The intensely cold weather of last week was rough on stock of all kinds

and in all conditions, and particularly hard on that portion having

short rations. But I have seen many worse storms and much harder weather

for stock; none however in which the fruits, small or large, suffered

worse. At least that is the general judgment at the present. Peach buds

are killed of course, and it will be lucky if the trees have escaped.

All blackberries, but the Snyder, are dead down to the snow line--and

some think the Snyder has not escaped, for reasons given further on.

Examinations made of the buds of Bartlett, Duchess, Howell, Tyson,

Bigarreau, Seckel, Buffum, Easter Buerre, and others yesterday, showed

them all to be about equally frosted and blackened, and probably

destroyed. Last year our pears suffered a good deal from the sleet of

the second of February, which clung to the trees ten days, and the crop

was a light one. This year, if appearances can be trusted, there will be

less. In the many intense freezes of the last twenty-five years, I have

never known pear buds to be seriously injured; last year being a marked

exception and this still more so. Hardy grapes have probably suffered as

much, and the tender varieties are completely done for. How well the May

cherry has resisted the low temperature remains to be seen. As for the

sweet cherries, it is probably the end of them.

There were buds set for an unusually abundant crop of apples in

1884--the Presidential year. The hardy varieties have escaped material

damage, no doubt, but some of the tender Eastern varieties, like the

Baldwin, Roxbury Russet, in all reasonable probability, have not only

lost their buds but their lives also.

* * * * *

The disasters following the very low temperature of last week have no

doubt been increased by the immaturity of the wood, due to the cool,

moist summer. If summers like those of 1882-83 are not warm enough to

ripen the corn crop, buds and wood of fruit trees will not acquire a

maturity that resists intense cold as we see by our experience with

pears, grapes, and peaches in the fruit season of 1883, and which is

almost sure to be repeated with aggravations in 1884. Possibly the

ground being but lightly frozen and protected by a good coat of snow,

may save the apple trees and others from great disaster following thirty

to thirty-five degrees below zero, when falling on half ripened wood,

but the reasonable fear is that orchards on high land in Northern and

Central Illinois, have been damaged more than last year. If so perhaps

it were better after all, since it will open the eyes of a great many to

the mistakes in location heretofore made, and lead them to put out

future orchards where they ought to be.

* * * * *

If my word of warning could reach those engaged in taking measures at

Washington to prevent the spread of epidemic and infectious diseases in

our stock, it would be "go slow." If the wishes of a few veterinarians

are met and the demands of a raft of pauper lawyers and politicians are

complied with, it will result in the creation of a half dozen

commissions. Each one of them, as previous ones have done, will find

sufficient reason for their continuance and reports will be made that

half the live stock in the country, South and West, is either in danger

from or suffering under some of the many forms of epidemic or infectious

diseases--and by the way, what justice is there in putting Detmers out

of the way, and clinging to Salmon and Laws, both of whom indorsed

nearly every thing the former did? Beware of commissions, and above all

of putting men upon them whose bread and butter is of more consequence

to them than the stock interest, vast as it is.

B. F. J.

WAYSIDE NOTES.

BY A MAN OF THE PRAIRIE.

Of the 2,500,000 packages of seeds distributed by the United States

Agricultural Department during last year more than 2,000,000 packages

were furnished to Congressmen, and I notice that some of the papers are

making unfavorable comments on the fact. Now I do not discover anything

that seems to me radically wrong in this practice of the Department of

Agriculture, or rather in the instructions under which the practice

prevails. There are some men, mostly seedsmen, and some publishers,

mostly those interested in securing patronage through seed premiums, or

which are run in the interest of seed dealers, who grumble a great deal

about this matter, and who sneer at the department and derisively call

it the "Government seed store." But I imagine if the public was

thoroughly informed of the good the department has done by its seed

distributions, it would have a great deal better opinion of this branch

than it now has, and I wish Mr. Dodge, or some other efficient man, who

knows all about it from the beginning would give to the country a

complete history of what has been done in the way of introducing and

disseminating new seeds, plants, and cuttings. I believe if the whole

truth were told it would put an end to ridicule and denunciation. I am

aware that there have been some things connected with this work that

were not exactly correct. There may have been some helping of friends in

the purchase of seeds; there may have been some noxious weed seeds sent

out to the detriment of the country; Congressmen may have used their

quota of seeds for the purpose of keeping themselves solid with their

constituents. But, after all, it is my candid opinion the seed

distributing branch of the department has been an untold blessing to the

farmers of this country. As to this matter of giving a large proportion

of the seeds to Congressmen, I have not much fault to find about that

either, though perhaps a better system of distribution might be devised.

