VI

“BUT what is her reason?” demanded the Old Maid.

“Reason! I don’t believe any of them have any reason.” The Woman of the

World showed sign of being short of temper, a condition of affairs

startlingly unusual to her. “Says she hasn’t enough work to do.”

“She must be an extraordinary woman,” commented the Old Maid.

“The trouble I have put myself to in order to keep that woman, just

because George likes her savouries, no one would believe,” continued

indignantly the Woman of the World. “We have had a dinner party

regularly once a week for the last six months, entirely for her benefit.

Now she wants me to give two. I won’t do it!”

“If I could be of any service?” offered the Minor Poet. “My digestion is

not what it once was, but I could make up in quality—a _recherché_ little

banquet twice a week, say on Wednesdays and Saturdays, I would make a

point of eating with you. If you think that would content her!”

“It is really thoughtful of you,” replied the Woman of the World, “but I

cannot permit it. Why should you be dragged from the simple repast

suitable to a poet merely to oblige my cook? It is not reason.”

“I was thinking rather of you,” continued the Minor Poet.

“I’ve half a mind,” said the Woman of the World, “to give up housekeeping

altogether and go into an hotel. I don’t like the idea, but really

servants are becoming impossible.”

“It is very interesting,” said the Minor Poet.

“I am glad you find it so!” snapped the Woman of the World.

“What is interesting?” I asked the Minor Poet.

“That the tendency of the age,” he replied, “should be slowly but surely

driving us into the practical adoption of a social state that for years

we have been denouncing the Socialists for merely suggesting. Everywhere

the public-houses are multiplying, the private dwellings diminishing.”

“Can you wonder at it?” commented the Woman of the World. “You men talk

about ‘the joys of home.’ Some of you write poetry—generally speaking,

one of you who lives in chambers, and spends two-thirds of his day at a

club.” We were sitting in the garden. The attention of the Minor Poet

became riveted upon the sunset. “‘Ethel and I by the fire.’ Ethel never

gets a chance of sitting by the fire. So long as you are there,

comfortable, you do not notice that she has left the room to demand

explanation why the drawing-room scuttle is always filled with slack, and

the best coal burnt in the kitchen range. Home to us women is our place

of business that we never get away from.”

“I suppose,” said the Girton Girl—to my surprise she spoke with entire

absence of indignation. As a rule, the Girton Girl stands for what has

been termed “divine discontent” with things in general. In the course of

time she will outlive her surprise at finding the world so much less

satisfactory an abode than she had been led to suppose—also her present

firm conviction that, given a free hand, she could put the whole thing

right in a quarter of an hour. There are times even now when her tone

suggests less certainty of her being the first person who has ever

thought seriously about the matter. “I suppose,” said the Girton Girl,

“it comes of education. Our grandmothers were content to fill their

lives with these small household duties. They rose early, worked with

their servants, saw to everything with their own eyes. Nowadays we

demand time for self-development, for reading, for thinking, for

pleasure. Household drudgery, instead of being the object of our life,

has become an interference to it. We resent it.”

“The present revolt of woman,” continued the Minor Poet, “will be looked

back upon by the historian of the future as one of the chief factors in

our social evolution. The ‘home’—the praises of which we still sing, but

with gathering misgiving—depended on her willingness to live a life of

practical slavery. When Adam delved and Eve span—Adam confining his

delving to the space within his own fence, Eve staying her spinning-wheel

the instant the family hosiery was complete—then the home rested upon the

solid basis of an actual fact. Its foundations were shaken when the man

became a citizen and his interests expanded beyond the domestic circle.

Since that moment woman alone has supported the institution. Now she, in

her turn, is claiming the right to enter the community, to escape from

the solitary confinement of the lover’s castle. The ‘mansions,’ with

common dining-rooms, reading-rooms, their system of common service, are

springing up in every quarter; the house, the villa, is disappearing.

