CHAPTER III.

When the _Impérieuse_ reached the coast of Spain early in 1808, we

were still at war with that country. Napoleon had not yet turned his

submissive ally into an enemy by that act of brigandage which was the

capital error of his life. The war was for us still a “rich war,” as

Nelson put it--there were still Spanish prizes to be picked up. Cochrane

was master of the work to be done. His previous cruise in the _Speedy_

had made him perfectly familiar with the Spanish coast. It had also

given him an absolute confidence in his power to beat the Spaniards

at any odds. On this occasion he had no opportunity to equal the most

marvellous of all his feats--the capture of the frigate _Gamo_ with his

tiny gun-brig the _Speedy_, but he was incessantly active and uniformly

successful. The _Impérieuse_ hugged the Spanish coast, destroyed isolated

forts, sailed into the very ports and marked her prey down coolly, before

sending her boats in to cut out the more tempting prizes. In all this

stirring fighting Marryat had such share as a midshipman might. The

history of it is recorded in “Frank Mildmay,” in “Mr. Midshipman Easy,”

in “Peter Simple.” One incident may be recorded as a type of the rest.

Lord Cochrane learnt that a certain vessel which he was resolute to

take was lying at anchor in Almeria. He himself, in his “Autobiography

of a Seaman,” calls her “a large French vessel, laden with lead and

other munitions of war.” Marryat, as quoted by his daughter, calls her

a polacre privateer, and says nothing of her nationality, but in other

respects the stories agree. The story may now go on in Marryat’s words:

“At daybreak we were well in with American colours at the peak.

[The place, as has been just said, was Almeria Bay, and this trick

of hoisting neutral colours was a common stratagem of war.] The

Spaniards had their suspicions, but, as we boldly ran into harbour,

anchored among the other vessels, and furled our sails, they did

not fire. They were puzzled, for they could not imagine that any

vessel would act with such temerity, as we were surrounded by

batteries. We had, however, anchored with springs upon our cables;

close to us within half musket shot, lay a large polacre privateer

of sixteen guns, the same vessel which had been attacked by, and

had beaten off the boats of the _Spartan_ with a loss of nearly

sixty men killed and wounded. On our other side were two large

brigs heavily laden and a zebecque; the small craft were in-shore

of us, the town and citadel about half a mile ahead of us at the

bottom of the bay, the batteries all around us, and evidently well

prepared. Our boats had long been hoisted out and lay alongside,

which circumstance added to the suspicions of the Spaniards; still,

as yet, not a gun was fired.

“Lord Cochrane’s reasons for running in with the frigate was,

that he considered the loss of life would be much less by this

manœuvre than if he had despatched the boats, and this privateer

he had determined to capture. He did not suppose, nor indeed did

any one, that, lying as she was under the guns of the frigate, she

would dare to fire a shot, but in this he was mistaken. The boats

were manned, and the remaining crew of the _Impérieuse_ at their

quarters. The word was given and the boats shoved off; one pinnace,

commanded by Mr. Caulfield, the first lieutenant, pulling for the

polacre ship, while the others went to take possession of the brigs

and zebecque.

“To our astonishment, as soon as the pinnace was alongside the

ship, she was received with a murderous fire, and half of our

boat’s crew were laid beneath the thwarts; the remainder boarded.

Caulfield was the first on the vessel’s decks--a volley of

musquetoons received him, and he fell dead with thirteen bullets

in his body. But he was amply avenged; out of the whole crew of

the privateer, but fifteen, who escaped below and hid themselves,

remained alive; no quarter was shown, they were cut to atoms on

the deck, and those who threw themselves into the sea to save

their lives were shot as they struggled in the water. The fire

of the privateer had been the signal for the batteries to open,

and now was presented the animated scene of the boats boarding

in every direction, with more or less resistance; the whole bay

reverberating with the roar of cannon, the smooth water ploughed

up in every quarter by the shot directed against the frigate and

boats, while the _Impérieuse_ returned the fire, warping round and

round with her springs to silence the most galling. This continued

for nearly an hour, by which time the captured vessels were under

all sail, and then the _Impérieuse_ hove up her anchor, and, with

the English colours waving at her gaff, and still keeping up an

undiminished fire, sailed slowly out the victor.”