I have yet to learn that an application to a Congressman for seed has

been disregarded, if the seeds were to be had, whether that application

came from a political friend or a political foe. And I do wish that

farmers generally would make more frequent application to the members

from their respective districts than they do. It will be money in their

pockets if they will keep posted in what the department has to

distribute which is valuable, or new and promising, and solicit samples

either from Congressmen or direct from the Commissioner of Agriculture.

* * * * *

"Put your thumb down there," said an experienced orchardist to me the

other day. We were talking about the recently started theory that the

best bearing orchards are to be found on the low lands of the prairies.

"You just wait and see if these brag orchards ever bear another crop! It

will be as it was after the severe winter of 1874 and '75, when the

following autumn many of our orchards bore so profusely. The succeeding

year the majority of the trees were as dead as smelts, and the balance

never had vigor enough afterward to produce a decent crop. Once before,"

said he, "we had a similar experience in Illinois. Put your thumb down

at this place and watch for results. Do not say anything about this in

your Wayside Blusterings, at least as coming from me," and of course I

don't. But I wanted the readers of THE PRAIRIE FARMER to help me watch

with fear and trembling for the fulfillment of this horticultural

prophesy, so I straightway make a note of it and ask you all to "put

your thumbs down here" and wait. My friend's theory is that the severe

cold of last winter destroyed a large portion of the roots of these

trees; that the root pruning caused the extra fruitfulness, but proved

too severe for the vitality of the trees to withstand, and that next

year the bulk of the trees will not leaf out at all; and further that

the old theory as taught by Kennecott, Whitney, Edwards, and the rest of

the "fathers," that apple trees cannot thrive with wet feet, was the

correct theory then and is the correct theory now. He would still plant

on high, well drained land.

* * * * *

My neighbor up at the "Corners" has a large flock of grade Cotswold

sheep--Cotswolds crossed on large native Merinos. He keeps them to

produce early lambs for the Chicago market. For the last three or four

years he has received, on an average, four dollars per head for his

lambs, taken at his farm. It is a profitable and pleasant sort of

farming. Some day I may tell how he manages, in detail.

* * * * *

REMEMBER _that_ $2.00 _pays for_ THE PRAIRIE FARMER _one year, and the

subscriber gets a copy of_ THE PRAIRIE FARMER COUNTY MAP OF THE UNITED

STATES, FREE! _This is the most liberal offer ever made by any

first-class weekly agricultural paper in this country._

[Illustration]

POULTRY NOTES.

Poultry-Raisers. Write for Your Paper.

CHICKEN CHAT.

Let me see--it was sometime during the month of December that the "Man

of the Prairie" went wandering all over the village, and even scoured

the country round about the village in search of an extra dozen eggs,

and went home mad, and, man fashion, threatened to kill off every hen on

the place if they didn't proceed to do their duty like hens and fellow

citizens. It was also during that same December that the fifty Plymouth

Rock hens that we are wintering in the barn cellar, laid, regardless of

the weather, 736 eggs--an average of nearly fifteen eggs apiece.

"Is it a fact that the corn is too poor for manufacture into eggs?"

I don't know anything about the corn in your locality, but I do know

that our Plymouth Rocks had whole corn for supper exactly thirty-one

nights during the month of December--not Western corn, but sound,

well-ripened, Northern corn, that sells in our market for twenty cents

more per bushel than Western corn. I also know that hens fed through the

winter on corn alone will not lay enough to pay for the corn, but in our

climate the poultry-raiser may feed corn profitably fully one-half the

time. When the morning feed consists of cooked vegetable and bran or

shorts, and the noon meal of oats or buckwheat, the supper may be of

corn. I believe the analytical fellows tell us that corn won't make

eggs, and I am sure I don't know whether it will or not, and I don't

much care; but I know that hens will eat corn, when they can get it, in

preference to any other grain, and I know that it "stands by" better

than anything else, and that it is a heat-producing grain, and

consequently just the thing to feed when the days are short and the

nights long, and the mercury fooling around 30 degrees below zero. Hens

need something besides egg material; they must have food to keep up the

body heat, and the poultry-raiser who feeds no corn in winter blunders

just as badly as the one who feeds all corn.

* * * * *

Talking about corn for fowls reminds me that the agricultural papers are

full of wails from farmers who were taken in last season on seed corn.

