WHY PEACE NEGOTIATIONS FAILED (1855).

=Source.=—_Life of Lord John Russell_, by Spencer Walpole,

vol. ii., p. 263. (London: 1889.)

I was ready to incur the responsibility of advising the acceptance of

the terms proposed in conjunction with the French Government. But I was

not prepared to advise that we should depart from or even hazard our

alliance with France for the chance of a peace on terms which I could

not consider entirely satisfactory. Moreover, it was impossible for

me to know the full weight of the motives which might have swayed the

Emperor. The immediate result of our acceptance of the Austrian terms

might have been the instant acquiescence of Russia, and the consequent

evacuation of the Crimea. How would the French army have borne a

retreat from before Sebastopol, relinquishing a siege which had cost so

much blood and so much suffering? Might not the discontent of the army

have disturbed the internal tranquillity of France, and even menaced

the throne of the Emperor?

Commercial Politics (1837-1856) · 第 84 / 86 题