I could have embraced Jane, besides forgiving her slurs on me, which may

contain an element of truth. There is more in her than I have supposed;

and of course what she insists on is exactly what I have all along meant

to do. But it did not come in handy to say so at this point. "I'll think

it over. You two had better go to bed: I must go out and smoke."

"Robert," said Mabel, "don't go out to-night. You can smoke in the

dining-room."

"No; I'll not take a base advantage of your present amiable mood. But I

tell you what it is; if you want to get Hartman here in cold weather you

must let us have a snuggery. He can't do without his tobacco."

It was a fine night, and I wanted a walk as well as a smoke. I felt

gratified, for this thing had gone just as I desired. I am not quite so

impulsive as Jane, and I understand the difficulties as she does not;

but my plan has merely waited for events to give it definite shape and

make it feasible. Certainly I must see Hartman, and as he can't come

here, I must go there. But I wanted the women to suggest my going; that

divides the responsibility, and gives them a hand in the game. I would

have had to propose it myself within a week or so, if they had not

spoken. But the Princess knows what she is about, and what is fit and

proper. It may seem strange that she should speak to Mabel instead of to

me; but she will say what she has to say to me before I start. In fact,

I'll not start till she does--how could I? It is her business I am going

on, with just enough of my own to give it a color. I'll write to Jim at

once, to ask when he wants me: the mails are slow up there, and it may

be a week before his answer comes. That will give me time to get my

instructions, and not be in any unseemly haste to seek them either. So

far, so good; but there is more to be done, and delicate work too, such

as will bear no scamping. It is the biggest contract you ever undertook,

R. T., and you must make a neat job of it.

XX.

APOLOGY FOR LYING.

If you do not understand my waiting for Mabel and the girls to prompt

this move, and allowing them to urge it against my apparent reluctance,

I ascribe this failure on your part to lack of experience, rather than

to any deeper deficiency. Some men like to make a parade of

independence, and to do--or pretend to do--everything of themselves,

without consulting or considering their womankind. But such are not the

sort I choose my friends from; for I have been accustomed to regard both

brain and heart as desirable appurtenances to a man. There is little

Bruteling, at the club, who would like to be considered a man of the

world--but I can't waste space or time on him. And I have met family men

even--but I don't meet them more than once if I can help it--who regard

their wives and sisters as playthings, dolls, upper-class servants, not

to be trusted, taken into their confidence, or treated with any real

respect. Such heresies have no place under a Christian civilization,

which has exalted Woman to her true rank as the equal and helpmeet of

Man, the object of his tenderest affections and most loyal services. It

is in his domestic life that one's true character is shown; and Home is

not only the dearest place on earth to me and to every one whose head is

level, but the stage on which his talents and qualities are best brought

out.

You think that I don't practice what I preach; that I introduce within

those sacred precincts too much of play-acting and small diplomacy, as

Jane says; that even at this moment my thoughts and intentions in a

matter which concerns us all are imperfectly revealed to my nearest and

dearest? Ah, that is owing to the difference between the sexes, and to

the singular lines on which the Sex was constructed, mentally speaking.

