ANNUAL MEETING HELD AT WASHINGTON, D. C., DEC. 8-12, 1885.

[By G. C. Ashmun, M. D., Health Officer, Cleveland, O.]

In the summer of 1873 a few gentlemen met at Long Branch, New Jersey,

and organized as the “American Public Health Association.” At that time

there were but few state boards of health, and local boards were not

generally efficient; and it was one of the chief objects of the American

Public Health Association to aid in the establishment of health and

sanitary organizations throughout the country. Prominent among the

original members of the association were gentlemen from the Mississippi

valley. For a long time the cities and towns of that valley had suffered

from visitations of yellow fever, and men had become somewhat

enlightened by the good results obtained from the course pursued by

certain officers during the war. Especially was this true in New

Orleans, and the question was fairly raised whether local conditions

were not responsible for the disastrous outbreaks which had occurred so

frequently.

From 1873 to the present time, there have been annual meetings of the

association, with a greatly enlarged membership. A large result of the

efforts of the association and its members is seen in the national,

state and local boards of health, and other sanitary organizations

throughout the country. But three of the states are now without state

organizations. The recent meeting in Washington was its “thirteenth

annual,” and was as well attended and its members as enthusiastic as at

any. The members were “welcomed” on behalf the medical fraternity of

Washington by the venerable Dr. J. M. Toner, and by the district

authorities through the President of the Board of Commissioners, Judge

Edmonds. These remarks were followed by the usual address by the

president of the association, Dr. Reeves of West Virginia.

The chief point, perhaps, of Dr. Reeves' address, and the one calling

out most expressions of approval, was the arraignment of Congress for

its failure to provide means for the support of the National Board of

Health. He cited the liberality shown to care for domestic animals, the

fisheries, the Indians, and, indeed, almost every conceivable object,

but Congress was unwilling to grant even a sum sufficient for gathering

and publishing the reports from local boards. He expressed a strong

feeling against the attempt to have the work for which the National

Board was created to perform, done by the Marine Hospital Service.

A large part of the time of the meetings was taken up in hearing reports

from committees appointed at the meeting in St. Louis, 1884. Among these

reports were some of great interest. Prof. Sargent, of Harvard, gave a

report upon “School Hygiene in American Schools and Colleges,” and this

was enlarged by a paper from Dr. Hartwell, of John Hopkins University,

on “The German System of Physical Education.” At this meeting prizes

were to be awarded, in accordance with the wish of Mr. Lomb, of Baush &

Lomb, Rochester. The subjects were:

The Cleveland Medical Gazette, Vol. 1, No. 3, January 1886 · 第 29 / 42 题