CHAPTER II.

QUARRELS.

A.D. 1327

Classes of quarrels in which the kings and the people were engaged.--The

Pope.--His claim of jurisdiction in England.--The Pope's legate and

the students at Oxford.--Great riot made by the students.--The end

of the affair.--Plan to assassinate the king.--Margaret, the

servant-girl.--Execution of Marish.--Ideas of the sacredness of the

person of a king.--Origin of the wars with Leolin, Prince of

Wales.--Leolin's bride intercepted at sea.--The unhappy fate of

Leolin.--Fate of Prince David, his brother.--Occasional acts of

generosity.--Story of Lewin and the box of dispatches.--The fate of

Lewin.--Origin of the modern title of Prince of Wales.--The first

English Prince of Wales.--Piers Gaveston.--Edward II. and his

favorite.--Their wild and reckless behavior.--The king goes away to

be married.--Edward's indifference on the occasion of his marriage.--His

infatuation in respect to Gaveston.--The coronation.--Bold and

presumptuous demeanor of Gaveston.--His unpopularity.--He is

banished.--His parting.--The Black Dog of Ardenne.--Gaveston's

return.--Gaveston made prisoner.--Consultation respecting him.--His

fate.--The Spencers.--The queen and Mortimer.--Edward III. proclaimed

king.--Edward II. made prisoner.--Edward II. formally deposed at

Kenilworth.--The delegation require the king to abdicate the

crown.--Opinion of the monks.--Alarm of the nobles.--Berkeley

Castle.--Plot for assassinating the king.--Dreadful death.--Great

hatred of Mortimer.--Situation of the castle of Nottingham.--The

caves.--Entrance of the conspirators into the castle.--Isabella's

unhappy fate.--Mortimer's Hole.

In the days of the predecessors of King Richard the Second,

notwithstanding the claim made by the kings of a right on their part

to reign on account of the influence exercised by their government in

promoting law and order throughout the community, the country was

really kept in a continual state of turmoil by the quarrels which the

different parties concerned in this government were engaged in with

each other and with surrounding nations. These quarrels were of

various kinds.

1. The kings, as we have already seen, were perpetually

quarreling with the nobles.

2. The different branches of the royal family were often

engaged in bitter and cruel wars with each other, arising

from their conflicting claims to the crown.

3. The kings of different countries were continually making

forays into each other's territories, or waging war against

each other with fire and sword. These wars arose sometimes

from a lawless spirit of depredation, and sometimes were

waged to resent personal insults or injuries, real or

imaginary.

4. The Pope of Rome, who claimed jurisdiction over the

Church in England as well as elsewhere, was constantly

coming into collision with the civil power.

From some one or other of these several causes, the kingdom of

England, in the time of Richard's predecessors, was seldom at peace.

Some great quarrel or other was continually going on. There was a

great deal of difficulty during the reigns that immediately preceded

that of Richard the Second between the kings and the Pope. The Pope,

as has already been remarked, was considered the head of the whole

Christian Church, and he claimed rights in respect to the appointment

of the archbishops, and bishops, and other ecclesiastics in England,

and in respect to the government and control of the monasteries, and

the abbeys, and to the appropriation and expenditure of the revenues

of the Church, which sometimes interfered very seriously with the

views and designs of the king. Hence there arose continual disputes

and quarrels. The Pope never came himself to England, but he often

sent a grand embassador, called a legate, who traveled with great pomp

and parade, and with many attendants, and assumed in all his doings a

most lofty and superior air. In the contests in which these legates

were engaged with the kings, the legates almost always came off

conquerors through the immense influence which the Pope exercised over

the consciences and religious fears of the mass of the people.

Sometimes the visits of the legates and their proceedings among the

people led to open broils. At one time, for instance, the legate was

at Oxford, where the great University, now so renowned throughout the

world, already existed. He was lodged at an abbey there, and some of

the scholars of the University wishing to pay their respects to him,

as they said, went in a body to the gates of the abbey and demanded

admission; but the porter kept them back and refused to let them in.