The story is the same in every country. The separate dwelling, where it

remains, is being absorbed into a system. In America, the experimental

laboratory of the future, the houses are warmed from a common furnace.

You do not light the fire, you turn on the hot air. Your dinner is

brought round to you in a travelling oven. You subscribe for your valet

or your lady’s maid. Very soon the private establishment, with its staff

of unorganised, quarrelling servants, of necessity either over or

underworked, will be as extinct as the lake dwelling or the sandstone

cave.”

“I hope,” said the Woman of the World, “that I may live to see it.”

“In all probability,” replied the Minor Poet, “you will. I would I could

feel as hopeful for myself.”

“If your prophecy be likely of fulfilment,” remarked the Philosopher, “I

console myself with the reflection that I am the oldest of the party.

Myself; I never read these full and exhaustive reports of the next

century without revelling in the reflection that before they can be

achieved I shall be dead and buried. It may be a selfish attitude, but I

should be quite unable to face any of the machine-made futures our

growing guild of seers prognosticate. You appear to me, most of you, to

ignore a somewhat important consideration—namely, that mankind is alive.

You work out your answers as if he were a sum in rule-of-three: ‘If man

in so many thousands of years has done so much in such a direction at

this or that rate of speed, what will he be doing—?’ and so on. You

forget he is swayed by impulses that can enter into no calculation—drawn

hither and thither by powers that can never be represented in your

algebra. In one generation Christianity reduced Plato’s republic to an

absurdity. The printing-press has upset the unanswerable conclusions of

Machiavelli.”

“I disagree with you,” said the Minor Poet.

“The fact does not convince me of my error,” retorted the Philosopher.

“Christianity,” continued the Minor Poet, “gave merely an added force to

impulses the germs of which were present in the infant race. The

printing-press, teaching us to think in communities, has nonplussed to a

certain extent the aims of the individual as opposed to those of

humanity. Without prejudice, without sentiment, cast your eye back over

the panorama of the human race. What is the picture that presents

itself? Scattered here and there over the wild, voiceless desert, first

the holes and caves, next the rude-built huts, the wigwams, the lake

dwellings of primitive man. Lonely, solitary, followed by his dam and

brood, he creeps through the tall grass, ever with watchful,

terror-haunted eyes; satisfies his few desires; communicates, by means of

a few grunts and signs, his tiny store of knowledge to his offspring;

then, crawling beneath a stone, or into some tangled corner of the

jungle, dies and disappears. We look again. A thousand centuries have

flashed and faded. The surface of the earth is flecked with strange

quivering patches: here, where the sun shines on the wood and sea, close

together, almost touching one another; there, among the shadows, far

apart. The Tribe has formed itself. The whole tiny mass moves forward,

halts, runs backwards, stirred always by one common impulse. Man has

learnt the secret of combination, of mutual help. The City rises. From

its stone centre spreads its power; the Nation leaps to life;

civilisation springs from leisure; no longer is each man’s life devoted

to his mere animal necessities. The artificer, the thinker—his fellows

shall protect him. Socrates dreams, Phidias carves the marble, while

Pericles maintains the law and Leonidas holds the Barbarian at bay.

Europe annexes piece by piece the dark places of the earth, gives to them

her laws. The Empire swallows the small State; Russia stretches her arm

round Asia. In London we toast the union of the English-speaking

peoples; in Berlin and Vienna we rub a salamander to the _deutscher

Bund_; in Paris we whisper of a communion of the Latin races. In great

things so in small. The stores, the huge Emporium displaces the small

shopkeeper; the Trust amalgamates a hundred firms; the Union speaks for

the worker. The limits of country, of language, are found too narrow for

the new Ideas. German, American, or English—let what yard of coloured

cotton you choose float from the mizzenmast, the business of the human

race is their captain. One hundred and fifty years ago old Sam Johnson

waited in a patron’s anteroom; today the entire world invites him to

growl his table talk the while it takes its dish of tea. The poet, the

novelist, speak in twenty languages. Nationality—it is the County

Council of the future. The world’s high roads run turnpike-free from

pole to pole. One would be blind not to see the goal towards which we

are rushing. At the outside it is but a generation or two off. It is

one huge murmuring Hive—one universal Hive just the size of the round

earth. The bees have been before us; they have solved the riddle towards

which we in darkness have been groping.”

