The following cases are illustrative of many important points:--

William Rogers, aged nineteen, of the 32d Regiment, was wounded on the

16th of June by a musket-ball, which entered at the inferior angle

of the left parietal bone, knocked him down, and for a few minutes

rendered him insensible. On recovering his mental powers, he found

that he was unable to speak, not so much (as he said afterward) from

the want of power to form words, as from the incapacity of giving them

sound. He was conscious of everything passing around him, and reasoned

correctly. He retired out of the reach of shot, and then lay down for

the night. On the following morning, he went to Brussels, where he was

examined and dressed. On the morning of the 18th he reached Antwerp

on horseback, very giddy, and overwhelmed with fatigue, fasting, and

watching; he was admitted into the Minimes General Hospital and put

to bed, when he soon fell into a sound sleep, which with some tea

refreshed him much.

June 19th. The ball was found to have passed obliquely upward and

backward at least two inches, and could be distinctly felt with a

probe. It gave more the idea of having raised the outer table than

that of having depressed the inner. The defect in speech was in some

measure diminished, and this with giddiness were the only symptoms of

compression. A poultice was placed over the wound, a brisk purgative

given, and spoon diet ordered.

20th. The pain and giddiness having increased, with annoyance from

noise and exposure to light, twenty-six ounces of blood were taken from

the arm. The following day the purgative was repeated, and the patient

was much relieved. Everything went on well, the wound was nearly

healed, and he was considered almost fit to be discharged, when, on

the 16th of July, the wound began to open; on the 18th it was dilated

and a portion of the cranium removed by the forceps; this was soon

followed by symptoms of inflammation of the brain; twenty ounces of

blood were taken immediately from the arm, purgatives and diaphoretics

were ordered, and the strictest abstinence enjoined. 23d. Venesection

was repeated, as well as the other means usually adopted to reduce high

action. 24th. Completely relieved. 26th. Another portion of the cranium

removed, the dura mater being fully exposed; the general health in the

best state.

August 3d. Doing remarkably well; the wound healthy; the pulsation of

the brain evident; the power of speech perfectly restored. The ball yet

remains in, according to the opinion of the patient, (who is a fine,

intelligent lad,) and he thinks it has gradually descended toward the

petrous portion of the left temporal bone. Sent to England at the end

of the month, the wound being healed.

When I saw this man at Antwerp I gave my opinion, without hesitation,

that the bone and the ball ought to have been removed in the first

instance, when he would have had a better chance for perfect recovery.

The operation, when afterward performed for the removal of the loose

pieces of bone, placed his life in great jeopardy. He was discharged

the service with the ball lodged, and it is more than probable that he

did not long survive, which he might have done if the ball had been

removed when it was first felt within the skull.

In the following case the ball could not perhaps have been removed in

the first instance with propriety; it might, however, have been lying

on the dura mater, or near it, within reach, and the actual state of

things ought to have been ascertained, the surgeon afterward deciding

whether any further operation were necessary.

Thomas O’Brien, 28th Regiment, aged twenty-three, was wounded by a

musket-ball on the 16th of June at Quatre Bras; the bullet penetrated

the occipital bone below and to the right of the junction of the

lambdoidal and sagittal sutures. On his arrival at Colchester, the

wound was healthy in appearance and healing rapidly. It appeared from

his own account that for some hours after the injury he was totally

deprived of sight; since that time he has been constantly more or less

affected with headaches, for which he has been prescribed occasional

cathartics and low diet. He has also been affected with pain and

weakness in both eyes, but more particularly in the right. While at

Brussels, and during his progress to Ostend, he lived very irregularly,

and was frequently intoxicated. The external wound was entirely healed

on the 20th of July, and no suspicion existed that the ball was lodged

in the brain. On the 25th matter was perceived under the scalp, and

was evacuated yesterday. To-day, the 27th, he complains of increase

of headache; pulse small and quick. V. S. ad ℥vj. Haust. cathart.

statim. 28th. In the course of this day his symptoms have become very

urgent; he is restless, with a very quick pulse; an extensive crucial

incision was made in the site of the original wound, and now for the

first time it was discovered that the ball had penetrated the brain;

several loose pieces of bone were extracted; a considerable quantity

of arterial blood was suffered to flow from the small vessels divided

in the incision. His bowels had been well opened by the cathartic. The

most vigorous treatment was continued, but the symptoms notwithstanding

increased, and he died on the morning of the 29th of July.