I don't wish to criticize the Architect's plans, but it seems to me I

could suggest improvements which might have simplified relations, and

avoided much embarrassment. The difficulty is that women, as a rule, can

neither use nor appreciate Frankness. Just after I was married, I

thought it was only the fair thing to tell Mabel about several girls I

had been sweet on before I knew her. Would you believe it, she burst

into tears, and upbraided me with my brutality; and she brings up that

ill-advised disclosure against me to this day. I know several ladies who

will not lie, under ordinary circumstances--not for the mere pleasure of

it, at least; Clarice, for instance, and Jane, I believe; but not one

who will tell the whole truth, or forgive you for telling it. Well,

well, we have to take them as they are, and make the best of them: they

have other redeeming traits, as Jane says of me. In heaven these

inequalities will be done away, and one can afford to speak out--at

least I hope so. But meantime you can see how these feminine

peculiarities hamper a man, and check his natural candor, and impose on

him a wholly new, or at least a hugely modified, ethical code. If I were

to follow my original bent, which was uncommonly direct and guileless, I

should be in hot water all the time. It is this struggle between nature

and--well, I can hardly call it grace; let us say necessity, or

environment--which is making me bald, and fat, and aging me so fast. You

have seen, in the course of this narrative, what scrapes I have gotten

into by speaking before I stopped to think, and blurting out the simple

truth. I was once as honest as they are ever made--and for practical and

domestic uses nearly an idiot. I have been obliged, actually forced, to

deny myself the indulgence of a virtue, and diligently to cultivate the

opposite vice. The preachers don't know everything: I could give them

points. I don't say I have succeeded remarkably, and the exercise has

been deeply painful to me; but it was absolutely essential, if I was to

be fit for the family circle, and able to do or get any good in this

imperfect world. There is no escape, unless you live in a hermitage like

Hartman. You may have noticed that my loved ones sometimes appear to

treat me with less than absolute respect and confidence: it is the

result of this life-conflict, which has left me with a character mixed,

and in one respect wrecked. But they would think much worse of me than

they do if I told them the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the

truth, on all occasions. Thus I might--and then again I might not--go to

our poor Princess, and say, "Clarice, Mabel and Jane think I ought to

see Hartman. I think so too, and they report you as concurring in the

verdict. This is delicately put under cover of my health and the fall

fishing; but we all know that you and Jim want looking after more than I

do, and that bigger game than trout is to be caught. Tell me what you

want me to say to him and do with him, and I will start at once." Some

women might stand that, possibly, but not the ones I am used to: such

would be eminently the way not to attain my benevolent end. No, no; you

can do nothing in such cases without finesse, as Jim calls it, and

strategy, and tact, and management; and if you have not these gifts by

nature, you must acquire them, whatever they may cost. I still hold to

my principles; but I don't propose to run them into the ground. In

morality, as elsewhere, a little too much is apt to be worse than much

too little; and theory and practice are very different things, not to be

rashly confounded. You want to hold the right theories, and then to live

as near them as depraved mundane conditions will allow. The manly

weapons of which Jane spoke so scornfully last night are the right

ones--when you can use them. In the case in hand, to tell all I know

would have been at any time, and would still be, impossible and ruinous.

Hartman is not so far out on some points: as he says, we did not arrange

the present scheme of things, and could not be proud of it if we had.

You may say, and I could not deny, that my diplomacy, such as it is, is

not always employed for the benefit of women only. Hartman is a luminous

and transparent soul--too much so for his own good: why did I practise

occasionally on him? I can explain that best on general principles.

In a world a majority of whose inhabitants are female, demoralization

has naturally extended far and wide, till strict veracity has become

unpractical. The first falsehood (after the serpent's) must have been

humiliating to him who uttered it, and a fatal example to those who

heard; but mankind soon grew used to the new fashion. I pass over the

rude barbarian ages, whose gross and inartistic lying offers no claim to

respectful and sympathetic interest, and no excuse but the lame one of

selfish depravity, common to the race. But with the inroads of

civilization Life became complex, and Truth was found too simple and

rigid to fit with all its varied intricacies. That is, when Truth _is_

simple. "Don't you think my baby beautiful?" demands a fond parent. "No,

I don't: far from it." That is the truth; but its naked and repulsive

brutality demands to be clothed with the garb of humane and graceful

fiction. "Prisoner at the bar, are you guilty or not guilty?" He is

guilty, of course; but if he says so, it is a dead give-away. In this

case indeed the interests of Truth are one with those of Society, though

not of the prisoner; but often it is different. The basis of ethics, our

moralists say, is as largely utilitarian as it is ideal. If so, is there

any special sacredness about cold facts, that they should get up on end

and demand to be published everywhere continually? Truth ought to be

modest, and not claim all the observances and honors, seeing there are

so many other deities whom we poor mortals are no less bound to worship.

When Grotius' wife lied to the policeman about her husband's

whereabouts, the lie was an act of piety, whereas truthtelling would

have been murderous infidelity. If the minions of the law were after me,

would I thank Mabel and Jane and Herbert for telling them which way I

had gone? There is no more aggravated nuisance than he who insists on

exposing all he knows at all times and places--as I used to do before I

learned these tricks. Look at poor Hartman, ejecting his honest

backwoods thought without asking whether it was a wise and decent

offering to his small but highly select audience; and see what trouble

he has brought on himself and all of us thereby.

