannot but indulge the hope that his “Book of Religions”

will prove acceptable and beneficial to the community, as imbodying a

great variety of facts on a subject of deep concern, worthy of the

exercise of our highest faculties, and requiring our most charitable

conclusions.

INDEX.

Abelians, or Abelonians, 243

Addison, Joseph, 417

Agricola, John, 370

Allenites, 280

American Missions, 336

Anabaptists, 190

Ancient American Covenant, 308

Andover Orthodox Creed, 138

Antinomians, 128

Anti-Pedobaptists, 196

Apostles’ Creed, 102

Aquarians, 168

Arians, 18

Arius, 368

Armenians, 303

Arminians, 115

Arminius, James, 373

Assembly’s Catechism, 141

Athanasian Creed, 102

Athanasius, 368

Atheists, 217

Augsburg Confession, 302

Bacon, Francis, 407

Baptists, 182, 311, 340

Quaker, 193

Baptist Missions, English, 339

Baxter, Richard, 376

Baxterians, 169

Bereans, 109

Beza, Theodore, 366

Bible Chronology, 175

Biographical Sketches, 350

Bishops, Episcopal, 314

Bourignonists, 201

Boyle, Robert, 412

Brown, Robert, 373

Brownists, 200

Bucer, Martin, 360

Bullinger, Henry, 363

Burnet, Gilbert, 429

Calvin, John, 365

Calvinists, 11, 313

Cambridge Platform, 48

Campbellites, 58

Charles V., 405

Chauncey, Charles, 385

Christian Connection, 295, 313

Christianity, Progress of, 432

Chronology, Bible, 175

Church Government, 20

Church Statistics, 311

Clarke, John, 387

Clarke, Richard, 399

Come-Outers, 177

Congregationalists, 20, 313

Courtney, William, 384

Creed, Andover, 138

Apostles’, 102

Athanasian, 102

Augsburg, 302

New Haven, 142

Nicene, 105

Orthodox, 132

Cumberland Presbyterians, 25

Daleites, 272

Dancers, 244

Deists, 215

Diggers, 246

Disciples of Christ, 58, 314

Disciples of St John, 284

Dissenters. See _Puritans_.

Doddridge, Philip, 420

Donatists, 281

Dorrelites, 164

Dutch Reformed Church, 88

Elizabeth, Princess, 411

Emancipators, 272

English Baptist Missions, 339

—— Methodist Missions, 343

Epicureans, 244

Episcopalians, 26, 314, 341

Essenes, 202

Family of Love, 259

Fighting Quakers, 162

Fox, George, 377

Free Communion Baptists, 300

Free-Will Baptists, 190, 312, 341

French Missions, 346

Friends, or Quakers, 64, 319

Genevieve, 162, 428

German Missions, 346

German Reformed Church, 90

Glass, John, 383

Glassites, 126

Government, Church, 20

Greek Church, 288

Hale, Matthew, 408

Harmless Christians, 57

Harmonists, 163

Hicksites, 74, 319

High Churchmen, 308

Higginson, Francis, 310, 374

Hooker, Richard, 385

Hopkins, Samuel, 397

Hopkinsians, 13

Humanitarians, 19

Huntingdon, Lady Selina, 395

Huss, John, 354

Hutchinson, Ann, 389

Hutchinsonians, 259

Independents, 20

Indian Missions, 342

Religions, 210

Statistics, 347

Jebb, John, 401

Jerome of Prague, 352

Jews, 202, 319, 347

Johnsonians, 280

Jumpers, 181

Justin Martyr, 368

Keith, George, 383

Keithians, 193

Knipperdolings, 283

Knox, John, 363

Latter-Day Saints, 260

Lavater, John G. C., 402

Lee, Ann, 381

Leo X., 367

Locke, John 415

London Missionary Society, 335

Luther, Martin, 355

Lutherans, 9, 320

Mahometans, 220

Maimonides, Moses, 203, 370

Martyr, Peter, 362

Materialists, 112

Mayhew, Jonathan, 398

Mendæans, 284

Melancthon, Philip, 361

Mennonites, 57

Menno, Simonis, 372

Methodists, Episcopal, 117, 321

Protestant, 123, 321

Methodists, Primitive, 305

Methodists’ Missions, 344

Views of Perfection, 274

Miller’s Views on the Second Coming of Christ, 170

Millenarians, 292

Missionary Statistics, 333

Missions, American Foreign, 336

Missions, Indian, 342

Molinos, Michael, 389

Moravians, 49, 333

Mormonites, 260

Muggletonians, 284

Murray, John, 423

N.