The ball was found lodged nearly two inches deep in the substance of

the right posterior lobe of the brain; a considerable quantity of pus

surrounded it; some inflammation of the brain and its membranes was

observed, but much less than might have been expected.

A. Clutterbuck, 61st Regiment, aged twenty-five, was wounded in the

back of the head by a musket-ball at the battle of Toulouse, on the

10th of April, 1814. He felt little inconvenience from the wound during

the first two days. On the 14th he complained of severe pain in the

head, giddiness, and dimness of sight; the face was flushed, pulse

hard and frequent. Twenty ounces of blood were taken from the arm, and

the wound enlarged so as to expose the cranium. The upper part of the

os occipitis was found fractured by the ball, and a circular portion

of it, about the size of a shilling, was depressed and fractured.

15th. Pain in the head much abated; no giddiness, dimness of sight,

or any unfavorable symptom; pulse still hard. V. S. ad ℥xx. To be

well purged. 19th. He was bled again this day to the extent of twelve

ounces, as a matter of precaution. 23d. Continues free from any bad

symptom. May 8th. The wound is now much contracted, and he feels no

inconvenience. A small portion of the bone still feels bare to the

probe, but the greater portion of the depressed piece is covered with

healthy granulations. No exfoliation has taken place. May 24th. The

wound is nearly healed; he is in good health and spirits, and without

inconvenience.

This case may be properly contrasted with that of O’Brien, as showing

by the result the difference between an uninjured and an injured brain.

If the fractured and depressed bone had not been at the back part of

the head, it is probable the depressed portion would have been removed

in the first instance, as it certainly would have been after the 15th,

if the unfavorable symptoms had not yielded to the general treatment;

but the bone would then have been removed under much more unfavorable

circumstances than at first.

The following case is related to show the extent to which blood-letting

may frequently be carried to preserve life. There having been no reason

to believe that the symptoms depended on fractured and depressed bone,

the scalp was not divided; and as the symptoms were coeval with and

not consecutive to the injury, they were therefore supposed to depend

on concussion rather than on compression of the brain. If the trephine

had been applied on the fourth day because the insensibility continued,

the additional injury would in all probability have proved fatal. If

the depletion of all kinds had been less effective, the inflammation

of the brain or of its membranes would certainly have terminated in

the effusion of lymph or the formation of matter, which the use of the

trephine would not have prevented nor removed.

George Mills, an artillery driver, aged twenty-eight, was admitted

into the Dépôt de Mendicité Hospital, Toulouse, May 29, 1814, in

consequence of having been thrown from his horse on his head against

the ground. He had fallen on the right side of the os frontis,

immediately above the eye, where the surface of the skin appeared to

be scratched and bruised, but the bone was not depressed: he was bled

freely, but remained insensible. The next morning he was again bled

to twenty ounces, which operation was repeated in the evening. On the

29th, the temporal artery was opened, and a vein in his arm at the

same time, the breathing being strong and sonorous, the eyes closely

shut, and he lying quite insensible; the pulse before the bleeding was

quick and small; after he had lost about eight ounces of arterial and

eight ounces of venous blood, it became fuller, and the breathing was

somewhat relieved; the slightest touch gave him pain, and he shrunk

from pressure made directly above the eye. The temporal artery was

again opened in the evening, and ten ounces of blood were taken away. A

purgative and a stimulating enema were ordered, and cold was constantly

applied to the head.

30th. He has been freely purged and appears more collected; the pulse

is still quick and small; breathing very free; the irritability

continues and he complains of pain on pressing the head. The purgative

and the enema were repeated, and ten ounces of blood were drawn from

the temporal artery, after which he attempted to speak. 31st. Passed

a good night; the pulse is quick and small; pain in the head still

great; was again bled to twelve ounces, and the purgative was repeated.

June 1st. Pulse quick; there is not so much pain in the injured part,

and he appears more sensible; was bled to twenty-four ounces, and the

purgative was repeated. 3d. Was again bled to ten ounces. From this

time until the 20th, he gradually improved, and was then discharged

cured.

The treatment in these cases was the same, although in one there was

no fracture, and in the other two there was fracture with depression.

The broken portions of bone did not, in Clutterbuck, appear to press

unequally on the dura mater, and it was presumed that the moderate

degree of pressure which ensued from the depression might be borne

with impunity, as it did not seem likely to be accompanied by the

projection inward of any pointed pieces which might irritate the brain.

