I conjecture that the use of the term "post conquestum" thus originated.

As we had Kings of England of the name of Edward before the Conquest,

Edward the First was distinguished from these monarchs by being styled

"King Edward, the son of King Henry" (his father was called "King Henry,

the son of King John"). In like manner, Edward II. was distinguished from

his father by being called "King Edward, the son of King Edward;" but

Edward III. could not thus be distinguished from his father; he was

therefore called King Edward III.; but, as there were Kings Edward _before_

the Conquest, the third was qualified by the addition of the phrase in

question, "post conquestum." To Richard II. generally, and to his

successors up to Henry VIII. either generally or occasionally, the same

phrase, "post conquestum," was also applied; but, if we except Edward IV.

and V., this phrase was not at all required, or applicable in their cases,

inasmuch as no King of England _before_ the Conquest was named either

Richard or Henry.

Notes and Queries, Number 70, March 1, 1851 A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 84 / 110 题