MARBLE RAMPANT.

161. I closed my last lecture at the question respecting Nicholas's

masonry. His mouldings may be careless, but do you think his joints will

be?

I must remind you now of the expression as to the building of the

communal palace--"of _dressed_ stones" [1]--as opposed to the Tower

of the Death-watch, in which the grip of cement had been so good.

Virtually, you will find that the schools of structural architecture are

those which use cement to bind

[Footnote 1: "Pietre conce." The portion of the has-reliefs of Orvieto,

given in the opposite plate, will show the importance of the jointing.

Observe the way in which the piece of stone with the three principal

figures is dovetailed above the extended band, and again in the rise

above the joint of the next stone on the right, the sculpture of the

wings being carried across the junction. I have chosen this piece on

purpose, because the loss of the broken fragment, probably broken

by violence, and the only serious injury which the sculptures have

received, serves to show the perfection of the uninjured surface, as

compared with northern sculpture of the same date. I have thought

it well to show at the same time the modern German engraving of the

subject, respecting which see Appendix.]

[Illustration: PLATE VIII.--"THE CHARGE TO ADAM." GIOVANNI PISANO.]

their materials together, and in which, therefore, balance of _weight_

becomes a continual and inevitable question. But the schools of

sculptural architecture are those in which stones are fitted without

cement, in which, therefore, the question of _fitting_ or adjustment

is continual and inevitable, but the sustainable weight practically

unlimited.

162. You may consider the Tower of the Death-watch as having been knit

together like the mass of a Roman brick wall.

But the dressed stone work of the thirteenth century is the hereditary

completion of such block-laying, as the Parthenon in marble; or, in

tufo, as that which was shown you so lately in the walls of Romulus; and

the decoration of that system of couchant stone is by the finished grace

of mosaic or sculpture.

163. It was also pointed out to you by Mr. Parker that there were two

forms of Cyclopean architecture; one of level blocks, the other of

polygonal,--contemporary, but in localities affording different material

of stone.

I have placed in this frame examples of the Cyclopean horizontal, and

the Cyclopean polygonal, architecture of the thirteenth century. And as

Hubert of Lucca was the master of the new buildings at Florence, I have

chosen the Cyclopean horizontal from his native city of Lucca; and as

our Nicholas and John brought their new Gothic style into practice at

Orvieto, I have chosen the Cyclopean polygonal from their adopted city

of Orvieto.

Both these examples of architecture are early thirteenth century work,

the beginnings of its new and Christian style, but beginnings with which

Nicholas and John had nothing to do; they were part of the national work

going on round them.

164. And this example from Lucca is of a very important class indeed.

It is from above the east entrance gate of Lucca, which bears the cross

above it, as the doors of a Christian city should. Such a city is, or

ought to be, a place of peace, as much as any monastery.

This custom of placing the cross above the gate is Byzantine-Christian;

and here are parallel instances of its treatment from Assisi. The lamb

with the cross is given in the more elaborate arch of Verona.

165. But farther. The mosaic of this cross is so exquisitely fitted that

no injury has been received by it to this day from wind or weather. And

the horizontal dressed stones are laid so daintily that not an edge of

them has stirred; and, both to draw your attention to their beautiful

fitting, and as a substitute for cement, the architect cuts his

uppermost block so as to dovetail into the course below.

Dovetail, I say deliberately. This is stone carpentry, in which the

carpenter despises glue. I don't say he won't use glue, and glue of the

best, but he feels it to be a nasty thing, and that it spoils his wood

or marble. None, at least, he determines shall be seen outside, and his

laying of stones shall be so solid and so adjusted that, take all the

cement away, his wall shall yet stand.

Stonehenge, the Parthenon, the walls of the Kings, this gate of Lucca,

this window of Orvieto, and this tomb at Verona, are all built on the

Cyclopean principle. They will stand without cement, and no cement shall

be seen outside. Mr. Burgess and I actually tried the experiment on this

tomb. Mr. Burgess modelled every stone of it in clay, put them together,

and it stood.

166. Now there are two most notable characteristics about this Cyclopean

architecture to which I beg your close attention.