The result confirmed the supposition and justified the treatment. If

the examination of the depressed part had led to the apprehension that

such points of bone did exist, and were sticking into and irritating

the dura mater or brain, they would have been removed, in the belief

that although they might not at the moment have given rise to any other

symptoms than those which depended on the blow, the time would come

when they would scarcely fail to cause those which usually accompany

the formation of matter within the skull. If this danger should also

be avoided, the subsequent evils which have been noticed as occurring

at a later period, and which ultimately require the same operation

for the relief of the patient after months of acute suffering, might

be encountered; for although a person may temporarily recover from an

injury in which a portion of bone has been allowed to remain a source

of irritation to the brain, it does not follow that such recovery

should be permanent. If there be a doubt on the mind of the surgeon,

whether there be or be not any pieces of bone depressed and irritating

the brain or its membranes, he should wait; this is the real difference

between the surgery of the latter part of the Peninsular war and that

of the olden time.

272. When a fracture is accompanied by depression, and the broken

portion or portions of bone would seem to be driven into the dura mater

or the brain, or to press so unequally upon them that as much mischief

is likely to ensue from leaving as from removing them, especially in

an adult or a middle-aged man, less harm will in general follow from

ascertaining the fact by dividing the scalp and removing the broken

pieces than by doing nothing, more particularly when the presence of a

foreign body has been ascertained. If there be no symptoms indicative

of mischief below the fractured part, the surgeon must then decide,

after the best estimate he is able to make, of the probable evil which

will occur from allowing the broken or depressed portions of bone to

remain.

A French grenadier was brought to the field hospital the second day

after the battle of Salamanca; he had received a blow on the left

side of the head, probably from a piece of shell, which had caused

a contusion and swelling on the left parietal bone, with a graze of

the scalp, but without any opening communicating with the bone. This

swelling, on examination, was so soft, and the feeling of depressed

bone beneath so distinct, combined with the fact of the continued

lethargic state of the patient, that an incision was made into it,

when the bone beneath was found broken into several small pieces. On

clearing away the blood, two pieces which were loose were readily

raised and removed by the elevator and forceps, and egress given to

an ounce or two of blood, which were extravasated beneath, apparently

from the rupture of the vessels passing between the dura mater and the

bone. The patient regained his senses in the course of the night and

morning of the third day, and under a strictly antiphlogistic regimen

gradually recovered, some other small pieces of bone coming away, one

or two others apparently reuniting to the uninjured parts, showing that

it is not always necessary to remove every portion of bone which may be

broken, provided any bond of union remains, and principally that which

exists between it and the dura mater.

These different cases stand out in bold relief as eminently successful

and opposed to those said to have been equally so under _la chirurgie

expectante_. They tend to show that however good a general rule may

be, it may admit of many and important exceptions; and they prove that

experience, aided by sound and correct observation, is essentially

necessary for the formation of a scientific surgeon.

273. In young persons the brain will bear a greater degree of pressure

and of irritation with impunity than it will in persons of mature age.

By far the greater number of cases in which recovery has taken place

after fracture and depression of the skull with injury of the brain,

and even loss of its substance, have occurred in children or in persons

_under the adult age_; greater reliance may therefore be placed on

the powers of nature in them; and recourse may be had less frequently

to the aid of operative surgery in order to prevent mischief than in

older persons, even when the bone is fractured as well as depressed. It

will be found, and the remark is important, that the cases of fracture

and depression reported to have been successfully treated without

operation, have occurred principally in young persons.

The result of my experience has rendered it imperative to remove at

once all portions of bone or foreign substances which have materially

injured the dura mater in adults, although no symptoms of compression

should be observed. If the wound in the dura mater should not be

sufficiently large to allow the offending body to be extracted through

it, the opening must be enlarged to enable it to be withdrawn without

further laceration.

274. Depressed portions of bone, accompanied by fracture at the

_back_ part of the head, need not necessarily be removed in the first

instance. When the fractured and depressed bone is accompanied by

symptoms of compression in an adult, which continue after the usual

antiphlogistic means and remedies have been employed in vain, and

appear to increase rather than to diminish, the broken and depressed

portion should be raised; for although the brain will bear and

accommodate itself to pressure in many persons in a manner which could

not be either foreseen or expected, it will not do so in all; and

the removal of the bone offers the best chance for relief, whether

the mischief has arisen from the pressure made by it or occurs from

the extravasation of blood beneath. When the principal symptom of

compression is a severe fixed pain in the part, although the state of

the fracture and depression would not alone have rendered the removal

of the bone positively necessary, it is advisable to do so when this

symptom is present.