Upon this a great noise and tumult arose, the students pressing

against the gates to get in, and the porter, assisted by the legate's

men, whom he called to his assistance, resisting them.

In the course of the fray one or two of the students succeeded in

forcing their way in as far as to the kitchen of the abbey, and there

one of them called upon a cook to help them. But the cook, instead of

helping them, dipped out a ladle full of hot broth from a kettle and

threw it into the student's face. Whereupon the other students cried

out, as the ancient chronicler relates it, "What meane we to suffer

this villanie," and, taking an arrow, he set it in his bow, having

caught up these weapons in the beginning of the fray, and let it fly

at the cook, and killed him on the spot.

This, of course, greatly increased the excitement. More students came

in, and so great was the tumult and confusion that the legate was in

terror for his life, and he fled and concealed himself in the belfry

of the abbey. After lying in this place of concealment for some time,

until the tumult was in some measure appeased, he crept out secretly,

fled across the Thames, and then, mounting a horse, made the best of

his way to London.

He made complaint to the king of the indignity which he had endured,

and the king immediately sent a troop of armed men, with an earl at

the head of them, to rescue the remainder of the legate's men that

were still imprisoned in the abbey, and also to seize all the students

that had been concerned in the riot and bring them to London. The earl

proceeded to execute his commission. He apprehended thirty of the

students, and, taking them to a neighboring castle, he shut them up

there as prisoners.

In the end, besides punishing the individual students who had made

this disturbance, the regents and masters of the University were

compelled to come to London, and there to go barefooted through the

principal street to a church where the legate was, and humbly to

supplicate his forgiveness for the indignity which he had suffered.

And so, with great difficulty, they obtained their pardon.

The students in those days, as students are apt to be in all countries

and in all ages, were a very impulsive, and, in some respects, a

lawless set. Whenever they deemed themselves injured, they pursued the

object of their hostility in the most reckless and relentless manner.

At one time a member of the University became so excited against the

king on account of some injury, real or imaginary, which he had

suffered, that he resolved to kill him. So he feigned himself mad, and

in this guise he loitered many days about the palace of Woodstock,

where the king was then residing, until at length he became well

acquainted with all the localities. Then, watching his opportunity, he

climbed by night through a window into a bedchamber where he thought

the king was lying. He crept up to the bedside, and, throwing back the

clothes, he stabbed several times into the bed with a dagger. He,

however, stabbed nothing but the bed itself, and the pillow, for the

king that night, as it happened, lay in another chamber.

As the student was making his escape, he was spied by one of the

chambermaids named Margaret Biset. Margaret immediately made a great

outcry, and the other servants, coming up, seized the student and

carried him off to prison. He was afterward tried, and was convicted

of treason in having made an attempt upon the king's life, and was

hanged. Before his death he said that he had been employed to kill the

king by another man, a certain William de Marish, who was a noted and

prominent man of those days. This William de Marish was afterward

taken and brought to trial, but he solemnly denied that he had ever

instigated the student to commit the crime. He was, however, condemned

and executed, and, according to the custom in those days in the case

of persons convicted of treason, his body was subjected after his

death to extreme indignities, and then was divided into four quarters,

one of which was sent to each of the four principal cities of the

kingdom, and publicly exhibited in them as a warning to all men of the

dreadful consequences of attempting such a crime.

Great pains were taken in those days to instill into the minds of all

men the idea that to kill a king was the worst crime that a human

being could commit. One of the writers of the time said that in

wounding and killing a prince a man was guilty of homicide, parricide,

Christicide, and even of deicide, all in one; that is, that in the

person of a king slain by the hand of the murderer the criminal

strikes not only at a man, but at his own father, and at Christ his

Savior, and God.

A great many strange and superstitious notions were entertained by the

people in respect to kings. These superstitions were encouraged, even

by the scholars and historians of those times, who might be supposed

to know better. But it was so much for their interest to write what

should be agreeable to the king and to his court, that they were by no

means scrupulous in respect to the tales which they told, provided

they were likely to be pleasing to those in authority, and to

strengthen the powers and prestige of the reigning families.