If they had followed the plan of an old farmer of my acquaintance they

would not now be obliged to mourn a corn crop cut off by frost. When

this old chap went to farming forty years ago he bought a peck of seed

corn of the Northern yellow flint variety, and as he "don't believe in

running after all the new seeds that are advertised in the papers," he

is still raising the same variety--only it ripens some three weeks

earlier than it did then. Every fall he does through his field and

selects his seed corn from the best of the earliest ripened ears; when

these ears are husked one or two husks are left on each ear, and then

the husks, with the ears attached, are braided together until there are

fifteen or twenty ears in a string. These strings of seed corn are hung

up in the sun for a fortnight or so, and then hung from the rafters in a

cool, dry loft over the wood-shed; there it remains till seed time comes

again, and it never fails to grow.

FANNY FIELD.

BUSINESS STILL RUNNING.

"My own hens closed out business six weeks ago," not long since said

"Man of the Prairie." He mentioned also, that he had not much faith in

pure bred poultry. Now he severely complains that no eggs can be found

among the farmers nor in village stores. I will not say that pure

strains of poultry are better layers than common, but, when one pays a

good price for poultry, it is an incentive to provide good shelter and

bestow upon them some manifestations of interest which would not be done

with the common fowls. Herein may lay in part the secret of better

returns from pure strains.

Years ago our chickens 'closed out business' for several months. Of late

this procedure is unknown. We crossed our best common hens with Plymouth

Rock stock, paying a good price. We furnished comfortable quarters, gave

variety of feed, and at present writing the lady-like biddies furnish

enough eggs for our own use and some to sell to stores and neighbors.

We still have a few common hens (not caring to have all pure) yet we

find that with same care and attention, the purer strains give best

returns.

Skeptical, like a good many others, we were loth to experiment. Thanks

to Fanny Field for her wise and instructive poultry writings. In a

recent number she seemed to be in doubt whether her writings were heeded

or doing any one good. Let me say in behalf of myself and a few others,

that a few married ladies now have pin money by following her

instructions, who, before, had to go to their lords (husbands) when they

wanted a little money, which was sometimes begrudgingly given, and often

times not at all.

BACHELOR & MAID.

COUNCIL BLUFFS, IOWA.

[Illustration]

THE APIARY.

THE BEST HIVE.

In answer to many inquiries as to the best hive, we will here state that

is a mere matter of choice. Many good movable frame hives are now in

use, free from patents, and while we prefer the Langstroth, there may be

others just as good.

Apiarists differ as to what constitutes the best hive. Novices in bee

culture generally think that they can invent a better hive than any in

use, but after trying their invention for awhile, conclude that they are

not as wise as they thought they were. Many hives are patented yearly by

persons ignorant of the nature of the honey-bee, and few, if any, are

received with favor by intelligent apiarists.

The requisites for a good hive are durability, simplicity, ease of

construction and of working, and pleasing to the eye. We think the

Langstroth embodies these. It was invented by the father of modern

bee-culture. He gave to the world the movable frame; without its use, we

might as well keep our bees in hollow logs, as our fathers did.

Different sizes of movable frames are now in use, but two-thirds of the

apiarists prefer the Langstroth.

Upon many farms, bees may be found in salt barrels, nail-kegs, etc.,

doing little good for their owner, while if they were put into hives,

where the surplus could be obtained in good shape, they would become a

source of income. Specialists either manufacture their own hives, or buy

them in the flat, in the lumber region. As the farmer may need but a few

hives, he may find leisure in winter to make them.

Every farmer needs a workshop, and if he has none, should provide

himself with one. It need not be large, and can be made quite

inexpensively. In his barn, if it is large, partition off a room for a

workshop 12 × 14 feet, and if he not be blessed with a good large barn,

why a thousand feet of common boards, and a load of good stout saplings,

with a little mechanical skill and some muscle, will provide a very good

farm workshop.

Get a few tools, such as a saw, square, plane, hatchet, a brace, and a

few bits, and before twelve months pass away you will wonder how you

ever managed to do without one before; many a singletree or doubletree

can be made, or broken implements repaired during leisure, or the rainy

days of late winter or spring, and the boys will go there to try their

hands, and develop their mechanical skill; exercising both brain and

muscle. Remember that the school of industry is second to no university

in the land.

