CHAPTER I.

Produced by Bryan Ness, LN Yaddanapudi and the Online

Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This

book was produced from scanned images of public domain

material from the Google Print project.)

THE

MARTYRS OF SCIENCE,

OR

THE LIVES

OF

GALILEO, TYCHO BRAHE, AND KEPLER.

BY

SIR DAVID BREWSTER, K.H. D.C.L.,

PRINCIPAL OF THE UNITED COLLEGE OF ST SALVATOR AND ST LEONARD,

ST ANDREWS; FELLOW OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF LONDON; VICE-PRESIDENT

OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF EDINBURGH; CORRESPONDING MEMBER

OF THE INSTITUTE OF FRANCE; AND MEMBER OF THE

ACADEMIES OF ST PETERSBURG, STOCKHOLM,

BERLIN, COPENHAGEN, GOTTINGEN,

PHILADELPHIA, &c. &c.

LONDON:

JOHN MURRAY, ALBEMARLE STREET.

1841.

G. S. TULLIS, PRINTER, CUPAR.

TO THE

RIGHT HON. FRANCIS LORD GRAY,

F.R.S., F.R.S.E.

MY LORD,

In submitting this volume to the public under your Lordship's auspices,

I avail myself of the opportunity thus afforded me of expressing the

deep sense which I entertain of the friendship and kindness with which

your Lordship has so long honoured me.

Although in these days, when Science constitutes the power and wealth of

nations, and encircles the domestic hearth with its most substantial

comforts, there is no risk of its votaries being either persecuted or

neglected, yet the countenance of those to whom Providence has given

rank and station will ever be one of the most powerful incitements to

scientific enterprise, as well as one of its most legitimate rewards.

Next to the satisfaction of cultivating Science, and thus laying up the

only earthly treasure which we can carry along with us into a better

state, is that of having encouraged and assisted others in the same

beneficent labours. That your Lordship may long continue to enjoy these

sources of happiness is the earnest prayer of,

MY LORD,

Your Lordship's

Most faithful and obedient servant,

DAVID BREWSTER.

ST LEONARDS, ST ANDREWS,

October 12, 1840.

CONTENTS.

LIFE OF GALILEO.

Page.

