CHAPTER X

THE TWO ASPECTS OF INFINITY

1

Let us turn our thoughts towards it. The problem goes beyond humanity

and embraces all things. It is possible, I think, to view infinity under

two distinct aspects. Let us contemplate the first of them. We are

plunged in a universe that has no limits in space or time. It can

neither go forward nor go back. It has no origin. It never began, nor

will it ever end. The myriads of years behind it are even as the myriads

which it has yet to unroll. From all time it has been at the boundless

centre of the days. It could have no aim, for, if it had one, it would

have attained it in the infinity of the years that lie behind us;

besides, that aim would be outside itself and, if there were anything

outside it, it would be bounded by that thing and would cease to be

infinity. It is not making for anywhere, for it would have arrived

there; consequently, all that the worlds within its pale, all that we

ourselves do can have no influence upon it. All that it will do it has

done. All that it has not done remains undone because it can never do

it. If it have no mind, it will never have one. If it have one, that

mind has been at its climax from all time and will remain there,

changeless and immovable. It is as young as it has ever been and as old

as it will ever be. It has made in the past all the efforts and all the

trials which it will make in the future; and, as all the possible

combinations have been exhausted since what we cannot even call the

beginning, it does not seem as if that which has not taken place in the

eternity that stretches before our birth can happen in the eternity that

will follow our death. If it have not become conscious, it will never

become conscious; if it know not what it wishes, it will continue in

ignorance, hopelessly, knowing all or knowing nothing and remaining as

near its end as its beginning.

This is the gloomiest thought to which man can attain. So far, I do not

think that its depths have been sufficiently sounded. If it were really

irrefutable—and some may contend that it is—if it actually contained the

last word of the great riddle, it would be almost impossible to live in

its shadow. Naught save the certainty that our conceptions of time and

space are illusive and absurd can lighten the abyss wherein our last

hope would perish.

2

This universe thus conceived would be, if not intelligible, at least

admissible by our reason; but in that universe float billions of worlds

limited by space and time. They are born, they die and they are born

again. They form part of the whole; and we see, therefore, that parts of

that which has neither beginning nor end themselves begin and end. We,

in fact, know only those parts; and they are of a number so infinite

that in our eyes they fill all infinity. That which is going nowhere

teems with that which appears to be going somewhere. That which has

always known what it wants, or will never learn, seems to be eternally

experimenting with more or less ill-success. At what goal is it aiming,

since it is already there? Everything that we discover in that which

could not possibly have an object looks as though it were pursuing one

with inconceivable ardour; and the mind that animates what we see in

that which should know everything and possess itself seems to know

nothing and to seek itself without intermission. Thus all that is

apparent to our senses in infinity gainsays that which our reason is

compelled to ascribe to it. According as we fathom it, we come to

understand how deep is our want of understanding; and, the more we

strive to penetrate the two incomprehensible problems that stand face to

face, the more they contradict each other.

3

What will become of us amid all this confusion? Shall we leave the

finite wherein we dwell to be swallowed up in this or the other

infinite? In other words, shall we end by absorption in the infinite

which our reason conceives, or shall we remain eternally in that which

our eyes behold, that is to say, in numberless changing and ephemeral

worlds? Shall we never leave those worlds which seem doomed to die and

to be reborn eternally, to enter at last into that which, from all

eternity, can neither have been born nor have died and which exists

without either future or past? Shall we one day escape, with all that

surrounds us, from this unhappy speculation, to find our way at last

into peace, wisdom, changeless and boundless consciousness, or into

hopeless unconsciousness? Shall we have the fate which our senses

foretell, or that which our intelligence demands? Or are both senses and

intelligence only illusions, puny implements, vain weapons of an hour,

which we never intended to examine or defy the universe? If there really

be a contradiction, is it wise to accept it and to deem impossible that

which we do not understand, seeing that we understand almost nothing? Is

truth not at an immeasurable distance from these inconsistencies which

appear to us enormous and irreducible and which, doubtless, are of no

more importance than the rain that falls upon the sea?

