Last year I was in Lombardy, and, as a faithful adherent of the

Viscontis, I stayed a little in Pavia. I found it a rather gloomy little

Lombard town, white-washed and paven. Here and there a wine-coloured

wall or tower broke the pallid monotony of the streets. The famous

fortress, where Isabel of Arragon eat her heart in bitterness so many

years, still exists, much rebuilt and altered indeed, but always a mass

of fine red colour. In Pavia, however, there was nothing so interesting

to me as those phantoms of vanished Viscontis and long-supplanted

Sforzas that seemed so strangely out of place in this sad little sordid

university town. And among these ranks of tragic shadows, the least

forgiven, the least beloved, was always the Duchess Beatrice.

I had known her too long, the youthful and charming Lady Macbeth of

Lombardy. I knew her as well as one can know a person, familiar through

the gossip of acquaintance, although unseen and distant. I had heard of

her as a haughty and ambitious woman, accepting with a smile the crimes

that placed the crown of Milan on her head. She appeared as some

Herodias of Luini’s, exquisite and sinister. And yet I knew she had been

dearly worshipped in her lifetime and long lamented in her tomb. There

are such Sirens, heartless and chill themselves, but capable of seizing

an honest love with the same hands that grasp at a blood-stained

treasure. Such, in my eyes, was the adored and evil wife of Lodovico il

Moro.

It was Christmas-time and cold; with difficulty I roused myself to visit

the Certosa. It is six miles, I suppose, from Pavia. The wretched

carriage slowly dragged along through the muddy country; and from the

whitened window one felt rather than saw the immense desolation of the

view. On either hand of the raised road, a sluggish canal, and beyond a

monotonous landscape of brown marshy pastures and bright green rice

fields flecked with water, across which the scant snow drifted. The road

seemed to extend for ever in front, unbroken, unturning. Suddenly in the

middle of the country the carriage stopped; I walked a few steps up a

muddy lane. To the right over a wall there appeared a great dome, with

rose-red minarets, with spires of pale red, ivory and marble, among

innumerable shaft-like towers tipped with cream-white columns. It is the

Certosa.

At another season and in better health I should have found much to

linger over in the great façade of the Certosa, fantastic, incoherent as

a Midsummer Night’s Dream. Every inch of the front is covered thickly

with ornament in high relief—Roman emperors and paladins of chivalry,

eagles with praying angels on their outspread pinions, exquisite maidens

floating full-length on a dolphin’s back, Sirens suckling their

unearthly babes, hippogriffs, Prophets of Israel: strange, unexpected as

the visions of delirium, they are assembled there. But, alone, in the

bitter wind, I glanced at it all for a moment and entered the vast

foundation of Giangaleazzo Visconti. Great halls, enormous, cold,

spoiled as much as may be by the seventeenth century; a few good

pictures by Borgognone, many bad ones; posthumous portraits of the great

Viscontis: it was not so interesting as I had supposed.

Still I wandered on, making reflections on the difference of type in the

Sforza and Visconti heads: the older tyrants keen-faced, refined with

delicate, bone-less oval faces, and thin firm lips ridged out in a

narrow line. There is something wolf-like in the long pointed noses, the

pointed chins, low foreheads, as well as in the keen eyes, narrow and

high in the head; altogether an interesting type, subtle, cruel,

intellectual, and fierce. The Sforzas with their Wellington noses, their

strongly marked eyebrows, prim-pursed lips and rounded chins, seem a

square-faced kindly race of captains. Lodovico il Moro himself is there,

with the fat face and fine chin of the elderly Napoleon, the delicate

beak-like nose of Wellington; a small querulous neat-lipped mouth, and

immense eyebrows, stretched like the talons of an eagle across the low

forehead, complete the odd, refined physiognomy of the man. I looked at

him with interest for a moment. But there, straight before me, stood the

tomb of the wife he lost so young, the Duchess Beatrice.

To think that she is dead, and to think she was a woman! Impossible. She

is a lively child, fallen asleep in playtime: motionless, but full of a

contained vivacity. Her tumbled curls hang loosely round her shoulders,

and stand up in a little frizz above the rounded childish forehead. As

she lies there, a look of infantine candour is diffused over the soft,

adorable, irregular features. She has straight, brief eyebrows like a

little girl, but her closed eyelids are rounded like the petals of a

thick white flower, and richly fringed with lashes. The little nose is

of no particular shape—not quite a straight nose, but certainly not a

snub; it is the prettiest nose at Court, with a rounded end like a

child’s. The cheeks, too, are round apple-cheeks, not in the least like

the Herodias of Luini; and round is the neat bewitching chin. But her

chief beauty is her mouth—a mouth with the soft-closed lips of a dear

child pretending to be asleep, yet smiling as if to say, “Soon I shall

jump up and throw my arms round your neck, and you will be so

surprised!”

