CHAPTER XXVI.

CANONBURY TOWER.

The outlying districts of London have each a curiously marked colour and

flavour of their own. Thus “the Borough,” the district about Bishopgate

Street, the City itself--and Islington, all have a distinct and

recognizable air. It would take long to define the elements of each, but

the skilled denizen has no difficulty in distinguishing. Islington has a

bustling, almost foreign air, and in some sense deserves its epithet

“merry.” A little beyond Islington there begins a district of so special

and curious a kind as really to have effect on the mind and spirits of

the traveller. For here he finds a succession of tame, spiritless villas

and terraces, gardens and small squares, not dilapidated, yet all

running to seed as it were. There is a general look of monotonous

hopelessness that cannot be described. No one seems to be about or

doing. There is one compensation--the good, clear, inspiring air. This

is felt as we mount those gently-rising hills which lead out of the main

road, and land us among the still more saddening squares and

abjectly-correct terraces. One of these is Canonbury Road, at the top of

which the atmosphere is positively “bracing,” and here--that is, a

little way on--we come to a most interesting old memorial, well worthy

the long jaunt from the West End.

In strange contrast with its associates rises a grim and gaunt old brick

tower, solid, massive, and lofty, against whose veteran sides lean some

old gabled houses, part of the structure. A thick and friendly coat of

ivy covers a goodly proportion of the old body. An antique rail

surmounts the top, while a meagre weathercock gives point and finish to

the whole. There is a certain majesty and breadth about this venerable

relic, which rises here to a great height, wrapped in the dignity of its

own desolation. There is always, indeed, a sense of sadness in the

spectacle of one of these old brick towers, all scarred and

weather-beaten with the storms and batterings of fortune.

Standing before the low-arched doorway, a genuine portal, the door

itself a bit of oak, framed and duly knobbed, I remind myself that this

picturesque tenement is associated, oddly enough, with some of the

pleasantest literary memories. Like its mediæval neighbour, old “St.

John’s Gate,” it was the refuge and shelter of the destitute “hack” more

than a hundred and twenty years ago. A regular line of _littérateurs_

have had the odd fancy of deserting their busy Grub Street, and of lying

_perdu_ here, either from choice or necessity; and it is easy to call up

the rather ungainly figure of Doctor Goldsmith toiling up Canonbury

Hill, and hiding here from his creditors.

A worthy woman--albeit garrulous--guides us over the old tower. After

saying that “she knew Oliver’s life well,” she added, “Them poets seem

to be always poor and in want.” It was astonishing to see the number and

spaciousness of the chambers in the old place, and their picturesque

rambling disposition. One was struck with admiration at the two spacious

rooms on the second and third floors, finely proportioned and baronial,

each adorned with ebony-toned oak panelling reaching to the ceiling, and

each with an elaborately carved mantelpiece, such as would have rejoiced

Charles Lamb at Blakesware. The delicacy and finish of the work cannot

be surpassed. There are old solid doors, black as ink, hanging on hinges

a yard long; fragments of old oak banisters; while in the upper stories

windows with diamond panes are still seen. The stair mounts in an

irregular way: off which are curious chambers and many odd “crannies.”

About 1766, the bookseller Newbery, as we learn from the pleasant

account of him just published, contracted with a Mr. Fleming, the then

tenant, to board and lodge the poet for £50 a year. According to this

authority, Goldsmith’s room was that on the second floor, and here he is

described as reading to one of the younger Newberys passages from his

MS. George Daniel, the bibliophile, who made a pilgrimage to the

tower--if he did not reside there--and gathered up the traditions, found

that the first-floor room was believed to have been the Doctor’s, and

“an old press bedstead in the corner” was shown in proof. Two families,

the Tappses and the Evanses, had been in care of the place for over 140

years: and Mrs. Tapps used to retail many stories about the poet to her

niece, who was in possession at the time of Mr. Daniel’s visit.

Washington Irving was so much interested by the place that he took up

his abode there for a time. Other tenants have been the eccentric Dr.