4

But, even to our poor understanding to-day, the discrepancy between the

infinity conceived by our reason and that perceived by our senses is

perhaps more apparent than real. When we say that, in a universe that

has existed since all eternity, every experiment, every possible

combination has been made; when we declare that there is no chance that

what has not taken place in the uncountable past can take place in the

uncountable future, our imagination perhaps attributes to the infinity

of time a preponderance which it cannot possess. In truth, all that

infinity contains must be as infinite as the time at its disposal; and

the chances, encounters and combinations that lie therein have not been

exhausted in the eternity that has gone before us any more than they

could be in the eternity that will come after us. The infinity of time

is no vaster than the infinity of the substance of the universe. Events,

forces, chances, causes, effects, phenomena, fusions, combinations,

coincidences, harmonies, unions, possibilities, lives are represented in

it by innumerous numbers that entirely fill a bottomless and vergeless

abyss where they have been shaken together from what we call the

beginning of the world that had no beginning and where they will be

stirred up until the end of a world that will have no end. There is,

therefore, no climax, no changelessness, no immovability. It is probable

that the universe is seeking and finding itself every day, that it has

not become entirely conscious and does not yet know what it wants. It is

possible that its ideal is still veiled by the shadow of its immensity;

it is also possible that experiments and chances are following one upon

the other in unimaginable worlds, compared wherewith all those which we

see on starry nights are no more than a pinch of gold-dust in the ocean

depths. Lastly, if either be true, it is also true that we ourselves, or

what remains of us—it matters not—will profit one day by those

experiments and those chances. That which has not yet happened may

suddenly supervene; and the next state, with the supreme wisdom which

will recognize and be able to establish that state, is perhaps ready to

arise from the clash of circumstances. It would not be at all

astonishing if the consciousness of the universe, in the endeavour to

form itself, had not yet encountered the combination of necessary

chances and if human thought were actually supporting one of those

decisive chances. Here there is a hope. Small as man and his brain may

appear, they have exactly the value of the most enormous forces that

they are able to conceive, since there is neither great nor small in the

immeasurable; and, if our body equalled the dimensions of all the worlds

which our eyes can see, it would have exactly the same weight and the

same importance as compared with the universe that it has to-day. The

mind alone perhaps occupies in infinity a space which comparisons do not

reduce to nothing.

5

For the rest, if everything must be said, at the cost of constantly and

shamelessly contradicting one’s self in the dark, and to return to the

first supposition, the idea of possible progress, it is extremely

probable that this again is one of those childish disorders of our brain

which prevent us from seeing the thing that is. It is quite as probable,

as we have seen above, that there never was, that there never will be

any progress, because there could not be a goal. At most there may occur

a few ephemeral combinations which, to our poor eyes, will seem happier

or more beautiful than others. Even so we think gold more beautiful than

the mud in the street, or the flower in a splendid garden happier than

the stone at the bottom of a drain; but all this, obviously, is of no

importance, has no corresponding reality and proves nothing in

particular.

The more we reflect upon it, the more pronounced is the infirmity of our

intelligence which cannot succeed in reconciling the idea of progress

and even the idea of experiment with the supreme idea of infinity.

Although nature has been incessantly and indefatigably repeating herself

before our eyes for thousands of years, reproducing the same trees and

the same animals, we cannot contrive to understand why the universe

indefinitely recommences experiments that have been made billions of

times. It is inevitable that, in the innumerable combinations that have

been and are being made in termless time and boundless space, there have

been and still are millions of planets and consequently millions of

human races exactly similar to our own, side by side with myriads of

others more or less different from it. Let us not say to ourselves that

it would require an unimaginable concourse of circumstances to reproduce

a globe like to our earth in every respect. We must remember that we are

in the infinite and that this unimaginable concourse must necessarily

take place in the innumerousness which we are unable to imagine. Though

it need billions and billions of cases for two features to coincide,

those billions and billions will encumber infinity no more than would a

single case. Place an infinite number of worlds in an infinite number of

infinitely diverse circumstances: there will always be an infinite

number for which those circumstances will be alike; if not, we should be

setting bounds to our idea of the universe, which would forthwith become

more incomprehensible still. From the moment that we insist sufficiently

upon that thought, we necessarily arrive at these conclusions. If they

have not struck us hitherto, it is because we never go to the farthest

point of our imagination. Now the farthest point of our imagination is

but the beginning of reality and gives us only a small, purely human

universe, which, vast as it may seem, dances in the real universe like

an apple on the sea. I repeat, if we do not admit that thousands of

worlds, similar in all points to our own, in spite of the billions of

adverse chances, have always existed and still exist to-day, we are

sapping the foundations of the only possible conception of the universe

or of infinity.

6

Now how is it that those millions of exactly similar human races, which

from all time suffer what we have suffered and are still suffering,

profit us nothing, that all their experiences and all their schools have

had no influence upon our first efforts and that everything has to be

done again and begun again incessantly?

As we see, the two theories balance each other. It is well to acquire by

degrees the habit of understanding nothing. There remains to us the

faculty of choosing the less gloomy of the two or persuading ourselves

that the mists of the other exist only in our brain. As that strange

visionary, William Blake, said:

“Nor is it possible to thought

A greater than itself to know.”