CHAPTER I. 1

Peculiar interest attached to his Life--His Birth--His early

studies--His passion for Mathematics--His work on the Hydrostatic

Balance--Appointed Lecturer on Mathematics at Pisa--His antipathy

to the Philosophy of Aristotle--His contentions with the

Aristotelians--Chosen Professor of Mathematics in Padua--Adopts the

Copernican system, but still teaches the Ptolemaic doctrine--His

alarming illness--He observes the new Star in 1604--His Magnetical

experiments,

CHAPTER II. 20

Cosmo, Grand Duke of Tuscany, invites Galileo to Pisa--Galileo

visits Venice in 1609, where he first hears of the Telescope--He

invents and constructs one, which excites a great

sensation--Discovers Mountains in the Moon, and Forty Stars in the

Pleiades--Discovers Jupiter's Satellites in 1610--Effect of this

discovery on Kepler--Manner in which these discoveries were

received--Galileo appointed Mathematician to Cosmo--Mayer claims the

discovery of the Satellites of Jupiter--Harriot observes them in

England in October 1610,

CHAPTER III. 42

Galileo announces his discoveries in Enigmas--Discovers the

Crescent of Venus--the Ring of Saturn--the Spots on the

Sun--Similar Observations made in England by Harriot--Claims of

Fabricius and Scheiner to the discovery of the Solar

Spots--Galileo's Letters to Velser on the claims of Scheiner--His

residence at the Villa of Salviati--Composes his work on Floating

Bodies, which involves him in new controversies,

CHAPTER IV. 56

Galileo treats his Opponents with severity and sarcasm--He is aided

by the Sceptics of the day--The Church Party the most

powerful--Galileo commences the attack, and is answered by Caccini,

a Dominican--Galileo's Letter to the Grand Duchess of Tuscany, in

support of the motion of the Earth and the stability of the

Sun--Galileo visits Rome--Is summoned before the Inquisition--And

renounces his opinions as Heretical--The Inquisition denounces the

Copernican system--Galileo has an audience of the Pope, but still

maintains his opinions in private society--Proposes to find out the

Longitude at Sea by means of Jupiter's Satellites--His negotiation

on this subject with the Court of Spain--Its failure--He is unable

to observe the three Comets of 1618, but is involved in the

controversy to which they gave rise,

CHAPTER V. 72

Urban VIII., Galileo's friend, raised to the Pontificate--Galileo

goes to Rome to offer his congratulations--The Pope loads Galileo

with presents, and promises a Pension to his Son--Galileo in

pecuniary difficulties, owing to the death of his patron,

Cosmo--Galileo again rashly attacks the Church, notwithstanding the

Pope's kindness--He composes his System of the World, to

demonstrate the Copernican System--Artfully obtains a license to

print it--Nature of the work--Its influence on the public mind--The

Pope resolves on suppressing it--Galileo summoned before the

Inquisition--His Trial--His Defence--His formal Abjuration of his

Opinions--Observations on his conduct--The Pope shews great

indulgence to Galileo, who is allowed to return to his own house at

Arcetri as the place of his confinement,

CHAPTER VI. 102

Galileo loses his favourite Daughter--He falls into a state of

melancholy and ill health--Is allowed to go to Florence for its

recovery in 1638--But is prevented from leaving his House or

receiving his Friends--His friend Castelli permitted to visit him

in the presence of an Officer of the Inquisition--He composes his

celebrated Dialogues on Local Motion--Discovers the Moon's

Libration--Loses the sight of one Eye--The other Eye attacked by

the same Disease--Is struck Blind--Negociates with the Dutch

Government respecting his Method of finding the Longitude--He is

allowed free intercourse with his Friends--His Illness and Death in

1642--His Epitaph--His Social, Moral, and Scientific Character,

* * * * *

LIFE OF TYCHO BRAHE.

CHAPTER I. 123

Tycho's Birth, Family, and Education--An Eclipse of the Sun turns

his attention to Astronomy--Studies Law at Leipsic--But pursues

Astronomy by stealth--His Uncle's Death--He returns to Copenhagen,

and resumes his Observations--Revisits Germany--Fights a Duel, and

loses his Nose--Visits Augsburg, and meets Hainzel--Who assists him

in making a large Quadrant--Revisits Denmark--And is warmly

received by the King--He settles at his Uncle's Castle of

Herritzvold--His Observatory and Laboratory--Discovers the new Star

in Cassiopeia--Account of this remarkable Body--Tycho's Marriage

with a Peasant Girl--Which irritates his Friends--His Lectures on

Astronomy--He visits the Prince of Hesse--Attends the Coronation of

the Emperor Rudolph at Ratisbon--He returns to Denmark,

CHAPTER II. 145

Frederick II. patronizes Tycho--And resolves to establish him in

Denmark--Grants him the Island of Huen for Life--And Builds the

splendid Observatory of Uraniburg--Description of the Island, and

of the Observatory--Account of its Astronomical Instruments--Tycho

begins his Observations--His Pupils--Tycho is made Canon of

Rothschild, and receives a large Pension--His Hospitality to his

Visitors--Ingratitude of Wittichius--Tycho sends an Assistant to

take the Latitude of Frauenburg and Konigsberg--Is visited by

Ulric, Duke of Mecklenburg--Change in Tycho's fortunes,

CHAPTER III. 160

Tycho's Labours do honour to his Country--Death of Frederick

II.--James VI. of Scotland visits Tycho at Uraniburg--Christian IV.

visits Tycho--The Duke of Brunswick's visit to Tycho--The Danish

Nobility, jealous of his fame, conspire against him--He is

compelled to quit Uraniburg--And to abandon his Studies--Cruelty of

the Minister Walchendorp--Tycho quits Denmark with his Family and

Instruments--Is hospitably received by Count Rantzau--Who

introduces him to the Emperor Rudolph--The Emperor invites him to

Prague--He gives him a Pension of 3000 Crowns--And the Castle of

Benach as a Residence and an Observatory--Kepler visits Tycho--Who

obtains for him the Appointment of Mathematician to Rudolph,

CHAPTER IV. 179

Tycho resumes his Astronomical Observations--Is attacked with a

Painful Disease--His Sufferings and Death in 1601--His Funeral--His

Temper--His Turn for Satire and Raillery--His Piety--Account of his

Astronomical Discoveries--His Love of Astrology and

Alchymy--Observations on the Character of the Alchymists--Tycho's

Elixir--His Fondness for the Marvellous--His Automata and Invisible

Bells--Account of the Idiot, called Lep, whom he kept as a

Prophet--History of Tycho's Instruments--His Great Brass Globe

preserved at Copenhagen--Present state of the Island of Huen,

* * * * *

LIFE OF JOHN KEPLER.

