INTRODUCTION

A brief review of the history of Kentuckians may assist the reader to

understand why they, a kind, hospitable people to the stranger, have

so long borne the reputation of ready fighters who often kill upon the

slightest provocation, and deserve that reputation in a large measure.

It is "bred in the bone" for a Kentuckian to quickly resent an insult

or redress an injury.

Long before the advent of the white man Kentucky, then Fincastle

County, Virginia, had been the vast hunting grounds of the Cherokees,

Creeks, Chickasaws and Catawbas of the South, and of the more hostile

tribes of Shawnees, Delawares and Wyandots of the North. These tribes,

when chance brought them together on their annual hunts, engaged in

conflicts so instant, so fierce and pitiless that the territory became

known as the Dark and Bloody Ground.

It was indeed a hunter's paradise. Dense forests covered the mountains.

Cane brakes fringed the banks of numerous beautiful streams, while to

the west lay immense undulating plains. Forest, cane brake and plain

were literally alive with bear, deer and the buffalo; the woods teemed

with innumerable squirrels, pheasants, wild turkeys and quail.

The fame of this hunting ground had attracted bold and adventurous

hunters long before Daniel Boone looked upon one of the most beautiful

regions in the world from the crest of Cumberland Mountain.

These hunters, upon their return home, gave glowing accounts of the

richness and fertility of the new country, and excited powerfully the

curiosity and imagination of the frontier backwoodsmen east of the

Alleghenies and of North Carolina.

To the hardy adventurers the lonely wilderness, with its many dangers,

presented attractions not to be found in the confinement and enfeebling

inactivities of the towns and little settlements. Daniel Boone visited

the new territory. He found that the descriptions he had received of

it were by no means exaggerations, and decided to remove thither with

his family. After some delay amid many difficulties the first white

settlement, Harrodstown (Harrodsburg) was established. Within a few

years other stations sprang into existence and population increased

with amazing rapidity. Immigrants crossing the Cumberland mountains

settled in the eastern and central parts of Kentucky, while those

traveling down the Ohio and Mississippi rivers, generally located in

the northern, western and southern portions of the state.

This invasion by the white man was not accomplished, however, without

long-continued, bloody struggles with the savages. To maintain the

slender foothold Boone and his companions had gained, required great

courage and tenacity of purpose.

The man who shivered at the winter's blast, or trembled at every

noise, the origin of which he did not understand, was not known among

those hardy settlers with nerves of iron and sinews of steel, who were

accustomed from earliest childhood to absolute self-dependence and

inured to exposure and dangers of every sort.[1] Man in this connection

must include the pioneer women who by their heroism illustrated their

utter contempt of danger, and an insensibility to terrors which would

palsy the nerves of men reared in the peaceful security of densely

populated communities. Even children of tender years exhibited a

courage and self-composure under trying circumstances that at this day

seem unbelievable.

The life of the Kentucky pioneer and backwoodsman was one of long and

bitter struggle. Hunting, clearing the forest, plowing and fighting

were his daily occupations. Every "station" had its conflicts with

the savages who fought with relentless desperation when they found

themselves gradually but surely driven from their beloved hunting

grounds.

These armed hunters and farmers were their own soldiers. They built

their own forts, they did their fighting under commanders they had

themselves chosen. They fought the foe in his own style, adopted his

mode of warfare, and proved generally more successful than bodies of

troops who battled under time-honored military tactics.

The Indian understood the advantage of cover, and the white man copied

his methods. Thus most of the Indian fights became nothing more nor

less than ambuscades in which the side displaying the most skill in

placing them, won the victory. Boone, Kenton, Brady, Wetzel--all that

galaxy of pioneers and Indian fighters of the early West fought the

enemy from ambush.

There were few courts, and the justices presiding over them knew

but little law. If the law proved too slow, or courts were too far

away, the settlers tried criminals and inflicted the punishment. The

backwoodsman was prompt to avenge a wrong. He was grim, stern, strong,

easily swayed by stormy passions, and always a lover of freedom, to the

core. He had suffered horrible injuries from the Indians and learned

to retaliate in kind. He became cruel and relentless toward an enemy,

but was loyal to the death to his friends and country. He was upright

and honest. These pioneers were indeed cast in the heroic mold. Many

of them fell in the struggle; but there was no time for sentiment and

wailing. Over the prostrate bodies of the fallen civilization marched

triumphantly westward and gave to America one of the most attractive

regions, to the nation heroic soldiers, brilliant lawyers, men of

science and of art, and a womanhood whose beauty and accomplishments

are a byword everywhere.

