BY ELIZABETH STUART PHELPS,

Author of "The Gates Ajar," "The Madonna of the Tubs," etc.

Has it not been said that once in a lifetime most of us succumb to the

particular situation against which we have cultivated the strongest

principles? If there be one such, among the possibilities to which a

truly civilized career is liable, more than another objectionable to

the writer of these words, the creation of autobiography has long been

that one.

Yet, for that offence, once criminal to my taste, I find myself hereby

about to become indictable; and do set my hand and seal, on this day

of the recall of my dearest literary oath, in this year of eminent

autobiographical examples, one thousand eight hundred and ninety-five.

"There is ----, who has written a charming series of personal

reminiscences, and ---- ----, and ----.

"You might meet your natural shrinking by allowing yourself to treat

especially of your literary life; including, of course, whatever went

to form and sustain it."

"I suppose I _might_," I sigh. The answer is faint; but the deed is

decreed. Shall I be sorry for it?

It is a gray day, on gray Cape Ann, as I write these words. The fog is

breathing over the downs. The outside steamers shriek from off the

Point, as they feel their way at live of noon, groping as though it

were dead of night, and stars and coast-lights all were smitten dark,

and every pilot were a stranger to his chart.

A stranger to my chart, I, doubtful, put about, and make the untried

coast.

At such a moment, one thinks wistfully of that fair, misty world which

is all one's own, yet on the outside of which one stands so humbly,

and so gently. One thinks of the unseen faces, of the unknown friends

who have read one's tales of other people's lives, and cared to read,

and told one so, and made one believe in their kindness, and affection

and fidelity for thirty years. And the hesitating heart calls out to

them: Will _you_ let me be sorry? Thirty years! It is a good while

that you and I have kept step together. Shall we miss it now? If _you_

will care to hear such chapters as may select themselves from the

story of the story-teller,--you have the oldest right to choose, and

I, the happy will to please you if I can.

* * * * *

The lives of the makers of books are very much like other people's in

most respects, but especially in this: that they are either rebels to,

or subjects of, their ancestry. The lives of some literary persons

begin a good while after they are born. Others begin a good while

before.

Of this latter kind is mine.

It has sometimes occurred to me to find myself the possessor of a sort

of unholy envy of writers concerning whom our stout American phrase

says that they have "made themselves." What delight to be aware that

one has not only created one's work, but the worker! What elation in

the remembrance of the battle against a commercial, or a scientific,

or a worldly and superficial heredity; in the recollection of the tug

with habit and education, and the overthrow of impulses setting in

other directions than the chosen movement of one's own soul!

What pleasure in the proud knowledge that all one's success is one's

own doing, and the sum of it cast up to one's credit upon the long

ledger of life! To this exhilarating self-content I can lay no claim.

For whatever measure of what is called success has fallen to my lot, I

can ask no credit. I find myself in the chastened position of one

whose literary abilities all belong to one's ancestors.

It is humbling--I do not deny that it may be morally invigorating--to

feel that whatever is "worth mentioning" in my life is no affair of

mine, but falls under the beautiful and terrible law by which the dead

men and women whose blood bounds in our being control our destinies.

Yet, with the notable exception of my father, I have less than the

usual store of personal acquaintance with the "people who most

influenced me." Of my grandfather, Moses Stuart, I have but two

recollections; and these, taken together, may not be quite devoid of

interest, as showing how the law of selection works in the mind of an

imaginative child.

I remember seeing the Professor of Sacred Literature come into his

dining-room one morning in his old house on Andover Hill which was

built for him, and marked the creation of his department in the early

days of the seminary history. He looked very tall and imposing. He had

a mug in his hand, and his face smiled like the silver of which it was

made.

The mug was full of milk, and he handed it ceremoniously to the

year-old baby, his namesake and grandson, my first brother, whose

high-chair stood at the table.

Then, I remember--it must have been a little more than a year after

that--seeing the professor in his coffin in the front hall; that he

looked taller than he did before, but still imposing; that he had his

best coat on--the one, I think, in which he preached; and that he was

the first dead person I had ever seen.