Necessarians. See _Materialists_.

Nestorians, 306

Netherland Missions, 346

New Haven Orthodox Creed, 142

New Jerusalem Church, 150

Newton, Isaac, 403

Nicene Creed, 105

Nonconformists, 294

Nonjurors, 294

Non-Resistants, 247

Novatians, 305

Oberlin Views of Sanctification, 278

Œcolampadius, John, 355

Orthodox Creeds, 132

Osgoodites, 166

Pantheists, 219

Pagans, 234

Pedobaptists, 193

Pelagians, 130

Penn, William, 378

Perfectionists, 274

Pharisees, 202

Popes of Rome, 326

Pre-Adamites, 131

Predestinarians, 132

Presbyterians, 22, 322

Cumberland, 25

Presbyterian Missions, 338

Priestley, Joseph, 400

Primitive Christians, 290

Methodists, 305

Princess Elizabeth, 411

Progress of Christianity, 432

Protestants, 125

Protestant Methodists, 123, 321

Missions, 333

Puritans, 200

Purves, James, 401

Puseyites, 299

Quakers, or Friends, 64

Quaker Baptists, 193

Quietists, 283

Ranters. See _Seekers_.

Re-Anointers, 282

Reformation, 85

Reformed Churches, 88

Reformed Dutch Church, 88, 324

German Church, 90

Rhenish Missions, 347

Restorationists, 91

Rogerenes, 166

Roman Catholics, 102, 324, 347

Russian Church, 288

Sabbatarians, 191

Sabellians, 125

Sadducees, 202

Sanctification, Views on, 278

Sandemanians, 126

Sandeman, Robert, 396

Satanians, 243

Saybrook Platform, 48

Seabury, Samuel, 33, 398

Schools, Theological, 432

Scottish Missions, 346, 347

Se-Baptists, 281

Sectarians, 20

Seekers, 247

Servetus, Michael, 371

Seventh-Day Baptists, 191, 312, 345

Shakers, 75

Simonians, 233

Six-Principle Baptists, 192

Skeptics, 245

Socinius, Faustus, 372

Socinians, 19

Southcotters, 255

Spinoza, Benedict, 380

Statistics of Churches, 311

of Missions, 333

Succession of Bishops, 315

Supralapsarians, 243

Swedenborg, 150

Swedenborgians, 150, 330

Tao-Se, 282

Taylor’s (Dr.) Views, 142

Theological Schools, 432

Tillotson, John, 402

Transcendentalists, 301

Trinitarians, 290

Tunkers, or Tumblers, 55

Unitarians, 196, 331

United Brethren, 49

United Society of Believers, 75

Universalists, 95, 331

Waldenses, 279

Water-Drinkers, 168

Watts, Isaac, 418

Wesley, John, 390

Wesleyan Missions, 343

Westminster Catechism, 141

Whippers, 167

Whitefield, George, 393

Whitefield Methodists, 293

Wickliffe, John, 350

Wickliffites, 245

Wilhelminians, 247

Wilkinsonians, 167

Williams, Roger, 386

Winchester, Elhanan, 425

Worshippers of the Devil, 285

Xavier, Francis, 161, 372

Yezidees, or Worshippers of the Devil, 285

Zanchius, Jerome, 366

Zinzendorf, Count, 383

Zuinglius, Ulricus, 359

Zuinglians, 246

LUTHERANS, OR, THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH.

This denomination adheres to the opinions of Martin Luther, the celebrated

reformer.

The Lutherans, of all Protestants, are those who differ least from the

Romish church, as they affirm that the body and blood of Christ are

materially present in the sacrament of the Lord’s supper, though in an

incomprehensible manner: this they term _consubstantiation_. They likewise

represent some rites and institutions, as the use of images in churches,

the vestments of the clergy, the private confession of sins, the use of

wafers in the administration of the Lord’s supper, the form of exorcism in

the celebration of baptism, and other ceremonies of the like nature, as

tolerable, and some of them useful. The Lutherans maintain, with regard to

the divine decrees, that they respect the salvation or misery of men in

consequence of a previous knowledge of their sentiments and characters,

and not as founded on the mere will of God. See _Augsburg Confession of

Faith_.