With the close of Indian hostilities came rapid development of the more

easily accessible portions of the state. Intercourse with the East

and North obliterated old habits and customs and primitive notions.

The fertility of the soil created wealth and with it came comfort.

With increasing prosperity came that high intellectual development

so essential to a sound, moral public sentiment, respect for the

law, and love of peace and order, the foundation stones of a happy

social structure. Schools and churches demonstrated their all-powerful

influence by the refinement and social purity of the inhabitants. The

_code duello_ which had formerly been resorted to almost universally in

settling personal differences, was made a crime by law and completely

disappeared.

In the mountains, however, development was slow. That section remained

isolated and practically cut off from intercourse with the more

populous and advanced portions of Kentucky and surrounding States.

Only in recent years have railroads begun to spread their iron network

through the mountains, tapping the almost inexhaustible coal veins,

mineral deposits of various kinds, wonderful forests of timber, until

now that section is become the richest in the State.

Education and refinement distinguished the Blue Grass Kentuckian at an

early date; he had long enjoyed the advantages of modern civilization,

while his mountaineer brother yet lived in the primitive fashion of

his forebears, and still remained a backwoodsman. He suffered the same

privations and possessed the traits of character of the early pioneers

of the Blue Grass.

For long years the mountain section remained a wilderness, with here

and there a small settlement. The inhabitants lived the lives of

frontiersmen and were generally poor. While many of them owned large

tracts of land, its productiveness scarcely repaid the labor spent in

cultivation. The great majority of these people were honest, upright

and hardworking, but the wilderness, the frontier, unfortunately

attracts the vicious, the violent, the criminal, the shiftless, the

outcast of better communities. Such characters have a pernicious

influence upon those with whom they come in contact, especially upon

the young and thoughtless fellows with a taste for viciousness.[2] The

mountains of the surrounding states of Virginia, West Virginia and

Tennessee offered admirable asylum to fugitives from justice of those

States. As like seeks like, individuals and families of that stripe

settled near each other, intermarried, and thus formed a dangerous

element in an otherwise good population.

Life in the wilderness, the frontier, is apt to bring out the true

nature of the man, and his qualities, good or bad, are accentuated.

The history of every frontier of this country is the same. The man who

leaves the restraining influence of civilization behind him, becomes

either _man_ or devil. If there is "dog-hair" in a man, the wilderness,

the frontier, will sprout it.

When the wicked element in a community had once gained a foothold,

it organized against possible interference. Once organization was

complete, all attempts to enforce law and order were promptly stifled

through terrorization which intimidated courts and overawed the

officers of the law. Under such circumstances the good element has but

one alternative--to lie supinely on its back and ask to be killed, or

to organize and strike back at the enemy, to destroy the vicious with

powder and shot, in open fight, if possible, from ambush if necessary,

as their sires fought in the days of the Indian. Herein lies the secret

of the long-continued, bloody internecine strifes which have made the

dark and bloody ground of the Indian days more dark and more bloody.

Herein we find the ready and clear explanation of the fact that many

men of unquestioned integrity and honor were thrown into the vortex of

bloody strife from necessity, to fight for preservation of themselves,

their families, their firesides.

Immigration into these remote mountain regions was almost nil and

intermarriage between the settlers became the rule. In this wise the

population of any county comprised but very few distinct families.

Everybody was of kin to everybody else, and therein we find the key to

the difficulties encountered by courts in dealing with crime.

The murderer, if a member of a prominent family, was certain to have

kinsmen among the officers. (We may as well use the present tense in

speaking of this, for the same conditions exist to-day, though less

pronounced.) His "family," man, woman and child, stand by him, aid his

escape or his defence in the court house. If the criminal, conscious of

the supporting influence surrounding him, disdains flight and boldly

faces trial, the next move is to secure a jury which will acquit him.

It often happens that those interested in the prosecution secretly come

to an agreement with the accused and his friends to cease prosecution

provided he and his in their turn would do the same to them in cases of

their own. It is merely a case of "you scratch my back and I'll scratch

yours." Citizens who love peace are loath to antagonize an outlaw clan

so long as they or theirs are not directly concerned. They have no

desire to assist officers in doing their duty, should these wish to do

it. To indict men for crime is often a risky thing.

