W. H. M.

_Christian Names_ (Vol. vii., p. 406.).--When Lord Coke says "a man cannot

have two names of baptism, as he may have divers surnames," he does not

mean that a man may not have two or more Christian names given to him at

the font, but that, while he may have "divers surnames at divers times," he

may not have divers Christian names _at divers times_.

When a man changes his Christian name, he alters his legal identity. The

surname, however, is assumable at pleasure. The use of surnames came into

England, according to Camden, about {489} the time of the Conquest, but

they were not in general use till long after that. Many branches of

families used to substitute the names of their estate or residence for

their patronymic, which often makes the tracing of genealogies a difficult

matter. It was not till the middle of the fourteenth century that surnames

began to descend from father to son, and a reference to any old document of

the time will show how arbitrarily such names were assumed.

A surname, in short, may be called a matter of convenience; a Christian

name, a matter of necessity. The giving two Christian names at baptism did

not come generally into use till, owing to the multiplication of the

patronymic, a single Christian name became insufficient to identify the

individual. Consequently an instance of a double Christian name, previous

to the commencement of the eighteenth century, is a rarity. The fifth and

sixth earls of Northumberland bore the names of Henry-Algernon Percy. The

latter died in 1537.

As to the period at which Christian names were assumed as surnames, your

correspondent ERICAS is referred to Lower's _English Surnames_.

Notes and Queries, Number 185, May 14, 1853 A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 82 / 114 题