The first: that as the laying of stones is so beautiful, their joints

become a subject of admiration, and great part of the architectural

ornamentation is in the beauty of lines of separation, drawn as finely

as possible. Thus the separating lines of the bricks at Siena, of this

gate at Lucca, of the vault at Verona, of this window at Orvieto, and

of the contemporary refectory at Furness Abbey, are a main source of the

pleasure you have in the building. Nay, they are not merely engravers'

lines, but, in finest practice, they are mathematical lines--length

without breadth. Here in my hand is a little shaft of Florentine mosaic

executed at the present day. The separations between the stones are,

in dimension, mathematical lines. And the two sides of the thirteenth

century porch of St. Anastasia at Verona are built in this manner,--so

exquisitely, that for some time, my mind not having been set at it, I

passed them by as painted!

167. That is the first character of the Florentine Cyclopean But

secondly; as the joints are so firm, and as the building must never

stir or settle after it is built, the sculptor may trust his work to two

stones set side by side, or one above another, and carve continuously

over the whole surface, disregarding the joints, if he so chooses.

Of the degree of precision with which Nicholas of Pisa and his son

adjusted their stones, you may judge by this rough sketch of a piece of

St. Mary's of the Thorn, in which the design is of panels enclosing very

delicately sculptured heads; and one would naturally suppose that the

enclosing panels would be made of jointed pieces, and the heads carved

separately and inserted. But the Pisans would have considered that

unsafe masonry,--liable to the accident of the heads being dropped out,

or taken away. John of Pisa did indeed use such masonry, of necessity,

in his fountain; and the bas-reliefs _have_ been taken away. But here

one great block of marble forms part of two panels, and the mouldings

and head are both carved in the solid, the joint running just behind the

neck.

168. Such masonry is, indeed, supposing there were no fear of thieves,

gratuitously precise in a case of this kind, in which the ornamentation

is in separate masses, and might be separately carved. But when the

ornamentation is current, and flows or climbs along the stone in the

manner of waves or plants, the concealment of the joints of the pieces

of marble becomes altogether essential. And here we enter upon a most

curious group of associated characters in Gothic as opposed to Greek

architecture.

169. If you have been able to read the article to which I referred you,

'Meneau,' in M. Violet le Duc's dictionary, you know that one great

condition of the perfect Gothic structure is that the stones shall be

'en de-lit,' set up on end. The ornament then, which on the reposing or

couchant stone was current only, on the erected stone begins to climb

also, and becomes, in the most heraldic sense of the term, rampant.

In the heraldic sense, I say, as distinguished from the still wider

original sense of advancing with a stealthy, creeping, or clinging

motion, as a serpent on the ground, and a cat, or a vine, up a

tree-stem. And there is one of these reptile, creeping, or rampant

things, which is the first whose action was translated into marble, and

otherwise is of boundless importance in the arts and labours of man.

170. You recollect Kingsley's expression,--now hackneyed, because

admired for its precision,--the '_crawling foam_,' of waves advancing

on sand. Tennyson has somewhere also used, with equal truth, the epithet

'climbing' of the spray of breakers against vertical rock. [1] In either

instance, the sea action is literally 'rampant'; and the course of a

great breaker, whether in its first proud likeness to a rearing horse,

or in the humble and subdued gaining of the outmost verge of its foam on

the sand, or the intermediate spiral whorl which gathers into a lustrous

precision, like that of a polished shell, the grasping force of a

giant, you have the most vivid sight and embodiment of literally rampant

energy; which the Greeks expressed in their symbolic Poseidon, Scylla,

and sea-horse, by the head and crest of the man, dog, or horse, with

the body of the serpent; and of which you will find the slower image, in

vegetation, rendered both by the spiral tendrils of grasping or climbing

plants, and the perennial gaining of the foam or the lichen upon barren

shores of stone.

[Footnote: Perhaps I am thinking of Lowell, not Tennyson; I have not

time to look.]