Towards the close of the last century, the Lutherans began to entertain a

greater liberality of sentiment than they had before adopted, though in

many places they persevered longer in despotic principles than other

Protestant churches. Their public teachers now enjoy an unbounded liberty

of dissenting from the decisions of those symbols of creeds which were

once deemed almost infallible rules of faith and practice, and of

declaring their dissent in the manner they judge most expedient.

The capital articles which Luther maintained are as follow:—

1. That the holy Scriptures are the only source whence we are to draw our

religious sentiments, whether they relate to faith or practice. (See 2

Tim. 3:15-17. Prov. 1:9. Isa. 8:20. Luke 1:4. John 5:39; 20:31. 1 Cor 4:6,

&c.)

2. That justification is the effect of faith, exclusive of good works, and

that faith ought to produce good works, purely in obedience to God, and

not in order to our justification. (See Gal. 2:21.)

3. That no man is able to make satisfaction for his sins. (See Luke

17:10.)

In consequence of these leading articles, Luther rejected tradition,

purgatory, penance, auricular confession, masses, invocation of saints,

monastic vows, and other doctrines of the church of Rome.

The external affairs of the Lutheran church are directed by three

judicatories, viz., a vestry of the congregation, a district or special

conference, and a general synod. The synod is composed of ministers, and

an equal number of laymen, chosen as deputies by the vestries of their

respective congregations. From this synod there is no appeal.

The ministerium is composed of ministers only, and regulates the internal

or spiritual concerns of the church, such as examining, licensing, and

ordaining ministers, judging in controversies about doctrine, &c. The

synod and ministerium meet annually.

Confession and absolution, in a very simple form, are practised by the

American Lutherans; also confirmation, by which baptismal vows are

ratified, and the subjects become communicants. Their liturgies are simple

and impressive, and the clergy are permitted to use extempore prayer. See

_Statistics of Churches_.

CALVINISTS.

This denomination of Christians, of the Congregational order, are chiefly

descendants of the English Puritans, who founded most of the early

settlements in New England. They derive their name from John Calvin, an

eminent reformer.

The Calvinists are divided into three parties,—_High_, _Strict_, and

_Moderate_. The _High_ Calvinists favor the Hopkinsian system. The

_Moderate_ Calvinists embrace the leading features of Calvin’s doctrine,

but object to some parts, particularly to his views of the doctrines of

predestination, and the extent of the design of Christ’s death. While they

hold to the election of grace, they do not believe that God has reprobated

any of his creatures. They believe that the atonement is, in its nature,

general, but in its application, particular; and that free salvation is to

be preached to sinners indiscriminately. The doctrines of the _Strict_

Calvinists are those of Calvin himself, as established at the synod of

Dort, A. D. 1618, and are as follow, viz.:—

1. They maintain that God hath chosen a certain number of the fallen race

of Adam in Christ, before the foundation of the world, unto eternal glory,

according to his immutable purpose, and of his free grace and love,

without the least foresight of faith, good works, or any conditions

performed by the creature; and that the rest of mankind he was pleased to

pass by, and ordain to dishonor and wrath, for their sins, to the praise

of his vindictive justice. (See Prov. 16:4. Rom. 9: from ver. 11 to end of

chap.; 8:30. Eph. 1:4. Acts 13:48.)

2. They maintain that, though the death of Christ be a most perfect

sacrifice, and satisfaction for sins, of infinite value, abundantly

sufficient to expiate the sins of the whole world,—and though, on this

ground, the gospel is to be preached to all mankind indiscriminately, yet

it was the will of God that Christ, by the blood of the cross, should

efficaciously redeem all those, and those only, who were from eternity

elected to salvation, and given to him by the Father. (See Ps. 33:11. John

6:37; 10:11; 17:9.)

3. They maintain that mankind are totally depraved, in consequence of the

fall of the first man, who being their public head, his sin involved the

corruption of all his posterity, and which corruption extends over the

whole soul, and renders it unable to turn to God, or to do any thing truly

good, and exposes it to his righteous displeasure, both in this world and

that which is to come. (See Gen. 8:21. Ps. 14:2, 3. Rom. 3:10, 11, 12,

&c.; 4:14; 5:19. Gal. 3:10. 2 Cor. 3:6, 7.)

4. They maintain that all whom God hath predestinated unto life, he is

pleased, in his appointed time, effectually to call, by his word and

Spirit, out of that state of sin and death, in which they are by nature,

to grace and salvation by Jesus Christ. (See Eph. 1:19; 2:1, 5. Phil.

2:13. Rom. 3:27. I Cor. 1:31, Titus 3:5.)