The round head rises from a long plump throat. The small figure too is

slender and plump at once, and very small, full of life still, it seems,

under the pretty tight silk dress, with the slashed and purfled sleeves,

and the long train of brocade, so lovingly, so carefully arranged not to

encumber nor hide those little pattened feet, that were so fain of

dancing and seem so ready to awake and dance again. This, then, is the

famous Beatrice!—I looked and looked, at last I understood not only her,

but the love of Lodovico: “And so, dear child, thou canst not live

without a crown?—Ah well! What shouldst thou know of murder, dishonour,

and the ruin of great states? Thou wilt never understand these gloomy

things, and I shall pay the price—Ah God in heaven, I thank Thee for the

gift of an immortal soul, since I may lose it for the pleasure of this

child!”

Perhaps it was in this way that Lodovico reasoned; or perhaps it may be

that at heart Macbeth is no less ambitious than his wife. Who knows? The

wife, at least, must stand for something. At least, some share in the

ruin of their country must be accorded to these three women—Bonne, who

recalled Lodovico to Milan; Isabel, who inspired the war of Arragon and

Sforza; and Beatrice, whose ambition urged her husband to invite the

French to Italy.

THE FLIGHT OF PIERO DE’ MEDICI.

(OCTOBER-NOVEMBER, 1494.)

When, in the October of 1494, the King of France marched south from

Asti, a torpor of stupefaction fell upon the princes of Italy. For the

last three years there was no one of them but had coquetted more or less

with France; there was no one of them but was the enemy of that arrogant

house of Arragon which had lost Scutari to Venice, and which had dared

reprove the usurpation of Milan by Lodovico Sforza. Charles was coming

into Italy to dethrone these evil and malignant princes, “fathers of all

treason,” as the author of “De Bello Gallico” has called them; “tyrants

by whom I think that Nero himself would seem a saint.” But now that the

French were actually in Lombardy, it struck the Italian despots with

ominous force that he might not be content with only Naples. Few of them

had any just title to their possessions; none of them, save Venice,

could resist the power of France. “The princes of Italy,” wrote the

Venetian secretary, “aghast at this passing of the mountains, tried to

arrange that the King should pass no farther south, each one doubting

for his own estate, and doubting most of all the enthusiasm of his own

subjects.” For if the tyrants of Italy dreaded the advent of the French,

the populace—the poor, starved, degraded slaves of these illegal

despots—welcomed their coming with open arms. “They were so called and

cried upon,” goes on our author, “so invoked by all the populace of

Italy, that there was none who could withstand them, for all the people

said _Benedictus qui venit in nomine Domini_.”

Sorely he was needed, that _Flagellum Dei_, of whom the inspired voice

of Savonarola prophesied daily in the great Cathedral of Florence.

Sorely he was required. For that autumnal Italy which at their coming

the Frenchmen found so fair, was no more than a waving green enchanted

garden full of poisons—poisons for the body, swift or slow, used without

scruple by Venice and Milan as a means to power, by Rome as an easy way

to wealth, by Naples for the vile gratification of cruel passions. The

terrible pages from the “Secreta Secretissima,” published by Lamansky in

1884, the folios of Marino Sanuto’s “Diaries,” the chronicles which fill

the “Archivio Storico,” are full of tragic murders, the more tragical

because so commonplace; and the quiet, impartial voice of Philippe de

Commines falters when he speaks of “les pitiez d’Italie.”