The Old Maid shuddered visibly. “What a terrible idea!” she said.

“To us,” replied the Minor Poet; “not to those who will come after us.

The child dreads manhood. To Abraham, roaming the world with his flocks,

the life of your modern City man, chained to his office from ten to four,

would have seemed little better than penal servitude.”

“My sympathies are with the Abrahamitical ideal,” observed the

Philosopher.

“Mine also,” agreed the Minor Poet. “But neither you nor I represent the

tendency of the age. We are its curiosities. We, and such as we, serve

as the brake regulating the rate of progress. The genius of species

shows itself moving in the direction of the organised community—all life

welded together, controlled by one central idea. The individual worker

is drawn into the factory. Chippendale today would have been employed

sketching designs; the chair would have been put together by fifty

workers, each one trained to perfection in his own particular department.

Why does the hotel, with its five hundred servants, its catering for

three thousand mouths, work smoothly, while the desirable family

residence, with its two or three domestics, remains the scene of waste,

confusion, and dispute? We are losing the talent of living alone; the

instinct of living in communities is driving it out.”

“So much the worse for the community,” was the comment of the

Philosopher. “Man, as Ibsen has said, will always be at his greatest

when he stands alone. To return to our friend Abraham, surely he,

wandering in the wilderness, talking with his God, was nearer the ideal

than the modern citizen, thinking with his morning paper, applauding

silly shibboleths from a theatre pit, guffawing at coarse jests, one of a

music-hall crowd? In the community it is the lowest always leads. You

spoke just now of all the world inviting Samuel Johnson to its dish of

tea. How many read him as compared to the number of subscribers to the

_Ha’penny Joker_? This ‘thinking in communities,’ as it is termed, to

what does it lead? To mafficking and Dreyfus scandals. What crowd ever

evolved a noble idea? If Socrates and Galileo, Confucius and Christ had

‘thought in communities,’ the world would indeed be the ant-hill you

appear to regard as its destiny.”

“In balancing the books of life one must have regard to both sides of the

ledger,” responded the Minor Poet. “A crowd, I admit, of itself creates

nothing; on the other hand, it receives ideals into its bosom and gives

them needful shelter. It responds more readily to good than to evil.

What greater stronghold of virtue than your sixpenny gallery? Your

burglar, arrived fresh from jumping on his mother, finds himself

applauding with the rest stirring appeals to the inborn chivalry of man.

Suggestion that it was right or proper under any circumstances to jump

upon one’s mother he would at such moment reject with horror. ‘Thinking

in communities’ is good for him. The hooligan, whose patriotism finds

expression in squirting dirty water into the face of his coster

sweetheart: the _boulevardière_, primed with absinth, shouting ‘_Conspuez

les Juifs_!’—the motive force stirring them in its origin was an ideal.

Even into making a fool of itself, a crowd can be moved only by

incitement of its finer instincts. The service of Prometheus to mankind

must not be judged by the statistics of the insurance office. The world

as a whole has gained by community, will attain its goal only through

community. From the nomadic savage by the winding road of citizenship we

have advanced far. The way winds upward still, hidden from us by the

mists, but along its tortuous course lies our track into the Promised

Land. Not the development of the individual—that is his own concern—but

the uplifting of the race would appear to be the law. The lonely great

ones, they are the shepherds of the flock—the servants, not the masters

of the world. Moses shall die and be buried in the wilderness, seeing

only from afar the resting-place of man’s tired feet. It is unfortunate

that the _Ha’penny Joker_ and its kind should have so many readers.

