The _Life_ exemplifies many of Defoe's life long interests a

E-text prepared by Chris Curnow, Joseph Cooper, and the Online Distributed

Proofreading Team (http://www.pgdp.net)

The Augustan Reprint Society

[DANIEL DEFOE]

A SHORT NARRATIVE OF THE

Life and Actions

Of His GRACE

_JOHN_, D. of Marlborough

(1711)

_Introduction by_

PAULA R. BACKSCHEIDER

Publication Number 168

William Andrews Clark Memorial Library

University Of California, Los Angeles

1974

GENERAL EDITORS

William E. Conway, William Andrews Clark Memorial Library

George Robert Guffey, University of California, Los Angeles

Maximillian E. Novak, University of California, Los Angeles

David S. Rodes, University of California, Los Angeles

ADVISORY EDITORS

Richard C. Boys, University of Michigan

James L. Clifford, Columbia University

Ralph Cohen, University of Virginia

Vinton A. Dearing, University of California, Los Angeles

Arthur Friedman, University of Chicago

Louis A. Landa, Princeton University

Earl Miner, Princeton University

Samuel H. Monk, University of Minnesota

Everett T. Moore, University of California, Los Angeles

Lawrence Clark Powell, William Andrews Clark Memorial Library

James Sutherland, University College, London

H. T. Swedenberg, Jr., University of California, Los Angeles

Robert Vosper, William Andrews Clark Memorial Library

CORRESPONDING SECRETARY

Edna C. Davis, William Andrews Clark Memorial Library

EDITORIAL ASSISTANT

Beverly J. Onley, William Andrews Clark Memorial Library

Typography by Wm. M. Cheney

INTRODUCTION

Opinion is a mighty matter in war, and I doubt but the French think it

impossible to conquer an army that he leads, and our soldiers think

the same; and how far even this step may encourage the French to play

tricks with us, no man knows.

Swift's _Journal to Stella_, 1 January 1711

... the moment he leaves the service and loses the protection of

the Court, such scenes will open as no victories can varnish over.

Bolingbroke's _Letters and Correspondence_,

23 January 1711

The career of John Churchill, Duke of Marlborough, reflects the

political battles of nearly thirty years of English politics. In an

age when duplicity, intrigue, personality, and an immediate history of

violence characterized politics, John Churchill was a constant, steady

military success even while his political and personal fortunes

alternately plunged and soared. His military ability insured his

importance to the Grand Alliance and his victories brought the

reverence of the European powers opposing Louis XIV as well as that of

his own people, but, at the same time, his successes also assured his

involvement with the fortunes of nearly every major English political

figure and movement in the years 1688 to 1712.

Marlborough's military career spanned two periods. Aware of the danger

of the "exorbitant power of France" and the corresponding danger to

the Protestant religion, disgusted with James's actions at the

_Gloucester_ shipwreck and in dealing with Scottish Protestants,

Marlborough had joined the bloodless shift to William of Orange. For

William, he led the English forces in Flanders in 1689 and in Ireland

in 1690; in 1691 he was in charge of the British forces in Europe with

the rank of lieutenant-general. In January, 1692, however, Marlborough

was dismissed from all of his offices for a combination of reasons,

each insufficient in itself but all too typical for him--open

opposition to William's Dutch dominated army, rumors that he and

Sarah, his ambitious and sometimes presumptuous wife, were plotting

Anne's usurpation of the throne, and dissension aroused between Anne

and her sister Queen Mary by the quixotic Sarah. When rumors of a

Jacobite uprising began, Marlborough spent six weeks in the Tower.

Although Marlborough was restored to political favor in 1698 partly as

a placatory gesture to Anne, it was 1701 before he resumed his

military career, this time as William's Commander-in-Chief and

Ambassador Extraordinary to the United Provinces. In this second phase

of his military career, he won every battle, took every fort that he

besieged, held the Grand Alliance together, broke the threatening

supremacy of France, and established England as a major power. Yet,

during these ten years, Queen Anne's ministry and Parliament underwent

several major upheavals: the resulting shifts in policy and

personalities alternately inconvenienced and vexed Marlborough. The

year 1711 marked the culmination of warring factions and clandestine

arrangement, and Daniel Defoe's _A Short Narrative of the Life and

Actions of his grace, John, Duke of Marlborough_, published 20

February 1711, originated in this battle. (For discussion of

authorship, please see Appendix.)

Much that happened in these years can be unraveled back to Harley,

Earl of Oxford. His influences and circuitous dealing emerge wherever

a close examination of politics is made.[1] Hiding his activities from

even his closest associates, employing spies and journalists whose

purposes seem contradictory, manipulating the House of Commons'

