SIR: I leave this morning for Tahlequah, the seat of government of the

Cherokee Nation, and Park Hill, the residence of Governor Ross, the

principal chief. Since 1835 there have always been two parties in the

Cherokee Nation, bitterly hostile to each other. The treaty of that

year was made by unauthorized persons, against the will of the large

majority of the nation and against that of the chief, Mr. Ross.

Several years ago Ridge, Boudinot, and others, principal men of the

treaty party, were killed, with, it was alleged, the sanction of Mr.

Ross, and the feud is today as bitter as it was twenty years ago. The

full-blooded Indians are mostly adherents of Ross, and many of

them--1,000 to 1,500 it is alleged--are on the side of the North. I

think that number is exaggerated. The half-breeds or white Indians (as

they call themselves) are to a man with us. It has all along been

supposed, or at least suspected, that Mr. Ross would side with the

North. His declarations are in favor of neutrality. But I am inclined

to believe that he is acting upon the policy (surely a wise one) of

not permitting his people to commit themselves until he has formal

guarantees from an authorized agent of the Confederate States. These I

shall give him if he will accept them. General McCulloch will be with

me, and I strongly hope that we shall satisfy him, and effect a formal

and firm treaty. If so, we shall have nearly the whole nation with us,

and those who are not will be unimportant. If he refuses he will learn

that his country will be occupied; and I shall then negotiate with the

leaders of the half-breeds who are now raising troops, and who will

meet me at the Creek Agency on Friday of next week. Several of those

living near here I have already seen.

On Wednesday of next week I will meet the chiefs of the Creeks at the

North Fork of the Canadian. I will then fix a day for a council of the

Creeks, and go on to meet the Choctaws at Fort Washita. When I shall

have concluded an arrangement with them I will go to the Chickasaw

Country, and thence to the Seminoles.

I hope to meet the heads of the Wichitas, Caddos, Iowas, Toncawes,

Delawares, Kickapoos, and Reserve Comanches at Fort Washita. I have

requested their agent to induce them to meet me there. The Creek

chiefs have a council with the wild Indians, Comanches and others,

high up on the North Fork of the Canadian, on the 10th proximo. I

shall endeavor, through the Creek chiefs, to have an interview with

the heads of the wild tribes at Fort Washita and induce them to come

in and settle on the reserve upon the False Washita River near Fort

Cobb.

As I shall be absent from this post some six weeks or more, it is not

likely that I shall be able to give you frequent advice of my

movements. There are no mails in the Indian country and I shall have

to employ expresses when I desire to send on letters.

We shall have no difficulty with the Creeks, Seminoles, Choctaws, and

Chickasaws, either in effecting treaties or raising troops. The

greatest trouble will be in regard to arms. Not one in ten of either

of the tribes has a gun at all, and most of the guns are indifferent

double-barreled. I do not know whether the Bureau of Indian Affairs is

a part of the Department of State, and of course whether this is

properly addressed to you. I do not address the Commissioner because I

understand he is on his way hither. The suggestions I wish to make are

important and I venture to hope that you will give them their proper

direction. I have already spoken of arms for the Indians. Those arms,

if possible, should be the plain muzzle-loading rifle, large bore,

with molds for conical bullets hollowed at the truncated end, which I

suppose to be the minie-ball. Revolvers, I am aware, cannot be had,

and an Indian would not pick up a musket if it lay in the road.

Our river is falling and will soon be low, when steam-boats will not

be able to get above Little Rock, if even there. To embody the Indians

and, collecting them together, keep them long without arms would

disgust them, and they would scatter over the country like partridges

and never be got together again. The arms should, therefore, be sent

here with all speed.

No funds have been remitted to me, nor have I any power to procure or

draw for any, for my expenses or for those of the councils I must

hold. It has always been customary for the Indians to be fed at such

councils, and they will expect it. I have borrowed $300 of Mr. Charles

B. Johnson, giving him a draft on the Commissioner of Indian Affairs,

for incidental expenses, and if I have a council at Fort Washita shall

contract with him to feed the Indians. I have seen Elias Rector, late

superintendent of Indian affairs at Fort Smith, and William

Quesenbury, appointed agent for the Creeks by the Government at

Washington, but who did not accept, and Samuel M. Rutherford, agent

for the Seminoles, who forwards his resignation immediately; and have

written to Matthew Leeper, agent for the Wichitas and other Reserve

Indians; and have formally requested each to continue to exercise the

powers of his office under the Confederate States. They are all

citizens of Arkansas and Texas and have readily consented to do so.