* * * * *

The neighboring countries with which the kings of England were most

frequently at war in those days were Scotland, Wales, and France.

These wars arose, not from any causes connected with the substantial

interests of the people of England, but from the grasping ambition of

the kings, who wished to increase the extent of their territories, and

thus add to their revenues and to their power. Sometimes their wars

arose from private and personal quarrels, and in these cases thousands

of lives were often sacrificed, and great sums of money expended to

revenge slights or personal injuries of comparatively little

consequence.

For instance, one of the wars with Wales broke out in this manner.

Leolin, who was then the reigning Prince of Wales, sent to France, and

requested the King of France that he might have in marriage a certain

lady named Lady Eleanor, who was then residing in the French king's

court. The motive of Leolin in making this proposal was not that he

bore any love for the Lady Eleanor, for very likely he had never seen

her; but she was the daughter of an English earl named Montfort, Earl

of Leicester, who was an enemy of the King of England, and, having

been banished from the country, had taken refuge in France. Leolin

thought that by proposing and carrying into effect this marriage, he

would at once gratify the King of France and spite the King of

England.

The King of France at once assented to the proposed marriage, but the

King of England was extremely angry, and he determined to prevent the

marriage if he could. He accordingly gave the necessary orders, and

the little fleet which was sent from France to convey Eleanor to Wales

was intercepted off the Scilly Islands on the way, and the whole

bridal party were taken prisoners and sent to London.

As soon as Leolin heard this, he, of course, was greatly enraged, and

he immediately set off with an armed troop, and made a foray upon the

English frontiers, killing all the people that lived near the border,

plundering their property, and burning up all the towns and villages

that came in his way. There followed a long war. The English were, on

the whole, the victors in the war, and at the end of it a treaty was

made by which Leolin's wife, it is true, was restored to him, but his

kingdom was brought almost completely under the power of the English

kings.

Of course, Leolin was extremely dissatisfied with this result, and he

became more and more uneasy in the enthralled position to which the

English king had reduced him, and finally a new war broke out. Leolin

was beaten in this war too, and in the end, in a desperate battle that

was fought among the mountains, he was slain. He was slain near the

beginning of the battle. The man who killed him did not know at the

time who it was that he had killed, though he knew from his armor that

he was some distinguished personage or other. When the battle was

ended this man went back to the place to see, and, finding that it was

the Prince Leolin whom he had slain, he was greatly pleased. He cut

off the head from the body, and sent it as a present to the king. The

king sent the head to London, there to be paraded through the streets

on the end of a long pole as a token of victory. After being carried

in this manner through Cheapside--then the principal street of

London--in order that it might be gazed upon by all the people, it was

set up on a high pole near the Tower, and there remained a long time,

a trophy, as the king regarded it, of the glory and renown of a

victory, but really an emblem of cruel injustice and wrong perpetrated

by a strong against a weaker neighbor.

Not long after this the King of England succeeded in taking Prince

David, the brother of Leolin, and, under the pretense that he had been

guilty of treason, he cut off his head too, and set it up on another

pole at the Tower of London, by the side of his brother's.

It must be admitted, however, that, although these ancient warriors

were generally extremely unjust in their dealings with each other,

and often barbarously cruel, they were still sometimes actuated by

high and noble sentiments of honor and generosity. On one occasion,

for instance, when this same Edward the First, who was so cruel in his

treatment of Leolin, was at war in Scotland, and was besieging a

castle there, he wrote one day certain dispatches to send to his

council in London, and, having inquired for a speedy and trusty

messenger to send them by, a certain Welshman named Lewin was sent to

him. The king delivered the package to Lewin inclosed in a box, and

also gave him money to bear his expenses on the way, and then sent him

forth.