radical October Club while preaching a "broad bottomed" moderate

government, and buzzing in the Queen's ear in a variety of ways,

Harley was ready for any exigency. England had wanted peace since 1709

when their insistence on "no peace without Spain" and on the XXXVII

Article asking for guarantees of three Spanish towns had rallied the

French behind the war;[2] Marlborough's pleas that peace be made and

Spain be dealt with later were ignored. Although Parliament voted

Malplaquet a triumph, Marlborough's power and prestige were

systematically shorn away, and embarrassing decisions contrived to

force his resignation were effected.[3] Should Marlborough resign, a

scapegoat for defeat or an unfavorable peace would be assured. By

1710, foreign policy had changed--a growing interest in trade and

colonization urged Parliament to end a costly and now unnecessary war

and had united the Tories, Jacobites, the Church party, as well as

such diverse men as the Dukes of Argyll, Somerset, Newcastle, and

Shrewsbury, a Whig. With the election of the radical Tory majority

(240 new members were seated) to the Commons in 1710 and the creation

of twelve new peers,[4] Harley's job of using diverse elements to form

a moderate government became more complex. He found it expedient to

establish and maintain influence with groups ranging from the radical

Tory October Club to Swift's country squire and clergy _Examiner_

readers to moderate Whigs such as Shrewsbury. Moreover, Defoe had

impressed upon him the importance of assuring the nation that moderate

and sensible men were at the bottom of all of the political

changes.[5] Harley, therefore, prepared for at least three apparently

exclusive possibilities--prosecuting the war for several more years,

negotiating a peace with the Allies, or making a separate peace with

France without the Allies. To keep all these possibilities alive,

Harley had to remain in harmony with Marlborough. The general's

popularity with the soldiers and the European powers and France's awe

of his military prowess necessitated the appearance that Marlborough's

command was secure. While the _Examiner_, with its Tory audience and

its emphasis on pressure for peace, was essential to Harley, so were

Swift's and Defoe's appeals for moderation at a time when sympathy for

Marlborough was rampant and the call "no peace without Spain" was

still defended even by the October Club; for the same reasons he was

glad to have Bolingbroke openly associated with the _Examiner_.

January of 1711 brought the decisive defeat at Brihuega which

effectively took the issue of Spanish succession away; in the ensuing

witch hunt, Almanza and the peace talks of 1709 were revived to

distract the people. While these inquiries proceeded, England received

word that France was ready to discuss terms. The delay between this (8

February) and France's formal proposal (2 May) was an anxious time for

Harley and his schemers. Defoe was busy setting the stage for the

outcome.

While Swift, the high Tory, could easily set about discrediting

Marlborough, the hero and standard bearer, and, by so doing, weaken

the Whig's position, Defoe's readers required different handling. His

most effective writing at this time was in pamphlets which reached a

wider audience and which were not bound by the consistency of the

Review. Defoe and Swift, primed with the Minister's inside knowledge,

set about to discredit the Whig ministry in basically the same way. In

the 15 February _Examiner_, Swift wrote,

No Body, that I know of, did ever dispute the Duke of Marlborough's

Courage, Conduct, or Success; they have been always unquestionable

and will continue to be so, in spight of the Malice of his Enemies,

or which is yet more, the Weakness of his Advocates. The Nation

only wished to see him taken out of ill Hands, and put into better.

But, what is all this to the Conduct of the late Ministry, the

shameful Mismanagements in Spain, or the wrong Steps in the Treaty

of Peace.... [6]

Defoe remarks, "our General wants neither Conduct or Courage" and

describes his greatest successes as "daughters to preserve his Memory"

while dissociating him somewhat from the Jacobites, Whigs, and

"business of [making] peace and war." When the _Review_ finally

discusses Marlborough's fall, Defoe suggests that the "greatest Guilt

... is the Error in Policy, and Prudence among his Friends."[7] Both

writers presented the Duke as a means to an end and discredited him on

personal grounds (avarice, ambition) thereby protecting the military

hero and the newborn glory of England fathered by his victories.[8]

Faced with Dissenters and moderate Whig readers, Defoe's _Review_ had

to seem to oppose Swift's _Examiner_ with its sneers at trade; not only

must it be consistent but it was obliged to shift its readers'

attention more slowly to the earlier failures of the Whig ministry and

the rich commercial advantages gained in the separate peace.

The _Life of Marlborough_ is part of a stream of pamphlets which Defoe

wrote supporting the Harley administration; _A Supplement to the Faults

on Both Sides_, a discussion of the Sacheverell case by two "displac'd

officers of state," _Rogues on Both Sides_, a study in contrasts

between old and new Whigs, and old, high flyer, and new Tories, and _A

Seasonable Caution to the General Assembly_ were published immediately

before and after. That same year, his pamphlets discuss the October

Club, the Spanish succession, "Mr. Harley," and the state of religion.

By summer when the peace was nearly assured though still secret, Defoe

was writing _Reasons for a Peace; Or, the War at an End_.

Taken in chronological order, Defoe's 1711 pamphlets indicate two

emerging directions: first, the reasons for ending the war become more

positive and entirely unconcerned with the General, and, second,

Defoe's comments about the Duke become less wholeheartedly admiring,

especially in _No Queen; Or, No General_. _Rogues on Both Sides_ is

witty praise for moderate men who act "according to English principles

of Law and Liberty regardless of People and Party" rather than

believing any demagogue who "cries it rains butter'd Turnips." After

this, the pamphlets become more informative and solemn--Defoe

demonstrates Whigs and Tories want the same things and that the country

bleeds to death. _Armageddon; or the Necessity of Carrying on the War_

(30 October 1711), _Reasons Why This Nation Ought to put a speedy End

to this Expensive War_ (6 October), and _Reasons for a Peace: or, the

War at an End_, for example, catalog the economic ailments--taxes,

pirates, hard to replace sailors and soldiers killed, but far worse, a

decline in trade resulting in closed shops and declining manufacturing

increasing unemployment--"the whole Kingdom sold to Usury" and

"Consumption of the Growth of the Country." As the year passed, Defoe

mentioned Marlborough less and less, but the General's possible

mistakes were progressively forced into balance with his victories.