If we have declared a protectorate over these tribes and extended our

laws over them we have, I suppose, continued in force there the whole

system. Even if we have not we cannot dispense with the superintendent

and agents. I shall also see Mr. Crawford, agent for the Cherokees,

and request him to continue to act, as I have requested Colonel Cooper

to do as agent for the Choctaws and Chickasaws. Unless all this were

done there would be both discontent and confusion, and I therefore

earnestly request that my action may be immediately confirmed and

these officers assured that they shall be continued, and that their

compensation shall be the same as under the United States and date

from the day of the resignation of each or of his acceptance of office

under the Confederate States. And I also strenuously urge that no

changes be made in these offices. The incumbents are all good men and

true, competent, and honest, and are, or will be, very acceptable to

the Indians. To make changes will be to make mischief.

Mr. Charles B. Johnson is feeding the Wichitas and other Reserve

Indians under a contract which ends on the 30th of June. I have

instructed him to continue feeding them during the present season

under the same contract, _i.e._, on the same terms, which I know to be

reasonable.

It is very important that some funds should be at my disposition. The

State of Arkansas has furnished me an escort of a company and General

McCulloch has procured me transportation. To meet contingent expenses

it is necessary that at least $1000 should be placed here subject to

my draft; and, as I have several times urged, money should be placed

in the proper hands to pay a bounty to each Indian that enlists.

I wish I had more definite instructions and power more distinctly

expressed, especially power in so many words to make treaties and give

all necessary guarantees. For without giving them nothing can be done,

and I am [not] sure that John Ross will be satisfied with my statement

or assurance that I have the power, or with anything less than a

formal authority from the Congress. He is very shrewd. If I fail with

him it will not be my fault.

I have the honor to be, sir, very truly and respectfully, yours,

ALBERT PIKE, Commissioner, &c.

_Official Records_, fourth ser., vol. i, 359-361.

[350] Pike to Cooley, February 17, 1866.

[351] _Official Records_, first ser., vol. liii, supplement, 688.

[352] A military escort had also been furnished by the Arkansas Military

Board to General McCulloch [_ibid._, 687].

[353] Motey, or Moty, Kennard is occasionally spoken of, in the records,

as the principal chief of the entire Creek Nation. The tribe was, however,

very sharply divided into the Lower and the Upper Creeks. Their

differences had been accentuated by the unpleasant and even dishonorable

and tragic circumstances of their removal from Georgia and Alabama. The

Lower Creeks represented the faction that had stood back of William

McIntosh and that had consented to the fraudulent treaty of Indian

Springs, the Upper Creeks were the dissenters [Abel, _History of Indian

Consolidation_, chapters vi and vii; Phillips, _Georgia and State Rights_,

56-57].

[354] Letter from Greenwood to the Delegation, February 4, 1861 [Indian

Office, _Letter Book_, no. 65, pp. 140-141].

[355] Commissioner of Indian Affairs, _Report_, 1861. Note that as early

as March 18, 1861, Secretary Smith had ordered the suspension of the

issuance of all requisitions to ordinary disbursing officers in the

seceding states. This order probably affected indirectly even the Indian

Territory [Smith to commissioner of Indian affairs, March 18, 1861,

_Miscellaneous Files, 1858-1863_].

[356] Governor Thomas O. Moore of Louisiana to President Davis, May 31,

1861 [_Official Records_, first ser., vol. iii, 588].

[357] See letter of W. S. Robertson to the Secretary of the Interior

[General Files, _Southern Superintendency, 1859-1862_, R1664].

[358] See statement of the "Loyal" Creek Delegation at the Fort Smith

Council, September, 1865 [Land Files, _Indian Talks, Councils, etc.,

1865-1866_, Box 4; Commissioner of Indian Affairs, _Report_, 1865, pp.

328-329].

[359] Opoeth-le-yo-ho-la was nevertheless a very prominent man among the

Upper Creeks and had been prominent even before the exodus from Georgia

and Alabama. At all events he was sufficiently prominent to protest with

others against the transportation contracts that had been made by the War

Department [Lewis Cass to Opoeth-le-yo-ho-la and other Creek chiefs, dated

Tuckabatchytown, Alabama, January 27, 1836]. Again in 1838,

Opoeth-le-yo-ho-la headed a party of protest, that time against the

selling of certain Creek lands left unsold at the time of emigration

[_Creek Reservation Papers_, 25].

