III

One of the fundamental characteristics of life is power of adaptation;

it will adapt itself to almost any condition; it is willing and

accommodating. It is like a stream that can be turned into various

channels; the gall insects turn it into channels to suit their ends when

they sting the leaf of a tree or the stalk of a plant, and deposit an

egg in the wound. "Build me a home and a nursery for my young," says the

insect. "With all my heart," says the leaf, and forthwith forgets its

function as a leaf, and proceeds to build up a structure, often of great

delicacy and complexity, to house and cradle its enemy. The current of

life flows on blindly and takes any form imposed upon it. But in the

case of the vegetable galls it takes life to control life. Man cannot

produce these galls by artificial means. But we can take various

mechanical and chemical liberties with embryonic animal life in its

lower sea-forms. Professor Loeb has fertilized the eggs of sea-urchins

by artificial means. The eggs of certain forms may be made to produce

twins by altering the constitution of the sea-water, and the twins can

be made to grow together so as to produce monstrosities by another

chemical change in the sea-water. The eyes of certain fish embryos may

be fused into a single cyclopean eye by adding magnesium chloride to the

water in which they live. Loeb says, "It is _a priori_ obvious that an

unlimited number of pathological variations might be produced by a

variation in the concentration and constitution of the sea water, and

experience confirms this statement." It has been found that when frog's

eggs are turned upside down and compressed between two glass plates for

a number of hours, some of the eggs give rise to twins. Professor Morgan

found that if he destroyed half of a frog's egg after the first

segmentation, the remaining half gave rise to half an embryo, but that

if he put the half-egg upside down, and compressed it between two glass

plates, he got a perfect embryo frog of half the normal size. Such

things show how plastic and adaptive life is. Dr. Carrel's experiments

with living animal tissue immersed in a proper mother-liquid illustrate

how the vital process--cell-multiplication--may be induced to go on and

on, blindly, aimlessly, for an almost indefinite time. The cells

multiply, but they do not organize themselves into a constructive

community and build an organ or any purposeful part. They may be likened

to a lot of blind masons piling up brick and mortar without any

architect to direct their work or furnish them a plan. A living body of

the higher type is not merely an association of cells; it is an

association and coöperation of communities of cells, each community

working to a definite end and building an harmonious whole. The

biochemist who would produce life in the laboratory has before him the

problem of compounding matter charged with this organizing tendency or

power, and doubtless if he ever should evoke this mysterious process

through his chemical reactions, it would possess this power, as this is

what distinguishes the organic from the inorganic.

I do not see mind or intelligence in the inorganic world in the sense in

which I see it in the organic. In the heavens one sees power, vastness,

sublimity, unspeakable, but one sees only the physical laws working on a

grander scale than on the earth. Celestial mechanics do not differ from

terrestrial mechanics, however tremendous and imposing the result of

their activities. But in the humblest living thing--in a spear of grass

by the roadside, in a gnat, in a flea--there lurks a greater mystery. In

an animate body, however small, there abides something of which we get

no trace in the vast reaches of astronomy, a kind of activity that is

incalculable, indeterminate, and super-mechanical, not lawless, but

making its own laws, and escaping from the iron necessity that rules in

the inorganic world.

Our mathematics and our science can break into the circle of the

celestial and the terrestrial forces, and weigh and measure and separate

them, and in a degree understand them; but the forces of life defy our

analysis as well as our synthesis.

Knowing as we do all the elements that make up the body and brain of a

man, all the physiological processes, and all the relations and

interdependence of his various organs, if, in addition, we knew all his

inheritances, his whole ancestry back to the primordial cells from which

he sprang, and if we also knew that of every person with whom he comes

in contact and who influences his life, could we forecast his future,

predict the orbit in which his life would revolve, indicate its

eclipses, its perturbations, and the like, as we do that of an

astronomic body? or could we foresee his affinities and combinations as

we do that of a chemical body? Had we known any of the animal forms in

his line of ascent, could we have foretold man as we know him to-day?

Could we have foretold the future of any form of life from its remote

beginnings? Would our mathematics and our chemistry have been of any

avail in our dealing with such a problem? Biology is not in the same

category with geology and astronomy. In the inorganic world, chemical

affinity builds up and pulls down. It integrates the rocks and, under

changed conditions, it disintegrates them. In the organic world chemical

affinity is equally active, but it plays a subordinate part. It neither

builds up nor pulls down. Vital activities, if we must shun the term

"vital force," do both. Barring accidents, the life of all organisms is

terminated by other organisms. In the order of nature, life destroys

life, and compounds destroy compounds. When the air and soil and water

hold no invisible living germs, organic bodies never decay. It is not

the heat that begets putrefaction, but germs in the air. Sufficient heat

kills the germs, but what disintegrates the germs and reduces them to

dust? Other still smaller organisms? and so on _ad infinitum_? Does the

sequence of life have no end? The destruction of one chemical compound

means the formation of other chemical compounds; chemical affinity

cannot be annulled, but the activity we call vital is easily arrested. A

living body can be killed, but a chemical body can only be changed into

another chemical body.

The least of living things, I repeat, holds a more profound mystery than

all our astronomy and our geology hold. It introduces us to activities

which our mathematics do not help us to deal with. Our science can

describe the processes of a living body, and name all the material

elements that enter into it, but it cannot tell us in what the peculiar

activity consists, or just what it is that differentiates living matter

from non-living. Its analysis reveals no difference. But this difference

consists in something beyond the reach of chemistry and of physics; it

is active intelligence, the power of self-direction, of self-adjustment,

of self-maintenance, of adapting means to an end. It is notorious that

the hand cannot always cover the flea; this atom has will, and knows

the road to safety. Behold what our bodies know over and above what we

know! Professor Czapek reveals to us a chemist at work in the body who

proceeds precisely like the chemist in his laboratory; they might both

have graduated at the same school. Thus the chemist in the laboratory is

accustomed to dissolve the substance which is to be used in an

experiment to react on other substances. The chemical course in living

cells is the same. All substances destined for reactions are first

dissolved. No compound is taken up in living cells before it is

dissolved. Digestion is essentially identical with dissolving or

bringing into a liquid state. On the other hand, when the chemist wishes

to preserve a living substance from chemical change, he transfers it

from a state of solution into a solid state. The chemist in the living

body does the same thing. Substances which are to be stored up, such as

starch, fat, or protein bodies, are deposited in insoluble form, ready

to be dissolved and used whenever wanted for the life processes.

Poisonous substances are eliminated from living bodies by the same

process of precipitation. Oxalic acid is a product of oxidation in

living cells, and has strong poisonous properties. To get rid of it, the

chemist inside the body, by the aid of calcium salts, forms insoluble

compounds of it, and thus casts it out. To separate substances from each

other by filtration, or by shaking with suitable liquids, is one of the

daily tasks of the chemist. Analogous processes occur regularly in

living cells. Again, when the chemist wishes to finish his filtration

quickly, he uses filters which have a large surface. "In living

protoplasms, this condition is very well fulfilled by the foam-like

structure which affords an immense surface in a very small space." In

the laboratory the chemist mixes his substances by stirring. The body

chemist achieves the same result by the streaming of protoplasm. The

cells know what they want, and how to attain it, as clearly as the

chemist does. The intelligence of the living body, or what we must call

such for want of a better term, is shown in scores of ways--by the means

it takes to protect itself against microbes, by the antitoxins that it

forms. Indeed, if we knew all that our bodies know, what mysteries would

be revealed to us!

The Breath of Life · 第 53 / 87 题