While seeming to be moderate, Defoe both tempers his readers' opinions

of the Duke and turns their attention to other issues.

The techniques and movement in _No Queen: Or, No General_ (10 January

1712) parallel the techniques and movement in the 1711 pamphlets. In

this 1712 pamphlet, Defoe's double-edged balance sheet is most obvious;

in the first six pages he lists the charges against the General which

he will not discuss--this reminds his readers of every possible failing

and, because of the language ("I'le forbear to lessen his Glorious

Character by Reckoning the Number of the Slain, or counting the Cost of

the Towns"), the significance of each "ignored" charge is increased.

Defoe recounts the economic issues at stake and insists that when

Marlborough's "blinded party" made him its representative, regardless

of his intentions, he became a formidable threat to the Queen and had

to be removed. The pamphlet gradually turns to the destructiveness of

party factions and by the patriotic ending ("Alas, what a Condition

were Britain in if her Fate depended upon the Life, or Gallantry, or

Merit, of one Man"), Marlborough is no longer an issue.

In the _Life_, Defoe defends the general from the charge of avarice,

the most plausible charge that the journalists were propagating.

Marlborough's courage and skill had also been called into question in

such papers as _The Post Boy_, and a spurious debate raged which could

only injure Marlborough over the gratitude of the nation. Defoe alludes

to pamphlets which impugn great men and represent them as "unworthy of

the Favour of the Prince" slanting the charge that Marlborough had been

rewarded perhaps too bountifully in order to imply that such writers

were malicious, uninformed, and ungrateful. Furthermore, Defoe says,

Marlborough deserved his reward, having bought it at a dear rate, and

it was no more than what "in all Times belong'd to Generals." Indeed,

Marlborough's successor, the Duke of Ormond, received the same bread

perquisite and percentage of foreign pay, but Defoe chooses to "defend"

Marlborough not with comparable facts which would destroy the

credibility of the attacking group, but rather with passing references

to the two other generals with whom he had to divide the money and with

the profits of sea captains and petty clerks in yards and stores! With

descriptions of the fitting appearance for generals and Marlborough's

sobriety in the field, Defoe tips the scales in Marlborough's favor.

That he ends the section with

Indeed Generals, tho' the most accomplish'd Heroes, are but Men,

they are not Infallible, but may be mistaken as well as other

Mortals, they are subject to Faults and Infirmities as well as

their Fellow-Creatures; but then their great Services for the good

of their Country ought to be cast into the Ballance, against their

humane Mistakes; and not only Charity, but Self-consideration

should give them very good Quarter, unless their Faults are prov'd

to be Wilful and Contumacious.(38)

is a paradigm of his technique. Coming immediately after this defense,

the argument that his victories should be "cast in the Ballance" is

somewhat degrading and implies that Marlborough may have been mistaken

in what he did and even leaves the question open with the phrase

"unless their Faults are prov'd Wilful and Contumacious."[9] The

following paragraph, however, opens the subject of Marlborough's

invincibility. Under the guise of wondering what an ungrateful nation

would do should he lose a battle, Defoe brings Marlborough's perfect

record, his piety, and the esteem France and his soldiers had for him

to our attention. The paragraph before, then, may be taken to introduce

Defoe's concern--even Marlborough could be mistaken in battle and lose,

and what would such a nation do then? The paragraph on the whole

reflects on the nation and is an eloquent defense of the Duke--he is

human, human beings make mistakes and his great good should excuse him

even more than an ordinary man's mistakes should be forgiven.

Harley knew that Marlborough was essential until peace negotiations

were secured. Marlborough had distrusted Harley throughout 1710, but he

also knew that Harley's stakes in a moderate government were great. In

1711, Rochester and the October Club began to challenge Harley, and

their demands alarmed even Queen Anne. The Queen, Bolingbroke, and

Harley all wrote Marlborough conciliatory letters. Marlborough answered

in kind and his letter after Harley was stabbed expresses deep concern.

Harley became increasingly convinced that only peace would preserve his

power, and Marlborough's power and reputation were essential for an

acceptable peace. As late as July, Harley's letters to Marlborough are

respectful and deceitfully warm:

My lord; I received from the hands of lord Mar, just as I came from

Windsor, the honour of your grace's letter, and I am not willing to

let a post pass, without making your grace my acknowledgments. It

is most certain, that you can best judge what is fit to be proposed

upon the subject you are pleased to mention....

