This opinion says (in part):--

"James Hargis is shown in this record to have been a savage, cruel

man; that he had a high, vindictive temper, and allowed neither

fear, nor remorse, nor pity to come between him and the objects of

his passionate resentment.... James Hargis was a man of violence

and of blood. He had established in the county of Breathitt a reign

of terror under the influence of which the law was paralyzed and

its ministers overrun. He is pictured as a man of gigantic frame,

savage temper and indomitable courage. He had surrounded himself

with armed mercenaries, whose minds he inflamed with drink, and

who seemed to be willing to do his bidding even to the point of

assassinating his enemies without fear of the consequences of their

crimes and without remorse or pity for the result.

"He had not only broken down the law and terrorized its officers,

but he had made the temple of justice itself the rendezvous for

assassins who, sheltered behind walls, reddened its portals with

the blood of its votaries. _He literally ingrafted upon the

civilization of the twentieth century the savagery of the fifth,

and introduced into a community of law and order the merciless

ferocity of the middle ages._"

Kentucky's Famous Feuds and Tragedies Authentic History of the World Renowned Vendettas of the Dark and Bloody Ground · 第 31 / 48 题