The criminal who has succeeded in defeating justice grows more bold,

continues to pursue his career with an enhanced contempt of the law,

until, at last, the cup runs over, and men, good and true, rise above

self, and for country's and humanity's sake take upon themselves the

task of restoring peace and order, and summarily cut short the life

cycle of the outlaw.

How far such organized bands of murderers have succeeded in overawing

the constituted authorities, is illustrated by instances recorded in

this volume, where the law, the government itself, actually compromised

with the outlaws, promised, yea, granted them immunity from past

crimes, only exacting a pledge of better behavior in the future. If a

man had committed but one little murder, he was in some danger of a

short term in the penitentiary. If he understood his business, instead

of stopping at one assassination, he simply continued his murder

mill in operation and the authorities would send special ministers

and envoys to "treat" with him as a power entitled to respect.

Exaggeration? No![3]

Officers of the law have actually aided in assassinations, or stood

idly by while murders were committed in their presence. Investigation

has proven that in every feud-ridden section the entire legal machinery

was rotten to the core, perverted to the end and purpose of protecting

particular men and of punishing their enemies. Is it any wonder, then,

that in such times and under such conditions preaching respect for law

is breath wasted?

Sifting the matter down, we find that the chief contributing causes

of these feudal troubles, wherever they have occurred, or may again

occur, are due directly:--to inefficient, corrupt and depraved

officials; to a want of a healthy moral public sentiment, through

lack of _proper_ education and religious training; to the fact that

the law-abiding element of the feud-ridden counties had so long

been domineered over by the criminal class and their parasites and

supporters in secret, that they are incapable of rendering any valuable

assistance in maintaining the law save in few exceptions, and these few

so much in the minority that a reformation is not to be hoped for if

left to their own resources; that during all the social chaos attending

feudal wars the promiscuous, unrestrained and illegal sale of whiskey

added fury, fire and venom to the minds and hearts of murderers. It

dragged into the terrible vortex of bloody crime many not directly

connected with the feud, but who took advantage of the disturbed

social conditions, the state of anarchy, to satisfy their own vicious

propensities without fear of interruption and punishment.[4]

The clannishness of the mountaineer has been the subject of much

comment. The student of sociology must, therefore, be interested in

learning that in a great measure the people of the Kentucky mountains

descended from the same stock that formed the noted Scottish clans

of old. One need only run over the names of the principal mountain

families to recognize their Scot origin. The Scots love the highlands,

and to the "highlands" of Kentucky many of them drifted. Scotland had

her feuds--those of the Kentucky mountains are nothing more nor less

than transplanted Scottish feuds, their continuation having been made

possible by the reasons heretofore given.

We believe it germane to the matter under discussion to add that not

only feuds, but mobs and the like, are, and ever have been, the direct

outgrowth of a lack of confidence of the people in their courts. The

shameful nightrider outrages in the western part of Kentucky a few

years ago, in a section which had boasted of a civilization superior by

far to that of the mountaineers, where schools and churches are to be

met with at every corner, were the outcome, so it is claimed, of the

failure of the law to deal sternly with the lawless tobacco trust, the

"original wrongdoer" in the noted tobacco war. If this were true, if

this justified the destruction by incendiaries of millions of dollars'

worth of property, brutal whippings, the indiscriminate slaughter of

entire families without regard to age or sex, the butchery of little

children (for aiding the tobacco trust, no doubt) then, indeed, is the

mountaineer feudist also innocent of wrongdoing; more so, for he, at

least, never made war upon suckling infants, nor have women suffered

harm, except in one or two instances. Nor is the cultured Blue Grass

citizen free to censure him, when he calls to mind the outrages of the

toll-gate raids, or takes into account the numerous lynching bees,

proceedings from which the mountains have always been practically free.

In view of all this we cannot go far from wrong when we say that the

law's delay, the failure to punish promptly, impartially and severely

its infractions, must shoulder the responsibility for all social

disturbances, and this is true in New York, in the West, as well as in

Kentucky.

Kentucky's Famous Feuds and Tragedies Authentic History of the World Renowned Vendettas of the Dark and Bloody Ground · 第 9 / 48 题