Lewin, however, instead of setting out on his journey, went to a

tavern, and there, with a party of his companions, he spent the money

which he had received in drink, and passed the night carousing. In the

morning he said that he must set out on his journey, but before he

went he must go back to the castle and have one parting shot at the

garrison. Under this pretext, he took his cross-bow and proceeded

toward the castle wall; but when he got there, instead of shooting his

arrows, he called out to the wardens whom he saw on guard over the

gate, and asked them to let down a rope and draw him up into the

castle, as he had something of great importance to communicate to the

governor of it.

So the wardens let down a rope and drew Lewin up, and then took him to

the governor, who was then at breakfast. Lewin held out the box to the

governor, saying,

"Here, sir, look in this box, and you may read all the secrets of the

King of England."

He said, moreover, that he would like to have the governor give him a

place on the wall, and see whether he could handle a cross-bow or not

against the English army.

Gunpowder and guns had not been introduced as means of warfare at this

time; the most formidable weapon that was then employed was the

cross-bow. With the cross-bow a sort of square-headed arrow was used

called a _quarrel_.

The governor, instead of accepting these offers on the part of Lewin,

immediately went out to one of the turrets on the wall, and, calling

to the English soldiers whom he saw below, he directed them to tell

the King of England that one of his servants had turned traitor, and

had come into the castle with a box of dispatches.

"And tell him," said the governor, "that if he will send some persons

here to receive him, I will let the man down to them over the wall,

and also restore the box of dispatches, which I have not opened at

all."

Immediately Lord Spencer, one of the king's chief officers, came to

the wall, and the governor of the castle let Lewin down to him by a

rope, and also passed the box of letters down. The King of England was

so much pleased with this generosity on the part of the governor that

he immediately ceased his operations against the castle, though he

caused Lewin to be hanged on a gallows of the highest kind.

* * * * *

But to return to Wales. After the death of Leolin and his brother the

kingdom of Wales was annexed to England, and has ever since remained a

possession of the British crown. The King of England partly induced

the people of Wales to consent to this annexation by promising that he

would still give them a native of Wales for prince. They thought he

meant by this that they should continue to be governed by one of their

own royal family; but what he really meant was that he would make his

own son Prince of Wales. This son of his was then an infant. He was

born in Wales. This happened from the fact that the king, in the

course of his conquests in that country, had seized upon a place

called Caernarvon, and had built a castle there, in a beautiful

situation on the Straits of Menai, which separate the main land from

the isle of Anglesea.

When his castle was finished the king brought the queen to Caernarvon

to see it, and while she was there, her child, Prince Edward, who

afterward became Edward the Second, was born.

This was the origin of the title of Prince of Wales, which has been

held ever since by the oldest sons of the English sovereigns.

[Illustration: CAERNARVON CASTLE.]

This first English Prince of Wales led a most unhappy life, and his

history illustrates in a most striking manner one of the classes of

quarrels enumerated at the head of this chapter, namely, the disputes

and contentions that often prevailed between the sovereign of the

country and his principal nobles. While he was a young man he formed a

very intimate friendship with another young man named Piers Gaveston.

This Gaveston was a remarkably handsome youth, and very prepossessing

and agreeable in his manners, and he soon gained a complete ascendency

over the mind of young Edward. He was, however, very wild and dissolute

in his habits, and the influence which he exerted upon Edward was

extremely bad. As long as the common people only were injured by the

lawless behavior of these young men, the king seems to have borne with

them; but at last, in a riot in which they were concerned, they broke

into the park of a bishop, and committed damage there which the king

could not overlook. He caused his son, the young prince, to be seized

and put into prison, and he banished Gaveston from the country, and

forbade his son to have any thing more to do with him. This was in 1305,

when the prince was twenty-one years of age.

In 1307, two years later, the king died, and the prince succeeded him,

under the title of King Edward the Second. He immediately sent for

Gaveston to return to England, where he received him with the greatest

joy. He made him a duke, under the title of Duke of Cornwall; and as

for the bishop whose park he and Gaveston had broken into, and on

whose complaint Gaveston had been banished, in order to punish him for

these offenses, the young king seized him and delivered him into

Gaveston's hands as a prisoner, and at the same time confiscated his

estates and gave them to Gaveston. Gaveston sent the bishop about from

castle to castle as a prisoner, according as his caprice or fancy

dictated.