171. If you will look to the thirtieth chapter of vol. i. in the new

edition of the "Stones of Venice," which, by the gift of its publishers,

I am enabled to lay on your table to be placed in your library, you

will find one of my first and most eager statements of the necessity of

inequality or change in form, made against the common misunderstanding

of Greek symmetry, and illustrated by a woodcut of the spiral ornament

on the treasury of Atreus at Mycenae. All that is said in that chapter

respecting nature and the ideal, I now beg most earnestly to recommend

and ratify to you; but although, even at that time, I knew more of Greek

art than my antagonists, my broken reading has given me no conception

of the range of its symbolic power, nor of the function of that more

or less formal spiral line, as expressive, not only of the waves of the

sea, but of the zones of the whirlpool, the return of the tempest, and

the involution of the labyrinth. And although my readers say that I

wrote then better than I write now, I cannot refer you to the passage

without asking you to pardon in it what I now hold to be the petulance

and vulgarity of expression, disgracing the importance of the truth it

contains. A little while ago, without displeasure, you permitted me to

delay you by the account of a dispute on a matter of taste between my

father and me, in which he was quietly and unavailingly right. It seems

to me scarcely a day, since, with boyish conceit, I resisted his wise

entreaties that I would re-word this clause; and especially take out of

it the description of a sea-wave as "laying a great white tablecloth of

foam" all the way to the shore. Now, after an interval of twenty years,

I refer you to the passage, repentant and humble as far as regards its

style, which people sometimes praised, but with absolue re-assertion

of the truth and value of its contents, which people always denied. As

natural form is varied, so must beautiful ornament be varied. You

are not an artist by reproving nature into deathful sameness, but by

animating your copy of her into vital variation. But I thought at that

time that only Goths were rightly changeful. I never thought Greeks

were. Their reserved variation escaped me, or I thought it accidental.

Here, however, is a coin of the finest Greek workmanship, which shows

you their mind in this matter unmistakably. Here are the waves of the

Adriatic round a knight of Tarentum, and there is no doubt of their

variableness.

172. This pattern of sea-wave, or river whirlpool, entirely sacred in

the Greek mind, and the [Greek: *bostruchos*] or similarly curling wave

in flowing hair, are the two main sources of the spiral form in lambent

or rampant decoration. Of such lambent ornament, the most important

piece is the crocket, of which I rapidly set before you the origin.

173. Here is a drawing of the gable of the bishop's throne in the upper

church at Assisi, of the exact period when the mosaic workers of the

thirteenth century at Rome adopted rudely the masonry of the north.

Briefly, this is a Greek temple pediment, in which, doubtful of their

power to carve figures beautiful enough, they cut a trefoiled hold for

ornament, and bordered the edges with harlequinade of mosaic. They then

call to their help the Greek sea-waves, and let the surf of the Ægean

climb along the slopes, and toss itself at the top into a fleur-de-lys.

Every wave is varied in outline and proportionate distance, though cut

with a precision of curve like that of the sea itself. From this root

we are able--but it must be in a lecture on crockets only--to trace the

succeeding changes through the curl of Richard II.'s hair, and the

crisp leaves of the forests of Picardy, to the knobbed extravagances of

expiring Gothic. But I must to-day let you compare one piece of perfect

Gothic work with the perfect Greek.

174. There is no question in my own mind, and, I believe, none in

that of any other long-practised student of mediæval art, that in pure

structural Gothic the church of St. Urbain at Troyes is without rival in

Europe. Here is a rude sketch of its use of the crocket in the spandrils

of its external tracery, and here are the waves of the Greek sea round

the son of Poseidon. Seventeen hundred years are between them, but the

same mind is in both. I wonder how many times seventeen hundred years

Mr. Darwin will ask, to retrace the Greek designer of this into his

primitive ape; or how many times six hundred years of such improvements

as we have made on the church of St. Urbain, will be needed in order

to enable our descendants to regard the designers of that, as only

primitive apes.

175. I return for a moment to my gable at Assisi. You see that the crest

of the waves at the top form a rude likeness of a fleur-de-lys. There

is, however, in this form no real intention of imitating a flower, any

more than in the meeting of the tails of these two Etruscan griffins.

The notable circumstance in this piece of Gothic is its advanced form

of crocket, and its prominent foliation, with nothing in the least

approaching to floral ornament.

176. And now, observe this very curious fact in the personal character

of two contemporary artists. See the use of my manually graspable flag.

Here is John of Pisa,--here Giotto. They are contemporary for twenty

years;--but these are the prime of Giotto's life, and the last of John's

life: virtually, Giotto is the later workman by full twenty years.

But Giotto always uses severe geometrical mouldings, and disdains all

luxuriance of leafage to set off interior sculpture.

John of Pisa not only adopts Gothic tracery, but first allows himself

enthusiastic use of rampant vegetation;--and here in the façade of

Orvieto, you have not only perfect Gothic in the sentiment of Scripture

history, but such luxurious ivy ornamentation as you cannot afterwards

match for two hundred years. Nay, you can scarcely match it then--for

grace of line, only in the richest flamboyant of France.