Maybe it teaches those to read who otherwise would never read at all. We

are impatient, forgetting that the coming and going of our generations

are but as the swinging of the pendulum of Nature’s clock. Yesterday we

booked our seats for gladiatorial shows, for the burning of Christians,

our windows for Newgate hangings. Even the musical farce is an

improvement upon that—at least, from the humanitarian point of view.”

“In the Southern States of America,” observed the Philosopher, sticking

to his guns, “they run excursion trains to lynching exhibitions. The

bull-fight is spreading to France, and English newspapers are advocating

the reintroduction of bear-baiting and cock-fighting. Are we not moving

in a circle?”

“The road winds, as I have allowed,” returned the Minor Poet; “the

gradient is somewhat steep. Just now, maybe, we are traversing a

backward curve. I gain my faith by pausing now and then to look behind.

I see the weary way with many a downward sweep. But we are climbing, my

friend, we are climbing.”

“But to such a very dismal goal, according to your theory,” grumbled the

Old Maid. “I should hate to feel myself an insect in a hive, my little

round of duties apportioned to me, my every action regulated by a fixed

law, my place assigned to me, my very food and drink, I suppose,

apportioned to me. Do think of something more cheerful.”

The Minor Poet laughed. “My dear lady,” he replied, “it is too late.

The thing is already done. The hive already covers us, the cells are in

building. Who leads his own life? Who is master of himself? What can

you do but live according to your income in, I am sure, a very charming

little cell; buzz about your little world with your cheerful, kindly

song, helping these your fellow insects here, doing day by day the useful

offices apportioned to you by your temperament and means, seeing the same

faces, treading ever the same narrow circle? Why do I write poetry? I

am not to blame. I must live. It is the only thing I can do. Why does

one man live and die upon the treeless rocks of Iceland, another labour

in the vineyards of the Apennines? Why does one woman make matches, ride

in a van to Epping Forest, drink gin, and change hats with her lover on

the homeward journey; another pant through a dinner-party and half a

dozen receptions every night from March to June, rush from country house

to fashionable Continental resort from July to February, dress as she is

instructed by her milliner, say the smart things that are expected of

her? Who would be a sweep or a chaperon, were all roads free? Who is it

succeeds in escaping the law of the hive? The loafer, the tramp. On the

other hand, who is the man we respect and envy? The man who works for

the community, the public-spirited man, as we call him; the unselfish

man, the man who labours for the labour’s sake and not for the profit,

devoting his days and nights to learning Nature’s secrets, to acquiring

knowledge useful to the race. Is he not the happiest, the man who has

conquered his own sordid desires, who gives himself to the public good?

The hive was founded in dark days before man knew; it has been built

according to false laws. This man will have a cell bigger than any other

cell; all the other little men shall envy him; a thousand fellow-crawling

mites shall slave for him, wear out their lives in wretchedness for him

and him alone; all their honey they shall bring to him; he shall gorge

while they shall starve. Of what use? He has slept no sounder in his

foolishly fanciful cell. Sleep is to tired eyes, not to silken

coverlets. We dream in Seven Dials as in Park Lane. His stomach,

distend it as he will—it is very small—resents being distended. The

store of honey rots. The hive was conceived in the dark days of

ignorance, stupidity, brutality. A new hive shall arise.”

[Picture: Who is it succeeds in escaping the law of the hive?]

“I had no idea,” said the Woman of the World, “you were a Socialist.”

“Nor had I,” agreed the Minor Poet, “before I began talking.”

“And next Wednesday,” laughed the Woman of the World; “you will be

arguing in favour of individualism.”

“Very likely,” agreed the Minor Poet. “‘The deep moans round with many

voices.’”

“I’ll take another cup of tea,” said the Philosopher.

* * * * *

* * * * *

_Printed by Hazell_, _Watson & Viney_, _Ld._, _London and Aylesbury_.

Tea-Table Talk · 第 7 / 7 题