Opoeth-le-yo-ho-la seems to have been one of the assassins of William

McIntosh; that is, if the subjoined statement of Acting-superintendent

William Armstrong is to be trusted:

CHOCTAW AGENCY August 31, 1836

C. A. HARRIS Esqr, Com{r} of Ind Affairs,

Sir: The first party of emigrating Creeks are now on the opposite side

of the river Arkansas, on their way up. I shall leave tomorrow so as

to meet them at Gibson; while there, I will see the McIntosh party and

endeavor to learn the state of feelings amongst the several parties.

Many threats have been made; and much dissatisfaction manifested by

both Chilly & Rolly McIntosh, the latter has sworn to kill

A-po-the-ho-lo who was concerned in taking the life of his Father.

Rolly McIntosh and the other Chiefs now over, are opposed to

Ne-a-math-la the Chief who is with the party emigrating, upon the

ground mainly that they may probably be superseded, or their authority

abridged. I will however report to you, fully, after I shall have

informed myself, of the state of feeling &c, and will endeavor with

Gen{l} Arbuckle, to bring about a reconciliation. Respectfully Your

Obt Servt

WM ARMSTRONG Act Supt West{n} Ter{y}

_War Department Files_, A37.

Early in the forties, Opoeth-le-yo-ho-la posed as a trader in the Creek

country. He was the partner of J. W. Taylor, a white man. The company so

composed failed, in 1843, "to give bond and license" and so Agent J. L.

Dawson closed its store [Communication of J. L. Dawson, September 5, 1843,

_War Department Files_, I1537].

[360] G. W. Stidham was probably a half-breed. Naturally, being the

official interpreter, he signed as the interpreter and not as a member of

the tribe.

[361]

We the loyal Creek Indians represented by the Delegation now present,

solemnly declare that the Treaty of July 10, 1861 was alone made by

the rebel portion of the Creek Indians, and never was executed or

assented to by the Union portion of the Nation, and is, not now, and

never has been, obligatory upon them and the names to said treaty, of

the loyal party, was a forgery--Land Files, _Indian Talks, Councils,

etc._, Box 4, 1865-1866; Commissioner of Indian Affairs, _Report_,

1865, p. 330.

[362] The document herewith given presents one view of the case:

The undersigned Delegates from the Creek Nation would respectfully ask

to make the following statement concerning the alliance between the

said Creek Nation and the so-called Confederate States of America. To

the end that the Creek Nation may be put upon a proper footing in the

estimation of your honorable body and that there may be no

misapprehension on the part of the Government you here represent we

beg leave to state:

1st. The Alliance entered into by the Creek Nation with the

Confederate Government was entered into voluntarily, and without the

interference of any person or persons other than members of our tribe.

In taking that step the assembled wisdom of the Nation in council,

thought they were acting for the best interests of the Nation and of

their posterity.

2d. Hopoethle Yoholo the far-famed leader of those members of our

tribe who battled against us, was not at the time of the making of the

treaty with Albert Pike Commissioner on the part of the Confederate

States, a Chief, counsellor or head man in said tribe and had no voice

in the council, he was however present at the making of said Treaty

and give said Pike to understand that he fully concurred in the result

of our deliberations. After the making of the Treaty Hopoethle Yoholo

collected together his adherents, and for reasons entirely of a

domestic character and in no wise connected with the National question

at issue, withdrew from the country and assumed a hostile attitude.

With this exception the Creeks were united as one man in action and

were ever united as one man in principle on the National question then

agitated.

3d. Although the Nation we represent would not attempt at this time to

urge anything in palliation of the course of conduct they adopted in

this matter, other than to ask your honorable body to esteem the error

as one of the "head and not of the heart"--but we beg leave to state

that at the time of the forming of the Alliance above refered to

circumstances over which we could not possibly exercise control seemed

to _demand_ an adoption of the course taken. The protection always

borne with the idea of allegiance, was taken from our Nation by the

withdrawal of the United States forces from the Indian Territory. This

movement left the Nations entirely without the support of the United

States government, and had they desired to remain neutral or to take

active measures on the side of the United States they could not

possibly have done so without having their Country desolated, or by

abandoning their homes. Surrounded by States, in a tumult of angry

excitement attendant upon a dissolution of their connection with the

United States, they were completely in the power of those States,

without having United States forces to call to their aid or

assistance. An alliance under such circumstances were [was]

indispensible to the safety of the country. Viewing the matter in this

light the Treaty was made, and once having linked our destiny with

those of the Confederacy, we could not in honor betray our trust. In

conclusion we beg leave to say that as long as events cannot be

controlled by human wisdom and foresight and until an honorable

adherence to promises made voluntarily, is dishonorable so long must

we deem ourselves in one sense at least--guiltless of any criminality

in this matter.--Land Files, _Indian Talks, Councils, etc., Box 4,

1865-1866._

[363] They were also worried over rumors of sequestration:

Statements having found their way into some of the public prints, to

the effect that supplies purchased for the use of the Choctaws, have

been detained by citizens of the Northern States, which statements if

uncontradicted may engender hostile feelings between those Indians and

the Government, I have thought proper to forward to you the enclosed

copies of official correspondence in relation to this subject, that

you may be able authoritatively to contradict such statements and

satisfy the Choctaws that the Government intends faithfully to

preserve and perpetuate the amicable relations subsisting between

itself and those people.--Dole to Rector and same to Coffin, May 16,

1861 [Indian Office, _Letter Book_, no. 65, p. 458].

[364] Particularly by means of the resolutions of the National Council,

June 10, 1861.

[365] _Official Records_, first ser., vol. iii, 593.

[366] For evidence of this and for the fullest extant account of the

progress of secession among the Choctaws, see letter of S. Orlando Lee to

Dole, March 15, 1862.

[367] The following is found in the _Fort Smith Papers_:

Tishomingo, C. N. Nov. 26, 1861.

GEN. A. G. MAYERS

Sir: Having been appointed as a Delegate from this Nation (the

Chickasaw) to the Southern Congress, am at a loss (to know) when the

Congress does meet. I have all along understood from newspaper

accounts that it was to be on the 22d of February, but some seems to

think it is sooner. Will you please inform me at your earliest

convenience at what time the S. Congress does meet. Your attention to

the above is respectfully requested. I am yours very Respectfully

JAMES GAMBLE.

P.S. Please continue to send me the Parallel, I will make it all right

with you when on my way to Va.

J. G.

[368] In the list of members of the Confederate congresses, given in

_Official Records_, fourth ser., vol. iii, 1184-1191, no Indian delegate

is specified until 1863.

[369] Cooper to President Davis, July 25, 1861 [_ibid_., first ser., vol.

iii, 614].

[370] E. H. Carruth, in a letter to General Hunter of November 26, 1861

[Commissioner of Indian Affairs, _Report_, 1861, p. 47], would have us

understand that the Seminoles as a tribe did not negotiate with Pike, but

that the whole affair was as between Pike and Jumper, Jumper being

assisted by four chosen friends. The five were probably bribed. That Pike

was not averse to the use of money for such ends, his letter to Walker of

June twelfth would lead us to suspect [_Official Records_, first ser.,

vol. iii, 590]. We have, however, no definite proof of the same. John

Jumper was early rewarded by the Confederate government. By act of the

Provisional Congress, January 16, 1861 [_Statutes at Large_, p. 284], he

was made an honorary lieutenant-colonel of the army of the Confederate

States. Carruth further says that the family influence of Jumper "enabled

him to raise forty-six men, not all Seminoles, and Ben McCulloch

authorized him to call to his aid six hundred rangers from Fort Cobb, that

he might crush out the Union feeling in his tribe."

[371] It is just possible that Rector had been with him all the time. At

all events Rector subsequently entered an expense account against the C.

S. A. for services from July tenth to August twenty-fourth inclusive. See

Appendix A, _Fort Smith Papers_.

[372] See letter of Agent Snow, dated March 10, 1864, and its enclosures,

one of which is a speech of Long John, who became principal chief when the

aged Billy Bowlegs died, and another, a speech of Pas-co-fa, who, provided

his signature to the treaty be genuine, eventually must have repented of

his Confederate alliance. He was soon, with Bowlegs and Chup-co, in the

ranks of Opoeth-le-yo-ho-la [General Files, _Seminole, 1858-1867_, S291].

[373] The report of the United States commissioner of Indian affairs for

1863 estimates the loyal Seminoles at about two-thirds of the tribe [House

_Executive Documents_, 38th congress, first session, vol. iii, 143], that

of the Confederate States commissioner of Indian affairs as fully one-half

[S. S. Scott to Secretary Seddon, January 12, 1863, _Official Records_,

fourth ser., vol. ii, 353].