5. Lastly, they maintain that those whom God has effectually called, and

sanctified by his Spirit, shall never finally fall from a state of grace.

They admit that true believers may fall partially, and would fall totally

and finally, but for the mercy and faithfulness of God, who keepeth the

feet of his saints; also, that he who bestoweth the grace of perseverance,

bestoweth it by means of reading and hearing the word, meditation,

exhortations, threatenings, and promises; but that none of these things

imply the possibility of a believer’s falling from a state of

justification. (See Isa. 53:4, 5, 6; 54:10. Jer. 32:38, 40. Rom. 8:38, 39.

John 4:14; 6:39; 10:28; 11:26. James 1:17. 1 Pet. 2:25.) See _Orthodox

Creeds_, and _Hopkinsians_.

HOPKINSIANS.

This denomination of Christians derives its name from Samuel Hopkins, D.

D., formerly pastor of the first Congregational church in Newport, R. I.

The following is a summary of the distinguishing tenets of the

Hopkinsians, together with a few of the reasons they bring forward in

support of their sentiments:—

“1. That all true virtue, or real holiness, consists in

disinterested benevolence. The object of benevolence is universal

being, including God and all intelligent creatures. It wishes and

seeks the good of every individual, so far as is consistent with

the greatest good of the whole, which is comprised in the glory of

God and the perfection and happiness of his kingdom. The law of

God is the standard of all moral rectitude or holiness. This is

reduced into love to God, and our neighbor as ourselves; and

universal good-will comprehends all the love to God, our neighbor,

and ourselves, required in the divine law, and, therefore, must be

the whole of holy obedience. Let any serious person think what are

the particular branches of true piety; when he has viewed each one

by itself, he will find that disinterested friendly affection is

its distinguishing characteristic. For instance, all the holiness

in pious fear, which distinguishes it from the fear of the wicked,

consists in love. Again, holy gratitude is nothing but good-will

to God and our neighbor,—in which we ourselves are included,—and

correspondent affection, excited by a view of the good-will and

kindness of God. Universal good-will also implies the whole of the

duty we owe to our neighbor; for justice, truth, and faithfulness,

are comprised in universal benevolence; so are temperance and

chastity. For an undue indulgence of our appetites and passions is

contrary to benevolence, as tending to hurt ourselves or others,

and so, opposite to the general good, and the divine command, in

which all the crime of such indulgence consists. In short, all

virtue is nothing but benevolence acted out in its proper nature

and perfection; or love to God and our neighbor, made perfect in

all its genuine exercises and expressions.

“2. That all sin consists in selfishness. By this is meant an

interested, selfish affection, by which a person sets himself up

as supreme, and the only object of regard; and nothing is good or

lovely in his view, unless suited to promote his own private

interest. This self-love is, in its whole nature, and every degree

of it, enmity against God; it is not subject to the law of God,

and is the only affection that can oppose it. It is the foundation

of all spiritual blindness, and, therefore, the source of all the

open idolatry in the heathen world, and false religion under the

light of the gospel: all this is agreeable to that self-love which

opposes God’s true character. Under the influence of this

principle, men depart from truth, it being itself the greatest

practical lie in nature, as it sets up that which is comparatively

nothing above universal existence. Self-love is the source of all

profaneness and impiety in the world, and of all pride and

ambition among men, which is nothing but selfishness, acted out in

this particular way. This is the foundation of all covetousness

and sensuality, as it blinds people’s eyes, contracts their

hearts, and sinks them down, so that they look upon earthly

enjoyments as the greatest good. This is the source of all

falsehood, injustice, and oppression, as it excites mankind by

undue methods to invade the property of others. Self-love produces

all the violent passions—envy, wrath, clamor, and evil speaking;

and every thing contrary to the divine law is briefly comprehended

in this fruitful source of all iniquity—self-love.

“3. That there are no promises of regenerating grace made to the

doings of the unregenerate. For, as far as men act from self-love,

they act from a bad end; for those who have no true love to God,

really do no duty when they attend on the externals of religion.

And as the unregenerate act from a selfish principle, they do

nothing which is commanded; their impenitent doings are wholly

opposed to repentance and conversion, therefore not implied in the

command to repent, &c.: so far from this, they are altogether

disobedient to the command. Hence it appears that there are no

promises of salvation to the doings of the unregenerate.