It was on such an occasion as this, if not in this very affair, that

Marryat is said to have had the adventure recorded by him in “Frank

Mildmay.” Like the hero of that story, he was knocked down by the body

of his leader, who was shot in front of him in a boarding affair, and

then almost trampled to death by the men who pressed on to carry the

prize. When the fight was over he was dragged out insensible, and laid

among the dead. The unfriendly remark of a comrade--that he had cheated

the gallows--revived him to give a vigorous denial. Mrs. Ross Church

states that this happened in Arcassan Bay during the first cruise of

the _Impérieuse_, but Cochrane himself mentions no such fight there,

and no loss of any of his officers. Frank Mildmay’s adventure happened

in Arcassan Bay, but Marryat would have obvious reasons for not being

strictly accurate as to place. If the incident was taken from his own

life, it can only have happened at Almeria. It may be noted that both

Mr. Handstone in the novel, and Mr. Caulfield in history, were first

lieutenants, and that both died in the same way, riddled with bullets, at

the head of a boarding party. Was Caulfield oppressed with a presentiment

of his coming death like the lieutenant in “Frank Mildmay”--or was he

indeed the original of that officer who, be it observed, is a very

distinct character, and has much the air of being a portrait? Perhaps a

preliminary question ought to be asked, namely, whether this incident

did actually happen to Marryat as recorded in the novel? It is possible.

The fact that he does not mention it in the passage quoted above proves

nothing. It is apparently taken from his unfinished life of his friend

Napier, in which he would naturally not dwell on his own personal

adventures. On the other hand, it is very much the sort of story which

might be transferred from the hero of the novel to its author.

In the course of 1808 a great change came over the war in the Western

Mediterranean. Napoleon made his famous (and infamous) grab at the

Spanish monarchy, and instantly, without hesitation, without concert

among themselves, in one great spontaneous burst of patriotic enthusiasm,

the Spanish people rose in arms. Their efforts were often unsuccessful,

and even disgraced by mismanagement or treason; but, on the whole, they

set Europe a magnificent example, which was well followed later on by

Russia, and they gave England what she had long wished for in vain--a

field of battle on land against Napoleon. The _Impérieuse_ had her share

in the Peninsular War. It was her duty not only to help the Spaniards in

the coast towns, but to harass the French troops which endeavoured to

enter Spain by the coast road. Cochrane was at his best in work of this

kind. For months he was engaged in incessant boat attacks on the French

transports, which endeavoured to reach Barcelona (then and throughout

the war in their possession), by hugging the shore. With this service

were mingled landing expeditions to blow up French telegraph stations or

batteries, or to help the Spaniards to defend forts which commanded the

road, and which the French for that very reason were particularly anxious

to capture. It was Cochrane’s belief to the end of his life that if he

had been supplied with a flotilla of light vessels and a regiment of

troops, he would have made it impossible for the French to enter Spain by

the Eastern Pyrenees at all. How far he was justified in this opinion, he

never was able to show. Indeed, when he was offered just such a command

on condition that he would abstain from attacking Admiral Gambier in the

House of Commons, he refused it. Even as it was, however, he did much.

His untiring vigilance made it impossible for the French to use the sea

for the transport of men or provisions, and difficult for them to use the

coast route which at many places was liable to be swept by the cannon of

the English frigate. They were driven to use the inland route through

a poor and rugged country swarming with guerrilleros. It is known that

all this part of the war proved enormously costly to the French, and

much of the credit due for imposing the loss upon them must go to the

_Impérieuse_. Marryat had his share of it all, and in “Frank Mildmay” he

has given a carefully finished sketch of one of the sharpest pieces of

service in it--the defence of Rosas, where he himself received a bayonet

wound.

