DESCRIPTION OF PLATE.

1. Represents the building at the southern extremity of the eastern wall

of the so-called Gymnasium described by Stephens--Travels in Yucatan,

vol. II., page 308. It is supposed by Dr. Le Plongeon to have been a

monument to the chieftain Chac-Mool.

2. This picture shows the upper portion of the same edifice, in which

were found "the mural paintings, bas-reliefs and other signs," which

gave a clue to the discovery of the statue.

3. Shows probably the locality where the statue was excavated. The same

sculptured slabs that appear in picture 8 in the foreground on the

right, are seen resting against a mound, in their supposed original

position, and serve to indicate the identity of the localities. In the

rear of the slabs is probably the heap of stones forming the pedestal

for the stone figure of a tiger spoken of in the "_Mexican Memorial_."

4. This is probably another view in the immediate neighborhood. Among

the scattered debris is the sculptured head of a serpent, with open

jaws.

5. Represents the sculptured slabs, which are seen also in pictures 3, 6

and 8. They are of unequal width, but the length and thickness was

probably the same in each.

6. Another view of the sculptured slabs. The first shows a bird of prey;

this is apparently a tiger. Both of them hold in their grasp objects of

a similar character.

NOTE. Several of these pictures are described in the _Mexican Memorial_,

but are there differently numbered.]

The exact spot whence this statue was exhumed cannot be certainly

stated, though among the plates which represent the discovery are two

which may reasonably be supposed to exhibit the locality. One of

these pictures shows the sculptured slabs which may have decorated the

mound where the excavation was made, and which again appear on the side

of the opening through which the statue is seen emerging. The slabs are

elaborately wrought, and represent, the one a tiger holding something in

his paw, and the other a bird of prey, with talons similarly employed.

During the early portion of his residence and explorations at

Chichen-Itza, Dr. Le Plongeon was assisted by Government troops, who

acted as a guard against hostile Indians--_sublivados_[59-*]--as these

ruins lie outside the limits of territory considered safe for

occupation; and though this protection was soon withdrawn, and the

discoverer was obliged to rely solely upon arms furnished to his

laborers, still he was not disheartened by the dangers of his

undertaking, nor dissuaded by the appeals of his friends from

persevering in his labors.

The first object discovered at this place, as will be learned from the

_Mexican Memorial_, was a long stone, half interred among the others,

which proved to be the base of a sculptured reclining tiger, of much

the same size, proportions and execution as the statue of Chac-Mool, as

is apparent from a photograph of the tiger in the general collection.

The head, of human form, which was wanting, was afterwards found at some

distance, in a pile of carved stones. The next objects that appeared

were the bas-reliefs, presumably those pictured in 3, 5, 6 and 8. The

mound of stones where the excavation was made was, according to Dr. Le

Plongeon, the pedestal that supported the effigy of the tiger. Work was

commenced at the top of the heap of stones, which were rudely thrown

together, rendering the labor difficult and dangerous. An excavation was

made measuring 7 meters in depth, which was protected by a trestle-work,

and at this depth a rough calcareous stone urn was secured which

contained a little dust, and upon it a coarse earthen cover. This was

near the head of the statue, which then appeared. The work of liberating

the statue required a deepening of the trench 1-1/2 meters more. A

picture in heliotype copied from a series of six photographs, showing

the various positions assumed by the figure during the process of

excavation, can be consulted upon the second page following. This work

of art was raised by Dr. Le Plongeon, with the assistance of his wife

and ten Indian laborers, by his own ingenuity, and without other

engineering apparatus than he had contrived from the trees and vines,

making use also of the bark, from which he constructed ropes. Dr. Le

Plongeon, in a private letter to the writer, says, "The statue is carved

out of a single block of beautifully white and homogeneous limestone. It

is naked, and the peculiar ornament suspended by a ribbon tied on the

back of the neck, that is seen on the chest, is the distinctive mark of

high rank. This same ornament is seen on the chests of all the

personages who were entitled to carry three feathers on their heads. The

band that composes the head-dress was formed of pieces of an octagonal

shape, joined together, and is fastened by ribbons also on the back of

the head. The figure had bracelets and garters of feathers, and the

sandals, quite different from those used by the present inhabitants of

the country, were tied to the feet and legs, and resemble those found on

the mummies of the _Guanehes_, the ancient inhabitants of the Canary

Islands. There were no ear laps, but square tablets appear in place of

the ears, on which are hieroglyphics giving the name, condition, &c.,

&c., of the personage represented by the statue. It is not an idol, but

a true portrait of a man who has lived an earthly life. I have seen him

represented in battle, in councils, and in court receptions. I am well

acquainted with his life, and the manner of his death. The scientific

world owes much to Mrs. Le Plongeon for the restoration of the mural

paintings where his history and the customs of his people are portrayed;

and where Stephens has been unable to see more than a few figures, she

has discovered the history of a people and of their leaders."

"The name, Chac Mool, or Balam, and the names of his two brothers,

_Huuncay_ and _Aac_, the latter the builder of the 'House of the

Governor' at Uxmal, are not given by us at random. They are written on

the monuments where represented, written in characters just as

intelligible to my wife and myself, as this paper is to you in latin

letters. Every person represented on these monuments is known to us by

name, since either over the head or at the feet, the name is written. We

have tracings of the mural paintings as seen on the walls of the inner

chamber of the monument raised by the queen of Itza to the memory of her

husband, Chac-Mool. Stephens mistook it for a shrine where the winners

at the games of ball were wont to make offerings to the presiding idol.

In your paper you have copied part of his description of that monument.

But the statue of Chac-Mool was not exhumed in it as you assert, but

four hundred yards from it, in the midst of the forest. No traveller or

writer has ever indicated the place where it lay buried, and it is by

deciphering the meaning of some hieroglyphics and mural paintings,

that we came to a knowledge of the place. The building with tigers and

shields was simply a monument dedicated to his memory."

[Illustration: _Statue at Chichen-Itza, Yucatan, in process of

exhumation by Dr. Augustus Le Plongeon, showing the engineering process

by which it was accomplished._

The Mayas, the Sources of Their History Dr. Le Plongeon in Yucatan, His Account of Discoveries · 第 18 / 30 题