“4. That the impotency of sinners, with respect to believing in

Christ, is not natural, but moral; for it is a plain dictate of

common sense, that natural impossibility excludes all blame. But

an unwilling mind is universally considered as a crime, and not as

an excuse, and is the very thing wherein our wickedness consists.

That the impotence of the sinner is owing to a disaffection of

heart, is evident from the promises of the gospel. When any object

of good is proposed and promised to us upon asking, it clearly

evinces that there can be no impotence in us, with respect to

obtaining it, besides the disapprobation of the will; and that

inability which consists in disinclination, never renders any

thing improperly the subject of precept or command.

“5. That, in order to faith in Christ, a sinner must approve, in

his heart, of the divine conduct, even though God should cast him

off forever; which, however, never implies love of misery, nor

hatred of happiness. For if the law is good, death is due to those

who have broken it. The Judge of all the earth cannot but do

right. It would bring everlasting reproach upon his government to

spare us, considered merely as in ourselves. When this is felt in

our hearts, and not till then, we shall be prepared to look to the

free grace of God, through the redemption which is in Christ, and

to exercise faith in his blood, ‘who is set forth to be a

propitiation to declare God’s righteousness, that he might be

just, and yet be the justifier of him who believeth in Jesus.’

“6. That the infinitely wise and holy God has exerted his

omnipotent power in such a manner as he purposed should be

followed with the existence and entrance of moral evil into the

system. For it must be admitted on all hands, that God has a

perfect knowledge, foresight, and view of all possible existences

and events. If that system and scene of operation, in which moral

evil should never have existed, were actually preferred in the

divine mind, certainly the Deity is infinitely disappointed in the

issue of his own operations. Nothing can be more dishonorable to

God than to imagine that the system which is actually formed by

the divine hand, and which was made for his pleasure and glory, is

yet not the fruit of wise contrivance and design.

“7. That the introduction of sin is, upon the whole, for the

general good. For the wisdom and power of the Deity are displayed

in carrying on designs of the greatest good; and the existence of

moral evil has, undoubtedly, occasioned a more full, perfect, and

glorious discovery of the infinite perfections of the divine

nature, than could otherwise have been made to the view of

creatures. If the extensive manifestations of the pure and holy

nature of God, and his infinite aversion to sin, and all his

inherent perfections, in their genuine fruits and effects, is

either itself the greatest good, or necessarily contains it, it

must necessarily follow that the introduction of sin is for the

greatest good.

“8. That repentance is before faith in Christ. By this is not

intended, that repentance is before a speculative belief of the

being and perfections of God, and of the person and character of

Christ; but only that true repentance is previous to a saving

faith in Christ, in which the believer is united to Christ, and

entitled to the benefits of his mediation and atonement. That

repentance is before faith in this sense, appears from several

considerations. 1. As repentance and faith respect different

objects, so they are distinct exercises of the heart; and

therefore one not only may, but must, be prior to the other. 2.

There may be genuine repentance of sin without faith in Christ,

but there cannot be true faith in Christ without repentance of

sin; and since repentance is necessary in order to faith in

Christ, it must necessarily be prior to faith in Christ. 3. John

the Baptist, Christ, and his apostles, taught that repentance is

before faith. John cried, ‘Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is at

hand;’ intimating that true repentance was necessary in order to

embrace the gospel of the kingdom. Christ commanded, ‘Repent ye,

and believe the gospel.’ And Paul preached ‘repentance toward God,

and faith toward our Lord Jesus Christ.’

“9. That, though men became sinners by Adam, according to a divine

constitution, yet they have, and are accountable for, no sins but

personal; for, 1. Adam’s act, in eating the forbidden fruit, was

not the act of his posterity; therefore they did not sin at the

same time he did. 2. The sinfulness of that act could not be

_transferred_ to them afterwards, because the sinfulness of an act

can no more be transferred from one person to another than an act

itself. 3. Therefore Adam’s act, in eating the forbidden fruit,

was not the _cause_ but only the _occasion_, of his posterity’s

being sinners. God was pleased to make a constitution, that, if

Adam remained holy through his state of trial, his posterity

should, in consequence, be holy also; but if he sinned, his

posterity should, in consequence, be sinners likewise. Adam

sinned, and now God brings his posterity into the world sinners.

_By_ Adam’s sin we are become sinners, not _for_ it; his sin being

only the _occasion_, not the _cause_, of our committing sins.

“10. That, though believers are justified _through_ Christ’s

righteousness, yet his righteousness is not _transferred_ to them.