CHAPTER I. 203

Kepler's Birth in 1571--His Family--And early Education--The

Distresses and Poverty of his Family--He enters the Monastic School

of Maulbronn--And is admitted into the University of Tubingen,

where he distinguishes himself, and takes his Degree--He is

appointed Professor of Astronomy and Greek in 1594--His first

speculations on the Orbits of the Planets--Account of their

Progress and Failure--His "Cosmographical Mystery" published--He

Marries a Widow in 1597--Religious troubles at Gratz--He retires

from thence to Hungary--Visits Tycho at Prague in 1600--Returns to

Gratz, which he again quits for Prague--He is taken ill on the

road--Is appointed Tycho's Assistant in 1601--Succeeds Tycho as

Imperial Mathematician--His Work on the New Star of 1604--Singular

specimen of it,

CHAPTER II. 220

Kepler's Pecuniary Embarrassments--His Inquiries respecting the Law

of Refraction--His Supplement to Vitellio--His Researches on

Vision--His Treatise on Dioptrics--His Commentaries on Mars--He

discovers that the orbit of Mars is an Ellipse, with the Sun in one

focus--And extends this discovery to all the other Planets--He

establishes the two first laws of Physical Astronomy--His Family

Distresses--Death of his Wife--He is appointed Professor of

Mathematics at Linz--His Method of Choosing a Second Wife--Her

Character, as given by Himself--Origin of his Treatise on

Gauging--He goes to Ratisbon to give his Opinion to the Diet on the

change of Style--He refuses the Mathematical Chair at Bologna,

CHAPTER III. 237

Kepler's continued Embarrassments--Death of Mathias--Liberality of

Ferdinand--Kepler's "Harmonies of the World"--The Epitome of the

Copernican Astronomy--It is prohibited by the Inquisition--Sir

Henry Wotton, the British Ambassador, invites Kepler to

England--He declines the Invitation--Neglect of Genius by the

English Government--Trial of Kepler's Mother--Her final

Acquittal--And Death at the age of Seventy-five--The States of

Styria burn publicly Kepler's Calendar--He receives his Arrears of

Salary from Ferdinand--The Rudolphine Tables published in 1628--He

receives a Gold Chain from the Grand Duke of Tuscany--He is

Patronised by the Duke of Friedland--He removes to Sagan, in

Silesia--Is appointed Professor of Mathematics at Rostoch--Goes to

Ratisbon to receive his Arrears--His Death, Funeral, and

Epitaph--Monument Erected to his Memory in 1803--His Family--His

Posthumous Volume, entitled "The Dream, or Lunar Astronomy,"

CHAPTER IV. 252

Number of Kepler's published Works--His numerous Manuscripts in 22

folio volumes--Purchased by Hevelius, and afterwards by Hansch--Who

publishes Kepler's Life and Correspondence at the expense of

Charles VI.--The History of the rest of his Manuscripts, which are

deposited in the Library of the Academy of Sciences at St

Petersburg--General Character of Kepler--His Candour in

acknowledging his Errors--His Moral and Religious Character--His

Astrological Writings and Opinions considered--His Character as an

Astronomer and a Philosopher--The Splendour of his

Discoveries--Account of his Method of Investigating Truth,

LIFE OF GALILEO.

CHAPTER I.

_Peculiar interest attached to his Life--His Birth--His early

studies--His passion for Mathematics--His work on the Hydrostatic

Balance--Appointed Lecturer on Mathematics at Pisa--His antipathy

to the Philosophy of Aristotle--His contentions with the

Aristotelians--Chosen professor of Mathematics in Padua--Adopts the

Copernican system, but still teaches the Ptolemaic doctrine--His

alarming illness--He observes the new Star in 1604--His magnetical

experiments._

The history of the life and labours of Galileo is pregnant with a

peculiar interest to the general reader, as well as to the philosopher.