The desire to be back in his place in Parliament, in order that he

might expose the malpractices of the Maltese Admiralty Court (this

is the motive assigned by himself, and was doubtless that of which he

was most conscious), induced Cochrane to apply for leave to bring the

_Impérieuse_ home to England. It was granted with a facility which throws

some doubt on his theory that the Admiralty feared his presence; and

early in March, 1809, he dropped anchor in Plymouth Sound. Unhappily for

himself, Cochrane was selected for a special piece of service before

he could resume his Parliamentary work. In February of this year a

French squadron had slipped out of Brest, with orders to drive off the

British seventy-fours which were then watching L’Orient, to pick up

three more ships at anchor there under Commodore Troude, and then to

proceed to the West Indies to relieve Martinique. Admiral Willaumez,

the French commander, did not escape the vigilance of the Channel

squadron. His fleet was sighted at sea, followed till it entered the

Pertuis d’Antioche, between the islands of Ré and Oléron, and very soon

a blockading force collected under Admiral Gambier. The outcries of

the London and Liverpool merchants roused the Admiralty to make great

exertions for the destruction of an armament which was designed to

operate in the West Indies, and would, by its mere presence in those

waters, have greatly disturbed English trade. In an evil hour for

Cochrane, my Lords remembered that he was well acquainted with this

part of the French coast, and they resolved to send him to execute an

attack on the enemy’s ships. Very reluctantly, for he knew how ill

he was likely to be received by officers whom he would practically

supersede, he undertook the work. He prepared a flotilla of explosion

vessels and fire-ships. In April the _Impérieuse_ had joined Gambier’s

squadron. A detailed account of the action which followed would be out

of place here. Its rather melancholy history is to be read in Cochrane’s

“Autobiography,” and the Minutes of the court martial on Lord Gambier.

The squadron was in an indifferent moral condition, divided by sour

professional factions, and impatient of its Admiral, a brave but weak

officer, chiefly known as what was called in the navy a “blue light,”

that is a pious man of a somewhat Methodistical turn. Very little zeal

was shown in supporting Cochrane. The attack was made on the night of

April 11th, and whatever the _Impérieuse_ could do was magnificently

done. The French fleet of eight line-of-battle ships, and some smaller

vessels, had withdrawn to the Basque Roads, at the mouth of the Charente,

and had fortified itself with a heavy boom. Towards that boom the English

explosion and fire-ships were driven by wind and tide after dark on the

11th. It is doubtful whether more than one of them reached it--but that

one was commanded by Cochrane himself. She was brought up to the boom

at half a cable’s length off the French frigate _Indienne_, and there

exploded, scattering the boom all over the mouth of the Charente. Through

the opening thus made a few English vessels passed. They were a mere

handful, and might have been sunk by the fire of the French, but our

enemies were panic stricken. They cut their cables, and ran ashore. When

day broke the French ships were fast aground, and might every one have

been destroyed; but Lord Gambier was an officer of the stamp peculiarly

hateful to Nelson. He was prompt to conclude that enough had been done,

and was loth to risk ships and men in what he thought an unnecessary

way. In vain did Cochrane, who had now returned to the _Impérieuse_,

hoist signal after signal urging the Admiral to attack. He told him

that the enemy were ashore, and could be destroyed; that they would get

off if they were not stopped; that they were actually preparing to get

off. It skilled not, and Gambier remained stolidly at anchor miles off.

At last Cochrane, who by this time was nearly rabid with rage, work,

and want of sleep, flew into a Berserker fury. He deliberately drifted

the _Impérieuse_ stern first under the guns of the French liners, and

then signalled that he was overpowered and in need of assistance. This

desperate measure, worthy of Nelson in his most splendid moments, did

at last force Admiral Gambier’s hand. Some vessels were sent--when it

was well-nigh too late to do any service at all--and distinctly too late

to do all that ought to have been done. Three of the French liners were

destroyed, but the others by throwing their guns overboard and starting

their water, were able to grovel over the mud-bar of the Charente, and

escape into a pool out of reach up the river. They never appeared in

the West Indies certainly, but the work was half done. Cochrane went

back to England--with all that was best and worst in him fermenting with

fury--to make his unhappy motion of opposition in the House to the vote

of thanks to Admiral Gambier. From thence came his final quarrel with the

Admiralty, and the court martial on Lord Gambier, in which it is only

too probable that English officers and officials of rank winked at the

suppression of evidence, and something not unlike forgery. Cochrane’s

service in our navy was over for long years.