For, 1. Personal righteousness can no more be transferred from one

person to another, than personal sin. 2. If Christ’s personal

righteousness were transferred to believers, they would be as

perfectly holy as Christ, and so stand in no need of forgiveness.

3. But believers are not conscious of having Christ’s personal

righteousness, but feel and bewail much indwelling sin and

corruption. 4. The Scripture represents believers as receiving

only the _benefits_ of Christ’s righteousness in justification, or

their being pardoned and accepted for Christ’s righteousness’

sake; and this is the proper Scripture notion of imputation.

Jonathan’s righteousness was imputed to Mephibosheth when David

showed kindness to him for his father Jonathan’s sake.”

The Hopkinsians warmly contend for the doctrine of the divine decrees,

that of particular election, total depravity, the special influences of

the Spirit of God in regeneration, justification by faith alone, the final

perseverance of the saints, and the consistency between entire freedom and

absolute dependence, and, therefore, claim it as their just due, since the

world will make distinctions, to be called HOPKINSIAN CALVINISTS.

The statistics of this denomination are included with those of the

_Calvinists_, near the close of this volume.

ARIANS.

The followers of Arius, a presbyter of the church of Alexandria, about A.

D. 315, who held that the Son of God was totally and essentially distinct

from the Father; that he was the first and noblest of those beings whom

God had created, the instrument by whose subordinate operation he formed

the universe, and, therefore, inferior to the Father, both in nature and

dignity; also, that the Holy Ghost was not God, but created by the power

of the Son. The Arians owned that the Son was the Word, but denied that

Word to have been eternal. They held that Christ had nothing of man in him

but the flesh, to which the Word was joined, which was the same as the

soul in us.

In modern times, the term _Arian_ is indiscriminately applied to those who

consider Jesus simply subordinate to the Father. Some of them believe

Christ to have been the creator of the world; but they all maintain that

he existed previously to his incarnation, though, in his preëxistent

state, they assign him different degrees of dignity.

(See Matt. 4:10; 19:17; 27:46. Mark 5:7; 13:32 John 4:23; 14:28; 20:17.

Acts 4:24. 1 Cor. 1:4; 11:3; 15:24. Eph. 1:17; 4:6. Phil. 1:3, 4, &c.)

SOCINIANS.

A sect so called from Faustus Socinus, who died in Poland, in 1604. There

were two who bore the name of Socinus,—uncle and nephew,—and both

disseminated the same doctrine; but it is the nephew who is generally

considered as the founder of this sect. They maintain that Jesus Christ

was a mere man, who had no existence before he was conceived by the Virgin

Mary; that the Holy Ghost is no distinct person; but that the Father is

truly and properly God. They own that the name of God is given, in the

holy Scriptures, to Jesus Christ, but contend that it is only a deputed

title, which, however, invests him with a great authority over all created

beings. They deny the doctrines of satisfaction and imputed righteousness,

and say that Christ only preached the truth to mankind, set before them,

in himself, an example of heroic virtue, and sealed his doctrines with his

blood. Original sin, and absolute predestination, they esteem scholastic

chimeras. Some of them likewise maintain the sleep of the soul, which,

they say, becomes insensible at death, and is raised again, with the body,

at the resurrection, when the good shall be established in the possession

of eternal felicity, while the wicked shall be consigned to a fire that

will not torment them eternally, but for a certain duration, proportioned

to their demerits. (See Acts 2:22; 17:31. 1 Tim. 2:5.)

HUMANITARIANS.

The Humanitarians believe in the simple humanity of Christ, or that he was

nothing more than a mere man, born according to the usual course of

nature, and who lived and died according to the ordinary circumstances of

mankind.

SECTARIANS.

This term is used among Christians to denote those who form separate

communions, and do not associate with one another in religious worship and

ceremonies. Thus we call Papists, Lutherans, Calvinists, different sects,

not so much on account of their differences in opinion, as because they

have established to themselves different fraternities, to which, in what

regards public worship, they confine themselves; the several denominations

above mentioned having no intercommunity with one another in sacred

matters. High, Strict, and Moderate Calvinists, High Church and Low

Church, we call only parties, because they have not formed separate

communions. Great and known differences in opinion, when followed by no

external breach in the society, are not considered constituting distinct

sects, though their differences in opinion may give rise to mutual

aversion.

The Jewish, Christian, Mahometan, and Pagan world is divided into an

almost innumerable variety of sects, each claiming to themselves the title

of orthodox, and each charging their opponents with heresy.