Not only poison for the enviable, slavery for the conquered, famine and

cruelty for the poor, and treachery among the princes of the earth; for

all alike there was a corrupt and horrible dissolution of moral

restraints. “There is no city in Italy,” records the Venetian, “not Rome

or Naples, not Bologna, Florence, Milan, or Ferrara, not my own Venice

even, that is holier than the Cities of the Plain.” Milan, with the

frescoes of Leonardo fresh upon the walls; Venice, where the

girl-madonnas of Giovanni Bellini were not yet all begun; Florence,

peopled with the saints of Botticelli, with the angels of the aged

Gozzoli upon the walls of Piero de’ Medici’s palace; Ferrara, where the

youthful Ariosto dwelt—these homes of the brightest and the fairest art

were morally no better than the Rome of the Borgias or the Naples of

Ferdinand and Alfonso. They were vile dens of corruption. And yet the

painted angels of Florence, the saints of Lombardy, were _not_ a mere

external fashion, a refined hypocrisy; they were the expression of a

movement in Italian hearts deeper than even this permeating evil—pure

underneath the mask of their perversion. When the French came into

Lombardy they found a contagion of spiritual enthusiasm among the

people; they encountered holy women who neither ate, drank, nor slept,

but dwelt in a continual ecstasy; and as they went along the roads the

poorer inhabitants came out to meet them, bearing palms in their hands,

and having on their pale and haggard faces a strange exalted smile.

“Blessed is he,” they sang, “who cometh in the name of the Lord;” for

the people were eager to be quit of the sin that hemmed them round. They

embraced the knees of their conquerors, and suffered willingly a great

deal of hardship at their hands, glad to be purified for ever by the

Scourge of God.

Had it not been for the welcome that they met, the French could never

have penetrated into Italy. They came ill-provided, without good

generals, without money. “There’s not a penny in the treasury,” wrote

Orleans to Ridolfi, in October, “and I have spent four thousand ducats

of my own to pay the troops.” The Italian despots trusted that this lack

of means would cause the French to retire before the winter, and Orleans

was in secret treaty with them to this end. Milan, says this interested

advocate, would be enough to satisfy the honour of France—Milan and a

yearly homage paid by Naples to the Crown of France.[114] But these

designs were frustrated by the enthusiasm with which the French were

received in the invaded provinces. The women brought their jewels to pay

the troops; the men threw open the gates of the cities; every difficulty

was overridden, for, says Commines, touched with the grave exaltation of

Italy, “God was Himself our leader: _Dieu monstroit conduire

l’entreprise_.”

Footnote 114:

See Desjardins I., “Négociations diplomatiques dans la Toscane.”

“At our first arrival,” he goes on, “the people honoured us as saints,

supposing all faith and virtue to be in us; but this opinion endured not

long.” The rude French soldiery—Gascons, Normans, Swiss, and German

mercenaries—pathetically ignorant of the fancied aureole playing round

their weatherbeaten faces, marched through Italy as through any other

conquered country. At Rapallo they put the town to the sword; they took

Fivizzano by a murderous assault; they shed much blood at Pontremoli;

for they could not understand that they seemed the Elect of Heaven, and

they sought by fierce reprisals to keep up a military prestige. But if

in Lombardy, in Lunigiana, the rude passage of the troops had to some

extent dispelled the illusions of the people—where the army had not yet

arrived the cities with open gates awaited it in holy awe. Arragon

retired from point to point without a battle fought. The subjects of

Catarina Sforza threatened her with rebellion if she refused submission

to the French; Bologna, against the will of Bentivoglio, insisted on

making peace with Charles. And in the Duomo of Florence, where

Savonarola preached of the Purifying Scourge of God, the people shouted,

“Franza, Franza!” where they were only used to sob in bitter patience,

“Misericordia.” And to these enthusiasts, impatient of Medicean luxury,

it was no drawback that the King, their deliverer, was a mere ugly

youth, “more a monster than a man,” as Guicciardini plainly states,

quite uncultured, and knowing neither Greek nor Latin. “In fact,” as the

Milanese Corio remarked, “an uninstructed person, though none the less

able to address his soldiery in telling terms, so that for love of him

they dash upon the enemy, shouting, ‘Alive or dead!’” In the autumn of

1494 this ugly, bright-eyed youth had inspired an equal devotion in the

populace of Florence.

The people were led by the monk Savonarola; but many of the old

Florentine families (the Nerli, Gualterotti, Sonderini, Capponi) were no

less anxious than the people to banish their _parvenu_ tyrant. Out of

all the crowd of monks, enthusiasts, bankers, patricians, and

politicians which made up the popular party, two _silhouettes_ stand

strongly forth. One is the preacher Savonarola—a man of middle height,

of dark complexion, and sanguine, bilious temperament. At forty-two his

face is lined with seams and wrinkles—a harsh, strong face with a sweet

expression, like Samson’s honey in the lion’s mouth; eyes that flash and

flame from under shaggy black eyebrows and shed their spiritual gleam

over the heavy Roman nose and the large mouth with the loose, thick lips

of the orator firmly closed and drawn into a painful smile; a kind,

noble, spiritual, tragic face, with something mad in it, or something at

the least that must pass for mad in this uninspired and transitory

world.

