LETTER II.

But I might perhaps make a better use of the opening you afford me if I

were to direct your mind to a loftier theme than that of art. It would

appear to be unseasonable to go in search of a code for the aesthetic

world, when the moral world offers matter of so much higher interest, and

when the spirit of philosophical inquiry is so stringently challenged by

the circumstances of our times to occupy itself with the most perfect of

all works of art--the establishment and structure of a true political

freedom.

It is unsatisfactory to live out of your own age and to work for other

times. It is equally incumbent on us to be good members of our own age

as of our own state or country. If it is conceived to be unseemly and

even unlawful for a man to segregate himself from the customs and manners

of the circle in which he lives, it would be inconsistent not to see that

it is equally his duty to grant a proper share of influence to the voice

of his own epoch, to its taste and its requirements, in the operations in

which he engages.

But the voice of our age seems by no means favorable to art, at all

events to that kind of art to which my inquiry is directed. The course

of events has given a direction to the genius of the time that threatens

to remove it continually further from the ideal of art. For art has to

leave reality, it has to raise itself boldly above necessity and

neediness; for art is the daughter of freedom, and it requires its

prescriptions and rules to be furnished by the necessity of spirits and

not by that of matter. But in our day it is necessity, neediness, that

prevails, and lends a degraded humanity under its iron yoke. Utility is

the great idol of the time, to which all powers do homage and all

subjects are subservient. In this great balance on utility, the

spiritual service of art has no weight, and, deprived of all

encouragement, it vanishes from the noisy Vanity Fair of our time. The

very spirit of philosophical inquiry itself robs the imagination of one

promise after another, and the frontiers of art are narrowed in

proportion as the limits of science are enlarged.

The eyes of the philosopher as well as of the man of the world are

anxiously turned to the theatre of political events, where it is presumed

the great destiny of man is to be played out. It would almost seem to

betray a culpable indifference to the welfare of society if we did not

share this general interest. For this great commerce in social and moral

principles is of necessity a matter of the greatest concern to every

human being, on the ground both of its subject and of its results. It

must accordingly be of deepest moment to every man to think for himself.

It would seem that now at length a question that formerly was only

settled by the law of the stronger is to be determined by the calm

judgment of the reason, and every man who is capable of placing himself

in a central position, and raising his individuality into that of his

species, can look upon himself as in possession of this judicial faculty

of reason; being moreover, as man and member of the human family, a party

in the case under trial and involved more or less in its decisions. It

would thus appear that this great political process is not only engaged

with his individual case, it has also to pronounce enactments, which he

as a rational spirit is capable of enunciating and entitled to pronounce.

It is evident that it would have been most attractive to me to inquire

into an object such as this, to decide such a question in conjunction

with a thinker of powerful mind, a man of liberal sympathies, and a heart

imbued with a noble enthusiasm for the weal of humanity. Though so

widely separated by worldly position, it would have been a delightful

surprise to have found your unprejudiced mind arriving at the same result

as my own in the field of ideas. Nevertheless, I think I can not only

excuse, but even justify by solid grounds, my step in resisting this

attractive purpose and in preferring beauty to freedom. I hope that I

shall succeed in convincing you that this matter of art is less foreign

to the needs than to the tastes of our age; nay, that, to arrive at a

solution even in the political problem, the road of aesthetics must be

pursued, because it is through beauty that we arrive at freedom. But I

cannot carry out this proof without my bringing to your remembrance the

principles by which the reason is guided in political legislation.

Aesthetical Essays of Friedrich Schiller · 第 14 / 57 题