Where perfect religious liberty prevails, as in the United States, and

where emigrants from all quarters of the globe resort in great numbers, it

is not surprising that most of the Christian sects in foreign countries,

with some of native origin, should be found in this part of the American

continent.

CHURCH GOVERNMENT.

There are three modes of church government, viz., the _Episcopalian_, from

the Latin word _episcopus_, signifying _bishop_; the _Presbyterian_, from

the Greek word _presbuteros_, signifying _senior_, _elder_, or

_presbyter_; and the Congregational or Independent mode. Under one of

these forms, or by a mixture of their several peculiarities, every church

in the Christian world is governed. The Episcopal form is the most

extensive, as it embraces the Catholic, Greek, English, Methodist, and

Moravian churches.

Episcopalians have three orders in the ministry, viz., bishops, priests,

and deacons; they all have liturgies, longer or shorter, which they either

statedly or occasionally use. All Episcopalians believe in the existence

and the necessity of an apostolic succession of bishops, by whom alone

regular and valid ordinations can be performed.

The Presbyterians believe that the authority of their ministers to preach

the gospel and to administer the sacraments is derived from the Holy

Ghost, by the imposition of the hands of the presbytery. They affirm,

however, that there is no order in the church, as established by Christ

and his apostles, superior to that of presbyters; that all ministers,

being ambassadors of Christ, are equal by their commission; that

_presbyter_ and _bishop_, though different words, are of the same import;

and that prelacy was gradually established upon the primitive practice of

making the _moderator_, or speaker of the presbytery, a permanent officer.

The Congregationalists, or Independents, are so called from their

maintaining that each congregation of Christians, which meets in one house

for public worship, is a complete church, has sufficient power to act and

perform every thing relating to religious government within itself, and is

in no respect subject or accountable to other churches.

Independents, or Congregationalists, generally ordain their ministers by a

council of ministers called for the purpose: but still they hold that the

essence of ordination lies in the voluntary choice and call of the people,

and that public ordination is no other than a declaration of that call.

PRESBYTERIANS.

The first settlers of New England were driven away from Old England, in

pursuit of religious liberty. They were required to conform to the

established Protestant Episcopal church, in all her articles of belief,

and modes of worship and discipline: their consciences forbade such

conformity: their ministers were displaced: their property was tithed for

the support of an ecclesiastical prelacy, which they renounced; and the

only relief which they could find, was in abandoning their country for the

new world.

Most of the first settlers of New England were Congregationalists; and

established the government of individuals by the male communicating

members of the churches to which they belonged, and of congregations by

sister congregations, met by representation in ecclesiastical councils. A

part of the ministers and people of Connecticut, at a very early period of

her history, were Presbyterians in their principles of church government.

Being intermixed, however, with Congregational brethren, instead of

establishing presbyteries in due form, they united with their

fellow-Christians in adopting, in 1708, the Saybrook Platform, according

to which the churches and pastors are consociated, so as virtually to be

under Presbyterian government, under another name.

The first Presbyterian churches duly organized in the United States, were

the first Presbyterian church in Philadelphia, and the church at Snow

Hill, in Maryland.

The first presbytery in the United States was formed about 1794, by the

voluntary association of several ministers, who had received Presbyterian

orders in Europe, and who agreed to govern themselves agreeably to the

Westminster Confession of Faith, Form of Government, Book of Discipline,

and Directory for Worship. (See _Andover Orthodox Creed_.)

The reason why the Presbyterians first settled in Pennsylvania, Maryland,

and New Jersey, was undoubtedly this—that in these places they found

toleration, and equal religious rights, while the Episcopacy was

established by law in Virginia, Congregationalism in New England, and the

Reformed Dutch church, with Episcopacy, in New York.

The doctrines of the Presbyterian church are Calvinistic; and the only

fundamental principle which distinguishes it from other Protestant

churches is this—that God has authorized the government of his church by

presbyters, or elders, who are chosen by the people, and ordained to

office by predecessors in office, in virtue of the commission which Christ

gave his apostles as ministers in the kingdom of God; and that, among all

presbyters, there is an official parity, whatever disparity may exist in

their talents or official employments.

All the different congregations, under the care of the general assembly,

are considered as the one Presbyterian church in the United States,

meeting, for the sake of convenience and edification, in their several

places of worship. Each particular congregation of baptized people,

associated for godly living, and the worship of Almighty God, may become a

Presbyterian church, by electing one or more elders, agreeably to the form

prescribed in the book styled the Constitution of the Presbyterian Church,

and having them ordained and installed as their session.