177. Now this fact would set you, if you looked at art from its

aesthetic side only, at once to find out what German artists had taught

Giovanni Pisano. There _were_ Germans teaching him,--some teaching

him many things; and the intense conceit of the modern German artist

imagines them to have taught him all things.

But he learnt his luxuriance, and Giotto his severity, in another

school. The quality in both is Greek; and altogether moral. The grace

and the redundance of Giovanui are the first strong manifestation of

those characters in the Italian mind which culminate in the Madonnas of

Luini and the arabesques of Raphael. The severity of Giotto belongs to

him, on the contrary, not only as one of the strongest practical men who

ever lived on this solid earth, but as the purest and firmest reformer

of the discipline of the Christian Church, of whose writings any remains

exist.

178. Of whose writings, I say; and you look up, as doubtful that he has

left any. Hieroglyphics, then, let me say instead; or, more accurately

still, hierographics. St. Francis, in what he wrote and said, taught

much that was false. But Giotto, his true disciple, nothing but what

was true. And where _he_ uses an arabesque of foliage, depend upon it it

will be to purpose--not redundant. I return for the time to our soft and

luxuriant John of Pisa.

179. Soft, but with no unmanly softness; luxuriant, but with no

unmannered luxury. To him you owe as to their first sire in art, the

grace of Ghiberti, the tenderness of Raphael, the awe of Michael Angelo.

Second-rate qualities in all the three, but precious in their kind, and

learned, as you shall see, essentially from this man. Second-rate he

also, but with most notable gifts of this inferior kind. He is the

Canova of the thirteenth century; but the Canova of the thirteenth,

remember, was necessarily a very different person from the Canova of the

eighteenth.

The Cauova of the eighteenth century mimicked Greek grace for the

delight of modern revolutionary sensualists. The Canova of the

thirteenth century brought living Gothic truth into the living faith of

his own time.

Greek truth, and Gothic 'liberty,'--in that noble sense of the word,

derived from the Latin 'liber,' of which I have already spoken, and

which in my next lecture I will endeavour completely to develope.

Meanwhile let me show you, as far as I can, the architecture itself

about which these subtle questions arise.

180. Here are five frames, containing the best representations I can get

for you of the façade of the cathedral of Orvieto. I must remind you,

before I let you look at them, of the reason why that cathedral was

built; for I have at last got to the end of the parenthesis which began

in my second lecture, on the occasion of our hearing that John of Pisa

was sent for to Perugia, to carve the tomb of Pope Urban IV.; and we

must now know who this Pope was.

181. He was a Frenchman, born at that Troyes, in Champagne, which I gave

you as the centre of French architectural skill, and Royalist character.

He was born in the lowest class of the people, rose like Wolsey; became

Bishop of Verdun; then, Patriarch of Jerusalem; returned in the year

1261, from his Patriarchate, to solicit the aid of the then Pope,

Alexander IV., against the Saracen. I do not know on what day he arrived

in Rome; but on the 25th of May, Alexander died, and the Cardinals,

after three months' disputing, elected the suppliant Patriarch to be

Pope himself.

182. A man with all the fire of France in him, all the faith, and all

the insolence; incapable of doubting a single article of his creed, or

relaxing one tittle of his authority; destitute alike of reason and of

pity; and absolutely merciless either to an infidel, or an enemy. The

young Prince Manfred, bastard son of Frederick II., now representing

the main power of the German empire, was both; and against him the Pope

brought into Italy a religious French knight, of character absolutely

like his own, Charles of Anjou.

183. The young Manfred, now about twenty years old, was as good a

soldier as he was a bad Christian; and there was no safety for Urban

at Rome. The Pope seated himself on a worthy throne for a

thirteenth-century St. Peter. Fancy the rock of Edinburgh Castle, as

steep on all sides as it is to the west; and as long as the Old Town;

and you have the rock of Orvieto.

184. Here, enthroned against the gates of hell, in unassailable

fortitude, and unfaltering faith, sat Urban; the righteousness of his

cause presently to be avouched by miracle, notablest among those of the

Roman Church. Twelve miles east of his rock, beyond the range of low

Apennine, shone the quiet lake, the Loch Leven of Italy, from whose

island the daughter of Theodoric needed not to escape--Fate seeking her

there; and in a little chapel on its shore a Bohemian priest, infected

with Northern infidelity, was brought back to his allegiance by seeing

the blood drop from the wafer in his hand. And the Catholic Church

recorded this heavenly testimony to her chief mystery, in the Festa of

the Corpus Domini, and the Fabric of Orvieto.

