EDUCATION

There are many who under-rate the power of environment But there are

few who deny the value of education. And education is environment. All

education, good or bad, in the home or the school, is environment.

And we all know, though some of us forget, that good education makes us

better and that bad education makes us worse. And we all know, though

some of us forget, that we have to be educated by others, and that

those others are part of our environment. For even in the case of

self-education we must learn from books, which were written by other

men.

And if we take the word education in its widest sense, as meaning all

that we learn, the importance of this part of our environment stares

us in the face. For as we are born not with morals, nor knowledge, nor

capacities, but only with the rudiments of such, it is plain to every

mind that our goodness or badness, our ignorance or knowledge, our

helplessness or power, depends to a very great extent upon the kind of

teaching we get.

The difference between the lout and the man of refinement is generally a

difference of education, of knowledge, and training.

The root cause of most prejudice and malice, of much violence, folly,

and crime, is ignorance. There would be no despised and under-paid poor,

no slums, no landless peasants, no serfs, were it not for the ignorance

of the masses, _and_ the classes. The rich impose upon the poor, and the

poor submit, for the one reason: they do not understand.

If they were taught better they would do better. And the better teaching

would be--improved environment.

It is not enough that people should be "educated," in the narrow sense

of the word. Teaching may do harm, as surely as it may do good. All

depends upon the things that are taught.

Much of the teaching in our Board Schools, our Public Schools, and our

Universities is _bad_.

If teaching is to be "good environment," the teaching must be good.

National or local ideals are part of our environment. We are born into

these ideals as we are born into our climate, and few escape their rule.

The ideals of England are not good. To succeed, to make wealth, to win

applause--these are not high ideals. To buy in the cheapest market and

sell in the dearest; to make England the workshop of the world; to seize

all rich and unprotected lands, and force their inhabitants into the

British Empire--these are not great ideals.

But such national ideals are part of our environment, and tell against,

or for, the development of our noblest human qualities.

A gospel of greed, vanity, and empire does not tend to make a people

modest, nor just, nor kindly. Indeed, it is chiefly because of their

greediness for commerce and wealth, and their ambition for empire,

that the nations to-day are armed and jealous rivals. And it is chiefly

because of their hunger for wealth, and their worship of vain display

and empty honours, that the classes and the masses are hostile and

divided. Ignorance again: they do not understand.

The force of environment, and especially the uses of education,

are stamped upon our proverbs, are bedded deep in universal custom.

"Knowledge is power," "As the twig is bent----" "He who touches pitch

shall be defiled," "Evil communications corrupt good manners." And what

educated parent would allow his children to grow up in ignorance, or

would expose them to the evil influences of impure literature or bad

companions.

Every church and chapel, every school and college, every book

that teaches, every moral lesson, every chaperon and tutor, is an

acknowledgment of the power of environment to wreck or save our young.

In practice we all fear or prize the influences of environment--upon

ourselves, and upon those we love.

It is when we have to deal with the "Bottom Dog" that we ignore the

facts which plead so strongly in his defence.

Not Guilty: A Defence of the Bottom Dog · 第 49 / 80 题