C. HARDWICK.

St. Catharine's Hall, Cambridge.

Seiler says (_Bibl. Herm._, part II. c. 4. s. 4.) that "The greater part

of the works on the harmony of the gospels are quite useless for our

times, as their authors mostly proceed on incorrect principles." He

refers only to the chief of them, namely:

Osiander, 1537. | Macknight, 1756.

Jansen, 1549-72. | Bengel, 1766.

Chemnitz, 1593. | Büsching, 1766.

Lightfoot, 1644. | Bertlings, 1767.

Van Til, 1687. | Priestley, 1777.

Lamy, 1689. | Schutte, 1779.

Le Roux, 1699. | Stephan, 1779.

Le Clerc, 1700. | Michaelis in his New Test.

May, 1707. | Rullmann, 1790.

Von Canstein, 1718-27.| Griesbach, 1776-97.

Rus, 1727-30. | White, 1799.

Hauber. | De Wette, 1818.

For other Harmonies, see Mr. Horne's _Bibliog. Index_, p. 128. Heringa

considers that the following writers "have brought the four Evangelists

into an harmonious arrangement, namely:

Hesz, 1784. | Stronck, 1800.

Bergen 1804.| Townsend, 1834.

And especially as to the sufferings and resurrection of Christ:

Voss, 1701. | Michaelis (translated by Duckett, 1827).

Iken, 1743. | Cremer, 1795.

Notes and Queries, No. 209, October 29 1853 A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 68 / 182 题