Now for the hives; in the first place you need a pattern. Purchase of

some dealer or manufacturer of apiarian supplies, a good Langstroth hive

complete with section boxes. Then get a couple of hundred feet (more or

less) of ten inch stock boards, mill dressed on both sides, then with

your pattern hive, workshop, and tools, you are master of the situation.

After your hives are made, don't forget to paint them; it is economy to

paint hives as well as dwelling houses.

LANGSTROTH HIVE.

For the benefit of those who may not be able to obtain a pattern hive,

or frame, we will give the dimensions. The sides of the Langstroth hive

are 10 inches wide, by 23 inches long, the ends are 12 inches long, the

back end the same width as the sides; front end, 3/8 inches narrower,

and recesses or sets back 3-3/8 inches from portico, all 7/8 inches

thick. The Langstroth frame is 17-1/4 × 9-1/4 inches outside measure.

The length of top bar of frame is 19-1/4 inches, the frame stuff is all

7/8 wide, the top bar is 5/8 × 7/8, and is V shaped on the under side

for a comb guide--the upright pieces 1/2 × 7/8, the bottom pieces

1/4 × 7/8.

The above are the dimensions of an eight frame hive. Strips 1/4 × 7/8

inches are nailed on the outside of the hive 1/4 inch from the upper

edge, and the cap or upper hive rests upon them. We make the cap 22-1/8

inches long by 13-7/8 inches wide in the clear, and ten inches high.

Some apiarists omit the porticos, but we like them, and the bees appear

to enjoy them. Right angled triangle blocks, made right and left, are

used to regulate the entrance. By changing the position of these blocks

on the alighting board the size of the entrance may be varied, and the

bees always directed to it by the shape of the block, without any loss

of time in searching for it--in case of robbing the hive, the hive can

be entirely closed with them. A board was formerly used to cover the

frames, but is now generally abandoned, apiarists preferring duck,

enameled cloth, or heavy muslin.

MRS. L. HARRISON.

* * * * *

NO SAFER REMEDY can be had for Coughs and Colds, or any trouble of the

Throat, than "_Brown's Bronchial Troches_." Price 25 cents. _Sold only

in boxes._

* * * * *

MISCELLANEOUS.

ARM & HAMMER BRAND

TO FARMERS.--It is important that the SODA OR SALERATUS they use should

be _white_ and _pure_, in common with all similar substances used for

food.

[Illustration: CHURCH & CO'S SODA & SALERATUS]

In making bread with yeast, it is well to use about half a teaspoonful

of the "ARM AND HAMMER" BRAND SODA or SALERATUS at the same time, and

thus make the bread rise better and prevent it becoming sour by

correcting the natural acidity of the yeast.

DAIRYMEN

AND

FARMERS

should use only the "ARM AND HAMMER" brand for cleaning and keeping

milk-pans sweet and clean.

_To insure obtaining only the_ "ARM AND HAMMER" _brand Soda or

Saleratus, buy it in_ "POUND _or_ HALF-POUND PACKAGES," _which bear our

name and trade-mark, as inferior goods are sometimes substituted for

the_ "ARM AND HAMMER" _brand when bought in bulk._

* * * * *

"THE BEST IS THE CHEAPEST."

ENGINES

SAW MILLS, THRESHERS,

HORSE POWERS,

(For all sections and purposes.) Write for FREE Pamphlet and Prices to

The Aultman & Taylor Co., Mansfield, Ohio.

* * * * *

THE FAMOUS EASY-RUNNING

Monarch Lightning Sawing Machine

IT BEATS THE WORLD FOR SAWING LOGS

OR FAMILY STOVE WOOD.

SENT ON 30 DAYS' TEST TRIAL.

[Illustration]

The boy in the picture on the left is sawing up logs into 20-inch

lengths, to be split into stovewood for family use. This is much the

BEST and CHEAPEST way to get out your firewood, because the 20-inch

blocks are VERY EASILY split up, a good deal easier and quicker than the

old-fashioned way of cutting the logs into 4-feet lengths, splitting it

into cordwood, and from that sawing it up with a buck saw into

stovewood. We sell a large number of machines to farmers and others for

just this purpose. A great many persons who had formerly burned coal

have stopped that useless expense since getting our Machine. Most

families have one or two boys, 16 years of age and up, who can employ

their spare time in sawing up wood just as well as not. The

MONARCH LIGHTNING SAWING MACHINE

will save your paying money and board to ONE hired man and perhaps TWO

men.

The boy at the right in the picture is sawing up cordwood in a buck

frame. You can very easily use our machine in this way if you have

cordwood on hand that you wish to saw up into suitable lengths for

firewood.