These things made the barons and nobles of England extremely

indignant, for Gaveston, besides being a corrupt and dissipated

character, was, in fact, a foreigner by birth, being a native of

Gascony, in France. His character seemed to grow worse with his

exaltation, and he and Edward spent all their time in rioting and

excess, and in perpetrating every species of iniquity.

Edward had been for some time engaged to be married to the Princess

Isabel, the daughter of the King of France. About six months after his

accession to the throne he set off for France to be married. It was

his duty, according to the ancient usages of the realm, to appoint

some member of the royal family, or some prominent person from the

ancient nobility of the country, to govern the kingdom as regent

during his absence; but instead of this he put Gaveston in this place,

and clothed him with all the powers of a viceroy.

[Illustration: PORTRAIT OF EDWARD THE SECOND.]

Edward was married to Isabel in Paris with great pomp and parade. Isabel

was very beautiful, and was a general favorite. It is said that there

were four kings and three queens present at the marriage ceremony.

Edward, however, seemed to feel very little interest either in his bride

or in the occasion of his marriage, but manifested a great impatience

to get through with the ceremonies, so as to return to England and to

Gaveston. As soon as it was possible, he set out on his return. The

bridal party were met at their landing by Gaveston, accompanied by all

the principal nobility, who came to receive and welcome them at the

frontier. The king was overjoyed to see Gaveston again. He fell into his

arms, hugged and kissed him, and called him his dear brother, while, on

the other hand, he took very little notice of the nobles and high

officers of state. Every body was surprised and displeased at this

behavior, but as Edward was king there was nothing to be said or done.

Soon afterward the coronation took place, and on this occasion all the

honors were allotted to Gaveston, to the utter neglect of the ancient

and hereditary dignitaries of the realm. Gaveston carried the crown,

and walked before the king and queen, and acted in all respects as if

he were the principal personage in the country. The old nobles were,

of course, extremely indignant at this. Hitherto they had expressed

their displeasure at the king's favoritism by private murmurings and

complaints, but now, they thought, it was time to take some concerted

public action to remedy the evil; so they met together, and framed a

petition to be sent to the king, in which, though under the form of a

request, they, in fact, demanded that Gaveston should be dismissed

from his offices, and required to leave the country.

The king was alarmed. He, however, could not think of giving his

favorite up. So he said that he would return them an answer to the

petition by-and-by, and he immediately began to pursue a more

conciliatory course toward the nobles. But the effect of his attempts

at conciliation was spoiled by Gaveston's behavior. He became more and

more proud and ostentatious every day. He appeared in all public

places, and every where he took precedence of the highest nobles of

the land, and prided himself on outshining them in the pomp and parade

which he displayed. He attended all the jousts and tournaments, and,

as he was really a very handsome and well-formed man, and well skilled

in the warlike sports in fashion in those days, he bore away most of

the great prizes. He thus successfully rivaled the other nobles in

gaining the admiration of the ladies of the court and the applause of

the multitude, and made the nobles hate him more than ever.

Things went on in this way worse and worse, until at last the general

sentiment became so strong against Gaveston that the Parliament, when

it met, took a decided stand in opposition to him, and insisted that

he should be expelled from the country. A struggle followed, but the

king was obliged to yield. Gaveston was required to leave the country,

and to take an oath never to return. It was only on these conditions

that the Parliament would uphold the government, and thus the king saw

that he must lose either his friend or his crown.

Gaveston went away. The king accompanied him to the sea-shore, and

took leave of him there in the most affectionate manner, promising to

bring him back again as soon as he could possibly do it. He

immediately began to manoeuvre for the accomplishment of this

purpose. In the mean time, as Gaveston had only sworn to leave

_England_, the king sent him to Ireland, and made him governor general

of that country, and there Gaveston lived in greater power and

splendor than ever.

