CHAPTER XX

THAT WE TASTE NOTHING PURE

The feebleness of our condition is such that things cannot, in their

natural simplicity and purity, fall into our use; the elements that we

enjoy are changed, and so 'tis with metals; and gold must be debased with

some other matter to fit it for our service. Neither has virtue, so

simple as that which Aristo, Pyrrho, and also the Stoics, made the end of

life; nor the Cyrenaic and Aristippic pleasure, been without mixture

useful to it. Of the pleasure and goods that we enjoy, there is not one

exempt from some mixture of ill and inconvenience:

"Medio de fonte leporum,

Surgit amari aliquid, quod in ipsis fioribus angat."

["From the very fountain of our pleasure, something rises that is

bitter, which even in flowers destroys."--Lucretius, iv. 1130.]

Our extremest pleasure has some sort of groaning and complaining in it;

would you not say that it is dying of pain? Nay, when we frame the image

of it in its full excellence, we stuff it with sickly and painful

epithets and qualities, languor, softness, feebleness, faintness,

'morbidezza': a great testimony of their consanguinity and

consubstantiality. The most profound joy has more of severity than

gaiety, in it. The highest and fullest contentment offers more of the

grave than of the merry:

"Ipsa felicitas, se nisi temperat, premit."

["Even felicity, unless it moderate itself, oppresses?"

--Seneca, Ep. 74.]

Pleasure chews and grinds us; according to the old Greek verse, which

says that the gods sell us all the goods they give us; that is to say,

that they give us nothing pure and perfect, and that we do not purchase

but at the price of some evil.

Labour and pleasure, very unlike in nature, associate, nevertheless,

by I know not what natural conjunction. Socrates says, that some god

tried to mix in one mass and to confound pain and pleasure, but not being

able to do it; he bethought him at least to couple them by the tail.

Metrodorus said, that in sorrow there is some mixture of pleasure. I

know not whether or no he intended anything else by that saying; but for

my part, I am of opinion that there is design, consent, and complacency

in giving a man's self up to melancholy. I say, that besides ambition,

which may also have a stroke in the business, there is some shadow of

delight and delicacy which smiles upon and flatters us even in the very

lap of melancholy. Are there not some constitutions that feed upon it?

"Est quaedam flere voluptas;"

["'Tis a certain kind of pleasure to weep."

--Ovid, Trist., iv. 3, 27.]

and one Attalus in Seneca says, that the memory of our lost friends is as

grateful to us, as bitterness in wine, when too old, is to the palate:

"Minister vetuli, puer, Falerni

Inger' mi calices amariores"--

["Boy, when you pour out old Falernian wine, the bitterest put

into my bowl."--Catullus, xxvii. I.]

and as apples that have a sweet tartness.

Nature discovers this confusion to us; painters hold that the same

motions and grimaces of the face that serve for weeping; serve for

laughter too; and indeed, before the one or the other be finished, do but

observe the painter's manner of handling, and you will be in doubt to

which of the two the design tends; and the extreme of laughter does at

last bring tears:

"Nullum sine auctoramento malum est."

["No evil is without its compensation."--Seneca, Ep., 69.]

When I imagine man abounding with all the conveniences that are to be

desired (let us put the case that all his members were always seized with

a pleasure like that of generation, in its most excessive height) I feel

him melting under the weight of his delight, and see him utterly unable

to support so pure, so continual, and so universal a pleasure. Indeed,

he is running away whilst he is there, and naturally makes haste to

escape, as from a place where he cannot stand firm, and where he is

afraid of sinking.

When I religiously confess myself to myself, I find that the best virtue

I have has in it some tincture of vice; and I am afraid that Plato, in

his purest virtue (I, who am as sincere and loyal a lover of virtue of

that stamp as any other whatever), if he had listened and laid his ear

close to himself and he did so no doubt--would have heard some jarring

note of human mixture, but faint and only perceptible to himself. Man is

wholly and throughout but patch and motley. Even the laws of justice

themselves cannot subsist without mixture of injustice; insomuch that

Plato says, they undertake to cut off the hydra's head, who pretend to

clear the law of all inconveniences:

"Omne magnum exemplum habet aliquid ex iniquo,

quod contra singulos utilitate publics rependitur,"

["Every great example has in it some mixture of injustice, which

recompenses the wrong done to particular men by the public utility."

--Annals, xiv. 44.]

says Tacitus.

It is likewise true, that for the use of life and the service of public

commerce, there may be some excesses in the purity and perspicacity of

our minds; that penetrating light has in it too much of subtlety and

curiosity: we must a little stupefy and blunt them to render them more

obedient to example and practice, and a little veil and obscure them, the

better to proportion them to this dark and earthly life. And therefore

common and less speculative souls are found to be more proper for and

more successful in the management of affairs, and the elevated and

exquisite opinions of philosophy unfit for business. This sharp vivacity

of soul, and the supple and restless volubility attending it, disturb our

negotiations. We are to manage human enterprises more superficially and

roughly, and leave a great part to fortune; it is not necessary to

examine affairs with so much subtlety and so deep: a man loses himself in

the consideration of many contrary lustres, and so many various forms:

"Volutantibus res inter se pugnantes, obtorpuerunt.... animi."

["Whilst they considered of things so indifferent in themselves,

they were astonished, and knew not what to do."--Livy, xxxii. 20.]

'Tis what the ancients say of Simonides, that by reason his imagination

suggested to him, upon the question King Hiero had put to him--[What God

was.--Cicero, De Nat. Deor., i. 22.]--(to answer which he had had many

days for thought), several sharp and subtle considerations, whilst he

doubted which was the most likely, he totally despaired of the truth.

He who dives into and in his inquisition comprehends all circumstances

and consequences, hinders his election: a little engine well handled is

sufficient for executions, whether of less or greater weight. The best

managers are those who can worst give account how they are so; while the

greatest talkers, for the most part, do nothing to purpose; I know one of

this sort of men, and a most excellent discourser upon all sorts of good

husbandry, who has miserably let a hundred thousand livres yearly revenue

slip through his hands; I know another who talks, who better advises than

any man of his counsel, and there is not in the world a fairer show of

soul and understanding than he has; nevertheless, when he comes to the

test, his servants find him quite another thing; not to make any mention

of his misfortunes.

Essays of Michel de Montaigne — Volume 12 · 第 3 / 14 章