Whenever the gray-headed men who knew him used to sit about, relating

anecdotes of him--as, how many commentaries he published, or how he

introduced the first German lexicon into this country (as if a girl in

short dresses would be absorbingly interested in her grandfather's

dictionaries!)--I saw the silver mug and the coffin.

Gradually the German lexicon in a hazy condition got melted in between

them. Sometimes the baby's mug sat upon the dictionary. Sometimes the

dictionary lay upon the coffin. Sometimes the baby spilled the milk

out of the mug upon the dictionary. But for my personal uses, the

Andover grandfather's memoirs began and ended with the mug and the

coffin.

The other grandfather was not distinguished as a scholar; he was but

an orthodox minister of ability and originality, and with a vivacious

personal history. Of him I knew something. From his own lips came

thrilling stories of his connection with the underground railway of

slavery days; how he sent the sharpest carving-knife in the house,

concealed in a basket of food, to a hidden fugitive slave who had

vowed never to be taken alive, and whose master had come North in

search of him. It was a fine thing, that throbbing humanity, which

could in those days burst the reformer out of the evangelical husk,

and I learned my lesson from it. ("Where _did_ she get it?"

conservative friends used to wail, whenever I was seen to have tumbled

into the last new and unfashionable reform.)

From his own lips, too, I heard the accounts of that extraordinary

case of house-possession of which (like Wesley) this innocent and

unimaginative country minister, who had no more faith in "spooks" than

he had in Universalists, was made the astonished victim.

Night upon night I have crept gasping to bed, and shivered for hours

with my head under the clothes, after an evening spent in listening to

this authentic and fantastic family tale. How the candlesticks walked

out into the air from the mantelpiece, and back again; how the chairs

of skeptical visitors collected from all parts of the country to study

what one had hardly then begun to call the "phenomena" at the

parsonage at Stratford, Connecticut, hopped after the guests when they

crossed the room; how the dishes at the table leaped, and the silver

forks were bent by unseen hands, and cold turnips dropped from the

solid ceiling; and ghastly images were found, composed of

underclothing proved to have been locked at the time in drawers of

which the only key lay all the while in Dr. Phelps's pocket; and how

the mysterious agencies, purporting by alphabetical raps upon bed-head

or on table to be in torments of the nether world, being asked what

their host could do to relieve them, demanded a piece of squash pie.

From the old man's own calm hands, within a year or two of his death,

I received the legacy of the written journal of these phenomena, as

recorded by the victim from day to day, during the seven months that

this mysterious misfortune dwelt within his house.

It may be prudent to say, just here, that it will be quite useless to

make any further inquiries of me upon the subject, or to ask of me--a

request which has been repeated till I am fain to put an end to

it--for either loan or copy of these records for the benefit of either

personal or scientific curiosity. Both loaning and copying are now

impossible, and have been made so by family wishes which will be

sacredly respected. The phenomena themselves have long been too widely

known to be ignored, and I have no hesitation in making reference to

them.

[Illustration: ELIZABETH STUART PHELPS, HER MOTHER, AND HER INFANT

BROTHER. AFTERWARDS PROFESSOR M. STUART PHELPS.]

Perhaps it is partly on account of the traditions respecting this bit

of family history that I am so often asked if I am a spiritualist. I

am sometimes tempted to reply in grammar comprehensible to the writers

of certain letters which I receive upon the subject:

"No; nor none of our folks!"

How the Connecticut parson on whom this mysterious infliction fell

ever came out of it _not_ a spiritualist, who can tell? That the

phenomena were facts, and facts explicable by no known natural law, he

was forced, like others in similar positions, to believe and admit.

That he should study the subject of spiritualism carefully from then

until the end of his life, was inevitable.

But, as nearly as I can make it out, on the whole, he liked his Bible

better.

Things like these did not happen on Andover Hill; and my talks with

this very interesting grandfather gave me my first vivid sensation of

the possibilities of life.

With what thrills of hope and fear I listened for thumps on the head

of my bed, or watched anxiously to see my candlestick walk out into

the air!