I hope it will be needless to renew the assurances to your grace,

that I will not omit any thing in my power, which may testify my

zeal for the public, and my particular honour and esteem for your

grace; and I doubt not, but when the lord you mention comes, I

shall satisfy him of the sincerity of my intentions towards your

grace.[10]

Harley's perfidy allowed him to assure Marlborough he would "never do

any thing which shall forfeit your good opinion" while pretending to

plan to restore Marlborough to the Queen's confidence. Further, when

Marlborough appealed to him to silence the libellous attacks by

journalists, Harley replied, "I do assure your grace I neither know nor

desire to know any of the authors; and as I heartily wish this

barbarous war was at an end, I shall be very ready to take my part in

suppressing them."[11] Details about the financing of Woodstock and

mutual friends crop up in the letters. So successful is Harley's

deception that when Sir Solomon Medina accuses Marlborough of graft,

Marlborough writes Harley:

Upon my arrival here, I had notice that my name was brought before

the commissioners of accounts, possibly without any design to do me

a prejudice. However, to prevent any ill impression it might make,

I have writ a letter to those gentlemen ... and when you have taken

the pains to read the inclosed copy, pray be so kind as to employ

your good offices, so as that it may be known I have the advantage

of your friendship. No one knows better than your lordship the

great use and expence of intelligence, and no one can better

explain it; and 'tis for that reason I take the liberty to add a

farther request, that you would be so kind to lay the whole, on

some fitting opportunity, before the queen, being very well

persuaded her majesty, who has so far approved, and so well

rewarded my services would not be willing they should now be

reflected on.[12]

Defoe points out that criticism of the Duke "may prove Dangerous and

Fatal" and the joy in the French court at each step in Marlborough's

fall reinforces Defoe's and Harley's opinion[13] Defoe recounts

Marlborough's greatest military victories beginning as far back as his

campaign in Brabant (reminding his readers of possible wealth gained

through a shipwreck and of the betrayal of Dunkirk as he goes along),

includes descriptions of his exemplary behavior including regular

prayers for the Camp, and praises Marlborough as a "finish'd Hero." The

conclusion to the pamphlet warns the nation again of Marlborough's

importance; his battles are bringing the enemy to "reason," procuring

"an honorable and lasting peace." References to the detrimental effect

of discrediting the general are found intermittently throughout the

pamphlet in allusion to Hannibal.

Defoe, then, served Harley's purposes well. He defended Marlborough and

shored up his prestige in a time when it was important for the French

to think that Marlborough could prosecute the war freely. As a known

employee of Harley's, Defoe furthered Marlborough's impression that

Harley could be depended upon.[14] Finally, he began to prepare the

moderate Whigs for peace by presenting the economic considerations and

disassociating Marlborough from the Queen's and the ministry's

"business of peace."

The possibility that Defoe acted independently in this writing cannot

be discounted.[15] Defoe had praised Marlborough since the beginning of

his career and the extent to which he and Godolphin adopted William's

policies added to Defoe's admiration; admiration is clear in this

pamphlet. Defoe had worked for Godolphin and Sunderland, and may have

used "by an Old Officer in the Army" as a disguise from Harley or even

as a means of publishing independently. That Defoe resented attacks on

his hero can hardly be doubted--the _Review_ and his pamphlets are

a catalog of the general's triumphs, and no where does he attack

unequivocably; even in _No Queen_ he puts chief blame on rumors and on

Marlborough's party. Harley's failure to make permanent provisions for

Defoe may suggest some dissatisfaction, but even if the possibility

that the _Life_ was not expressly ordered by Harley is considered, it

is noteworthy that nothing in it is offensive to Harley, and, more

important, remarkable that it serves Harley's needs and ends at the

time so well.

Definitely Defoe's, however, are veiled but telling attacks on Swift

and his type. Although the purpose of the _Examiner_ was to "furnish

Mankind, with a Weekly Antidote to that Weekly Poison,"[16] Defoe

parodied this by saying his pamphlet was to "undeceive the People." The

"base Pamphleteers" are labeled uninformed and ungrateful; they have

no way of making right judgments in the matter of perquisites and

soldier's pay; they go out to see a battlefield as they might a well

laid-out garden, and, of course, their "Mouths go off smartly with a

Whiff of Tobacco" (an obvious ridiculing contrast to the cannon fire of

the real fighters).

Furthermore, compared to attacks on Marlborough in libels such as _The

Duke of M***'s Confessions to a Jacobite Priest_, _The Land-Leviathan_:

_or_, _the Modern Hydra_, and _The Perquisite Monger_, Defoe's pamphlet

was exemplary in its moderation. Even Swift's attacks are moderate

beside the majority of these 1711-12 pamphlets; not even he conjured

up memories of regicide and rebellion as did the more numerous and

libellous pamphleteers. For example, _The Mobb's Address to my Lord

M***_ (1710) linked Marlborough to Sacheverell and assured the Duke his

"most dutiful Mobb, will use our utmost Care and Diligence to raise all

riotous and tumultous Assemblys, and with undaunted Vigour ... oppose

... all who will keep up the Authority of the Crown." _Oliver's

Pocket Looking Glass_ (1711) while more erudite was scarcely less

inflammatory--shades of Cromwell were called up, a "Colossus" with an

"Army compos'd of almost all nations" faced the "body politic."