This outspokenness is often mere self-indulgence. Take me, for instance:

to this day, in spite of all the lessons I have had, it is far easier

and pleasanter for me to tell the truth than not. People of this

temperament must learn to put a check on nature. Self-indulgence is

bad, all agree, and self-denial useful and necessary. This is the way

virtues clash and collide. I say, confound such a world. What is a plain

man to do in it? As the poet sings, the _Summum Bonum_ belongs in

heaven, and you can't expect to get at it here, but must simply do the

best you can, which is generally not very good. And then, as another

poet puts it, very likely nobody will appreciate your efforts, but you

will get cuffed for them: we are punished for our purest deeds, and so

forth.--But this is trenching on Hartman's province. It is well that I

should think all this out now: I can talk it over with him before we get

to business. He will want sympathy with his notions about the depravity

of things in general, and that will smooth the way, and make him willing

to open up on the specific woe that lies nearest.

To return to our muttons. The guilt of duplicity has lain heavy on my

conscience for two months, but how can I help it? I don't so much mind

keeping what I know from Mabel and Jane, for it is not their affair. But

it is Clarice's affair--most eminently so--and I had promised solemnly

to tell her at once when I knew or thought of anything that concerned

her. It was obviously impossible to keep my promise in this case--not on

my account, but on hers. It will not be easy to tell even Jim that I

overheard their last colloquy, and witnessed the tragical parting scene:

I'll have to watch my opportunities, and spring that on him just at the

right moment, when it will have the best effect. Now any one who knows

Clarice must see that to tell her this would be to take the most awful

risks, and probably to destroy all chance of reconciling them; that is

level to the meanest apprehension, I judge. No sir: it can't be done

till I have seen Jim, and got things in train. Properly handled, the

secret--that is, my possession of it, which is a second secret, almost

as weighty as the original one--may be a tool to manage both these

intractable subjects with, and bring them to terms: in a fool's hands,

and thrown about promiscuously, it would be an infernal machine to blow

us up. No: I'll take whatever guilt there is, rather than hurt Clarice

now and hereafter. Do you want to know my opinion of a man who is always

and only thinking about keeping his hands clean and his conscience at

peace, so that he can't do a little lying--or it might be other

sinning--on adequate occasion, to serve his friends or a good cause? I

think he is a cad, sir--a low-minded cad; and of such is not the kingdom

of heaven. It may not occur every day: it might not do to insert in the

text-books as a rule; but once in a while there may be better businesses

than saving one's soul and keeping one's conscience void of offense.[2]

I am arguing against my own nature in all this. In my heart I love Truth

above all things, and follow and serve her with a devotion that is

probably exaggerated. But I can't help seeing that there are two kinds

of her. When she is simple and obvious, she seems to reside in bare

facts, which we may easily respect too much, for what are they but

blackguard carnalities? Preraphaelitism in art, Realism in literature,

might be all very well if they would keep their place--which is in the

kitchen. Some may want pots and pans, and scullions, and pigs' feet, and

ribs of beef described. I don't myself; but it is a free country, and

vivid and accurate portraiture of these delicacies may constitute the

main charm of literature for some readers, possibly. But Realism wants

to take its pots and pans into the parlor: it always overdoes things. "A

daisy by the river's brim a yellow daisy was to him, and it was nothing

more." Well, what else should it be?--But perhaps I have not got that

right. Pass on to our next head.

Truth is not always simple--by no means always. Often she is highly

complex, and as much mixed as I was just now; and then you don't know

where she is, or what she is, and it gets to be all guesswork. One says,

Here, and another says, There: the philosophers upset each other's

schemes in turn, the theologians hurl reciprocal excommunications, the

scientists of to-day laugh at those of last year. If Pilate meant it

this way, we owe him some sympathy and respect. "Speak the truth and

shame the devil," they say. Bah! [I think this expletive ought to be

spelt _Baa_.] When you know what the truth is, you are more likely to

shame your friends, and become obnoxious and ridiculous. And in most

cases you don't know, and if you suppose you do, you are mistaken. I

have thought out a way of approximating Truth on a large scale, and more

nearly than most succeed in doing; but this is a big topic, and I had

better keep it to entertain Hartman with.