His brilliant discoveries, the man of science regards as his peculiar

property; the means by which they were made, and the development of his

intellectual character, belong to the logician and to the philosopher;

but the triumphs and the reverses of his eventful life must be claimed

for our common nature, as a source of more than ordinary instruction.

The lengthened career which Providence assigned to Galileo was filled up

throughout its rugged outline with events even of dramatic interest. But

though it was emblazoned with achievements of transcendent magnitude,

yet his noblest discoveries were the derision of his contemporaries, and

were even denounced as crimes which merited the vengeance of Heaven.

Though he was the idol of his friends, and the favoured companion of

princes, yet he afterwards became the victim of persecution, and spent

some of his last hours within the walls of a prison; and though the

Almighty granted him, as it were, a new sight to descry unknown worlds

in the obscurity of space, yet the eyes which were allowed to witness

such wonders, were themselves doomed to be closed in darkness.

Such were the lights and shadows in which history delineates

"The starry Galileo with his woes."[1]

[1] Childe Harold, canto iv. stanza liv.

But, however powerful be their contrasts, they are not unusual in

their proportions. The balance which has been struck between his days of

good and evil, is that which regulates the lot of man, whether we study

it in the despotic sway of the autocrat, in the peaceful inquiries of

the philosopher, or in the humbler toils of ordinary life.

Galileo Galilei was born at Pisa, on the 15th of February, 1564, and was

the eldest of a family of three sons and three daughters. Under the name

of Bonajuti, his noble ancestors had filled high offices at Florence;

but about the middle of the 14th century they seem to have abandoned

this surname for that of Galileo. Vincenzo Galilei, our author's father,

was himself a philosopher of no mean powers; and though his talents seem

to have been exercised only in the composition of treatises on the

theory and practice of music, yet he appears to have anticipated even

his son in a just estimate of the philosophy of the age, and in a

distinct perception of the true method of investigating truth.[2]

[2] Life of Galileo, Library of Useful Knowledge, p. 1.

The early years of Galileo were, like those of almost all great

experimental philosophers, spent in the construction of instruments and

pieces of machinery, which were calculated chiefly to amuse himself and

his schoolfellows. This employment of his hands, however, did not

interfere with his regular studies; and though, from the straitened

circumstances of his father, he was educated under considerable

disadvantages, yet he acquired the elements of classical literature, and

was initiated into all the learning of the times. Music, drawing, and

painting were the occupations of his leisure hours; and such was his

proficiency in these arts, that he was reckoned a skilful performer on

several musical instruments, especially the lute; and his knowledge of

pictures was held in great esteem by some of the best artists of his

day.

Galileo seems to have been desirous of following the profession of a

painter: but his father had observed decided indications of early

genius; and, though by no means able to afford it, he resolved to send

him to the university to pursue the study of medicine. He accordingly

enrolled himself as a scholar in arts at the university of Pisa, on the

5th of November, 1581, and pursued his medical studies under the

celebrated botanist Andrew Caesalpinus, who filled the chair of medicine

from 1567 to 1592.

In order to study the principles of music and drawing, Galileo found it

necessary to acquire some knowledge of geometry. His father seems to

have foreseen the consequences of following this new pursuit, and though

he did not prohibit him from reading Euclid under Ostilio Ricci, one of

the professors at Pisa, yet he watched his progress with the utmost

jealousy, and had resolved that it should not interfere with his medical

studies. The demonstrations, however, of the Greek mathematician had too

many charms for the ardent mind of Galileo. His whole attention was

engrossed with the new truths which burst upon his understanding; and

after many fruitless attempts to check his ardour and direct his

thoughts to professional objects, his father was obliged to surrender

his parental control, and allow the fullest scope to the genius of his

son.

From the elementary works of geometry, Galileo passed to the writings of

Archimedes; and while he was studying the hydrostatical treatise[3] of

the Syracusan philosopher, he wrote his essay on the hydrostatical

balance,[4] in which he describes the construction of the instrument,

and the method by which Archimedes detected the fraud committed by the

jeweller in the composition of Hiero's crown. This work gained for its

author the esteem of Guido Ubaldi, who had distinguished himself by his

mechanical and mathematical acquirements, and who engaged his young

friend to investigate the subject of the centre of gravity in solid

bodies. The treatise on this subject, which Galileo presented to his

patron, proved the source of his future success in life.