This was the man who for a good four years was virtually the ruler of

Florence; this was the man who, more than any other, helped on the cause

of France in Italy. “A man of holy life,” says Commines, who knew him.

And Guicciardini describes him: “Full of charity, of natural goodness,

and religion—so clever in philosophy, one would think he himself had had

the making of it; without a trace of lust or avarice; but if he had a

vice it was simulation, the prompting of a proud ambition.” One more

voice arrests us: “A treacherous friar, worthy the end of the wicked.”

But it is Marino Sanuto who speaks, the political enemy of Savonarola

and a personal stranger to his qualities.

Behind the strong profile of the friar we note another head, also worthy

of remark. This is Piero Capponi, a man of old Florentine family,

republican by descent. Sturdily built and square, with brilliant eyes,

he has a certain air of a courser sniffing battle; brief and resolute in

speech, vigorously mature in age, he seems the very embodiment of virile

energy. He is rich, for an astrologer at his birth having foretold his

death in battle, he was persuaded by his father to devote himself to

commerce. The man worked at money-getting with the restless, dominant

force he put into everything he did, and made his fortune in a sort of

fury. Then he threw up his career, having enough, and entered public

life at thirty years of age. A republican, his restless need of activity

made him accept the Medicean service. He had been ambassador in France,

and was as French as Savonarola. “See them near, like ghosts,” he used

to say, “and there is nothing to be afraid of in these French.” Although

at this time the right arm of the Republic, his patrician birth, his

acquaintance with the magnificence of princes, made him recoil from the

extremer measures of the monk. A man of the greatest spirit, the

staunchest energy, the very width of his views and his natural love of

change made him a danger to a peaceful but imperfect Government. Born to

be a great captain, he loved, above all things, a difficult campaign;

and he spent his life in fighting alternately his enemies and his

friends, until at last the astrologer’s prediction, true in spite of

human prudence, set a bridle on his martial soul.

These two men represent the two parties who chiefly desired the advent

of the French—the enthusiasts, the poor, the children of Savonarola, and

the powerful burghers, as rich and may be better born than Piero de’

Medici, who resented their tyrant’s views on the republic, who resented

almost more his alliance with the detested Spanish autocrats of Naples.

On the other side—the side of the Orsini, of Cardinal Bibbiena, of

Bernardò del Nero, and the aristocratic party, there is but one man that

can arrest us as Capponi or Savonarola must arrest us, and that is Piero

de’ Medici himself.

Piero and the King of France were mortal enemies; the King of Naples had

no more resolved ally than Medici, though the French inclinations of the

city prevented him from showing the true colour of his opinions. He was,

in fact, “immoderately bound up with Arragon, and determined to chance

the same fortune,” as Guicciardini tells us; since in return for this

alliance he had arranged that Ferdinand of Naples should support him in

turning his old republic into a new monarchy. Naples in those days

represented in Italy the kingdom as distinguished from the Signory; it

was the natural pole-star of the aristocrat. And Piero was drawn to the

south as much by sentiment as by inclination; his mother Clarice, his

young wife Alfonsina, both came of the Roman family of Orsini.

In 1494 Piero de’ Medici was about four-and-twenty years of age. He was

beautiful in person and very vigorous. He was clever at games and

sports; he had a charming way of pronouncing his words, a winning voice,

and a great facility in making impromptu verses. But this handsome,

graceful personage was not popular in Florence. He was haughty and

arrogant beyond expression, subject to furies of animal anger, proud,

and cruel. He would have men waylaid at night in the street and beaten

violently by private bravos. He was so absolute, that even in matters he

did not pretend to understand, he would govern all according to his

fancy. And this aristocrat of a free republic was as fiery, vain,

careless, and impatient as he was presumptuous. While the people

murmured “Franza” with white excited faces; while Savonarola was

thundering his prophecies of the _Flagellum Dei_; while news of the

massacres and the irresistible advance of France struck a religious

terror into Tuscany—the young head of the state left the garrisons

unprovided and unguarded; not a week’s provisions in Sarzana or Pietra

Santa; not a handful of infantry in the fastnesses of the hills. While

winds of rebellion, war, and outrage swept the city, he, the one man

unmoved, was to be seen as usual playing _pallone_ in the public

streets, a light-minded aristocrat, full of a certain easy and handsome

bravado, caring for no one’s safety, not even for his own.