Hill, of Garrick’s happy epigram--

For physic and farces

His equal there scarce is:

His farces are physic,

His physic a farce is;

with Smart, the mad poet, who wrote an epic in Bedlam; Humphreys,

another poet; “Junius” Woodfall; Chambers, who wrote an encyclopædia;

and Speaker Onslow. A later resident was Seymour, the artist, associated

with the earlier numbers of “Pickwick,” who shut himself up here with a

fellow student to study “High Art,” a line he fortunately abandoned for

what was his real gift. What rooms in London offer so curious a

succession of tenants? Some time ago a “Young Men’s Association” fixed

itself here, but the young men are fled, and once more “desolate is the

dwelling of Morna.” The view from the platform on the roof was almost

confounding: the vast champaign spreading away below to the wooded hills

of Hampstead and Highgate; while the keen inspiriting air blew from

these heights. It was a surprise even for a fair and _spirituelle_

antiquary of our acquaintance, who was tempted up to the dizzy

elevation, and could scarcely credit that London offered such a

spectacle. St. Paul’s seemed to lie at your feet.

This old brick tower dates from the fourteenth century, and belonged to

the canons of the gloomy Church of St. Bartholomew, another fine but

fast-decaying monument. It belongs to “the Marquis”--that is, to the

Marquis of Northampton--of whose provident care and attention this fine

old relic is well worthy. If such relief be much longer delayed it will

come too late. A few hundred pounds would do much in the way of

restoration. It would make a museum, or even, as a show-place, would

benefit the district, drawing visitors. There is an ominous rumour that

it is intended to pull it down, as cumbering the earth, and to sell the

ground for building.

The West-end Londoner who has never explored the quarter that leads to

the northern heights will be agreeably surprised by the antique,

original flavour of “Merrie Islington.” At night or evening the bustle,

glare of lights, jingling of bells, and converging of tramcars, the

enormous crowds waiting or passing, the fine clear air, the steep hilly

streets, the glimpse of the open country, and the general animation make

up quite a foreign scene. There is even a half-rural air, with the

stunted or “pollarded” trees, the terraces and mouldering gardens in

front, and the little superannuated houses; carriers’ carts are waiting

loaded and ready to set off for villages and towns a few miles away.

Here converge half a dozen streets, two or three steep hills, and

innumerable lines of tramways and omnibuses. Every instant the cars and

’busses are arriving and departing, enormous crowds are waiting to get

in and go their way, and the jingling of the bells, the metallic sound

of the wheels, the chatter of voices, supply a sort of music of an

original kind. The most picturesque effect arises from the trains of

cars perpetually coming up the hills from the town below, and arriving

as it were, unexpectedly--arriving from round the corners, and crossing

each other in bewildering confusion. When all is lighted up the

spectacle for bustle and animation and crowd quite suggests a busy

foreign city, from the glare of innumerable lights, to which Islington

seems highly partial. The Islingtonians, it may be noted, are

healthy-looking folk, for the place is high and the air inspiring, as

any jaded Londoner journeying from the west will find. Close beside us

are two well-known places of amusement, the “Grand Theatre,” some

fifteen years an obscure music hall, suddenly becoming celebrated, owing

to _Geneviève de Brabant_ and Miss Emily Soldene; to say nothing of the

two “_John-Darms_,” as the French comic soldiers were invariably known

at Islington, one of them performed in broken English by a droll

Frenchman. Before us is the Agricultural Hall, where the Mohawk

Minstrels, highly appreciated, perform.

Old Sadler’s Wells Theatre introduces us at once to the New River,

officially constituted and recognized by a large reservoir and offices,

where it “pulls itself together,” as it were, after its long forty

miles’ journey from Amwell in Hertfordshire, before beginning its work

in London. The old theatre, brimful of curious associations, still

struggles on, and presents itself as a very quaint, old-fashioned pile.