The _Life_ exemplifies many of Defoe's life long interests and opinions

and points to the fiction he was to write. Virtues espoused throughout

his career are praised here. Ingratitude was a deplorable but all too

common failing of mankind--that Marlborough should be "undervalued and

slighted" was "no new Thing, all the Histories of the World are full of

Examples to this purpose" and his greatness provides but a mark at

which the envious may shoot. In _Atalantis Major_ Defoe elaborates on

the causes of the nation's ingratitude: the debt was too great for

payment and resentment was the natural result. A second interest was

the military hero; much of Defoe's fiction--_Memoirs of a Cavalier_,

_Captain Singleton_, for instance--involved military men, and

Marlborough along with King Gustavus Adolphus of Sweden, another

soldier who scorned the conventional seventeenth century chess game

tactics, furnished a model. The "finish'd Hero" described includes all

of the virtues of Defoe's fictional leaders from Robinson Crusoe to

John in _Journal of the Plague Year_ to the Cavalier--"Prudent, and

Vigilant, and Temperate, Alert, and industrious, with an humble

Submission to the Will of the Almighty" (26), "Temperate, Sober,

Careful, Couragious, Politick, Skilful, so he is Courteous, Mild,

Affable, Humble, and Condescending to People of the meanest Condition"

(45). The Duke's virtues as well as Gustavus's enable the reader of

_Memoirs of a Cavalier_ and _The Memoirs of Captain George Carlton_ to

judge the commanders as Defoe would have. Above all, the "assured

Skill" and "daring Courage" appealed to Defoe--Robinson Crusoe's

campaigns against the cannibals and in the Far East repeat the daring,

risk-all quality of Ramilles. Defoe's enjoyment of marching vicariously

over great battles has led biographers such as J. R. Moore to say that

it was unfortunate his military genius was never used,[17] and is

obvious in almost all of his fiction. So skillful are his descriptions

that J. H. Burton pauses to note "the character and claims of a book

(_Memoirs of Capt. George Carlton_, 1728) that has afforded him

valuable instruction on the general character of the war, along with

special instructions in its leading events."[18]

Defoe's _Life_ was his first biography; other "memoirs" of the Duke of

Melfort (1714), Daniel Williams (1718), and Major Ramkins (1719)

suggest the progression to _The Life and Strange Surprizing Adventures

of Robinson Crusoe_ (1719) and two other lives in that same year.

Defoe's sometimes troublesome skill with narrative voices is, in the

_Life_, a shadow of the competence displayed in _Moll Flanders_.

Although the "old Officer's" voice is sustained and there are excellent

touches, the distinctiveness and absorbing intimacy are only hinted at.

The polemist appeals too apparently to his readers while the opening

pages approach a declamation. The persona protests that he doesn't

"pretend in this Narrative to Inform the great People at Court,

concerning this thing," and that he writes only for the common people.

Defoe does limit carefully his material to events which were common

knowledge or would have been open to an old soldier--while he describes

the key maneuver of Ramilles, he certainly lacks a complete overview.

Many of the virtues praised would appeal most strongly to men who might

have been common foot concerned with regular bread, a well-run camp,

and a conscientious strategist, or to simple, pious women glad to hear

that their general prayed and provided Sunday sermons. Allusions to

Satan, "the cunning engineer," Solomon, and Moses were common enough,

while those to Hannibal and Raleigh had been exploited in Defoe's

other writing. Perhaps the most graphic section in this voice is the

description of the common soldier's misery in a rainy season march and

siege. A few passages have the confidential, gossipy tone of ordinary

people around a tavern table--Sarah was admired abroad, but in her own

country it was said she was "guilty of more Folly than a Retainer to

the College in Moore-Fields,"[19] an experienced old general knows more

coffeehouse quarterbacks, and the soldier naively speculates with

relish how "my Lord" narrowly escaped being "torn in Pieces" for the

rumor that he spoke words which would be "brutal from the mouth of

a Porter." Naive arguments (no man would continue in so hard an

undertaking from selfish motives), sincere patriotism (defense of his

King and Queen and praise for a nation "with a generous Race of Warlike

People" ready to risk their lives), and honest indignation at

"barbarous Lies" authenticate the narrator.

Defoe's writing--fiction and non-fiction--is all of a piece. The same

subjects and opinions reoccur and the techniques and style are nearly

indistinguishable. Expository material alternates with narrative

examples (which may in turn be followed by a paragraph or two drawing a

conclusion or a "moral") in all of his writing. The primary difference

is in the length of the narrative examples--in the fiction they are

naturally much longer. Over the years, they become increasingly

dramatic as may be seen in books such as _The Fortunate Mistress_ and

_Conjugal Lewdness_. _A Short Narrative_ conforms to this structural

pattern. Sentences which direct the reader's attention to this

structure are common. For instance, Defoe defends Marlborough's courage

with descriptions of the battle of Brabant, Ramilles, references to

Hannibal, and concludes, "And thus then you see, that our General wants

neither Conduct or Courage." Defoe's skill with these short, dramatic,

illustrative examples developed with the years. Defoe was always

concerned with presenting a case clearly and persuasively. Clearly

marked structure and "reasonable" conclusions alternate with anecdotes

and reminiscences intended to hold the reader's interest and dramatize

Defoe's points.[20]

Defoe's _Life of Marlborough_ serves as a kind of barometer for the age

and for Defoe. A reliable if sketchy list of the Duke's military

successes and the major charges raised against him at various times

during his life may be matched to the struggles in the English

government and on the continent. The time had nearly come for the

Jacobites, whom Marlborough had offended by deserting James, and the

Tories, who had long thought him a presumptuous general and a former

Tory (or a lukewarm Tory as Marlborough might have thought himself) who

had perverted a Tory Queen, brought the Bill of Occasional Conformity

to defeat, and driven Tories out of office, to collect the debt that

they felt Marlborough owed them. The biography, written in the interim

between two foreign policies when so many momentous plans were

proceeding backstage, mirrors the age. It is also a barometer by which

Defoe's development can be measured; his journalistic involvement and

employment, his non-fiction techniques as well as his progress toward

the fiction are implied.