But even Piero, as he knocked the tennis-ball against the palace front,

must now and then have felt a certain twinge of anxiety. For every day

brought news of the farther retreat of Arragon, and only success, and

brilliant success, could justify the Arragonese alliance in the eyes of

the Florentines. Already that aristocratic alliance had touched the

mercantile republic in a sensitive point: in June the King of France had

expelled the Florentine bankers and merchants out of his kingdom. This

meant ruin to many honourable families, and decided the burghers to join

the party of Savonarola, so weakening the Medicean faction that people

whispered it was Capponi who had thus advised King Charles, in order to

disgust the impoverished merchants with their tyrant. But the documents

published in Desjardins contradict this supposition. It was from

Lodovico il Moro, the determined enemy of Florence and of Piero, that

King Charles accepted this happy suggestion.

The burghers were all for France, in order to regain their commerce. The

people, under Savonarola, the Republican families under Capponi, desired

nothing more than the advent of King Charles. The very cousins of Piero

himself had become so French, that a year ago he had exiled them to

their country villas, where they lived in comfortable durance,

surrounded by the light of popular martyrdom. To resist all these varied

forces, Piero, on his side, could count a few old friends of his father,

such as Bernardò del Nero and his secretary Bibbiena, an ambitious

priest, and his wife’s brother, Pagolo Orsini, captain of the forces of

the republic.

The situation was grave indeed, but he took it lightly, with a facile

temerity that would not condescend to prudence. On the 3rd of October

his ambassador at Milan wrote that the French spoke of wintering in Pisa

and Sarzana. Yet not a single fortress had a week’s provisions. So late

as the 22nd of October, in answer to a last appeal from France, he sent

the Bishop of Arezzo to King Charles with a vague, exasperating,

indecisive answer. The same week the two cousins of Piero escaped from

their villas, and rode post-haste to the French camp. “Sire,” they cried

to Charles, “be not angry with Florence. The tyrant is against you, but

you have the faithful devotion of the people.” The King was well

inclined to believe the two young men with whom he had often practised,

and who had suffered a year’s imprisonment for his sake. “We do not

confuse the people of Florence with the governor,” answered the Council.

“The last alone is the King’s enemy.” And, departing from Piacenza, the

armies of France marched on the Florentine territories.

In a few days they were on the Tuscan border. At Fivizzano and

Pontremoli they had so avenged a slight resistance that the gates flew

open at their approach. Who dare resist the Scourge of God? Terror and

awe bent every head before them. In Florence the populace surged along

the narrow streets, and declared they would not resist the King of

France. Three days after Piero had sent off the Bishop of Arezzo, a

popular tumult seemed ready to burst at any moment.

What could he do? The French were now within fifty miles of Pisa, and

though the mountain fortresses ought to have kept them at bay all the

winter long, Piero remembered too late that he had forgotten to

provision them; that he had neglected to call the Pisan hostages into

Florence, and that Pisa hated her cruel mistress, and was certain to

revolt to France. Only one course suggested itself to the desperate

young man, and this course was so adventurous, romantic, and unusual,

that it captivated at once his unsteady imagination. Many years ago,

when Arragon had worsted Florence on the battlefield, Lorenzo de’ Medici

had gone as his own ambassador to Naples, running, it is true, a great

risk of steel or poison, but by his fascinating address making a devoted

friend of an exasperated enemy. Piero determined to follow the example

of his father. On the 26th of October he heard that the French were

arriving before Sarzana, within two days’ march of Florence. On the

evening of that day the tyrant of Florence secretly escaped from his own

palace, left the city in the dusk of evening, and rode through the chill

autumn night as far as Empoli.

II.

“EMPOLI, _26 Oct., 1494_.

“_Piero de’ Medici to the Signory of Florence._

“Because I believe I ought not to suffer imputation or reproach for that

which, according to my mind and feeble judgment, appeared to me the most

salutary remedy to preserve my menaced country, I depart from you to

offer myself to the most Christian king, and to turn on to my own head

the storm that menaces my native land. Nor is there any consequent

punishment, but I would rather suffer it in my own person than behold it

inflicted on this republic.

The End of the Middle Ages: Essays and Questions in History · 第 21 / 26 段