185. And sending was made for John, and for all good labourers in

marble; but Urban never saw a stone of the great cathedral laid. His

citation of Manfred to appear in his presence to answer for his heresy,

was fixed against the posts of the doors of the old Duomo. But Urban had

dug the foundation of the pile to purpose, and when he died at Perugia,

still breathed, from his grave, calamity to Manfred, and made from it

glory to the Church. He had secured the election of a French successor;

from the rock of Orvieto the spirit of Urban led the French chivalry,

when Charles of Anjou saw the day of battle come, so long desired.

Manfred's Saracens, with their arrows, broke his first line; the Pope's

legate blessed the second, and gave them absolution of all their sins,

for their service to the Church. They charged for Orvieto with their

old cry of 'Mont-Joie, Chevaliers!' and before night, while Urban lay

sleeping in his carved tomb at Perugia, the body of Manfred lay only

recognizable by those who loved him, naked among the slain.

186. Time wore on and on. The Suabian power ceased in Italy; between

white and red there was now no more contest;--the matron of the Church,

scarlet-robed, reigned, ruthless, on her seven hills. Time wore on; and,

a hundred years later, now no more the power of the kings, but the power

of the people,--rose against her. St. Michael, from the corn market,--Or

San Michele,--the commercial strength of Florence, on a question of free

trade in corn. And note, for a little bye piece of botany, that in

Val d'Arno lilies grow among the corn instead of poppies. The purple

gladiolus glows through all its green fields in early spring.

187. A question of free trade in corn, then, arose between Florence and

Rome. The Pope's legate in Bologna stopped the supply of polenta, the

Florentines depending on that to eat with their own oil. Very wicked,

you think, of the Pope's legate, acting thus against quasi-Protestant

Florence? Yes; just as wicked as the--not quasi-Protestants--but

intensely positive Protestants, of Zurich, who tried to convert the

Catholic forest-cantons by refusing them salt. Christendom has been

greatly troubled about bread and salt: the then Protestant Pope,

Zuinglius, was killed at the battle of Keppel, and the Catholic cantons

therefore remain Catholic to this day; while the consequences of this

piece of protectionist economy at Bologna are equally interesting and

direct.

188. The legate of Bologna, not content with stopping the supplies of

maize to Florence, sent our own John Hawkwood, on the 24th June, 1375,

to burn all the maize the Florentines had got growing; and the abbot

of Montemaggiore sent a troop of Perugian religious gentlemen-riders

to ravage similarly the territory of Siena. Whereupon, at Florence, the

Gonfalonier of Justice, Aloesio Aldobrandini, rose in the Council of

Ancients and proposed, as an enterprise worthy of Florentine generosity,

the freedom of all the peoples who groaned under the tyranny of the

Church. And Florence, Siena, Pisa, Lucca, and Arezzo,--all the great

cities of Etruria, the root of religion in Italy,--joined against the

tyranny of religion. Strangely, this Etrurian league is not now to

restore Tarquin to Rome, but to drive the Roman Tarquin into exile. The

story of Lucretia had been repeated in Perugia; but the Umbrian Lucretia

had died, not by suicide, but by falling on the pavement from the window

through which she tried to escape. And the Umbrian Sextus was the Abbot

of Montemaggiore's nephew.

189. Florence raised her fleur-de-lys standard: and, in ten days, eighty

cities of Romagua were free, out of the number of whose names I

will read you only these--Urbino, Foligno, Spoleto, Narni, Camerino,

Toscanella, Perugia, Orvieto.

And while the wind and the rain still beat the body of Manfred, by the

shores of the Rio Verde, the body of Pope Urban was torn from its tomb,

and not one stone of the carved work thereof left upon another. 190. I

will only ask you to-day to notice farther that the Captain of Florence,

in this war, was a 'Conrad of Suabia,' and that she gave him, beside her

own flag, one with only the word 'Libertas' inscribed on it.

I told you that the first stroke of the bell on the Tower of the

Lion began the carillon for European civil and religious liberty. But

perhaps, even in the fourteenth century, Florence did not understand, by

that word, altogether the same policy which is now preached in France,

Italy, and England.

What she did understand by it, we will try to ascertain in the course of

next lecture.

Val d'Arno Ten Lectures on the Tuscan Art Directly Antecedent to the Florentine Year of Victories; Given Before the University of Oxford in Michaelmas Term, 1873 · 第 28 / 35 题