In prints of old Sadler’s Wells--and very pretty they are--we are shown

this rural playhouse on the bank of the New River itself, with a row of

trees between, and a man in a cocked hat fishing. As is well known, this

position by the river used to be turned to dramatic uses, the waters

being let in for aquatic spectacles. The shade of Grimaldi must haunt

the place. The track of the New River can still be made out, running

beside the theatre, but it is now covered in.

The old mansion in Clerkenwell which serves as the head office of the

New River Company is worthy of the energetic, gallant, and beruffled Sir

Hugh Myddelton, the Lesseps of his time. His statue is to be seen in

Islington; and in all the annals of English pluck and perseverance there

is nothing better or more encouraging than the indomitable pluck of this

intrepid water purveyor--himself “a company.” The board room of the

building is a fine, picturesque apartment in a good old style; its

ceiling, a good piece of florid decoration, laid out in carpet pattern,

or like a flowerbed, with rich stucco borders--a circle within a square,

and a border round that again. Panelling runs all round, and there is an

elaborately-wrought mantel, with carvings and other decorations.

Corinthian pillars flank it, one on each side, and the whole chamber has

a lightsome, spacious look and general air of state.

Among Lamb’s quaint and interesting recollections of his time at

Christ’s Hospital, one, of a little boy’s scheme which was never carried

out, seemed always highly original. He once, he tells us, planned an

expedition to discover the source of the New River; that is, to follow

its course to the original spring in Hertfordshire. But, as may be

conceived, this was far too arduous an undertaking for a schoolboy. The

New River seems to have been always associated with Lamb’s course in a

mysterious way. In his school-days the summit of holiday enjoyment was

to be taken to it to bathe: an extraordinary proceeding, which nowadays

would be a high crime against manners. At one time he fixed his

residence on its very bank, at Colebrooke Row, and his letters have

constant allusions to his “old New River.” He was proud of his little

house. “You enter without passage into a cheerful dining-room, etc.” It

was from this mansion, as readers of “Elia” know, that George Dyer, the

blear-eyed pundit, walked straight into the river, and was fished out,

having had a narrow escape indeed. He lived to marry his charwoman in

his old age, to his great comfort.

It is impossible to pass this house without being affected with dismal

associations. It stands in a most desolate stretch of houses, and the

buried river in front seems to add to the forlornness. Since Lamb’s day

the river has been covered in, and is, as it were, lost to view. But as

we come to Canonbury it suddenly shows itself in a rather cheerful

fashion between green banks and trees. Following it diligently, we see

it rippling away between its banks--very pellucid on the whole, and not

too broad for an active jumper to clear at a bound. It does not seem

more than two or three feet deep. Here there are abundance of shady

trees; and the houses have their little gardens coming down to the edge,

with cosy seats, a stray Japanese umbrella spread--all exactly as if it

were some real river and not an unpretending make-believe runnel. But

has it not come all the way from “pleasant Hertfordshire,” and recreated

many a cit’s heart, who of a summer’s evening has his afternoon tea at

the river’s edge? Presently our old New River dives underground once

more, and seems hopelessly lost. Here I was completely puzzled to find

it again. With much difficulty and many inquiries, and many false scents

too, I caught it up; when I saw it strike out across the country,

meandering over a rich green pasture in diligent fashion, with a pretty

open walk beside it. Thence it passed under the road, by some

old-fashioned houses with gardens and overgrown with creepers. Here is

the prettily-named region of the Green Lanes, and an old-fashioned line

of houses called Paradise Row, which looks out on spreading “park-like

meadows,” to use the auctioneers’ term; and here our river seems to have

regularly got free and started off across the grass, never stopping till

it reaches Stoke Newington. Here, however, it meets with rough usage;

for the company have erected large buildings, pumping-engines, and

reservoirs, and, as it arrives from Hertfordshire, it is detained

prisoner until it accumulates in volume. In short, the amount of

agreeable twirling and general aquatic vagaries pursued by the pleasant

little stream during its course must be extraordinary. It brings

pleasure and rurality wherever it goes. I was sorry to part company with

it, and would gladly have pursued it further on its rural course.

Picturesque London · 第 26 / 31 章