[3] De Insidentibus in Fluido.

[4] Opere di Galileo. Milano, 1810, vol. iv. p. 248-257.

Through the Cardinal del Monte, the brother-in-law of Ubaldi, the

reigning Duke of Tuscany, Ferdinand de Medici was made acquainted with

the merits of our young philosopher; and, in 1589, he was appointed

lecturer on mathematics at Pisa. As the salary, however, attached to

this office was only sixty crowns, he was compelled to enlarge this

inadequate income by the additional occupation of private teaching, and

thus to encroach upon the leisure which he was anxious to devote to

science.

With this moderate competency, Galileo commenced his philosophical

career. At the early age of eighteen, when he had entered the

university, his innate antipathy to the Aristotelian philosophy began to

display itself. This feeling was strengthened by his earliest inquiries;

and upon his establishment at Pisa he seems to have regarded the

doctrines of Aristotle as the intellectual prey which, in his chace of

glory, he was destined to pursue. Nizzoli, who flourished near the

beginning of the sixteenth century, and Giordano Bruno, who was burned

at Rome in 1600, led the way in this daring pursuit; but it was reserved

for Galileo to track the Thracian boar through its native thickets, and,

at the risk of his own life, to strangle it in its den.

With the resolution of submitting every opinion to the test of

experiment, Galileo's first inquiries at Pisa were directed to the

mechanical doctrines of Aristotle. Their incorrectness and absurdity

soon became apparent; and with a zeal, perhaps, bordering on

indiscretion, he denounced them to his pupils with an ardour of manner

and of expression proportioned to his own conviction of the truth. The

detection of long-established errors is apt to inspire the young

philosopher with an exultation which reason condemns. The feeling of

triumph is apt to clothe itself in the language of asperity; and the

abettor of erroneous opinions is treated as a species of enemy to

science. Like the soldier who fleshes his first spear in battle, the

philosopher is apt to leave the stain of cruelty on his early

achievements. It is only from age and experience, indeed, that we can

expect the discretion of valour, whether it is called forth in

controversy or in battle. Galileo seems to have waged this stern warfare

against the followers of Aristotle; and such was the exasperation which

was excited by his reiterated and successful attacks, that he was

assailed, during the rest of his life, with a degree of rancour which

seldom originates in a mere difference of opinion. Forgetting that all

knowledge is progressive, and that the errors of one generation call

forth the comments, and are replaced by the discoveries, of the next,

Galileo did not anticipate that his own speculations and incompleted

labours might one day provoke unmitigated censure; and he therefore

failed in making allowance for the prejudices and ignorance of his

opponents. He who enjoys the proud lot of taking a position in advance

of his age, need not wonder that his less gifted contemporaries are left

behind. Men are not necessarily obstinate because they cleave to deeply

rooted and venerable errors, nor are they absolutely dull when they are

long in understanding and slow in embracing newly discovered truths.

It was one of the axioms of the Aristotelian mechanics, that the heavier

of two falling bodies would reach the ground sooner than the other, and

that their velocities would be proportional to their weights. Galileo

attacked the arguments by which this opinion was supported; and when he

found his reasoning ineffectual, he appealed to direct experiment. He

maintained, that all bodies would fall through the same height in the

same time, if they were not unequally retarded by the resistance of the

air: and though he performed the experiment with the most satisfactory

results, by letting heavy bodies fall from the leaning tower of Pisa,

yet the Aristotelians, who with their own eyes saw the unequal weights

strike the ground at the same instant, ascribed the effect to some

unknown cause, and preferred the decision of their master to that of

nature herself.

Galileo could not brook this opposition to his discoveries; nor could

the Aristotelians tolerate the rebukes of their young instructor. The

two parties were, consequently, marshalled in hostile array; when,

fortunately for both, an event occurred, which placed them beyond the

reach of danger. Don Giovanni de Medici, a natural son of Cosmo, had

proposed a method of clearing out the harbour of Leghorn. Galileo, whose

opinion was requested, gave such an unfavourable report upon it, that

the disappointed inventor directed against him all the force of his

malice. It was an easy task to concentrate the malignity of his enemies

at Pisa; and so effectually was this accomplished, that Galileo resolved

to accept another professorship, to which he had been previously

invited.

