II. EDUCATION.

Of the primary schools it is unnecessary to speak. They were of the same

kind that were established in Boston at that period. Indeed I can

recollect but two, one, a child's school of boys and girls, kept by a

Miss Scott, at the corner of Mt. Vernon Street and Hancock; the other a

boys' school kept by a Mr. Capen, a poor hump-backed cripple who could

not get out of his chair, but wheeled himself about the room, and kept

on his table a cowhide, which was pretty generously exercised. The

school was on Bedford Street behind the "Church of Church Green." A

little alley-way ran along in the rear of the church through which I

used to go to the school-house.

The Latin School was an old institution brought hither by Rev. John

Cotton, who remembered the Free Grammar School founded in Lincolnshire,

England, by Queen Mary, in which Latin and Greek were taught. It was

established here, in 1635, five years after the landing of Winthrop, two

or three years before Harvard College. When I was there, it stood on

School Street, opposite the Franklin statue. It had a granite front and

a cupola. The head-master was Charles K. Dillaway, an excellent scholar,

a faithful teacher, an agreeable man. He had to resign in consequence of

ill-health. The tutors were Henry W. Torrey and Francis Gardner, who

afterwards became head-master. Both were pupils of the school. Mr.

Frederick P. Leverett, author of the Latin Lexicon, was chosen to

succeed Mr. Dillaway, but died before assuming the office. The next

head-master, during my course, was Epes Sargent Dixwell, a most

accomplished man, an elegant scholar, a gentleman of the world, very

much interested, as I remember, in the plastic art of Greece. He is

still living, and amuses himself by writing Greek. Mr. Dixwell held

office till 1851, when he established a private school. The discipline

of the Latin School was strict but mild. Corporal punishment was the

unquestioned rule, but it was never harshly administered, though the

knowledge that it might be undoubtedly did a good deal toward

stimulating the ambition of the scholars. Here and there no doubt a boy

exasperated the teacher by idleness or disorder; possibly at moments the

teacher was nervous and irritable. I recollect a single instance in

which he was over-sensitive, too prone to take offence, which fastened

suspiciously upon some individual scholar; but injustice was a very rare

occurrence. We learned Greek and Latin, the rudiments of algebra,

writing and declamation; but the best part of the education I received

in those days was an atmosphere of elegant literature, derived from

friends of my father. I used to see William H. Prescott taking his walk

on Beacon Street, in the sun, and have often sat in his study in his

tranquil hours, and heard him talk. The beautiful library of George

Ticknor, at the head of Park Street, was open to me, and I can see his

form now as he walked on the Common. George S. Hillard, the elegant man

of letters, was a familiar figure on the street. Charles Sumner, then a

young law student, strode vigorously along, his manner even then

suggesting the advent of a new era.

In 1846, I listened to his oration before the Phi Beta Kappa Society of

Harvard University on the Scholar [Pickering]; the Jurist [Story]; the

Artist [Allston]; the Philanthropist [Channing]; and his bold

declamation was strangely in contrast with the academical gown that he

wore. Daniel Webster used to stalk by our house, the embodiment of the

Constitution, the incarnation of law, the black locomotive of the train

of civilization. Ralph Waldo Emerson often sat at my father's table

diffusing the radiance of serene ideas, and heralding the diviner age

that was to come.

From the Latin School to Harvard College was an easy transition. There

existed an impression that Latin-School boys might take their ease for

the first year at Cambridge, because they were so well prepared, but I

found enough to do; there was the great library, there were the advanced

studies, there was the more perfect training. The President was Josiah

Quincy, the elder. Henry W. Longfellow was professor of modern

languages; Cornelius C. Felton, the ardent philhellene, taught Greek;

Charles Beck, a German, taught Latin; Benjamin Peirce was professor of

mathematics; James Walker was an instructor in intellectual and moral

philosophy; Joseph Lovering, teacher in chemistry. Among the tutors were

Bernard Roelker, in German; Pietro Bachi, in Italian; Francisco Sales,

in Spanish.

The new buildings now in the college yard were not erected; Holworthy

(1812), Stoughton (1804-1805), Hollis (1763), Harvard (1766), Holden

(1734), Massachusetts Hall (1720), University Hall (1812-1813) were in

existence. There were no athletics; there was no gymnasium; there was no

boating; there was little base-ball. There were few literary societies;

so that we were driven back mainly upon intellectual labor. The

professors' houses were always open, and there was choice society in the

town. I recollect particularly well going to the house of John White

Webster, who was executed later for the murder of Dr. Parkman. He was

very fond of music and had a daughter who sang finely, besides being

handsome. She afterwards married Mr. Dabney, of Fayal. The Doctor was a

nervous man, high strung, but good-natured and polite. His fatal

encounter with Dr. Parkman I always attributed to a sudden outbreak of

passion.

Within the grounds of the college we were quite studious, companionable

among ourselves. There was no rioting, no excess of any kind. Walking

and swimming in the river Charles were our chief recreations. Connection

with Boston was infrequent and difficult, as there was no railroad. The

Sundays could be passed in the city if the student brought a certificate

that he went regularly to church; otherwise it was expected that the

First Church, or one of the others, should be frequented. The

instruction was of a cordial, friendly, courteous, and humane kind; the

professors were enthusiastic students in their departments. I well

recollect Professor Longfellow's kindness; Professor Felton's ardor (I

visited Pompeii with him in 1853). Charles Beck was a burning patriot in

the war. Pietro Bachi's great eyes lighted up and glowed as he talked

about Dante. Bernard Roelker afterwards became a lawyer in New York.

Charles Wheeler and Robert Bartlett, tutors, both rare spirits, died

young. On the whole, life at Harvard College was exceedingly pleasant,

and a real love of learning was implanted in young men's bosoms.

The corner-stone of Gore Hall was laid in 1813. The books were moved

into the library in the summer vacation of 1814. There were forty-one

thousand volumes at that time.

In the early part of my career, I took my meals in Commons, at an

expense of two dollars and a quarter a week, the highest price then

paid. Commons was abolished for a time in 1849, it being found difficult

to satisfy the students, who for some years had boarded in the houses in

the neighborhood.

There were excitements too. Though there was no gymnasium, or boating,

and little foot-ball, base-ball, or cricket (these games were all very

simple and rudimentary), there were the clubs, the "[Greek: Alpha Delta

Phi]," still a secret society, and occupying a back upper room, to which

we mounted by stealth,--the same room serving for initiations and

sociables,--was exceedingly interesting in a literary point of view.

There were papers on Scott, Byron, Wordsworth, delightful conversations,

anecdotes, songs.

The "Institute of 1770" taught us elocution, and readiness in debate;

the "[Greek: Phi Beta Kappa]," no longer a secret society, and no longer

actively literary, hung over us like a star, stimulating ambition and

inciting us to excellence in scholarship.

Altogether it was a delightful life; a life between boyhood and

manhood; of purely literary ambition, of natural friendship. There was

no distinction of persons, no affected pride. We found our own level,

and kept our own place. Money did not distinguish or family, only

brains. There was no care but for intellectual work; there was no excess

save in study. Expenses were small, indulgences were few and simple. The

education was more suited to those times than to these, when culture

must be so much broader, and social expectations demand such varied

accomplishments.

Recollections and Impressions, 1822-1890 · 第 13 / 41 题