THE METEORIC STONE OF THE THRACIAN CHERSONESUS.

In the _Quarterly Review_ just published, the reviewer, in the course of an

interesting article on "Meteors, Aerolites, and Shooting Stars," makes a

suggestion which, if admitted into "N. & Q.," may {106} meet the eye of

some English resident or traveller in the East, who will give to it the

attention it deserves.

A great degree of interest is attached to the recorded fall of aerolites in

times past, and the most remarkable and authentic record of antiquity on

this subject is that of the massive stone which fell in the 78th Olympiad

(about the time of the birth of Socrates), at Ægospotamos (the goat's

river), on the Hellespont,--the place soon afterwards the scene of that

naval victory of Lysander, in the last year of the Peloponnesian war, which

subjected Athens and Greece for a time to the Spartan power. The fall of

this stone, says the reviewer, is expressly mentioned by Aristotle; by the

author of the Parian Chronicle; by Diogenes of Apollonia; and most fully by

Plutarch and Pliny, both of whom distinctly state it to be shown in their

time--the sixth century after its fall. Pliny's description is well marked.

"Qui lapis etiam nunc ostenditur, magnitudine vehis, colore adusto;" and he

adds the fact that a burning comet (meteor) accompanied its descent.

Plutarch explicitly states that it was still held in much veneration by the

inhabitants of the Chersonesus. He also speaks of its vast size. If the

mass remained visible, and of such magnitude as described, down to Pliny's

time, it is far from impossible (remarks the reviewer) that it may even now

be re-discovered, with the aid, perchance, of some stray tradition attached

to the place, surviving, as often happens, the lapse of ages, the changes

of human dominion, and even the change of race itself, upon the spot. The

locality, indeed, is not further indicated than by the statement of its

fall at Ægospotamos; but the invariable manner in which it is thus

described defines tolerably well the district to be examined. We learn (he

adds) from the old geographers, that there was a town called Ægospotami on

the Thracian side of the Hellespont, and we may infer a stream from which

its name was derived. The description of the naval fight, and the situation

relatively to Lampsacus (the modern Lamsaki), further define the locality

within certain limits. The reviewer then adds some practical suggestions of

importance. The traveller devoting himself to this research should make his

head-quarters at various places near the spot in question. He should render

himself previously familiar with the aspect of meteoric stones, as now seen

in European cabinets, and should study the character of rocks and

fragmentary masses in the vicinity, to appreciate the differences of

aspect. A small part only of the mass may now appear above the surface, and

may even be wholly concealed by alluvial deposits, in which case the

research would, of course, be in vain, unless happily aided by local

tradition, which at the outset should be sedulously sought for. The

research, if successful, would be of interest enough, both for history and

science, to perpetuate a man's name. In the hope that some of the

correspondents of "N. & Q.," now sojourning in, or likely to visit the

locality, may be tempted to undertake it, I send you these suggestions,

extracted from an article of no small scientific interest and value; and I

will conclude with the Query, whether the "sacred black stone," which is

mentioned by Colonel Williams (the British Commissioner for the settlement

of the Turkish boundary question) to be regarded by the Seids inhabiting

Despool as their palladium, has any legend of meteoric origin connected

with its history?

Notes and Queries, Number 170, January 29, 1853 A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 41 / 141 题