The chair of mathematics in the university of Padua having been vacant

for five years, the republic of Venice had resolved to fill it up; and,

on the recommendation of Guido Ubaldi, Galileo was appointed to it, in

1592, for a period of six years.

Previous to this event, Galileo had lost his father, who died, in 1591,

at an advanced age. As he was the eldest son, the support of the family

naturally devolved upon him; and this sacred obligation must have

increased his anxiety to better his circumstances, and therefore added

to his other inducements to quit Pisa. In September 1592, he removed to

Padua, where he had a salary of only 180 florins, and where he was again

obliged to add to his income by the labours of tuition. Notwithstanding

this fruitless occupation of his time, he appears to have found leisure

for composing several of his works, and completing various inventions,

which will be afterwards described. His manuscripts were circulated

privately among his friends and pupils; but some of them strayed beyond

this sacred limit, and found their way into the hands of persons, who

did not scruple to claim and publish, as their own, the discoveries and

inventions which they contained.

It is not easy to ascertain the exact time when Galileo became a convert

to the doctrines of Copernicus, or the particular circumstances under

which he was led to adopt them. It is stated by Gerard Voss, that a

public lecture of Moestlin, the instructor of Kepler, was the means of

making Galileo acquainted with the true system of the universe. This

assertion, however, is by no means probable; and it has been ably shown,

by the latest biographer of Galileo,[5] that, in his dialogues on the

Copernican system, our author gives the true account of his own

conversion. This passage is so interesting, that we shall give it

entire.

[5] Life of Galileo, in Library of Useful Knowledge, p. 9.

"I cannot omit this opportunity of relating to you what happened to

myself at the time when this opinion (the Copernican system) began to be

discussed. I was then a very young man, and had scarcely finished my

course of philosophy, which other occupations obliged me to leave off,

when there arrived in this country, from Rostoch, a foreigner, whose

name, I believe, was Christian Vurstisius (Wurteisen), a follower of

Copernicus. This person delivered, on this subject, two or three

lectures in a certain academy, and to a crowded audience. Believing that

several were attracted more by the novelty of the subject than by any

other cause, and being firmly persuaded that this opinion was a piece of

solemn folly, I was unwilling to be present. Upon interrogating,

however, some of those who were there, I found that they all made it a

subject of merriment, with the exception of one, who assured me that it

was not a thing wholly ridiculous. As I considered this individual to be

both prudent and circumspect, I repented that I had not attended the

lectures; and, whenever I met any of the followers of Copernicus, I

began to inquire if they had always been of the same opinion. I found

that there was not one of them who did not declare that he had long

maintained the very opposite opinions, and had not gone over to the new

doctrines till he was driven by the force of argument. I next examined

them one by one, to see if they were masters of the arguments on the

opposite side; and such was the readiness of their answers, that I was

satisfied they had not taken up this opinion from ignorance or vanity.

On the other hand, whenever I interrogated the Peripatetics and the

Ptolemeans--and, out of curiosity, I have interrogated not a

few--respecting their perusal of Copernicus's work, I perceived that

there were few who had seen the book, and not one who understood it. Nor

have I omitted to inquire among the followers of the Peripatetic

doctrines, if any of them had ever stood on the opposite side; and the

result was, that there was not one. Considering, then, that nobody

followed the Copernican doctrine, who had not previously held the

contrary opinion, and who was not well acquainted with the arguments of

Aristotle and Ptolemy; while, on the other hand, nobody followed Ptolemy

and Aristotle, who had before adhered to Copernicus, and had gone over

from him into the camp of Aristotle;--weighing, I say, these things, I

began to believe that, if any one who rejects an opinion which he has

imbibed with his milk, and which has been embraced by an infinite

number, shall take up an opinion held only by a few, condemned by all

the schools, and really regarded as a great paradox, it cannot be

doubted that he must have been induced, not to say driven, to embrace it

by the most cogent arguments. On this account I have become very curious

to penetrate to the very bottom of the subject."[6]

[6] Systema Cosmicum, Dial. ii. p. 121.