Rollins College

Winter Park, Florida

NOTES TO THE INTRODUCTION

1. Harley as a "trickster is a doctrine as deeply rooted in historical

opinion as the military skill of Marlborough and the oratorical

accomplishments of Bolingbroke." John Hill Burton, _A History of the

Reign of Queen Anne_ (New York: Scribner & Welford, 1880), iii, p. 71.

See also Elizabeth Hamilton, _The Backstairs Dragon: A Life of Robert

Harley, Earl of Oxford_ (London: Hamish Hamilton, 1969).

2. Winston S. Churchill, _Marlborough; His Life and Times_ (New

York: Scribner's, 1938), vi, pp. 85-6.

3. Marlborough was systematically deprived of the men upon whom he

relied most. The ministry took over Army promotions and dismissed

existing officers under the guise of protecting the Queen. Churchill,

vi, pp. 334-5.

4. Burton, iii, pp. 92-3.

5. Defoe to Harley, July 28, 1710. George Healey, ed., _The Letters

of Daniel Defoe_ (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1955).

6. _Examiner_, February 15, 1711. Herbert Davis, ed., _The Prose

Works of Jonathan Swift_ (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1940), p. 87.

7. Defoe's _Review_, January 22, 1712.

8. Cf. discussions of this in John Ross, _Swift and Defoe: A Study

in Relationship_ (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1941);

Richard I. Cook, _Jonathan Swift as A Tory Pamphleteer_ (Seattle:

University of Washington Press, 1967), and Irvin Ehrenpreis, _Swift:

The Man, His Works and the Age_ (Cambridge: Harvard University Press,

1967), ii, pp. 450ff. and 526ff.

9. This is similar to an argument Defoe uses to distinguish between

types of debtors in the _Review_ (iii, 83-4 and 397-400). Whether or

not the crime was "Wilful" was very important to Defoe; perhaps his

revised opinion of Marlborough as most obvious in his tribute to him

at his death is the result of his change of opinion about Marlborough's

motives and removing him from the list of heroes who possessed the

"courage of honor" as described in _An Apology for the Army_.

10. William Coxe, _Memoirs of John, Duke of Marlborough with his

Original Correspondence_ (London: Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme & Brown,

1820), vi, p. 48.

11. Coxe, vi, p. 123.

12. Coxe, vi, 126.

13. The advantage France gained from Marlborough's fall and their

complete awareness of it is discussed in Churchill, vi, pp. 462-69.

14. Coxe, vi, p. 126; Hamilton, p. 172, and _The Letters and Dispatches

of John Churchill, First Duke of Marlborough_ (London: John Murray,

1845), v.

15. J. R. Moore, _Daniel Defoe: Citizen of the Modern World_ (Chicago:

U. of Chicago Press, 1958), pp. 255-56; Defoe's _An Appeal to Honor and

Justice_; and Chalmers says Defoe wrote what "either gratified his

prejudices or supplied his needs."

16. Davis, "_A Letter to the Examiner_," p. 221.

17. Moore, pp. 58-61.

18. Burton, ii, p. 171.

19. Bedlam and Grub Street as the colleges in the vicinity of

Moorefields were standard jokes. Moorfields was also associated with

cheap lodging, prostitution, theft, and the Pesthouse Burying Ground,

altogether an unhealthy environment.

20. Defoe discusses this in _Robinson Crusoe_, _Serious Reflections_,

and a _Collection of Miscellaney Letters_ and several other places. He

says, for example:

The custom of the ancients in writing fables is my very laudable

pattern for this; and my firm resolution in all I write to exalt

virtue, expose vice, promote truth, and help men to serious reflection,

is my first moving cause and last directed end.

(Preface to the Review)

Things seem to appear more lively to the Understanding, and to make a

stronger Impression upon the Mind when they are insinuated under the

cover of some Symbol or Allegory, especially where the moral is good,

and the Application obvious and easy.

(_Collection of Miscellaney Letters_, iv, 210)

21. For this and many other examples of Defoe's distinguishing

qualities in this appendix, I am deeply indebted to the late Professor

John Robert Moore.

BIBLIOGRAPHICAL NOTE

The facsimile of Defoe's _A Short Narrative of ... Marlborough_ (1711)

is reproduced from a copy (Shelf Mark: *PR3404/S5451) in the William

Andrews Clark Memorial Library. The total type-page (p. 7) measures

153 x 79 mm.

A SHORT NARRATIVE OF THE

Life and Actions Of His GRACE

JOHN, D. of _Marlborough_,

FROM THE Beginning of the REVOLUTION,

to this present Time.

WITH SOME REMARKS on his CONDUCT.

_By an Old Officer in the Army._

_LONDON_,

Printed for _JOHN BAKER_, at the _Black-Boy_ in _Pater-noster-Row_,

1711.

Price Six-Pence.

A short NARRATIVE OF THE ACTIONS

Of his GRACE _John_, Duke of _Marlborough_.

