BY SHERWOOD RYSE.

Although the game of lawn tennis, which was introduced to the readers of

YOUNG PEOPLE early in the summer, has made giant strides in popularity,

it does not seem to carry its character in its face, for there are still

people to be found who have seen the game and yet have not appreciated

its merits. More than one person has said to me, "I don't see much fun

in knocking a ball over a net for a person on the other side to knock it

back again."

Now there is a great deal of reason in that. To knock a ball over a net

for another person to knock it back again would be very poor fun. But,

as we know, the object in knocking the ball over the net is that the

other person shall _not_ knock it back, which is quite another thing,

and which, indeed, is the essence of the game.

Should this view of the case fail to convince the ignorant persons above

referred to that lawn tennis is a game deserving of respect, and that it

is not, what Dr. Johnson called fishing, the pastime of fools, I would

take them to see a lawn tennis tournament. I would do that, however,

only out of pure good nature, for it would be a great deal more pleasant

to look on at a tournament in company with some one who knows the game.

And so, if you please, I will take my readers to the tournament at the

St. George's cricket ground at Hoboken, New Jersey. The name of the club

suggests that it is English in its origin; and that is a good omen, for

is not old England the home of lawn tennis, as it is also of cricket?

Eight courts are laid out on the carefully prepared ground, which is

refreshingly green even after this long dry summer, and several games

are in progress.

Our artist has chosen for the subject of his illustration on page 41 the

double-handed match between Messrs. Anderson and Henry, of the Seabright

Club, and Messrs. D. and G. F. Miller, of Utica. Though the

double-handed game is very interesting, it does not possess the same

attraction, for players at least, as a single-handed contest, in which

one player has to cover the whole of his court. Not that the young

player who looks forward to taking part some day in a public tournament

should neglect the double game. It is, indeed, a very necessary part of

the practice required to make a player thoroughly at home in the game,

for it teaches him how to "place" his "returns."

Watch the players carefully, and notice the quick decision required to

place the ball beyond the reach of both their antagonists. In a

single-handed game there is only one man's vigilance to outwit. In the

double game there are two, and one of two partners, if they are both

good players, should always be within reach of the ball wherever it may

be placed. Thus you see that a young player who has learned to place his

returns well in a double game will find that part of his work much

easier when he has only one antagonist on the other side of the net.

But while I have been talking about "placing," the crowd has gathered

around a court where a single-handed game is being played. Let us, then,

practice what we preach, and place ourselves where we can see the game.

It is between Mr. Anderson--the same whom we saw playing in the double

game--and Mr. Cairnes, a young Englishman who is on a visit to this

country, and has returned the hospitality he has received by beating the

lawn tennis champion of the United States. Ah, well, we will forgive

him, for he is young--barely twenty-one, judging from his looks--and he

does not know any better. But he can play tennis.

As we take our places, the scorer calls, "Two games all." Anderson plays

up well, and wins the next game, and still another. The doughty

Englishman is getting beaten; he is playing carelessly. But see! It is

very plain that he recognizes the fact that the games are going on too

fast, for as soon as he learns that the score is four to two in

Anderson's favor, his play begins to improve. He wins the next four

games in succession, and so wins the set. And right well did he play.

It is difficult to say wherein lies his great excellence. It is not in

his "service." Service is all very well, and it is very useful to have a

good service, especially when playing against indifferent antagonists;

but among the best players service does not count for much. The "return"

is of very much more importance, if for no other reason than that one

has many more balls to return than to serve. In the first place, you

should make certain that your ball is going over the net. Youth is

ambitious, and ambition every now and then gets a fall; and so the young

player who tries to just skim the top of the net every time is very apt

to drive his ball into instead of over the net. It is much better to

send even the easiest kind of a ball for your adversary to return, for

there is always a chance of his foot slipping, or something of the kind;

or perhaps he will be ambitious, and drive the ball with great skill and

precision into the middle of the net. The English player returned his

balls very closely over the net, but they always went over, and

doubtless his accuracy in that respect is the result of long practice.

Another point in which he excelled was the skillful manner in which he

placed the ball close to the side lines in the back court. This is very

pretty work, but it is also dangerous, for it must always be remembered

that there is not a hair's-breadth between a "good" ball and a bad one,

between just in court and just out. One is success, and the other

failure. For young players there are many opportunities of placing a

ball out of the opponent's reach without playing it right up to the base

line or side lines of the court. In tennis, as in other things, a middle

course is safest for beginners.

Although lawn tennis has sprung rapidly into favor, it is still but a

new game in this country. It takes several seasons' play for a person to

become a first-rate player. By the time most of my readers are old

enough to take part in a public tournament, some of them will probably

play better than the best players of to-day. As time goes on, the

standard of the game grows higher. The best players to-day are men, and

they did not have the great advantage of beginning to learn tennis when

they were boys.

But it is not only a boys' game; it is quite as suitable for girls, and

many girls and grown ladies play very well, in spite of the man who said

in an article on the subject not long ago that all ladies were "duffers"

at tennis. If some of our lady players were to express their opinions of

that man, he would not be flattered by them, even if the ladies did not

call him slang names.

In New York and other large cities there are winter tennis clubs, to

which both ladies and gentlemen belong. Very cold work, perhaps you

think, with snow on the ground, and the thermometer somewhere near zero;

but indeed they care nothing for that. What are snow-storms and chilling

winds to them when they are safely under cover in some hall that they

have hired for one or two afternoons a week? That is how tennis is

played in winter, and if it should be called floor tennis rather than

lawn tennis, the game is the same, and the enjoyment perhaps as great as

in the summer game.

But tennis is, after all, a summer game. Winter has its own sports and

pastimes--skating, coasting, sleighing, and the gymnasium--to which my

readers will devote their hours of recreation. So at the first flurry of

snow they will hang their rackets as trophies over the mantel, and leave

lawn tennis to the enthusiasts until the warm sun and soft rains of

spring shall have spread over the court a carpet of fresh green grass.

Harper's Young People, November 15, 1881 An Illustrated Weekly · 第 11 / 60 题