ADDENDA.

Several reports and cases having reached me from various medical

officers in the Crimea, too late for publication in their proper

places, I have thought it best to notice some generally as to results,

others particularly. Chloroform has been freely administered in all the

Divisions of the army save the Second, and has been generally approved;

one death only, as far as is known, having occurred directly from its

administration, of which Staff-Surgeon Gordon, P.M.O. of the Second

Division, has favored me with the following report:--

Martin Kennedy, 62d Regiment, aged 32 years, a healthy soldier, having

accidentally wounded one of his fingers by his musket going off, and

the medical officer in charge considering it necessary to remove it,

was brought under the influence of chloroform, but, according to his

(the surgeon’s) statement, only about ʒij could have been inhaled. He

had commenced the operation, when the patient suddenly expired. On the

post-mortem examination, beyond a little fatty deposit on the external

surface of the left ventricle, together with a degree of hypertrophy

of the same, no morbid appearance existed. The usual restoratives were

resorted to, but ineffectually.

The following case, furnished by Assistant-Surgeon Hannan, 49th

Regiment, is given as an illustration of the success of amputation

without chloroform in the Second Division:--

Patrick Kenny, 49th Regiment, aged 22. This soldier, while on duty

in the trenches on the 21st of July, received a compound comminuted

fracture of the right humerus, extending from its middle third to the

head of the bone. The integuments of the outer and upper part of the

shoulder were carried away. There was also a contused and lacerated

wound of the left knee, opening into the joint, with comminuted

fracture of the patella, these injuries being caused by pieces of

shell. He was seen a quarter of an hour after admission by Dr. Gordon,

P.M.O., who removed the arm at the shoulder-joint, making a sufficient

flap from the integuments of the axilla. The thigh was then amputated

in its lower third. These operations were performed in immediate

succession without the administration of chloroform. The thigh healed

nearly by the first intention--all the ligatures having come away by

the fourteenth day. The shoulder healed by granulation--the ligature

of the axillary artery coming away on the twenty-first day. During the

progress of treatment he had not any constitutional disturbance further

than three slight attacks of diarrhœa. He is now up and about, and goes

to England by the next opportunity.

In the worst cases of amputation at the hip-joint, or at the upper

third of the thigh, chloroform has appeared to cause insensibility

to pain without diminishing the powers of the sufferer, when given

with due caution or not carried so far as to affect the pulse or

respiration. (See _Aphor._ 51.) The evidence on this point is

sufficient to authorize surgeons to administer it in all such cases,

with the expectation that it will always prove advantageous, an

accidental death, such as has been observed from its use, being

independent of the nature of the injury. The amputations performed

at the hip-joint, at least six in number, have not been successful

as to the result, although the sufferers bore them well in the first

instance, offering every prospect of recovery for days and even for

weeks.

Deputy Inspector-General Taylor informs me, and his opinion is

corroborated by all the medical officers, that the labors the

troops had to perform, the privations they suffered, the frequent

insufficiency of their food, the want of proper clothing, with other

depressing causes, had so deprived them of that power British soldiers

generally possess, that all the operations of importance performed on

the lower extremities were more or less unsuccessful, while those on

the upper were as remarkable for their success. This deprivation of

power, it is said, was even more observable in the French army; and

he informs me that most of their surgeons had declined performing any

of the great operations usually done on the upper third of the thigh,

in consequence of their almost certain failure, preferring to let

the injuries take their course, even unto the death of the sufferers,

rather than hasten their dissolution by any operation usually

considered and often found to be conservative; a lamentable state of

things from which governments may draw an inference of the utmost

importance, viz., that to guard against the effects of disease as well

as of injuries, the utmost pains should be taken to preserve the health

and maintain the vigor of their soldiers. A matter of expense as well

as of arrangement.

This statement is corroborated by Deputy Inspector-General Alexander,

who informed me, on the 3d of August, 1855, that “during the whole of

this campaign, where we have had ample opportunities of testing the

use of chloroform, both after the battles of the Alma and Inkerman, as

well as throughout the whole siege operations before Sebastopol, up to

the present period, no operations whatever of any consequence (save

with one or two exceptions, and then at the patients’ own request,)

have been performed in the Light Division, without first placing the

patient under the influence of chloroform, and in no single instance

have either the medical officers of the Division, or myself, seen any

bad results follow, or had to reject its use, but quite the contrary.