Seeing the Press is open, and every body dares Write and Publish what

he pleases, and Persons of the highest Honour and Virtue, to the great

Shame and Scandal of our Country, are expos'd to the World, in base

Pamphlets; and according to the Malice or Misunderstanding of the

Authors, are represented to the World unworthy of the Favour of the

Prince, as well as Obnoxious to the Common-Wealth, in which they live:

It becomes every honest Man, who knows more of the Matter, to set

things in a true Light, to undeceive the People, as much as he is able,

that they may be no longer impos'd on by such false Reports, which in

the end may prove Dangerous and Fatal.

_There is nothing new_, saith Solomon, _under the Sun_; the same Causes

will always produce the same Effects; and while Mankind bear about

them, the various Passions of Love and Joy, Hatred and Grief, the

cunning Engineer, that stands behind the Curtain, will influence and

work these Passions according to his Malice, to the destruction of

Persons of highest Worth.

I shall therefore give a _short Narrative_ of the _Actions_ of the most

Illustrious _John_ Duke of _Marlborough_, with some Reflections on

them, that People may not wonder how it comes to pass, that such a

Great Captain, equal no doubt to any in all Ages, considering the

Powers whom he has Oppos'd, after all his Victories, should be

represented in the publick Writings of the Town, as over-Honoured and

over-Paid for all his past Services, and neglected and almost forgotten

in the midst of all his Triumphs, and his Name almost lost from the

Mouths of those People, who for several Years last past, and not many

Months since, have been fill'd with his Praises.

The first time that I had the Honour of seeing _John_, Earl of

_Marlborough_, (for so I shall call him till he was created a Duke) was

at a place call'd _Judoigne_ in _Brabant_, where our Army was Encamp'd,

I think about three Months after the late King was Crown'd. He was sent

over the King's Lieutenant, with the _British_ Forces under his

Command, which could then be spared for that Service. Our united Forces

were Commanded in general, by the Old Prince _Waldeck_.

After several Marches, we came to the Confines of _Haynault_, within a

League of a small Town call'd _Walcourt_, and on St. _Lewis_'s Day, a

Saint suppos'd to be prosperous to the _French_ Nation, their Army,

Commanded by Mareschal _d'Humiers_, very betimes in the Morning,

Marched to Attack us.

An _English_ Colonel guarded a Pass towards the aforesaid little Town,

to which the Enemy bent their Course; and being in Distress, was

reliev'd by my Lord in Person, who ordred his Retreat to such an

Advantage, that he flank'd the Enemy with perpetual Fire; and this was

the first Cause that cool'd them in their Design of pushing our Army.

At his return, the Prince receiv'd him with a great deal of

Satisfaction, and assured him that he would let the King know that he

saw into the Art of a General more in one Day, than others do in a

great many Years.

At the end of this Campaign, my Lord _Marlborough_ was ordered, with

half of the Forces under his Command, to Embark for _Ireland_; where I

come to relate what he performed there: As soon as he arrived in the

Harbour of _Kingsale_, having Landed his Forces, without the least loss

of Time, Marched directly to the Fort or Citadel of that Place, which

is a strong Fortification, and at that time, well provided with a good

Garrison, and all things necessary for a strong Defence.

My Lord did not stand to use Forms with them, which might look like a

Siege; but with a conquering Resolution, and perpetual Volleys, so

terrified them, that they soon Surrendred.

And now at this Place it was where the Duke's Actions began to be

Envied, and evil Reports touching his good Name and Reputation were

industriously spread abroad; and I am apt to believe, such back Friends

as these will hardly leave him so long as he remains in the World.

There was a Ship at that time in the said Harbour, which 'twas reported

had some Money on Board for paying of the Forces in these Parts; which

Ship, by some untimely Accident, was blown up and lost; and presently

after it was given out by some ill People there present with my Lord,

and by them sent into _England_ to their Party, that he had gotten the

Money beforehand to himself, and that the Ship was destroyed by his

Contrivance; that he had vast Sums of Money in _Holland_, and at

_Venice_; nay, some went farther and affirmed, that he had settled a

good Fund, upon Occasion, at _Constantinople_: And I am sure some such

like Reports and palpable Falsities are continued on him to this very

Day.

And now I suppose it could not be in this Year that the strong City of

_Dunkirk_ was to be betrayed by the Governour of it, and Surrendred to

some of the King's Forces.

In the next Campaign in _Flanders_, the Old _Waldeck_ was severely

beaten by Duke _Luxembourg_, at the Battle of _Flerus_: We were only

Six Battalions of _British_ left in _Ghent_, under the Command of the

then Brigadier _Talmach_: We had Orders to march, and to join the grand

Army at least a Fortnight before the Fight happened; but as we were

about to march out of the City, the City Gates were shut against us by

the People of that Place, because we had no Money to pay our Quarters.

Mr. _Sizar_, whom my Lord brought over with him the Year before, was

our Pay-Master-General, and at this time was gone down into _Holland_

to get some Money upon Credit, till our Supply was returned from

_England_; and then I remember there was a barbarous Lie spread up and

down among us, that our Money was kept in the Hands of Merchants by the

contrivance of my Lord and Mr. _Sizar_, that they might reap such a

particular Benefit, which could not be much, for the use of it.

_Waldeck_ being beaten, the Elector of _Brandenbourg_, for supporting

of him, was oblig'd by long Marches, to come and join us; after which,

nothing more of Consequence happened this Year. And now I suppose it

could not be in this Year that _Dunkirk_ was to be given up to some

party of the King's Forces; both his Majesty and my Lord _Marlborough_

being absent from us, and we had no Marches towards that part of the

Country, and good Reason for it, for we could not if we would.

