THE GOOD AS SUPREME NEITHER NEEDS NOR POSSESSES INTELLECTION.

No doubt Intelligence is beautiful; it is the most beautiful of things,

since it is illuminated by a pure light, since it shines with a pure

splendor, and contains the intelligible beings of which our world, in

spite of its beauty, is but an adumbration and image. The intelligible

world is located in a region resplendent with clearness, where is

nothing either obscure or indefinite, where, within itself, it enjoys a

blissful life. It entrances the human gaze, especially when one knows

how to commune with it. But just as a view of heaven, and the splendor

of the stars leads one to seek and conceive their author, likewise the

contemplation of the intelligible world, and the fascination it exerts

leads (the beholder) to seek its author. The question then arises, Who

is He who has given existence to the intelligible world? Where and how

did He beget this so pure Intellect, this so beautiful son who derives

all of his fulness from his father[202]? This supreme Principle itself

is neither Intelligence nor son, but is superior to Intelligence, which

is His son. Intelligence, His son, succeeds Him, because the son needs

to receive from the father both intellection and fulness, which is

his food; so (the son) holds the first rank after Him who has need of

nothing, not even intellection. Nevertheless Intelligence possesses

fulness and true intellection, because it immediately participates in

the Good. Thus the Good, being above real fulness and intellection,

neither possesses them, nor needs them; otherwise, He would not be the

Good.

Plotinos: Complete Works, v. 2 In Chronological Order, Grouped in Four Periods · 第 303 / 381 题