It appears, on the testimony of Galileo himself, that he taught the

Ptolemaic system, in compliance with the popular feeling, after he had

convinced himself of the truth of the Copernican doctrines. In the

treatise on the sphere, indeed, which bears his name,[7] and which must

have been written soon after he went to Padua, and subsequently to 1592,

the stability of the earth, and the motion of the sun, are supported by

the very arguments which Galileo afterwards ridiculed; but we have no

means of determining whether or not he had then adopted the true system

of the universe. Although he might have taught the Ptolemaic system in

his lectures after he had convinced himself of its falsehood, yet it is

not likely that he would go so far as to publish to the world, as true,

the very doctrines which he despised. In a letter to Kepler, dated in

1597, he distinctly states that he _had, many years ago, adopted the

opinions of Copernicus_; but that _he had not yet dared to publish his

arguments in favour of them, and his refutation of the opposite

opinions_. These facts would leave us to place Galileo's conversion

somewhere between 1593 and 1597, although _many_ years cannot be said

to have elapsed between these two dates.

[7] The authenticity of this work has been doubted. It was printed

at Rome, in 1656, from a MS. in the library of Somaschi, at Venice.

See Opere di Galileo, tom. vii. p. 427.

At this early period of Galileo's life, in the year 1593, he met with an

accident which had nearly proved fatal. A party at Padua, of which he

was one, were enjoying, at an open window, a current of air, which was

artificially cooled by a fall of water. Galileo unfortunately fell

asleep under its influence; and so powerful was its effect upon his

robust constitution, that he contracted a severe chronic disorder,

accompanied with acute pains in his body, and loss of sleep and

appetite, which attacked him at intervals during the rest of his life.

Others of the party suffered still more severely, and perished by their

own rashness.

Galileo's reputation was now widely extended over Europe. The Archduke

Ferdinand (afterwards Emperor of Germany), the Landgrave of Hesse, and

the Princes of Alsace and Mantua, honoured his lectures with their

presence; and Prince Gustavus Adolphus of Sweden also received

instructions from him in mathematics, during his sojourn in Italy.

When Galileo had completed the first period of his engagement at Padua,

he was re-elected for other six years, with an increased salary of 320

florins. This liberal addition to his income is ascribed by Fabbroni to

the malice of one of his enemies, who informed the Senate that Galileo

was living in illicit intercourse with Marina Gamba. Without inquiring

into the truth of the accusation, the Senate is said to have replied,

that if "he had a family to support, he had the more need of an

increased salary." It is more likely that the liberality of the republic

had been called forth by the high reputation of their professor, and

that the terms of their reply were intended only to rebuke the malignity

of the informer. The mode of expression would seem to indicate that one

or more of Galileo's children had been born previous to his re-election

in 1598; but as this is scarcely consistent with other facts, we are

disposed to doubt the authenticity of Fabbroni's anecdote.

The new star which attracted the notice of astronomers in 1604, excited

the particular attention of Galileo. The observations which he made upon

it, and the speculations which they suggested, formed the subject of

three lectures, the beginning of the first of which only has reached

our times. From the absence of parallax, he proved that the common

hypothesis of its being a meteor was erroneous, and that, like the fixed

stars, it was situated far beyond the bounds of our own system. The

popularity of the subject attracted crowds to his lecture-room; and

Galileo had the boldness to reproach his hearers for taking so deep an

interest in a temporary phenomenon, while they overlooked the wonders of

creation which were daily presented to their view.

In the year 1606, Galileo was again appointed to the professorship at

Padua, with an augmented stipend of 520 florins. His popularity had now

risen so high, that his audience could not be accommodated in his

lecture-room; and even when he had assembled them in the school of

medicine, which contained 1000 persons, he was frequently obliged to

adjourn to the open air.

Among the variety of pursuits which occupied his attention, was the

examination of the properties of the loadstone. In 1607, he commenced

his experiments; but, with the exception of a method of arming

loadstones, which, according to the report of Sir Kenelm Digby, enabled

them to carry twice as much weight as before, he does not seem to have

made any additions to our knowledge of magnetism. He appears to have

studied with care the admirable work of our countryman, Dr Gilbert, "De

Magnete," which was published in 1600; and he recognised in the

experiments and reasonings of the English philosopher the principles of

that method of investigating truth which he had himself adopted. Gilbert

died in 1603, in the 63d year of his age, and probably never read the

fine compliment which was paid to him by the Italian philosopher--"I

extremely praise, admire, and envy this author."

The Martyrs of Science, or, The lives of Galileo, Tycho Brahe, and Kepler · 第 1 / 7 章