I come now to our third Campaign, which was made in _Flanders_; and if

ever _Dunkirk_ was to be betrayed in some secret manner to the late

King; and if ever the Secret thereof was reveal'd by his Majesty to the

Earl of _Marlborough_; and if my Lord did reveal the same weighty

Secret to his Wife; and if by her it was discovered to her Sister at

_St. Germans_, and by her to the _French_ King, it must be placed in

this Year, or else it must be _extra anni solisque Vias_, the Lord

knows when and where.

I am sure that the pretended Discovery of this same Secret hath lain

hard on my Lord's Name for a great many Years; and upon most Discourses

of the Affairs in _Flanders_, that business of _Dunkirk_ is trump'd up

against my Lord to this very Day.

For as soon as this Story was sent abroad, it flew like Lightening, and

like the sham tragical Report which was put upon the _Irish_ at the

Revolution, it was scattered over all the Kingdom in an instant. The

loss of _Dunkirk_ is not to be forgotten, and 'tis fresh in the Minds

of the common People, both in Town and Country; and not only the

Farmers over a Pot of Ale at Market, will shake their Heads at

_Malbur_, (for so they call him) for losing of _Dunkirk_; but also

Gentlemen of good Rank and Condition believe it to be true, and talk of

it with a great deal of Regret to this very time. I don't pretend in

this Narrative to Inform the great People at Court, concerning this

thing; without doubt they very well know there was no great matter in

this mighty Secret; but most of it a design to Disgrace my Lord

_Marlborough_, that he might the more easily be turn'd out of his

Places at Court and in the Army: I write this to the common People

only; to vindicate the Innocent, and to undeceive a good part of the

Nation, who have not had an Opportunity to be better Informed.

This Summer then being our Third Campaign, the King came to the Army,

and with Him my Lord _Marlborough_, and several other Persons of

Quality: Among the rest was Count _Solmes_, a nigh Relation to his

Majesty, and Colonel of the great Regiment of _Dutch_ Blue Guards; and

then it was after two or three Marches that my Lord was observ'd to be

somewhat neglected, and his Interest in the Army to decay and cool; and

upon a certain Morning, as we were in full March, a Man might judge by

what then happened that it was so: For it seems the Count had ordered

his Baggage and Sumpters to take Place of my Lord's, and to cut them

out of the Line; of which Affront my Lord being inform'd by his

Servants, soon found him out, and having caus'd his Baggage to enter

the Post which was his due, with his Cane lifted up, and some hard

Words in _French_, 'twas thought by a great many that it would end in a

single Combat; but the Count thought fit to shear off, and we heard no

more of it.

All this Summer was spent in a great many Marches after the _French_,

to bring them to a Battle, but they Industriously and Artfully declin'd

it. The Summer being spent, the King committed the Army again to Prince

_Waldeck_, and went in haste to the _Hague_. Our Regiment was sent to

Garrison at _Mechlen_, where came the _Dutch_ Foot Guards to Winter

also. Count _Solmes_, as he designed for _Holland_, took this City in

his way, and there he assured a certain _English_ Colonel, who not long

before had been check'd by my Lord, about some Disorders in his

Regiment, that the Earl of _Marlborough_ had made his Peace with

_France_, and in a short time he would hear, that he would be call'd to

an Account for it.

When I went to _England_ that same Winter, my Lord's Appartments were

at the _Cock-pit_. 'Twas fine to see them full of Gentlemen and

Officers of all Ranks, as they are now to be seen every Day at his

Levee at St. _James_'s; but no sooner had my Lord _Sidney_ brought him

word from the King, that His Majesty had no farther Service for him in

the Court, or in the Army, but my Lord was forsaken by all his Shadows,

and his House left in a profound Silence.

Now a Person of my Lord's high Posts, especially having been so

eminently instrumental in the Revolution, could not be well laid aside

from all his Employments, without some Reasons were given to the People

for it; and in a short time the pretended Reasons were produced, and

they prevailed mightily.

The first was, That at the King's Levee at the putting on of the Shirt,

my Lord should speak scornfully of the Person of the King, who at the

same time having made a great Spitting (for his Majesty was a long time

troubled with a Consumptive Cough) that my Lord should say to some

Gentlemen nigh him, that _he wish'd it might be his last_.

As soon as this gross Affront was made known to the King, by a certain

Party, who can calumniate stoutly, and blast as well as blacken, it was

in a Moment all over the Court and Town; and 'tis a wonder my Lord was

not torn in Pieces.

But now to the Truth of this Matter. My Lord has been always esteem'd a

nice Courtier, well guarded in his Words, and one of the most Mannerly

best-bred Men of the Nation; and no Man of Sense can believe that a Man

of his Character could be so Indiscreet, as to drop such Words, which

would be Barbarous and Brutal from the Mouth of a Porter, much more

from the Lips of a Noble-Man and a General.

The other Reason was, That through his or his Lady's Treachery or

Indiscretion, the contrivance about _Dunkirk_ was discovered to the

_French_, or else 'tis very probable it would have been in our

Possession. And now to clear this Aspersion also.

A Short Narrative of the Life and Actions of His Grace John, D. of Marlborogh · 第 1 / 4 段