XI

The transition of a great nation from barbarism to an elementary form

of culture is always interesting. So, too, is the same transition in

the case of a "great profession." In 1840, when the propulsion of

ships by means of a steam-driven screw opened a new era in maritime

history, the "practical man" in the engineering trade was an

uneducated savage. Possessing no trade union, no voice in Parliament,

no means of educating himself in the intricate theory of the machinery

he helped to build, the mechanic of sixty years ago was regarded

by those above him in the social scale merely as a "hand." When,

therefore, steamships became common, and men were needed to operate

and care for the propelling mechanism, they were naturally drawn

from the ranks of mechanics who were employed in the works to

construct it. Stokers were enlisted, in a similar way, from those

working on land-boilers. Here, then, were two new classes of

seamen, corresponding very largely to the officers and sailors of a

sailing-ship. To the unbiassed judgment, it went without saying that

the engineer on watch would take rank with the navigating officer on

watch; but the old school of mariners, the school whose ideas of

progress are crystallised for all time in the historic report of

certain Admiralty Lords that "steam power would never be of any

practical use in Her Majesty's Navy," thought differently. In their

opinion, the engineer was the same as a stoker, and from that day

almost to this the deck-officer who served his time in a sailing-ship

secretly regards the engineers of his steamer as upstarts more or

less, whose position and pay are a gross encroachment upon his own

more ancient privileges.

A little consideration will show that there was some reason for

this feeling in the beginning. In the case of the Royal Navy, the

aggravation was particularly acute. The deck-officers, then as now,

were sons of gentlemen, were members of an ancient and honourable

service, a service included among that select quaternity, to be

outside of which was to be a nonentity--the Navy, the Army, the

Church, and the Bar. The naval officer, then as now, did not soil his

hands, wore a sword, and was swathed in an inextricable meshwork of

red tape, service codes, and High Toryism. He had his own peculiar

notions of studying a profession, looked askance at the new-fangled

method of driving a ship, honestly thinking, with Ruskin, that a

"floating kettle" was a direct contravention of the laws of God.

Imagine, then, the aristocratic consternation of these honourable

gentlemen when the care and maintenance of propelling machinery,

auxiliary mechanism, and also guns and gun-mountings, were gradually

transferred to a body of men of low social extraction, uncultured and

unpolished land-lubbers and civilians! Only within the last twenty

years have naval engineer officers, now drawn from the same social

strata as the navigating officers, won official recognition of their

importance in the _personnel_ of a ship.

In the case of the engineers of the Mercantile Marine the struggle has

been the same, though by no means so bitter or so sustained. The

reasons for this are two.

In the first place, the navigating officers of a merchantman are

merely the employees of civilians--the shipowners. In the second

place, the Board of Trade, by compelling shipowners to carry a certain

number of navigators and engineers holding certificates of competency,

have placed them on one professional level. Nevertheless, the

animosity between the mates and the shrewd, greasy, sea-going engineer

was keen enough, sharpened no doubt by the preponderating wages of the

latter. Again, the former's habits of deference and mute obedience to

the master, at once navigator, agent, and magistrate of the ship,

were not readily assimilated by the engineer, whose democratic

consciousness was just then rising into being, and whose mechanical

instincts were outraged by the sailor's ignorant indifference to the

knowledge and unremitting vigilance demanded by the machinery in his

care.