O yes; I was to explain why I sometimes use roundabout methods even with

him. If you tell all you know to everyone you meet, or disclose your

real character, it will generally be a waste of good material which

might better be economized. By the way, what _is_ my real character? How

should I know? One sees one side of it, another another. I see all that

have turned up yet, but there may be many more, thus far latent; and how

am I to harmonize them all, and take the average of a succession of

phenomena? I am complex, like Truth.

But I must not interrupt myself any more. Let us fall back on the

utilitarian basis of ethics. You see, if I had talked like this to Jim

when we met last May, he would have put himself on guard and begun to

study me, whereas I wanted to draw him out--as I did. I have no

objection to people studying me when I don't care to study them; but

when there is anything to be done for them you have got to understand

them first, and to this end it is best to appear simple and not distract

their minds from the contemplation and disclosure of their own

qualities: you can play on their vanity if your own does not stand in

the road. Hartman has a fine mind, but in his innocent rural way he took

for granted that I had stood still since we were together at college. So

I played to his lead, and pretended, for instance, to know nothing about

poetry; whereas, as you must have noticed, I am pretty well read, and my

memory is remarkably copious and accurate. (Clarice did indeed say that

I sometimes got the lines wrong; but what she meant was that the

passages I quoted in my well-meant efforts to console her were of too

gay a character for her melancholy mood.)

In this way I secured Jim's regard and confidence, which I am using for

his good: if I had put myself forward, and been anxious to impress him

with my importance, he might have looked on me with the cynical

indifference which is all the feeling he can afford to most people, and

I should never have got him out of the woods. So when I was taking him

to Newport, I said what it was desirable to say, and omitted what was

not: how else should a rational man talk? And that first night there, I

took the tone that he required, as a host is bound to do: sacred are the

duties of christian hospitality. Poor Jim is as good as a play; he takes

Life in such dead earnest, and expects his friends to be rampant

idealists too: so I mounted the high horse for once to gratify him. He

will never forget that, nor cease to respect me accordingly: he thinks I

was serious then, and joking at all other times. You and I of course

understand that Life is but a series of appearances; and if I seem to

contradict myself, to say one thing on one page and its opposite on the

next, I am only reporting the various phases assumed by facts without

and moods within. 'The shield is gold.' 'No, it is silver.' Well, shall

we fight about that? Probably it is both. A thing may be black in one

light, and white in another, for what I know. Of all fools the positive

philosophers seem to me the worst; and the most abject kind of conceit

is that of alleged consistency. Why will you insist on a definiteness

which has so little place in nature? The world is a chameleon, and you

and I are smaller copies of it.

I must try to explain all this to Hartman, and make him see that it is

time he took on another color. He has been down in the depths all this

while; now let him get up on the heights. But he would never do it of

himself, nor without the management of a more practical mind. If I took

things as he does, I should be tempted to say, "You monumental idiot, to

fling a rash word at a girl as proud as Lucifer, and then to take her

hasty repartee as a final verdict from doomsday book!" Happily there is

one person around with sense enough to see that both these moon-struck

babes are forgivable, and therefore capable of such bliss as may be

found in a world of which the best to be said is that we are in very

small measure responsible for it. They were both foolish, of course; but

what proportion does their joint offence bear to their punishment--and

ours? That is the Order of Things--this blessed and beautiful Kosmos.

[Footnote 2: The unwary reader may possibly need to be reminded that R.

T. is not to be taken too seriously, especially in this his Apology for

Lying.--_Pub._]

XXI.

JANE TO THE RESCUE.

It may seem unfeeling in me to indulge in dissertations like the above

at so critical a juncture: but they serve to fill the time while I am

waiting for marching orders. I have written to Jim, and that is all I

can do at present. Jane thinks differently: she ought to have been a

man, she is so fond of action. She got me in a corner to-day.

"Well, brother?"

"Well, Jane?"

"What have you done?"