Let us add that it is not possible for it to know anything other than

itself. What we do not know would be enough to create the world afresh;

and what we do know cannot add one moment to the life of a fly. Who can

tell but that our chief mistake lies in believing that an intelligence,

were it an intelligence thousands of times as great as ours, directs the

universe? It may be a force of quite another nature, a force that

differs as widely from that on which our brain prides itself as

electricity, for instance, differs from the wind that blows. That is why

it is fairly probable that our mind, however powerful it become, will

always grope in mystery. If it be certain that everything in us must

also be in nature, because everything comes to us from her, if the mind

and all the logic which it has placed at the culminating point of our

being direct or seem to direct all the actions of our life, it by no

means follows that there is not in the universe a force greatly superior

to thought, a force having no imaginable relation to the mind, a force

which animates and governs all things according to other laws and of

which nothing is found in us but almost imperceptible traces, even as

almost imperceptible traces of thought are all that can be found in

plants and minerals.

In any case, there is nothing here to make us lose courage. It is

necessarily the human illusion of evil, ugliness, uselessness and

impossibility that is to blame. We must wait not for the universe to be

transformed, but for our intelligence to expand or to take part in the

other force; and we must maintain our confidence in a world which knows

nothing of our conceptions of purpose and progress, because it doubtless

has ideas whereof we have no idea, a world, moreover, which could

scarcely wish itself harm.

7

“These are but vain speculations,” it will be said. “What matters, after

all, the idea which we form of those things which belong to the

unknowable, seeing that the unknowable, were we a thousand times as

intelligent as we are, is closed to us for ever and that the idea which

we form of it will never have any value?”

That is true; but there are degrees in our ignorance of the unknowable;

and each of those degrees marks a triumph of the intelligence. To

estimate more and more completely the extent of what it does not know is

all that man’s knowledge can hope for. Our idea of the unknowable was

and always will be valueless, I admit; but it nevertheless is and will

remain the most important idea of mankind. All our morality, all that is

in the highest degree noble and profound in our existence has always

been based on this idea devoid of real value. To-day, as yesterday, even

though it be possible to recognize more clearly that it is too

incomplete and relative ever to have any actual value, it is necessary

to carry it as high and as far as we can. It alone creates the only

atmosphere wherein the best part of ourselves can live. Yes, it is the

unknowable into which we shall not enter; but that is no reason for

saying to ourselves:

“I am closing all the doors and all the windows; henceforth, I shall

interest myself only in things which my everyday intelligence can

compass. Those things alone have the right to influence my actions and

my thoughts.”

Where should we arrive at that rate? What things can my intelligence

compass? Is there a thing in this world that can be separated from the

inconceivable? Since there is no means of eliminating that

inconceivable, it is reasonable and salutary to make the best of it and

therefore to imagine it as stupendously vast as we are able. The gravest

reproach that can be brought against the positive religions and notably

against Christianity is that they have too often, if not in theory, at

least in practice, encouraged such a narrowing of the mystery of the

universe. By broadening it, we broaden the space wherein our mind will

move. It is for us what we make it: let us then form it of all that we

can reach on the horizon of ourselves. As for the mystery itself, we

shall, of course, never reach it; but we have a much greater chance of

approaching it by facing it and going whither it draws us than by

turning our backs upon it and returning to that place where we well know

that it no longer is. Not by diminishing our thoughts shall we diminish

the distance that separates us from the ultimate truths; but by

enlarging them as much as possible we are sure of deceiving ourselves as

little as possible. And the loftier our idea of the infinite, the more

buoyant and the purer becomes the spiritual atmosphere wherein we live

and the wider and deeper the horizon against which our thoughts and

feelings stand out, the horizon which is all their life and which they

inspire.

“Perpetually to construct ideas requiring the utmost stretch of our

faculties,” wrote Herbert Spencer, “and perpetually to find that such

ideas must be abandoned as futile imaginations, may realize to us more

fully than any other course, the greatness of that which we vainly

strive to grasp.... By continually seeking to know and being continually

thrown back with a deepened conviction of the impossibility of knowing,

we may keep alive the consciousness that it is alike our highest wisdom

and our highest duty to regard that through which all things exist as

the Unknowable.”

8

Whatever the ultimate truth may be, whether we admit the abstract,

absolute and perfect infinity—the changeless, immovable infinity which

has attained perfection and which knows everything, to which our reason

tends—or whether we prefer that offered to us by the evidence,

undeniable here below, of our senses—the infinity which seeks itself,

which is still evolving and not yet established—it behoves us above all

to foresee in it our fate, which, for that matter, must, in either case,

end by absorption in that very infinity.

Our Eternity · 第 10 / 12 章