A boy sixteen years old can work the machine all day and not get any

more tired than he would raking hay. The machine runs VERY EASILY, so

easily, in fact, that after giving the crank half a dozen turns, the

operator may let go and the machine will run itself for THREE OR FOUR

REVOLUTIONS. Farmers owning standing timber cannot fail to see the many

advantages of this great LABOR-SAVING AND MONEY-SAVING MACHINE. If you

prefer, you can easily go directly into the woods and easily saw the

logs into 20-inch lengths for your family use, or you can saw them into

4-foot lengths, to be split into cordwood, when it can be readily hauled

off to the village market. Many farmers are making a good deal of money

with this Machine in employing the dull months of the year in selling

cordwood.

It makes a great difference in LABOR AND MONEY both in using our

machine, because you get away with a second man. It takes two men to run

the old-fashioned cross-cut saw, and it makes two backs ache every day

they use it. Not so with our saw.

We offer $1,000 for a sawing machine that is EASIER OPERATED and FASTER

RUNNING than ours. Every farmer should own our machine. It will pay for

itself in one season. Easily operated by a sixteen-year-old boy.

Lumbermen and farmers should GET THE BEST--GET THE CHEAPEST--GET THE

MONARCH LIGHTNING SAWING MACHINE.

E. DUTTER, Hicksville, O., writes:--It runs so easy that it is JUST FUN

to saw wood.

C. A. COLE, Mexico, N. Y., writes:--With this machine I sawed off an elm

log, twenty-one inches in diameter, in one minute, forty-three seconds.

Z. G. HEGE, Winston, N. C., writes:--I have shown your machine to

several farmers, and all pronounce it a PERFECT SUCCESS.

WM. DILLENBACK, Dayton, Tex., writes:--I am WELL PLEASED with the

MONARCH LIGHTNING SAWING MACHINE. My boys can saw WITH ALL EASE.

L. W. YOST, Seneca, Kan., writes:--I will bet $50 that I can saw as much

with this machine as any two men can with the old-fashioned cross-cut

saw.

T. K. BUCK, Mt. Vernon, Ill., writes:--I have given the Monarch a fair

trial, and can truly say it is ALL YOU CLAIM FOR IT, a complete success,

enabling a boy to do the work of two strong men, and indeed, more. I

would not take $75 for the MONARCH and be deprived of the privilege of

having another like it. I sawed off a twenty-inch solid water oak log

twelve times yesterday in FORTY-FIVE MINUTES.

J. M. CRAWFORD. Columbia, S. C., writes:--I tried the Monarch on an oak

log to-day before twenty farmers. All said it WORKED PERFECTLY.

N. B.--We are selling SIX TIMES as many Machines as any other firm,

simply because our Machine gives perfect satisfaction. Our factory is

running day and night to fill orders. Send in your order at once. The

BEST is the CHEAPEST. Our agent sold four machines in one day. Another

sold twenty-eight in his township. Another agent cleared $100 in one

week. BE SURE AND MENTION THIS PAPER.

WE WISH A LIVE, WIDE-AWAKE AGENT IN EVERY COUNTY IN THE UNITED STATES

AND CANADA. Write for Latest Illustrated Catalogue giving Special Terms

and scores of Testimonials.

MONARCH MANUFACTURING CO.

163 E. RANDOLPH STREET, CHICAGO, ILL.

* * * * *

REMEMBER _that $2.00 pays for_ THE PRAIRIE FARMER _from this

date to January 1, 1885; For $2.00 you get it for one year and a copy

of_ THE PRAIRIE FARMER COUNTY MAP OF THE UNITED STATES, FREE!

_This is the most liberal offer ever made by any first-class weekly

agricultural paper in this country._

SCIENTIFIC.

SOME GOSSIP ABOUT DARWIN.

The last number of the American Naturalist presents the following from

David S. Jorden, of Bloomington, Indiana. It is one of those gossipy

bits about the great scientist that every body enjoys reading.

In a recent visit to England, the writer strolled into the village of

Down in Kent, and talked with some of the villagers in regard to Mr.

Darwin, whose beautiful home is just outside the little town.

Some of this talk, although in itself idle and valueless, may have an

interest to readers, as showing how a great man looks to his smaller

neighbors.

Prairie Farmer, Vol. 56: No. 3, January 19, 1884. A Weekly Journal for the Farm, Orchard and Fireside · 第 6 / 10 段