[374] While at the Creek Agency, Pike had communicated, so it seems, with

John Jumper and had asked him to meet him there with six others competent

and authorized to make a treaty. Up to the time of hearing from Pike, John

Jumper seems to have been inclined to adhere faithfully to the United

States government. The excellent report of E. H. Carruth, July 11, 1861

gives full particulars of this whole affair.

[375] See supplementary Article [_Official Records_, fourth ser., vol. i,

525].

[376] See communications from Bowlegs [So-nuk-mek-ko] to Commissioner of

Indian Affairs, March 2, 1863 and May 13, 1863 [General Files, _Seminole,

1858-1869_, B131, B317]. See also Dole to Coffin, March 24, 1863 [Indian

Office, _Letter Book_, no. 70, pp. 208-209].

[377] Commissioner of Indian Affairs, Report, 1869 [House _Executive

Documents_, 41st congress, second session, vol. iii, part 3, p. 521].

[378] See letter of E. H. Carruth.

[379] William P. Davis of Indiana had been given the United States

Seminole Agency but he never reached his post [Dole to John D. Davis,

April 5, 1862, Indian Office _Letter Book_, no. 68, p. 39]. Consequently,

the Confederate States agent, Rutherford, had sole influence there. Not

until George C. Snow of Indiana became United States Seminole agent, did

the non-secessionist Indians get the encouragement and support they ought

to have had all along.

[380] See Appendix B--_Leeper Papers_.

[381] The _Leeper Papers_, printed in the Appendix, furnish convincing

proof of this. Note also that July 4, 1861, Rector wrote to Leeper from

Fort Smith as follows:

In the 3rd section of the law of the Confederate Congress, regulating

the Indian service connected with said government, and making

provision for the continuance in office of the Superintendent and

Agents heretofore connected with the original U. S. government, you

will be continued upon the same terms and at the same salary, as

heretofore received from the federal government, and before entering

upon your duties as such it will be your duty to take an oath before a

proper officer of a State of the Confederate States, to support the

Constitution of and accept a Commission from the Confederate States of

America....--_Leeper Papers._

[382] Pike to Walker, dated Seminole Agency, July 31, 1861 [_Official

Records_, first ser., vol. iii, 624]. Writing to Benjamin, December 25,

1861 [_ibid._, vol. viii, 720], Pike said he had "64 men."

[383] These two treaties are interesting in various particulars. They

contained fewer concessions, fewer departures from established practice

than any others of the nine. They were made primarily for the maintenance

of peace on the Texan frontier. That fact is only too evident from their

contents and from the circumstances of their negotiation. One of the chief

reasons, cited by Texas, for her withdrawal from the Union was the failure

of the United States to protect her from Indian ravages. It seems never to

have occurred to her to mention the fact that her citizens, by their

aggressions, had constantly provoked the ravages, if such we can call

them. The northern counties of Texas were not "Southern" in climate or

industries, so it was especially necessary to enlist their sympathy in the

Confederate cause by keeping the Indians of the plains quiet and peaceful.

The Comanche treaties were also interesting in the matter of their

signatures and of their schedules. The signatures included that of Rector,

of the Creek chiefs, Motey Kennard and Chilly McIntosh, and of the

Seminole chief, John Jumper. The schedules promised such things as the

following to the Indians but in amounts that were beautifully indefinite:

Blue drilling, warm coats, calico, plaid check, regatta cotton shirts,

socks, hats, woolen shirts, red, white and blue blankets, red and blue

list cloth, shawls and handkerchiefs, brown domestic, thread, yarn and

twine, shoes, for men and women, white drilling, ribbons, assorted

colors, beads, combs, camp kettles, tin cups and buckets, pans, coffee

pots and dippers, needles, scissors and shears, butcher knives, large

iron spoons, knives and forks, nails, hatchets and hammers, augers,

drawing knives, gimlets, chopping axes, fish-hooks, ammunition,

including powder, lead, flints and percussion caps, tobacco.

Two of a kind would have satisfied most of the requirements of these

schedules. The list of things is interesting from the standpoint of

domesticity and general utility and also from the standpoint of the things

that the same Indians had previously seemed to need in such immense

quantities. For illustration it would be well to note that when Agent

Leeper handed in his last accounts to the United States government, he

claimed to have issued during the second quarter of 1861 to the Indians at

the Wichita Agency, 550 pounds of coffee, 550 pounds of sugar, 650 pounds

of soap, 600 pounds of tobacco, etc.

The American Indian as Slaveholder and Seccessionist An Omitted Chapter in the Diplomatic History of the Southern Confederacy · 第 30 / 35 段