They judge that to presbyteries the Lord Jesus has committed the spiritual

government of each particular congregation, and not to the whole body of

the communicants; and on this point they are distinguished from

Independents and Congregationalists. If all were governors, they should

not be able to distinguish the overseers or bishops from all the male and

female communicants; nor could they apply the command, “Obey them that

have the rule over you, and submit yourselves; for they watch for your

souls, as they that must give account.” (Heb. 13:17.) If all are rulers in

the church who are communicants, they are at a loss for the meaning of the

exhortation, “We beseech you, brethren, to know them that labor among you,

_and are over you in the __ Lord_, and admonish you; and to esteem them

very highly in love for their work’s sake.”

If an aggrieved brother should tell the story of his wrongs to each

individual communicant, he would not thereby tell it to the church

judicially, so that cognizance could be taken of the affair. It is to the

church, acting by her proper organs, and to her overseers, met as a

judicatory, that he must bring his charge, if he would have discipline

exercised in such a way as God empowered his church to exercise it.

The general assembly is the highest judicatory in the Presbyterian church,

and is constituted by an equal number of teaching and ruling elders,

elected by each presbytery annually, and specially commissioned to

deliberate, vote, and determine, in all matters which may come before that

body. Each presbytery may send one bishop and one ruling elder to the

assembly: each presbytery, having more than twelve ministers, may send two

ministers and two ruling elders, and so, in the same proportion, for every

twelve ministerial members.

Every Presbyterian church elects its own pastor; but, to secure the whole

church against insufficient, erroneous, or immoral men, it is provided

that no church shall prosecute any call, without first obtaining leave

from the presbytery under whose care that church may be; and that no

licentiate, or bishop, shall receive any call, but through the hands of

his own presbytery.

Any member of the Presbyterian church may be the subject of its

discipline; and every member, if he judges himself injured by any portion

of the church, may, by appeal, or complaint, carry his cause up from the

church session to the presbytery, from the presbytery to the synod, and

from the synod to the general assembly, so as to obtain the decision of

the whole church, met by representation in this high judicatory.

Evangelical ministers of the gospel, of all denominations, are permitted,

on the invitation of a pastor, or of the session of a vacant church, to

preach in their pulpits; and any person known properly, or made known to a

pastor or session, as a communicant in good, regular standing, in any

truly Christian denomination of people, is, in most of their churches,

affectionately invited to occasional communion. They wish to have

Christian fellowship with all the redeemed of the Lord, who have been

renewed by his Spirit; but, in ecclesiastical government and discipline,

they ask and expect the coöperation of none but Presbyterians. See

_Statistics_.

CUMBERLAND PRESBYTERIANS.

In the year 1800, a very great revival of religion took place within the

bounds of the synod of Kentucky, in consequence of which, a greater number

of new congregations were formed than it was possible to supply with

regularly-educated ministers. To remedy this evil, it was resolved to

license men to preach who were apt to teach, and sound in the faith,

though they had not gone through any course of classical study. This took

place at the Transylvania presbyter; but, as many of its members were

dissatisfied with the proposed innovation, an appeal was made to the

synod, which appointed a commission to examine into the circumstances of

the case, the result of whose report was, a prohibition of the labors of

uneducated ministers, which led the opposite party to form themselves into

an independent presbytery, which took its name from the district of

Cumberland, in which it was constituted.

As to the doctrinal views, they occupy a kind of middle ground between

Calvinists and Arminians. They reject the doctrine of eternal reprobation,

and hold the universality of redemption, and that the Spirit of God

operates on the world, or as coëxtensively as Christ has made the

atonement, in such a manner as to leave all men inexcusable.

The Cumberland Presbyterians have about 550 churches and ministers, and

about 70,000 members. They have a college at Cumberland, Ky.

EPISCOPALIANS.

That form of Church polity, in which the ministry is divided into the

three orders of Bishops, Priests, and Deacons, each having powers and

duties, distinct from the others, the Bishops being superior to the

Priests and Deacons, and the immediate source of all their authority, is

called EPISCOPACY, and those who adhere to this polity, are called

EPISCOPALIANS.

The Book of Religions Comprising the Views, Creeds, Sentiments, or Opinions, of All the Principal Religious Sects in the World, Particularly of All Christian Denominations in Europe and America, to Which are Added Church and Missionary Statistics, Together With Biographical Sketches · 第 1 / 35 段