With this scene of mingled heroism and stupidity, the more brilliant part

of Marryat’s naval life came to an end. He was engaged in the Basque

Roads on one of the fire-ships, and when they proved of little use, was

probably recalled to the _Impérieuse_. It is to be hoped at least that

he was on her deck when her captain, in an exaltation of fury, drifted

her among the French liners. In point of time, however, his service was

merely beginning, and he was to do good work yet, both as a subordinate

and as commander; but it wanted the heroic touch of the first three

years. When Cochrane was superseded from the _Impérieuse_, Marryat

remained with the new captain, and under him took part in the wholly

wretched Walcheren business, out of which he got--in common with some

thousands of others--all that it had to give--a distinct idea of how a

combined expedition ought _not_ to be conducted,--and an attack of marsh

fever.

From this time until the close of the Great War, he was on such active

service as the overpowering supremacy we had attained at sea left to

be performed. From the Scheldt he returned invalided on board the

_Victorious_, 74. As soon as he was fit for service, he was appointed

to the _Centaur_, 74, the flag-ship of Sir Samuel Hood, with whom he

went back to the Mediterranean, but not to the stirring life of his

old frigate. After a year of the seventy-four he returned home, and

was appointed to the _Æolus_ frigate on the American station. He went

out as a passenger on the _Atlas_, 64, and joined his ship at Halifax.

In the _Æolus_, and then in another frigate, the _Spartan_, he became

familiar with the West Indies, which are, with the Mediterranean, the

scenes of so large a part of his stories. In 1812 he had served his time

as midshipman, and returned home to pass. His influence was good, as

the fact that he served so much in frigates proves, and he received his

lieutenant’s commission immediately after going through his examination

(December 26, 1812). Six months later he was appointed to _L’Espiègle_

sloop, and cruised in her on the north coast of South America, till

he was invalided by the breaking of a blood-vessel, and sent home as

a passenger on board his old frigate, the _Spartan_, which had now

finished her commission. This accident, due in part to a constitutional

infirmity, which ultimately proved fatal to him, occurred at Barbadoes,

at a dance--perhaps a dignity ball. In 1814 he was back on the coast of

America in the _Newcastle_, 58, and was again invalided home, this time

from Madeira. In June, 1815, just as the Great War was closing, Marryat

was promoted commander, and the first period of his life came to an end.

The years from 1809 to 1815 may be rapidly passed over, for though

they added to his experience, they were colourless as compared with

the cruises of the _Impérieuse_. He saw some service in them, but it

was either tame, or a mere repetition of what he had seen before. The

so-called “war of 1812” was in progress during part of his service in the

_Spartan_ and all his service in the _Newcastle_, but he saw little of

it. Some boat work--and sharp work too--he went through in Boston Bay,

but he saw nothing of those unlucky frigate actions with the Americans,

which gave us such a disagreeable shock, and it was not his good fortune

to be one of the crew of the famous _Shannon_. The capture of a small

privateer or two, by so powerful a vessel as the _Newcastle_, was no

important experience to a man who had seen the boarding of the _King

George_, the defence of the Trinidad fort at Rosas, and the affair in the

Basque Roads. An acquaintance he made with an American prisoner of war

while on board the _Newcastle_ was useful to him afterwards, but at the

time he probably thought little about it.

