THE COURAGE OF ORIGINALITY.

Most of us are at times conscious of hearing from the lips of

another, or reading from the printed page, thoughts that have existed

previously in our own minds. They may have been vague and unarranged,

but still they were our own, and we recognize them as old friends,

though dressed in a more fitting and expressive costume than we ever

gave them. Sometimes an invention or a discovery dawns upon the world

to bless and improve it, and while all are engaged in extolling it

some persons feel that they have had its germs floating in their

minds, though from the lack of favorable conditions, or some other

cause, they never took root or became vital. An act of heroism is

performed, and a bystander is conscious that he has that within him by

which he could have taken the same step, although he did not. Some one

steps forward and practically opposes a social custom that is admitted

to be evil, yet maintained, and by his influence lays the ax to

its root and commences its destruction; while many, commending his

courage, wonder why they had not taken the same course long ago.

In numberless instances we are conscious of having had the same

perceptions, the same ideas, the same powers, and the same desires

to put them into practice that are shown by the one who has so

successfully expressed them; yet they have, for some reason, lain

dormant and inoperative within us.

When we consider the waste of human power that this involves, we may

well search for its cause. Doubtless it sometimes results from the

absorption (more or less needful) of each one is his individual

pursuit. No one can give voice to all he thinks, or accomplish all

that he sees to be desirable, while striving, as he should, to gain

excellence in his own chosen work. Conscious of his own limitations,

he will rejoice to see many of his vague ideas, hopes, and aspirations

reached and carried out by others. But the same consciousness that

reconciles him to this also reveals much that he _might_ have said or

done without violating any other obligation, but which he has allowed

to slip from his hands to those of another, perhaps through lack of

energy, or indolence, or procrastination. The cause, however, most

operative in this direction is a strange disloyalty to our own

convictions. We look to others, especially to what we call great men,

for thoughts, suggestions, and opinions, and gladly adopt them

on their authority. But our own thoughts we ignore or treat with

indifference. We admire and honor originality in others, but we value

it not in ourselves. On the contrary, we are satisfied to make poor

imitations of those we revere, missing the only resemblance that is

worth anything, that of a simple and sincere independent life.

We would not undervalue modesty or recommend self-sufficiency. We

should always be learners, gladly welcoming every help, and respecting

every personality. But we should also respect our own, and bear in

mind, that "though the wide universe is full of good, no kernel of

nourishing corn can come to us but through our toil bestowed on that

plot of ground which is given to us to till." To undervalue our own

thought because it is ours, to depreciate our own powers or faculties

because some one else's are more vigorous, to shrink from doing what

we can because we think we can do so little, is to hinder our own

development and the progress of the world. For it is only by exercise

that any faculty is strengthened, and only by each one putting his

shoulder to the wheel that the world moves and humanity advances.

There is nothing more insidious than the spirit of conformity, and

nothing more quickly paralyzes the best parts of a man. A gleam of

truth illuminates his mind, and forthwith he proceeds to compare it

with the prevailing tone of his community or his set. If it agree not

with that, he distrusts and perhaps disowns it; it is left to perish,

and he to that extent perishes with it. By and by, when some one more

independent, more truth-loving, more courageous than himself arises

to proclaim and urge the same thing that he was half ashamed to

acknowledge, he will regret his inglorious fear of being in the

minority. We are accustomed to think that greatness always denotes

exceptional powers, yet most of the world's great men have rather been

distinguished by an invincible determination to work out the best

that was within them. They have acted, spoken, or thought according to

their own natures and judgment, without any wavering hesitation as to

the probable verdict of the world. They were loyal to the truth that

was in them, and had faith in its ultimate triumph; they had a mission

to fulfill, and it did not occur to them to pause or to falter. How

many more great men should we have were this spirit universal, and how

much greater would each one of us be if, in a simple straightforward

manner, we frankly said and did the best that we knew, without fear or

favor? Soon would be found gifts that none had dreamed of, powers that

none had imagined, and heroism that was thought impossible. As Emerson

well says, "He who knows that power is inborn, that he is weak because

he has looked for good out of him and elsewhere, and so perceiving

throws himself unhesitatingly on his thought, instantly rights

himself, stands in the erect position, commands his limbs, works

miracles, just as a man who stands on his feet is stronger than a man

who stands on his head."--_Phil. Ledger._

* * * * *

Scientific American Supplement, No. 488, May 9, 1885 · 第 51 / 59 题