IT IS UNCERTAIN WHETHER AN INTERMEDIARY BODY BE IMPLIED BY VISION.

1. Above[161] we suggested the question whether it be possible to see

without some medium such as the air or a diaphanous body[162]; we

shall now try to consider it. It has already been asserted that in

general the soul cannot see or feel without the intermediation of some

body; for, when completely separated from the body (the soul dwells

in the intelligible world). But, as touch consists of perception,

not indeed of intelligible entities, but only of sense-objects, the

soul cannot see or feel without the intermediation of some body; for

when completely separated from some body, the soul dwells in the

intelligible world. But, as touch consists of perception, not indeed

of intelligible entities, but only of sense-object, the soul in order

to come in contact with these sense-objects, must enter into cognitive

or affective relation with them by the means of intermediaries which

must possess an analogous nature; and that is why the knowledge of

bodies must be acquired by the means of corporeal organs. Through these

organs which are so interrelated as to form a sort of unity, the soul

approaches sense-objects in a manner such as to establish effective

communion. That contact between the organ and the cognized object must

be established is evident enough for tangible objects, but is doubtful

for visible objects. Whether contact be necessary for hearing is a

question we shall have to discuss later.[163] Here we shall first

discuss whether sight demand a medium between the eye and color.

Plotinos: Complete Works, v. 2 In Chronological Order, Grouped in Four Periods · 第 267 / 381 题