His captains in these years doubtless served him as models when he began

his work as a novelist, but they were none of them men of the commanding

kind. The best remembered of them was Captain E. P. Brenton of the

_Spartan_, brother of the famous Sir Jahleel who fought a brilliant

frigate action off Naples, under the very eyes of Murat. Captain Brenton

had himself done good work, but his chief reputation was made in later

days, as the author of a life of St. Vincent, and a history of the

Great War, which is itself mainly remembered as the object of incessant

corrections, often pettifogging, commonly superfluous, and always

intensely wearisome, in James’s “Naval History.”

Even in the most peaceful times, opportunities of facing danger come in

every seaman’s way. He may have his chance to save life, and he must

help to fight the storm. In both of these ways Marryat distinguished

himself. Few men have more frequently risked their own lives to save

others. As a midshipman in the _Impérieuse_ he went overboard to save a

fellow midshipman. He saved the life of a seaman while serving on the

_Æolus_, and narrowly escaped drowning on a similar occasion when serving

in _L’Espiègle_. On this occasion he was a mile and a half off before the

sloop could be brought to, and when a boat picked him up he was nearly

senseless. This also was a part of experience to Marryat, for it was

while overboard from _L’Espiègle_ that he discovered that drowning is not

an unpleasant death. It is recorded in his Life by his daughter that,

first and last, “during the time he served in the navy, he was presented

with twenty-seven certificates, recommendations, and votes of thanks,

for saving the lives of others at the risk of his own, beside receiving

a gold medal from the Humane Society.” This mark of distinction given in

1818 was assuredly well deserved.

Not less pleasing to Marryat than the memory of his efforts to save

others, must have been his recollection of the honour he gained in

volunteering during a gale to cut away the main-yard of the _Æolus_.

The story appears, more or less coloured and adapted, with so many

other of his reminiscences in “Frank Mildmay.” In the sober pages of

Marshall, it is, however, a quite sufficiently gallant story. “On the

30th of September, 1811, in lat. 40° 50’ N., long. 65° W. (off the coast

of New England), a gale of wind commenced at S.E., and soon blew with

tremendous fury; the _Æolus_ was laid on her beam ends, her top-masts

and mizen-masts were literally blown away, and she continued in this

extremely perilous situation for at least half an hour. Directions were

given to cut away the main-yard, in order to save the main-mast and

right the ship, but so great was the danger attending such an operation

considered, that not a man could be induced to attempt it until Mr.

Marryat led the way. His courageous conduct in this emergency excited

general admiration, and was highly approved by Lord James Townshend, one

of whose ship’s company he also saved by jumping overboard at sea.”

Up then to the age of three-and-twenty Marryat had prepared himself

to write sea stories by making his life a sea story. He had, in fact,

fulfiled the counsel of perfection given to the epic poet. He had seen

no great battle; the last of them had been fought before he entered the

service; he had not even shared in a single ship action. But what he did

not witness himself he saw through the eyes of messmates. The battles,

to judge from the little said of them in his stories, do not appear

to have greatly interested Marryat--perhaps he found a difficulty in

realizing what one would be like, perhaps he found them unmanageable.

With the single ship actions he had no such difficulty. He could tell

precisely what must happen, and he had no doubt heard tales of many such

pieces of fighting. Indeed, in the actual sea-life of the time, the great

battles did not play a much more considerable part than they do in the

novels. Of the 2,437 lieutenants on the navy list when Marryat entered

the service, the very great majority had never seen a general engagement.

It was thought a rather exceptional thing that Collingwood should have

been present in three battles. Nelson himself only took part in four,

or five, if Admiral Hotham’s feeble action in the Gulf of Lyons is to be

allowed the name. But most officers had seen service of some kind, and

had tales to tell. Marryat, too, had been fortunate in an eminent degree.

He had been wounded, but not severely--he had never been taken prisoner

or shipwrecked. His service had been varied. Between 1806 and 1815 he had

seen the North Sea, the Channel, the Mediterranean, and the Eastern Coast

of America, from Nova Scotia to Surinam. His promotion had been rapid.

Altogether he had had much to develop, and nothing to sour him, in this

first period of his life.

Life of Frederick Marryat · 第 3 / 10 章