At length, in little more than a year, Gaveston came back. His oath

not to return was disposed of by means of a dispensation which King

Edward obtained for him from the Pope, absolving him from the

obligation of it. When he was reinstated in the king's court he

behaved more scandalously than ever. He revenged himself upon the

nobles who had been the means of sending him away by ridiculing them

and giving them nicknames. One of them he called Joseph the Jew,

because his face was pale and thin, and bore, in some respects, a

Jewish expression. Another, the Earl of Warwick, he called the Black

Dog of Ardenne. When the earl heard of this, he said, clenching his

fist, "Very well; I'll make him feel the Black Dog's teeth yet."

In a word, the nobles were excited to the greatest pitch of rage and

indignation against the favorite, and, after various struggles and

contentions between them and the king, they at length broke out into

an open revolt. The king at this time, with Gaveston and his wife,

were at Newcastle, which is in the north of England. The barons fell

upon him here with the intention of seizing Gaveston. Both the king

and Gaveston, however, succeeded in making their escape. Gaveston fled

to a castle, and shut himself up there. The king escaped by sea,

leaving his wife behind, at the mercy of the conspirators. The barons

treated the queen with respect, but they pressed on at once in pursuit

of Gaveston. They laid siege to the castle where he sought refuge.

Finding that the castle could not hold out long, Gaveston thought it

best to surrender while it yet remained in his power to make terms

with his enemies; so he agreed to give himself up, they stipulating

that they would do him no bodily harm, but only confine him, and that

the place of his confinement should be one of his own castles.

When he came down into the court-yard of the castle, after signing

this stipulation, he found there ready to receive him the Earl of

Warwick, the man to whom he had given the nickname of the Black Dog of

Ardenne. The earl was at the head of a large force. He immediately

took Gaveston into custody, and galloped off with him at the head of

his troop to his own castle. The engraving represents a view of this

fortress as it appeared in those days.

When they had got Gaveston safe into this castle, the chiefs held a

sort of council of war to determine what should be done with their

prisoner. While they were consulting on the subject, intending

apparently to spare his life as they had agreed, some one called out,

"It has cost you a great deal of trouble to catch the fox, and now, if

you let him go, you will have a great deal more trouble in hunting him

again."

This consideration decided them; so they took the terrified prisoner,

and, in spite of his piteous cries for mercy, they hurried him away to

a solitary place a mile or two from the castle, and there, on a little

knoll by the side of the road, they cut off his head.

[Illustration: WARWICK CASTLE.]

One would have supposed that by this time the king would have been cured

of the folly of devoting himself to favorites, but he was not. He

mourned over the death of Gaveston at first with bitter grief, and when

this first paroxysm of his sorrow was passed, it was succeeded with a

still more bitter spirit of revenge. He immediately took the field

against his rebellious barons, and a furious civil war ensued. He soon,

too, found a new favorite, or, rather, two favorites. They were

brothers, and their names were Spencer. They are called in history the

Spencers, or the Despensers. The quarrels and wars which took place

between the king and these favorites on one hand, and the barons and

nobles on the other, were continued for many years. The queen took sides

with the nobles against her husband and the Spencers. She fled to

France, and there formed an intimacy with a young nobleman named

Mortimer, who joined himself to her, and thenceforth accompanied her and

made common cause with her against her husband. With this Mortimer she

raised an army, and, sailing from Flanders, she landed in England. On

landing, she summoned the barons to join her, and took the field against

her husband. The king was beaten in this war, and fled again on board a

vessel, intending to make his escape by sea. The two Spencers, one after

the other, were taken prisoners, and both were hung on gibbets fifty

feet high. They were hung in their armor, and after they were dead their

bodies were taken down and treated as it was customary to treat the

bodies of traitors.[A]

[Footnote A: In cases of treason the condemned man was first

disemboweled; then his head was taken off; then the body was cut into

quarters. The head and the four quarters of the body were then sent to

various parts of the kingdom, and set up in conspicuous places in

large cities and towns.]