But not a thump! Not a rap! Never a snap of the weakest proportions

(not explicable by natural laws) has, from that day to this, visited

my personal career. Not a candlestick ever walked an inch for me. I

have never been able to induce a chair to hop after me. No turnip has

consented to drop from the ceiling for me. Planchette, in her day,

wrote hundreds of lines for me, but never one that was of the

slightest possible significance to me, or to the universe at large.

Never did a medium tell me anything that ever came to pass; though one

of them once made a whole winter miserable by prophesying a death

which did not occur.

Being destitute of objections to belief in the usefulness of

spiritualistic mystery,--in fact, by temperament, perhaps inclining to

hope that such phenomena may be tamed and yoked, and made to work for

human happiness,--yet there seems to be something about me which these

agencies do not find congenial. Though I have gone longing for a sign,

no sign has been given me. Though I have been always ready to believe

all other people's mysteries, no inexplicable facts have honored my

experience.

The only personal prophecy ever strictly fulfilled in my life was--I

am not certain whether I ought to feel embarrassed in alluding to

it--made by a gipsy fortune-teller. She was young and pretty, the

seventh child of a seventh child, and she lived in a Massachusetts

shoe-town by the name of Lynn. And what was it? Oh, but you must

excuse me.

The grandfather to whom these marvels happened was not, as I say, a

literary man; yet even he did write a little book--a religious tale,

or tract, after the manner of his day and profession; and it took to

itself a circulation of two hundred thousand copies. I remember how

Mr. James T. Fields laughed when he heard of it--that merry laugh

peculiar to himself.

"You can't help it," the publisher said; "you come of a family of

large circulations."

One day I was at school with my brother,--a little, private school,

down by what were called the English dormitories in Andover.

I was eight years old. Some one came in and whispered to the teacher.

Her face turned very grave, and she came up to us quietly, and called

us out into the entry, and gently put on our things.

"You are to go home," she said; "your mother is dead." I took my

little brother's hand without a word, and we trudged off. I do not

think we spoke--I am sure we did not cry--on the way home. I remember

perfectly that we were very gayly dressed. Our mother liked bright,

almost barbaric colors on children. The little boy's coat was of red

broadcloth, and my cape of a canary yellow, dyed at home in white-oak

dye. The two colors flared before my eyes as we shuffled along and

crushed the crisp, dead leaves that were tossing in the autumn wind

all over Andover Hill.

When we got home they told us it was a mistake; she was not dead; and

we were sent back to school. But, in a few weeks after that, one day

we were told we need not go to school at all; the red and yellow coats

came off, and little black ones took their places. The new baby, in

his haggard father's arms, was baptized at his mother's funeral; and

we looked on, and wondered what it all meant, and what became of

children whose mother was obliged to go to heaven when she seemed so

necessary in Andover.

At eight years of age a child cannot be expected to know her mother

intimately, and it is hard for me always to distinguish between the

effect produced upon me by her literary success as I have since

understood it, and that left by her own truly extraordinary

personality upon the annals of the nursery.

[Illustration: PROFESSOR PHELPS'S HOUSE AT ANDOVER, MASSACHUSETTS, THE

HOUSE IN WHICH ELIZABETH STUART PHELPS WAS REARED.]

My mother, whose name I am proud to wear, was the eldest daughter of

Professor Stuart, and inherited his intellectuality. At the time of

her death she was at the first blossom of her very positive and

widely-promising success as a writer of the simple home stories which

took such a hold upon the popular heart. Her "Sunnyside" had already

reached a circulation of one hundred thousand copies, and she was

following it fast--too fast--by other books for which the critics and

the publishers clamored. Her last book and her last baby came

together, and killed her. She lived one of those rich and piteous

lives such as only gifted women know; torn by the civil war of the

dual nature which can be given to women only. It was as natural for

her daughter to write as to breathe; but it was impossible for her

daughter to forget that a woman of intellectual power could be the

most successful of mothers.

[Illustration: PROFESSOR AUSTIN PHELPS, FATHER OF ELIZABETH STUART

PHELPS.

McClure's Magazine December, 1895 · 第 24 / 84 题