The greatest discrimination is required in cases where the extent of

the injury is not so manifest and in which there is more room for

doubt. In most cases in which a slight or moderate degree of fracture

and depression of the skull has taken place, the symptoms of concussion

are present as well as those of compression. The symptoms of concussion

are, however, coeval with the injury, and although those of compression

may take place almost instantaneously, they more usually occur at a

later period of time. The symptoms of concussion may nevertheless

continue for days, more particularly the insensibility, or that state

which is approaching to it, complicating the case and embarrassing the

practitioner. In a child or young person the symptoms of compression

or irritation, when they appear even at a secondary period, may pass

away under further moderate depletion; but in an adult any undue

delay in giving the necessary relief, by the removal of the depressed

portion of bone, will in general be destructive to the patient. It is

the irritation caused by the depressed bone on the dura mater, and

communicated to the brain, which gives rise to the unfavorable symptoms

and to the formation of matter which follows them.

A gentleman received a blow on the side of the head, which knocked him

down and deprived him of his senses, from which state he partially

recovered, and vomited; some stupefaction, however, remained, although

he could be made to answer by a little importunity. Pulse 62,

irregular, breathing slow, the pupils contracting under the influence

of light; the integuments where the blow was received were soft and

swollen, in all probability from an extravasation of blood beneath.

The next day the pulse was full and regular, the pupils were dilated,

vomiting had taken place several times, and the patient answered

correctly on being sharply questioned. He was bled largely, purgatives

were administered, and cold was steadily applied to the head. He was

bled the next day; on the third the left arm became paralytic, the

pupils continued dilated, and on the fifth day paralysis implicated the

left leg as well as the arm. There could now be no doubt that the brain

was suffering from compression; but as the nerves of the excito-motory

system were unaffected, and the functions of ingestion and egestion

were satisfactorily accomplished, it was thought advisable to trust to

the efforts of nature. The swelling of the scalp was painful.

A week afterward the general symptoms were the same, or only slightly

augmented by fever; but, as the swelling of the scalp was more painful,

it was opened, and a quantity of matter was evacuated, the bone beneath

being fractured and depressed. As this operation gave some relief, it

was thought advisable to wait, with the hope that the benefit thus

obtained might prove permanent. The patient did not improve, however;

and as the symptoms of fever increased, and were accompanied at last

by rigors and great pain in the head, the depressed portions of bone

were removed, and about half an ounce of purulent matter escaped

from between the dura mater and the bone. The relief given this time

was effective, and the patient perfectly recovered. “La chirurgie

expectante” placed this man’s life in the greatest jeopardy. It was

only saved at the last moment by the aid of that surgery which ought

not to have been withheld when the paralysis, by affecting the leg as

well as the arm, demonstrated the extension of the mischief within the

head. In this instance the operation was successful, but it is not in

general so serviceable when delayed to so late a period. It is in cases

of this serious nature often a means of prevention rather than of cure.

275. When a severe blow, accompanied by a shock, as from a fall, has

been received on the head, and the skull is so thick and strong as to

be able to resist the violence thus offered without being broken, or is

only slightly fractured, the vibration or _trémoussement_ is directly

communicated to the brain, giving rise to laceration or bruising of its

structure in various situations, to the rupture and separation of the

vessels of the dura mater from the bone to which they are attached,

and to derangement of other parts, which will in all probability be

followed by inflammation, and may even terminate in the formation of

matter under the dura mater as well as above it, and even in the brain

itself. It is said to take place by “contre-coup” when the mischief

occurs in any other part of the head than that which is struck,

numerous instances of which are given by the older French authors. They

were probably cases of laceration, the consequence of concussion of the

brain, and not relievable by the art of surgery; but the injury which

the older surgeons particularly distinguished as by “contre-coup” was

where the blow was on one side, and a fracture took place or matter was

formed in a circumscribed spot on the other; these cases did sometimes,

they say, although rarely, admit of relief by operative surgery. These

cases, unaccompanied by fracture, do not appear to take place under the

improved method of treatment by larger depletion, by antimony, and by

the early use of mercury. In the event, however, of their occurring,

there is no surgeon of the present day who would attempt an operation

of exploration on the opposite side of the head to the injury, without

some sign of mischief existing at that part; although such operation,

if done, might accidentally be followed by success.

Commentaries on the Surgery of the War in Portugal, Spain, France, and the Netherlands from the battle of Roliça, in 1808, to that of Waterloo, in 1815; with additions relating to those in the Crimea in 1854-55, showing the improvements made during and since that period in the great art and science of surgery on all the subjects to which they relate. · 第 90 / 129 题