In the midst of these proceedings the barons held a sort of

Parliament, and made a solemn declaration that the king, by his

flight, had abdicated the throne, and they proclaimed his son, the

young Prince of Wales, then about fourteen years old, king, under the

title of Edward the Third. In the mean time, the king himself, who had

attempted to make his escape by sea, was tossed about in a storm for

some days, until at last he was driven on the coast in South Wales. He

concealed himself for some days in the mountains. Here he was hunted

about for a time, until he was reduced to despair by his destitution

and his sufferings, when at length he came forth and delivered himself

up to his enemies.

[Illustration: KENILWORTH CASTLE.]

He was made prisoner and immediately sent to Kenilworth Castle, and

there secured. Afterward he was brought to trial. He was accused of

shameful indolence and incapacity, and also of cowardice, cruelty, and

oppression, and of having brought the country, by his vices and

maladministration, to the verge of ruin. He was convicted on these

charges, and the queen, his wife, confirmed the verdict.

Not being quite sure, after all, that by these means the dethronement

of the king was legally complete, the Parliament sent a solemn

deputation to Kenilworth Castle to depose the monarch in form. The

king was brought out to meet this deputation in a great hall of the

castle. He came just as he was, dressed in a simple black gown. The

deputation told him that he was no longer king, that all allegiance

had been withdrawn from him on the part of the people, and that

henceforth he must consider himself as a private man. As they said

this, the steward of the household came forward and broke his white

wand, the badge of his office, in token that the household was

dissolved, and he declared that by that act all the king's servants

were discharged and freed. This was a ceremony that was usually

performed at the death of a king, and it was considered in this case

as completely and finally terminating the reign of Edward.

The delegation also exacted from him something which they considered

as a resignation of the crown. His son, the young prince, it was said,

was unwilling to ascend the throne unless the barons could induce his

father voluntarily to abdicate his own rights to it. They were the

more desirous in this case of completely and forever extinguishing all

of King Edward's claims, because they were afraid that there might be

a secret party in his favor, and that that party might gain strength,

and finally come out openly against them in civil war, in which case,

if they were worsted, they knew that they would all be hung as

traitors.

[Illustration: A MONK OF THOSE DAYS.]

Indeed, soon after this time it began to appear that there were, in

fact, some persons who were disposed to sympathize with the king. His

queen, Isabel, who had been acting against him during the war, was now

joined with Mortimer, her favorite, and they two held pretty much the

whole control of the government, for the new king was yet too young to

reign. Many of the monks and other ecclesiastics of the time openly

declared that Isabel was guilty of great sin in thus abandoning her

husband for the sake of another man. They said that she ought to leave

Mortimer, and go and join her husband in his prison. And it was not

long before it began to be rumored that secret plots were forming to

attempt the king's deliverance from his enemies. This alarmed the nobles

more than ever. The queen and some others wrote sharp letters to the

keepers of the castle for dealing so gently with their prisoner, and

gave them hints that they ought to kill him. In the end, the fallen

monarch was transported from one fortress to another, until at length he

came to Berkeley Castle. The inducement which led Mortimer and the

queen to send the king to these different places was the hope that some

one or other of the keepers of the castles would divine their wishes in

regard to him, and put him to death. But no one did so. The keeper of

Berkeley Castle, indeed, instead of putting his prisoner to death,

seemed inclined to take compassion on him, and to treat him more kindly

even than the others had done. Accordingly, after waiting some time,

Mortimer seized an opportunity when Lord Berkeley, having gone away from

home, was detained away some days by sickness, to send two fierce and

abandoned men, named Gourney and Ogle, to the castle, with instructions

to kill the king in some way or other, but, if possible, in such a

manner as to make it appear that he died a natural death. These men

tried various plans without success. They administered poisons, and

resorted to various other diabolical contrivances. At last, one night,

dreadful outcries and groans were heard coming from the king's

apartment. They were accompanied from time to time with shrieks of

terrible agony. These sounds were continued for some time, and they were

heard in all parts of the castle, and in many of the houses of the town.