"Done? what should I do?"

"Use a man's tools, that you are so fond of; plain speech, if no more.

Have you spoken to Clarice yet?"

"No: why should I speak to her? She spoke to Mabel, not to me."

"Robert, are you ever sincere in anything? When _I_ profess affection

for people, I am ready to serve them at their need."

"So am I, and Clarice knows it. She is perfectly aware that I am ready

to do this thing, or any other thing within my power, for her at any

time. It is easy for her to say what she wants."

"Brother, you are _so_ stupid! Don't you know that it is excessively

difficult for her to allude, however remotely, to a matter like this?

Say what she wants, she would die first. Do you desire to wait for that?

She is not like the rest of us; and a woman is not like a man. _You_

could talk for a week, and turn your whole mind inside out, with no

fatigue--except to your audience; but the faintest reference to what I

need not name would cost her a painful effort. I told you it was a great

thing for her to say what she did to Mabel. That ought to have been

enough for you."

"How could it be enough? Do try to talk sense now, Jane. How can I go

off blindly on a fool's errand--in her interest, but without commission

or instructions?"

"Ask her for them, then. It is ungenerous to put on her the burden of

opening the subject. She is doubtless waiting for you to speak, and

wondering at your slackness."

"Hanged if I can understand that. How many times have you lectured me

about showing her proper respect, and restraining my native coarseness,

and what not; and now you want me to go to her like a trooper or a grand

inquisitor, and ask about the state of her feelings toward Hartman. I

can't do it, Jane. When you get into such a scrape, I might try it, if

you insisted--though it would go against me, as Sir Lancelot said: then

you could see how you liked it. Clarice wouldn't like it at all; and she

has deserved better things of me than that."

"She _has_ deserved better things of you than she is getting. I thought

you loved her as I do. So that was only one of your pretences?"

"I love her too well to harass her; to intrude upon her solitude when

she does not want me; to pry into her affairs without her consent, and

destroy what chance there is that she may call me when she is ready."

"She will never be ready, unless we, that are her first friends, come to

her aid against her own pride and shyness. You think me intrusive--a

meddlesome old maid, prying into what does not concern me: but, brother,

she and Mr. Hartman were made for one another. They were deeply

interested, both of them--I could see it plainly: it would have been

settled in a few days more, if that wretched misunderstanding had not

occurred. _He_ may get over it; he is a man, though he did not seem to

be that kind. But she--she is of the deep, and silent, and constant

type: she will nurse this hurt till it kills her. I love her, Robert;

she has nobody but us. She never knew a thing like this before; it is

her first experience. Other men to her were playthings, or bores; she

had no friend among them but you. You cannot fancy how hard it is for

her; harder far than for a younger girl. She is so helpless, for all her

pride--her pride makes her more helpless to speak or act. If I could

only help her, now--"

And here, to my amazement, my stately sister broke down in a passion of

tears and sobs: I never knew her do such a thing before. I patted, and

petted, and soothed her, and did all that a man of humanity and

experience does in such cases. I shall apply for the title, Consoler of

Feminine Woes, since the business of the office comes to me. It will be

Mabel next, I suppose, and then this thing must stop, unless we begin

the round afresh. Clarice may naturally want to be comforted once or

twice more; but I hope soon to remove all further occasion for that.

Jane and I have not been like this since we were children.

"There, there. Sister dear, I would knock any man down, and insult any

woman, who said of you what you just said of yourself. You are not an

old maid, and you might be a society leader if you cared for it: plenty

of women are who have more years and less looks and manners and brains

than you. You are as far as possible from a meddler: your fault is that

you keep too much to yourself. I am sure Clarice would be touched and

flattered by your interest in her: I should, if you took a quarter as

much in me. Do you know, I never saw you look so well, or do yourself

such credit--till now--as night before last. My heart said amen to every

word you uttered, even when you were girding at me; for you thought I

deserved it, and in part I did. I will have no more secrets from

you--except such as I have no right to impart. If you will, we shall be

friends now, and work together in this thing. You always seemed to

despise me, Jane; and it is tedious when the affection is all on one

side."

A Pessimist in Theory and Practice · 第 7 / 13 段