Of course, in such a campaign, many operations of the most serious

character, both on the upper and lower extremities, have been performed

in the Division by the different medical officers as well as by myself.

At the Alma, I operated upon three patients at the hip-joint, two

being our own men and the third a Russian. All the three patients were

first placed under chloroform, with the results above stated. In the

case of a soldier of the 90th Regiment, whose right arm I removed at

the shoulder-joint on the 10th of July, for great destruction of the

soft parts and extensive injury to the humerus, the patient was so

low when placed on the table that brandy and water was given to him,

and he was then immediately afterward placed under chloroform. When

I had finished, it was found that his pulse was stronger than before

commencing the operation. In Sir T. Trowbridge’s case, in which I had

to remove both feet, one at the ankle-joint and the other above it, he

was placed under chloroform for both operations, a few minutes having

been allowed to elapse before giving it to him again for the second

operation, and with the best results. Both feet were much injured

by round shot, the bones of both being completely smashed with great

destruction of the soft parts, so much so, that in the case at the

ankle-joint I had to form the flap from the cushion of the heel. I,

however, did not remove the articular surface of the lower end of the

tibia, as recommended by Mr. Syme, and the wound healed well. Of the

three cases mentioned at the hip-joint, two were performed on the 21st,

and the Russian on the 22d of September. At one of the former I was

assisted by the late Dr. Mackenzie, from Edinburgh. All three were

carried down on the 22d, to be placed on board ships for conveyance

to Scutari. It has been reported to me that one of the two operated

on, on the 21st, Peter Sullivan, 33d Regiment, died at Scutari General

Hospital on the 11th of October, three weeks from the date of the

operation, ‘from excessive debility.’ Nothing could be ascertained

about Peter Cleary, 23d Fusiliers; it is therefore most likely that he

died on the passage.

“The Russian died on the 22d of October, ‘from great debility and

extensive sloughing.’

“A shoulder-joint case in the 90th Regiment never had a bad symptom,

and the wound is all but healed. The flap in this case was made from

the axillary portion of the arm, the deltoid having been all but

destroyed.

“The flap operation has been invariably performed in the Light

Division, with but two exceptions, viz., one of the arm and the other

of the thigh.”

Excision of the head, neck, and trochanter of the femur, with portions

of the shaft, has been performed at least six times before Sebastopol.

The result has been unfavorable in five, although in all there were

well-grounded expectations of success for weeks. In one case by Mr.

Blenkins, of the Grenadier Guards, he informs me, it was for the first

three or four weeks very favorable. The man, however, sank at the end

of the fifth week from deposition of matter in the knee-joint. (See p.

42 et seq.) Of the second case, which occurred in the general hospital

in the camp and ended fatally, I have no further notice. The third, in

the 68th Regiment, in charge of Mr. O’Leary, the operation performed on

the 19th of August, was going on most favorably on the 5th of October.

Private Thomas M’Kenena, aged twenty-five, was struck by a fragment of

shell, on the 19th of August, over the great trochanter of the left

femur. The wound, nearly an inch in length, extended down to the bone,

which was distinctly fractured. Some loose scales could be felt at

the bottom of the wound. On examination, the injury appeared to be a

transverse fracture of the neck of the thigh-bone, apparently involving

the joint.

After a consultation with superior medical officers, it was decided

that excision should be performed, which was done without difficulty.

No vessels required ligature, although the man lost a considerable

quantity of blood.

The excised parts, which are herewith forwarded, show that the nature

of the injury was different from what it was supposed to be, and that

the head of the bone was intact.

After the wound, about five inches long, had been sewn up, the limb was

placed in a sling made of strong canvas, and was swung from a beam over

the man’s cot, the bed being raised.

This method of treatment was adopted with a view to encourage

approximation of the upper end of the bone to the pelvis, and by

pressure on the sides of the limb to prevent the accumulation of matter

among the tissues. The man progresses favorably.

Diet was very generous.

Commentaries on the Surgery of the War in Portugal, Spain, France, and the Netherlands from the battle of Roliça, in 1808, to that of Waterloo, in 1815; with additions relating to those in the Crimea in 1854-55, showing the improvements made during and since that period in the great art and science of surgery on all the subjects to which they relate. · 第 116 / 129 题