It is in this fashion that a class of men like my Chief have

developed. Born of the lower middle class, the artisan class,

apprenticed to their trade at twelve or thirteen years of age, and,

on going to sea, suddenly finding themselves in possession of a

definite uniform and rank with a fixed watch and routine, their

natural instinct leads them to do their utmost to "live up" to their

new dignity. In course of time, after a certain minimum of sea

service, and an unbroken record of efficiency and good behaviour, the

Board of Trade examiner affixes his stamp on the finished product, and

the youth ventures on matrimony and indulges in dreams of rising in

the world. His travelling has given his mind a certain shallow breadth

of outlook; he will discuss Italian art with you, although his

knowledge of Italy is confined to the low parts of Genoa and Naples,

with perhaps a visit to the Campo Santo of the former. He has acquired

the reading habit, perforce, at sea, though his authors would be

considered dubious by the educated; and a smattering of some other

language, generally Spanish, is, in his own opinion, good reason for

holding himself above the common mechanic ashore. His salary as a

chief engineer enables his wife to keep a servant and buy superior

garments; he puts money by, and in the course of time solidifies his

position as a genuine bourgeois. In the meantime he exhales Smiles. He

believes in Rising in the World. He would blot out a perfectly

inoffensive, if ignoble, ancestry, and he would also, if he could,

make friends with English Grammar. But how can I hope for his success

in the latter struggle when the books he borrows from my little store

are returned uncut. Possibly the colourless eyes, which survey me over

the _retrousse_ nose and deceptive moustache, are capable of gathering

wisdom from the uncut fields of learning. And yet, and yet, have I not

unintentionally surprised him in his cabin devouring "The Unwritten

Commandment" or "The Lady's Realm," while my Aristophanes is on

the settee? I do not blame a sea-going engineer for disliking

Aristophanes. Many agricultural labourers would find him uninforming.

But why borrow him and simulate a cultured interest in his plays?

My friend, I think, abhors blatant uxoriousness. So do I. And I fear

the Most Wonderful Man on Earth is blatantly uxorious. I honour him

for a certain sadness in his voice when he speaks of unrequited love.

But his constant reference to Ibsen's _motif_ in the "Wild Duck,"

though it fails in its primary object of convincing me that he is

familiar with Ibsen's plays, does in truth tell me that some fair one

gave him sleepless nights.

Of course, this amusing assumption would not stand a single hour in a

cultured circle. Some periodicals of the day foster the fallacy in

many an unfortunate mind that to read about a book is really quite

as good as actually to read it. Their readers are led to infer that

learning is quite a spare-time affair. I once assured a victim of this

delusion that in true culture there was no threepence-in-the-shilling

discount; and he wrinkles his brows yet, I believe, wondering what I

meant. How many years of close study, my friend, are required to

enable one to stroll through a second-hand book-shop, pick up the

_one_ treasure from the shelves, and walk out again?

It may be, perchance, that I labour this trait in the character of one

who would be great but for his disabilities. Which thought recalls to

my mind a suspicion that intermittently haunts me--that, living as we

do here on this ocean tramp, "thrown together," as the phrase goes,

so constantly, faults in another man grow more and more apparent;

social abrasions which would be smoothed down and forgotten ashore are

roughened at each fresh encounter, until the man is hidden behind one

flaming sin. Especially is this to be expected when mind and body are

worn, the one with responsibility, the other with rough toil. Who am I

that I should claim cultured intercourse from these heroes? Have I not

shared their agony and bloody sweat in times of storm and stress?

Have I not seen this same wearer of elevators in his engine-room,

a blood-stained handkerchief across his head where he has been

"smashed," the sweat running from his blackened features, watching

his engines with an agony no young mother ever knew?

What of the time when our main steam pipe burst in the Irish Sea in a

fog? Read in the Chief Mate's log an entry, "_Delayed 2 hrs. 40 min.,

break-down in engine-room._" Simple, isn't it? But behind those brief

words lies a small hell for the Chief Engineer. Behind them lies two

hours and forty minutes' frenzied toil in the heat of the boiler-tops,

where the arched bunkers keep the air stifling; two hours and forty

minutes' work with tools that race and slither to the rolling of the

ship, with bolts that burn and blister, with steam that knows no

master when she's loose. Literature? Art? Old friend, these gods seem

very impotent sometimes. They seem impotent, as when, for instance, my

first gauge-glass burst. Pacing up and down in front of my engines,

there is a hiss and a roar, and one of my firemen rushes into the

engine-room, his right hand clasping the left shoulder convulsively.

He has been cut to the bone with a piece of the flying glass. Men of

thirty years' sea-time tell me they never have got used to a glass

failing. And then the fight with the water and steam in the darkness,

the frenzied groping for the wires to shut the cocks, the ceaseless

roar of water and steam! A look at the engines, an adjustment of the

feed-valves, lest the water get low while I am fitting a new glass,

and then to work. How glad one is when one sees that luminous ring,

which denotes the water-level, rise "two-thirds glass" once more! And

how far from the fine arts is he whose life is one long succession of

incidents like these? Can they blame us if we look indulgently upon

mere writers and painters? Surely, when the books are opened and the

last log is read, when the overlooker calls our names and reads out

the indictment "_Lacking culture_," we may stand up manfully and

answer as clearly as we can, "Lord, we had our business in great

waters."

An Ocean Tramp · 第 14 / 44 题