The truth was, the executioners whom Mortimer had sent were murdering

the king in a manner almost too horrible to be described.[B] The people

in the castle and in the town knew very well what these dreadful

outcries meant. They were filled with consternation and horror at the

deed, and they spent the time in praying to God that he would receive

the soul of the unhappy victim.

[Footnote B: They came to him while he was asleep, and pressed him

down with heavy feather beds, which they cast upon him to stifle his

cries, and then thrust a red-hot spit up into his bowels through a

horn, as some said, or a part of the tube of a trumpet, according to

others, so as to kill him by the internal burning without making any

outward mark of the fire on his person. Notwithstanding their efforts

to stifle his cries, he struggled so desperately in his agony as

partly to break loose from them, and thus made his shrieks and

outcries heard.]

[Illustration: BERKELEY CASTLE.]

After this, Mortimer and the queen for two or three years held pretty

nearly supreme power in the realm, though, of course, they governed in

the name of the young king, who was yet only fourteen or fifteen years

of age. There was, however, a great secret hatred of Mortimer among

all the old nobility of the realm. This ill-will ripened at last into

open hostility. A conspiracy was formed to destroy Mortimer, and to

depose the queen-mother from her power, and to place young Edward in

possession of the kingdom. Mortimer discovered what was going on, and

he went for safety, with Edward and the queen, to the castle of

Nottingham, where he shut himself up, and placed a strong guard at the

gates and on the walls.

This castle of Nottingham was situated upon a hill, on the side of

which was a range of excavations which had been made in a chalky stone

by some sort of quarrying. There was a subterranean passage from the

interior of one of these caves which led to the castle. The castle

itself was strongly guarded, and every night Isabel required the

warden, on locking the gates, to bring the keys to her, and she kept

them by her bedside. The governor of the castle, however, made an

agreement with Lord Montacute, who was the leader in the conspiracy

against Mortimer, to admit him to the castle at night through the

subterranean passage. It seems that Mortimer and the queen did not

know of the existence of this communication. They did not even know

about the caves, for the mouths of them were at that time concealed by

rubbish and brambles.

[Illustration: CAVES IN THE HILL-SIDE AT NOTTINGHAM CASTLE.]

It was near midnight when Montacute and the party who went with him

entered the passage. They crowded their way through the bushes and

brambles till they found the entrance of the cave, and then went in.

They were all completely armed, and they carried torches to light their

way. They crept along the gloomy passage-way until at last they reached

the door which led up into the interior of the castle. Here the governor

was ready to let them in. As soon as they entered, they were joined by

young Edward at the foot of the main tower. They left their torches

here, and Edward led them up a secret staircase to a dark chamber. They

crept softly into this room and listened. They could hear in an

adjoining hall the voices of Mortimer and several of his adherents, who

were holding a consultation. They waited a few minutes, and then, making

a rush into the passage-way which led to the hall, they killed two

knights who were on sentry there to guard the door, and, immediately

bursting into the apartment, made Mortimer and all his friends

prisoners.

The queen, who was in her bed in an adjoining room at this time,

rushed frantically out when she heard the noise of the affray, and,

with piteous entreaties and many tears, she begged and prayed Edward,

her "sweet son," as she called him, to spare the gentle Mortimer, "her

dearest friend, her well-beloved cousin." The conspirators did spare

him at that time; they took him prisoner, and bore him away to a

place of safety. He was soon afterward brought to trial on a charge of

treason, and hanged. Isabel was deprived of all her property, and shut

up in a castle as a prisoner of state. In this castle she afterward

lived nearly thirty years, in lonely misery, and then died.

The adjoining engraving represents a near view of the subterranean

passage by which Lord Montacute and his party gained admission to the

castle of Nottingham. It is known in modern times as MORTIMER'S HOLE.

[Illustration: MORTIMER'S HOLE.]

Richard II Makers of History · 第 2 / 14 章